Book review

Valson Thampu’s memoir of running St Stephen’s College is as stormy as his days as principal there

This is one side of the story of how he pursued change while negotiating constant opposition

The noted American management thinker Simon Sinek in his famous TED talk, “How great leaders inspire action” develops an interesting intersection between successful individuals and organisations like Apple, Martin Luther King and the Wright brothers. Whereas most others are defined by what they do or how they do it, successful examples are defined by why they do it.

Sinek argues that Apple has always communicated its “why” – “Everything we do, we believe in challenging the status quo. We believe in thinking differently.” And this allowed them to transition from computers to MP3 players, tablets and mobile phones. Similarly, Martin Luther King did not go around telling people what needed to change in America, but focused instead on “I believe”.

Valson Thampu’s memoirs on his time as principal at St Stephen’s College, Delhi, titled On a stormy course: In the hot seat at St Stephen’s, starts off with his attempting to answer “why” it exists. He quotes from the preamble to the original constitution of the college: “The object of the society is to prepare young men for University degrees and examinations and to instruct them in the doctrines of Christianity, which instruction must be in accordance with the teaching of the church of England”.

Thampu makes a strong case that the Christian character of the college and its preferential option for the poor are encoded in its DNA, illustrating the example of its principal SN Mukarji (1926-1945), who toured the villages of Punjab, Haryana and UP to identify young talent who would not have thought of a college education in normal course. It was after independence, Thampu argues, when the alumni of the college began to occupy a significant fraction of the Indian bureaucracy, that unease about the Christian character of the college began to spread, and what he terms myths about its history started being built.

First move

What, then, is the first thing Thampu did on being appointed caretaker principal of the college in 2007? He increased the proportion of seats for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes – which he wasn’t legally bound to do as head of a minority institution– and for Christian students to 40%, versus the 50% that was legally permitted.

What follows in the book is a chronicle of his battles against the faculty and alumni, who were opposed to this move. Thampu talks about being caricatured as an “evangelical fundamentalist”, and being called upon by Sheila Dikshit, then the chief minister of Delhi, to respond to anonymous allegations that he was denigrating Hinduism through his morning assemblies. After this came attacks on multiple fronts, aimed at disqualifying him as principal by questioning his eligibility. Some accused him of having a fake PhD, while UGC functionaries concluded that his PhD was invalid. All this forced Thampu to step down as caretaker principal. However, there was a twist in the tale. Thampu was back at the helm after applications for the post of principal opened in September 2008.

Always in hot water

The next eight years saw him jumping from one controversy into another. Two of these were particularly prominent. One involved Kapil Sibal, the Union Human Resource Development minister at the time, intervening to ensure that India’s Under-19 cricket team captain Unmukt Chand could take his exams despite omly 1% attendance. The other involved an accusation by a PhD student of criminal intimidation when she accused her research advisor, a member of the college faculty, of sexual harassment.

One does get the feeling throughout the book of being on the sets of something like Netflix’s House of Cards. Thampu is forced to outwit his opponents at every step of the way. The only difference is that the principal elicits more support and sympathy from the reader than the character of Frank Underwood does. You almost end up feeling sorry for the lone warrior at various moments in the book.

However, I did find it slightly disappointing that Thampu didn’t consider it important enough to mention the legendary Rohtas (who ran a dhaba on the campus for thirty years, following in the footsteps of his father Sukhia), whose battles with the principal made national headlines.

Principal versus faculty

Unsurprisingly, all the controversies during Thampu’s time at Stephen’s constitute the meat of the book, but he also touches upon – and takes ownership of – improvements in the college during his tenure. Amongst these are the upgradation of infrastructure, the campus being made disabled-friendly, the dismantling of the for profit Mathematical Science Foundation, and the setting up of the Centre for Theoretical Physics and the Centre for the Study of Gender and Social Processes.

The last section of the book focuses on the theme of autonomy for the college. Thampu makes a strong case for it, highlighting its benefits and also laughing off the claim that college would fall under the control of the church as a result (since it already is). He also highlights what he refers to as a resistance to change a,ong teachers.

One anecdote to bring this out: In 2009, when Thampu was keen to replace the chalk-and-blackboard setup in classrooms with whiteboards and marker pens, a section of the faculty claimed that these pens were “carcinogenic”. Thampu lists several examples of committees being set up to upgrade infrastructure, launch new initiatives, and expand the college. In all these cases, he says, members of the faculty remained inactive despite their inclusion in the committees, which eventually had to be disbanded for this very reason.

A common thread through the book consists of apt references to philosophers like Kant, Rousseau, and Mill, among others, revealing Thampu’s scholarly disposition. The book is written in a non-linear format, with each chapter dedicated to a specific theme – such as “Roots”, “Myths”, and “Propaganda” – intertwined with philosophical observations. Long-term observers and readers might feel Thampu has a split personality – vociferously championing some causes while casting a cool, distant gaze towards others.

Perhaps A Lonely Changemaker would have been a more appropriate title for this book.

On A Stormy Course: In The Hot Seat At St Stephen’s, Valson Thampu, Hachette India.

Nipun Malhotra studied Economics (2010 batch) at St Stephen’s College. He can be followed here on twitter.

We welcome your comments at
Sponsored Content BY 

Changing the conversation around mental health in rural India

Insights that emerged from discussions around mental health at a village this World Mental Health Day.

Questioning is the art of learning. For an illness as debilitating as depression, asking the right questions is an important step in social acceptance and understanding. How do I open-up about my depression to my parents? Can meditation be counted as a treatment for depression? Should heartbreak be considered as a trigger for deep depression? These were some of the questions addressed by a panel consisting of the trustees and the founder of The Live Love Lough Foundation (TLLLF), a platform that seeks to champion the cause of mental health. The panel discussion was a part of an event organised by TLLLF to commemorate World Mental Health Day.

According to a National Mental Health Survey of India 2015-16, conducted by the National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences (NIMHANS), common mental disorders including depression, anxiety disorders and substance use disorders affect nearly 10% of the population, with 1 in 20 people in India suffering from depression. The survey reported a huge treatment gap, a problem that is spread far and wide across urban and rural parts of the country.

On 10th of October, trustees of the foundation, Anna Chandy, Dr. Shyam Bhat and Nina Nair, along with its founder, Deepika Padukone, made a visit to a community health project centre in Devangere, Karnataka. The project, started by The Association of People with Disability (APD) in 2010, got a much-needed boost after partnering with TLLLF 2 years ago, helping them reach 819 people suffering from mental illnesses and spreading its program to 6 Taluks, making a difference at a larger scale.


During the visit, the TLLLF team met patients and their families to gain insights into the program’s effectiveness and impact. Basavaraja, a beneficiary of the program, spoke about the issues he faced because of his illness. He shared how people used to call him mad and would threaten to beat him up. Other patients expressed their difficulty in getting access to medical aid for which they had to travel to the next biggest city, Shivmoga which is about 2 hours away from Davangere. A marked difference from when TLLLF joined the project two years ago was the level of openness and awareness present amongst the villagers. Individuals and families were more expressive about their issues and challenges leading to a more evolved and helpful conversation.

The process of de-stigmatizing mental illnesses in a community and providing treatment to those who are suffering requires a strong nexus of partners to make progress in a holistic manner. Initially, getting different stakeholders together was difficult because of the lack of awareness and resources in the field of mental healthcare. But the project found its footing once it established a network of support from NIMHANS doctors who treated the patients at health camps, Primary Healthcare Centre doctors and the ASHA workers. On their visit, the TLLLF team along with APD and the project partners discussed the impact that was made by the program. Were beneficiaries able to access the free psychiatric drugs? Did the program help in reducing the distance patients had to travel to get treatment? During these discussions, the TLLLF team observed that even amongst the partners, there was an increased sense of support and responsiveness towards mental health aid.

The next leg of the visit took the TLLLF team to the village of Bilichodu where they met a support group that included 15 patients and caregivers. Ujjala Padukone, Deepika Padukone’s mother, being a caregiver herself, was also present in the discussion to share her experiences with the group and encouraged others to share their stories and concerns about their family members. While the discussion revolved around the importance of opening up and seeking help, the team brought about a forward-looking attitude within the group by discussing future possibilities in employment and livelihood options available for the patients.

As the TLLLF team honoured World Mental Health day, 2017 by visiting families, engaging with support groups and reviewing the successes and the challenges in rural mental healthcare, they noticed how the conversation, that was once difficult to start, now had characteristics of support, openness and a positive outlook towards the future. To continue this momentum, the organisation charted out the next steps that will further enrich the dialogue surrounding mental health, in both urban and rural areas. The steps include increasing research on mental health, enhancing the role of social media to drive awareness and decrease stigma and expanding their current programs. To know more, see here.

This article was produced by the Scroll marketing team on behalf of The Live Love Laugh Foundation and not by the Scroll editorial team.