change of guard

‘The man who knows too much': What’s in store for Ahmed Patel in Congress under Rahul Gandhi?

The political secretary to Sonia Gandhi is a Rajya Sabha member but there is no clarity on the role he is likely to play in the party organisation.

He was reputed to be the second most powerful person in the Congress, the go-to man in all emergencies, the party’s chief trouble shooter and organiser par excellence. For the last 16 years, Ahmed Patel, former Congress president Sonia Gandhi’s political secretary, was known to be all this and much more. But with Rahul Gandhi taking over as Congress chief on December 16, the curtain has come down on Patel’s long and eventful innings.

Patel has made it known to everyone that his term as the Congress president’s political secretary automatically came to an end after Sonia Gandhi decided to step aside in favour of her son. His term was co-terminus with Sonia Gandhi’s tenure in office, he has pointed out.

Patel is a Rajya Sabha member but there is no clarity on the role he is likely to play in the party organisation. He will continue as a member of the Congress Working Committee, the party’s highest decision-making body, but only till it is recast by the new president. Though it is highly unlikely that he will be removed from the working committee, there can be no denying that Patel will not have the same clout in the Rahul Gandhi-led Congress as he did when Sonia Gandhi headed the party. And yet, it will be difficult for Rahul Gandhi to forsake Patel as he is a repository of information, having been privy to major policy and organisational decisions. It is for this reason that he is also referred to as the “man who knows too much”.

As her political secretary, Patel controlled access to Sonia Gandhi, served as a bridge between her and Congress members and later between the party and the Manmohan Singh government.
As her political secretary, Patel controlled access to Sonia Gandhi, served as a bridge between her and Congress members and later between the party and the Manmohan Singh government.

Backroom boy

Understated and self-effacing, Patel proved to be the perfect choice for the post of political secretary to the Congress president. As Sonia Gandhi’s chief confidant, he wielded immense power in the party but took care to keep a low profile, was extremely discreet in his dealings and never courted publicity. It was only after Sonia Gandhi ceased to be party chief and after the declaration of the Gujarat Assembly polls that Patel gave a series of interviews to television channels.

During his tenure as Sonia Gandhi’s political secretary, Patel controlled access to the Congress president, served as a bridge between her and Congress members and later between the party and the government during the 10 years the United Progressive Alliance was in power. Though Patel will never admit to it, he also had a major say in the appointment of party functionaries as a result of which he can boast of a loyal band of followers in the party, including senior leaders such as Ashok Gehlot, Digvijaya Singh, Kamal Nath and Bhupinder Singh Hooda.

Patel may not be a mass leader but he has a firm grip on the Congress organisation as he has, over the years, developed a deep understanding of the complex functioning of the 132-year-old party. All this stood Patel in good stead during his re-election to the Rajya Sabha in August when a determined Bharatiya Janata Party president Amit Shah went all out to defeat Patel but with no success. Thanks to his managerial skills and his undeniable clout in the party, Patel succeeded in outwitting Shah.

While Patel’s connect with Congress members is well known, he has also developed a personal relationship with leaders of other political parties. Whether it is Bahujan Samaj Party chief Mayawati, Sharad Pawar of the Nationalist Congress Party or Rashtriya Janata Dal leader Lalu Prasad, Patel has a hotline to them all. Little wonder then that Sonia Gandhi depended on Patel to deal with demanding Congress allies when the United Progressive Alliance government was in power. A quintessential “backroom boy”, Patel was constantly firefighting on Sonia Gandhi’s behalf, whether it was dealing with rebellion in the Congress ranks or with angry allies.

Can Rahul Gandhi afford to relegate Ahmed Patel to the margins? (Credit: PTI)
Can Rahul Gandhi afford to relegate Ahmed Patel to the margins? (Credit: PTI)

Past and future

Patel’s association with the Gandhi family goes back to the days of Indira Gandhi when he was party joint secretary and later deputed to work with Rajiv Gandhi, who was Congress general secretary. This stint gave him proximity to Rajiv Gandhi, who appointed Patel as parliamentary secretary after he took charge as prime minister in 1985.

The low-profile Patel entered the Congress Working Committee and was elevated as general secretary during PV Narasimha’s regime in the 1990s. He was subsequently appointed party treasurer when Sitaram Kesri was Congress president. Having played a key role in the installation of Sonia Gandhi as Congress chief in 1998, Patel retained this all-powerful post after she took over. However, a miffed Patel put in his papers following differences with Sonia Gandhi’s private secretary V George. As a result, Patel was out in the cold but it was not for long as he soon returned in a far more influential position as Sonia Gandhi’s private secretary. He held this post for 16 years, effectively sidelining possible rivals like Ambika Soni and ensuring Sonia Gandhi’s continued dependence on him.

Since it has been known for some years now that Rahul Gandhi would eventually take over as Congress chief, Patel has been preparing for this generational change. Known to be quiet and almost invisible, Patel suddenly became vocal and visible over two years ago. He took to Twitter, started addressing political rallies and also spoke up in the Rajya Sabha on a number of subjects. While he insisted that he tended to be more proactive when the Congress was in the Opposition, the overwhelming view in the party was that he was positioning himself for a new role in the Rahul Gandhi-led Congress.

It is now to be seen if Patel will become just another face in the party or if he will get a second innings and, if so, in what position. The question is, can Rahul Gandhi afford to relegate Patel to the margins?

Support our journalism by subscribing to Scroll+ here. We welcome your comments at letters@scroll.in.
Sponsored Content BY 

Do you really need to use that plastic straw?

The hazards of single-use plastic items, and what to use instead.

In June 2018, a distressed whale in Thailand made headlines around the world. After an autopsy it’s cause of death was determined to be more than 80 plastic bags it had ingested. The pictures caused great concern and brought into focus the urgency of the fight against single-use plastic. This term refers to use-and-throw plastic products that are designed for one-time use, such as takeaway spoons and forks, polythene bags styrofoam cups etc. In its report on single-use plastics, the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) has described how single-use plastics have a far-reaching impact in the environment.

Dense quantity of plastic litter means sights such as the distressed whale in Thailand aren’t uncommon. Plastic products have been found in the airways and stomachs of hundreds of marine and land species. Plastic bags, especially, confuse turtles who mistake them for jellyfish - their food. They can even exacerbate health crises, such as a malarial outbreak, by clogging sewers and creating ideal conditions for vector-borne diseases to thrive. In 1988, poor drainage made worse by plastic clogging contributed to the devastating Bangladesh floods in which two-thirds of the country was submerged.

Plastic litter can, moreover, cause physiological harm. Burning plastic waste for cooking fuel and in open air pits releases harmful gases in the air, contributing to poor air quality especially in poorer countries where these practices are common. But plastic needn’t even be burned to cause physiological harm. The toxic chemical additives in the manufacturing process of plastics remain in animal tissue, which is then consumed by humans. These highly toxic and carcinogenic substances (benzene, styrene etc.) can cause damage to nervous systems, lungs and reproductive organs.

The European Commission recently released a list of top 10 single-use plastic items that it plans to ban in the near future. These items are ubiquitous as trash across the world’s beaches, even the pristine, seemingly untouched ones. Some of them, such as styrofoam cups, take up to a 1,000 years to photodegrade (the breakdown of substances by exposure to UV and infrared rays from sunlight), disintegrating into microplastics, another health hazard.

More than 60 countries have introduced levies and bans to discourage the use of single-use plastics. Morocco and Rwanda have emerged as inspiring success stories of such policies. Rwanda, in fact, is now among the cleanest countries on Earth. In India, Maharashtra became the 18th state to effect a ban on disposable plastic items in March 2018. Now India plans to replicate the decision on a national level, aiming to eliminate single-use plastics entirely by 2022. While government efforts are important to encourage industries to redesign their production methods, individuals too can take steps to minimise their consumption, and littering, of single-use plastics. Most of these actions are low on effort, but can cause a significant reduction in plastic waste in the environment, if the return of Olive Ridley turtles to a Mumbai beach are anything to go by.

To know more about the single-use plastics problem, visit Planet or Plastic portal, National Geographic’s multi-year effort to raise awareness about the global plastic trash crisis. From microplastics in cosmetics to haunting art on plastic pollution, Planet or Plastic is a comprehensive resource on the problem. You can take the pledge to reduce your use of single-use plastics, here.

This article was produced by the Scroll marketing team on behalf of National Geographic, and not by the Scroll editorial team.