Letters to the editor

Readers debate: Should Jignesh Mevani have ousted a Republic TV reporter from his press conference?

Responses to a Scroll.in article on the debate ensuing the first-time MLA’s stance against the TV channel.

Mevani’s move

There is nothing wrong in Jignesh Mevani asking the Republic TV reporter to be removed from his press conference (“Should Republic TV be supported by fellow journalists? Chennai incident sparks debate”). I used to wonder why Arnab Goswami and his channel are going soft on the ruling party. I learnt only today that the channel is partly owned by a BJP backed MP. Obviously Goswami and his team will go extra mile to blacken the Opposition to appease their masters. Goswami has lost whatever respect I had for him and his style of reporting. In fact I would suggest to all Opposition party leaders to boycott his channel and refuse to participate in his debates. – PVV Raghavan

***

The question of solidarity is not about quid-pro-quo. The novice Mewani wanted to address a press conference. He had no right to dictate who should be present and who can ask questions. For that, he is free to open his own news channel and give his views on every subject. – VV Rao

***

Arnab Goswami is an insult to journalism. He is a demagogue, not a journalist in any sense of the word. He thinks shouting is journalism. He should be boycotted. – Rajesh Vyas

***

Jignesh Mevani should behave first.The language he uses is unbecoming of a politician. He is a first-time MLA who won piggybacking on the Congress. He has to build a following brick by brick. – Gopalakrishnan

***

Chennai journalists have shown their maturity. They should not take the help of the politicians to resolve their issues with Republic TV. They can do that at a professional level. – Ashim Halder

***

It is very unbecoming of you to drive a wedge in the journalist fraternity. Are you a media house or political representative?

You may be dead against Arnab Goswami but that hatred should not surmount the unity in the journalist fraternity. Kill the other guy should not be the motto of journalists. And that Goswami may not go out of his way to support a brother journalist does not make it okay to break the backbone of fourth pillar. – Pralhad

***

This question is superfluous. Mevani’s demand was dictatorial. A press conference cannot be selective. Media also cannot be selective in their support. – Suresh Hattangadi

***

Shame on the journalists who suddenly found a spine, that too in support of Republic and Arnab Goswami, who regularly rains insults on them.Why didn’t they stand up for their right to free speech when Goswami insulted them!

Shame on them for not supporting a man who has the guts to stand up against the State and who won a victory against it in a fair election. Has the media buckled down because it is afraid to go against the state, in name of press freedom? – Bharati Shroff

***

Freedom of expression has been granted not only to Jignesh Mevani but to everybody. Journalism is a professional. Professionals are to be respected. – Jayaraman KB

***

Arnab Goswami’s arrogant style provokes even the audience. If journalists support him, it implies that they will stand by him no matter how he behaves. This will only encourage his arrogance and bring down the standards of jounalism. Is Goswami a journalist or a dictator? He is doing a disservice to journalism. – Ibrahim Khaleel

***

​Jignesh Mevani did the right thing. He wanted to address journalists and Republic TV has nothing to do with journalism. It is the propaganda channel of a party.​ This was an unnecessary show of solidarity and a false sense of sanctity for their profession. Would they have boycotted the press conference if it was Narendra Modi and not Jignesh Mevani? – Dipak Dholakia

***

Should Republic TV be supported ? Mewani was reportedly funded during the Gujarat Election by the radical Popular Front of India. Republic TV has exposed Mewani and his unparliamentary language against the prime minister. He did not want a Republic TV reporter at his press briefing. Republic TV’s viewer-share is highest for English TV news. Boycotting Republic TV is like denouncing the Indian public, who love the channel for its honest and fearless reporting. – Sandeep Nath

Support our journalism by subscribing to Scroll+ here. We welcome your comments at letters@scroll.in.
Sponsored Content BY 

Tracing the formation of Al Qaeda and its path to 9/11

A new show looks at some of the crucial moments leading up to the attack.

“The end of the world war had bought America victory but not security” - this quote from Lawrence Wright’s Pulitzer-Prize winning book, ‘The Looming Tower’, gives a sense of the growing threat to America from Al Qaeda and the series of events that led to 9/11. Based on extensive interviews, including with Bin Laden’s best friend in college and the former White House counterterrorism chief, ‘The Looming Tower’ provides an intimate perspective of the 9/11 attack.

Lawrence Wright chronicles the formative years of Al Qaeda, giving an insight in to Bin Laden’s war against America. The book covers in detail, the radicalisation of Osama Bin Laden and his association with Ayman Al Zawahri, an Egyptian doctor who preached that only violence could change history. In an interview with Amazon, Wright shared, “I talked to 600-something people, but many of those people I talked to again and again for a period of five years, some of them dozens of times.” Wright’s book was selected by TIME as one of the all-time 100 best nonfiction books for its “thoroughly researched and incisively written” account of the road to 9/11 and is considered an essential read for understanding Islam’s war on the West as it developed in the Middle East.

‘The Looming Tower’ also dwells on the response of key US officials to the rising Al Qaeda threat, particularly exploring the turf wars between the FBI and the CIA. This has now been dramatized in a 10-part mini-series of the same name. Adapted by Dan Futterman (of Foxcatcher fame), the series mainly focuses on the hostilities between the FBI and the CIA. Some major characters are based on real people - such as John O’ Neill (FBI’s foul-mouthed counterterrorism chief played by Jeff Daniels) and Ali Soufan (O’ Neill’s Arabic-speaking mentee who successfully interrogated captured Islamic terrorists after 9/11, played by Tahar Rahim). Some are composite characters, such as Martin Schmidt (O’Neill’s CIA counterpart, played by Peter Sarsgaard).

The series, most crucially, captures just how close US intelligence agencies had come to foiling Al Qaeda’s plans, just to come up short due to internal turf wars. It follows the FBI and the CIA as they independently follow intelligence leads in the crises leading up to 9/11 – the US Embassy bombings in East Africa and the attack on US warship USS Cole in Yemen – but fail to update each other. The most glaring example is of how the CIA withheld critical information – Al Qaeda operatives being hunted by the FBI had entered the United States - under the misguided notion that the CIA was the only government agency authorised to deal with terrorism threats.

The depth of information in the book has translated into a realistic recreation of the pre-9/11 years on screen. The drama is even interspersed with actual footage from the 9/11 conspiracy, attack and the 2004 Commission Hearing, linking together the myriad developments leading up to 9/11 with chilling hindsight. Watch the trailer of this gripping show below.

Play

The Looming Tower is available for streaming on Amazon Prime Video, along with a host of Amazon originals and popular movies and TV shows. To enjoy unlimited ad free streaming anytime, anywhere, subscribe to Amazon Prime Video.

This article was produced by the Scroll marketing team on behalf of Amazon Prime Video and not by the Scroll editorial team.