fire alarm

Death of 10 trekkers in massive Tamil Nadu forest fire raises serious questions about safety

If the trek in Kurangani forest reserve did not have the forest department’s permission, why was it allowed?

On Monday evening, the family of 27-year-old Nisha requested that she be taken off ventilator support at a government hospital in Madurai, making her the 10th victim of a forest fire in Theni district of southern Tamil Nadu. The fire started in the Kurangani forest reserve on Sunday, trapping 39 trekkers from Chennai, Coimbatore and Tiruppur, an NDTV report said.

The Indian Air Force concluded its rescue mission after a six-hour operation on Monday. The Defence Ministry tweeted that 27 trekkers had been rescued. But going by some reports, a few trapped trekkers may still be missing.

Theni District Collector Pallavi Baldev told The News Minute that the trekking group had camped at an estate in the forest area on Saturday and were on their way back on Sunday when they were caught in the fire. “They panicked and the group got scattered,” she said. There was one team of 27 people from Chennai, and another team of 12 from Erode.

Conservator of Forests (Madurai Circle) RK Jegania told The Times of India the expedition was illegal. The Theni Collector had also said that the trekkers had not crossed the forest checkposts. However, evidence later emerged that the Erode team had crossed a checkpost on the way to Kurangani forests. In a note to the authorities, one of the member D Prabhu said that the team paid Rs 200 per head to the forest department.

“The Chennai team did not get permission from forest department, but the Erode team did,” said Sivakumar, special branch inspector for Theni district. The inspector was however not sure if the Chennai team had passed through a checkpost or had taken a different route. “We have not got all the details yet, since we were all busy with rescue work,” he said. “We have just formed a team and are investigating into this.”

However, forest experts and experienced trekkers said the blame lay both with the organisers and the forest department, which should have stopped the group when it entered the forest area.

Responsible trekking

In Tamil Nadu, the forest department manages ecotourism and operates treks and walking trails in a few places such as the Pichavaram mangrove forest or Annamalai Tiger reserve, said Saravanan of the Wild Wing Trust. A non-governmental organisation focussed on wildlife and the environment, the trust also conducts treks in the state.

Saravanan said the forest department’s permission must be taken before entering any reserve. The department usually, as per protocol, sends a forest watcher or guide with a group to handle any difficult situation that may arise – a measure that could have saved lives in Sunday’s fire.

“Even if I am an experienced trekker who may have climbed the Himalayas or trekked in Brazil, I cannot predict any localised situation in the places where I am hiking,” Saravanan said. “Any place should be understood very well while walking into it.”

Shivam, an expedition leader at the Bengaluru-based trekking organisation India Hikes, also stressed the need for trekking groups to receive permission to set up camp. He said that forest officials visit campsites to check for open bonfires, which are not permitted.

The forest department has several check points where trekkers are charged a nominal amount for each day spent in the forest, factoring in the cost of a guide and a maintenance fee among others. It is to avoid paying these costs that some trekkers do not inform the forest department of their expedition.

“Since there are a lot of openings to a forest area, it is hard for officials to control who is venturing into the region,” said Shivam. “It matters how responsible you are as a trekker. When the department sets these kinds of rules, if any emergency occurs, they can contact you or your parents.”

Saravanan, too, said that many groups venture into forest areas without permission. “Nobody has stopped them so far,” he said. He added that a growing number of resorts located near forests advertise nature treks and walks, activities that require the forest department’s permission. Trespassing on reserve forest area is an offence under the Wildlife Protection Act of 1972, he pointed out.

Saravanan said that for the past five years or so, the forests of Theni have been getting around 100 trekkers every weekend, and their activities need to be better regulated. “It is the forest department’s job to see that nobody enters this region, but they hardly seem to be operating,” he said.

Time for fires

The end of winter is a time to be particularly careful. Forest fires, natural or man-made, are common around this time, said Sadiq Ali, founder of the Wildlife and Nature Conservation Trust in Ooty. The forests are very dry and trees falling or rubbing against each other can spark a fire. At times, communities living in the vicinity of the forests set fire to the dried grass to ensure fresh greenery after the monsoon, he said.

“In the forest department, we start working on fire control from March,” Ali, who is also the honorary warden of the Nilgiris reserve forest, said. “Wherever there is a fire, we involve the locals to help us extinguish it.”

According to Saravanan, the area that caught fire on Sunday is open deciduous forest, with more grass than trees. “If there had been more trees, the fire would have been much bigger,” he said.

Saravanan added that the forest department decides whether it is safe to venture into the region, and that “if they feel it is too dry, they will stop operating the trail”.

Support our journalism by subscribing to Scroll+ here. We welcome your comments at letters@scroll.in.
Sponsored Content BY 

Do you really need to use that plastic straw?

The hazards of single-use plastic items, and what to use instead.

In June 2018, a distressed whale in Thailand made headlines around the world. After an autopsy it’s cause of death was determined to be more than 80 plastic bags it had ingested. The pictures caused great concern and brought into focus the urgency of the fight against single-use plastic. This term refers to use-and-throw plastic products that are designed for one-time use, such as takeaway spoons and forks, polythene bags styrofoam cups etc. In its report on single-use plastics, the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) has described how single-use plastics have a far-reaching impact in the environment.

Dense quantity of plastic litter means sights such as the distressed whale in Thailand aren’t uncommon. Plastic products have been found in the airways and stomachs of hundreds of marine and land species. Plastic bags, especially, confuse turtles who mistake them for jellyfish - their food. They can even exacerbate health crises, such as a malarial outbreak, by clogging sewers and creating ideal conditions for vector-borne diseases to thrive. In 1988, poor drainage made worse by plastic clogging contributed to the devastating Bangladesh floods in which two-thirds of the country was submerged.

Plastic litter can, moreover, cause physiological harm. Burning plastic waste for cooking fuel and in open air pits releases harmful gases in the air, contributing to poor air quality especially in poorer countries where these practices are common. But plastic needn’t even be burned to cause physiological harm. The toxic chemical additives in the manufacturing process of plastics remain in animal tissue, which is then consumed by humans. These highly toxic and carcinogenic substances (benzene, styrene etc.) can cause damage to nervous systems, lungs and reproductive organs.

The European Commission recently released a list of top 10 single-use plastic items that it plans to ban in the near future. These items are ubiquitous as trash across the world’s beaches, even the pristine, seemingly untouched ones. Some of them, such as styrofoam cups, take up to a 1,000 years to photodegrade (the breakdown of substances by exposure to UV and infrared rays from sunlight), disintegrating into microplastics, another health hazard.

More than 60 countries have introduced levies and bans to discourage the use of single-use plastics. Morocco and Rwanda have emerged as inspiring success stories of such policies. Rwanda, in fact, is now among the cleanest countries on Earth. In India, Maharashtra became the 18th state to effect a ban on disposable plastic items in March 2018. Now India plans to replicate the decision on a national level, aiming to eliminate single-use plastics entirely by 2022. While government efforts are important to encourage industries to redesign their production methods, individuals too can take steps to minimise their consumption, and littering, of single-use plastics. Most of these actions are low on effort, but can cause a significant reduction in plastic waste in the environment, if the return of Olive Ridley turtles to a Mumbai beach are anything to go by.

To know more about the single-use plastics problem, visit Planet or Plastic portal, National Geographic’s multi-year effort to raise awareness about the global plastic trash crisis. From microplastics in cosmetics to haunting art on plastic pollution, Planet or Plastic is a comprehensive resource on the problem. You can take the pledge to reduce your use of single-use plastics, here.

This article was produced by the Scroll marketing team on behalf of National Geographic, and not by the Scroll editorial team.