Identity Project

‘We will be constantly tracked’: Why university teachers are uneasy about submitting Aadhaar numbers

The government claims collecting the identity numbers will help weed out ‘ghost teachers’, but many fear the real purpose is to establish a surveillance system.

Colleges and universities demanding Aadhaar numbers from their staff has caused disquiet. Although many have complied and submitted their 12-digit biometric-based identity numbers, they remain uneasy about it. Others, such as at the National University of Juridical Sciences in Kolkata and the Indian Institute of Technology in Delhi, have plainly refused.

Most of India’s higher education institutions asked their teachers to submit Aadhaar numbers in the summer of 2017 soon after the central government made Aadhaar mandatory for availing a range of services. Teachers in Delhi University’s colleges, funded by the Delhi state government, though had been instructed to submit Aadhaar – to be linked to their service books – as far back as September 2015. At the law university in Kolkata, teachers were told to give the identity numbers for the Teacher Information Format, used for conducting the All India Survey on Higher Education, in April last year.

Releasing the survey for 2017 early this year, Human Resource Development Minister Prakash Javadekar claimed that linking Aadhaar to the Teacher Information Format had helped identify over 80,000 “ghost teachers” in institutions of higher education across the country. According to NTDV, Javadekar said his ministry had discovered that the “ghost teachers” used “proxy methods and are apparently teaching at multiple places full time”. Most, he added, were in state and private universities.

Teachers, however, are sceptical: they point out that using Aadhaar to identify “ghost teachers” will make little difference because teachers cannot moonlight for other institutions without the “connivance of authorities” – principals, owners and the local administration. If those in authority allow the practice of moonlighting to continue, a teacher at IIT Delhi argued, there is little Aadhaar can do about it.

Teachers fear the real purpose of the exercise is to establish a system of surveillance: by linking Aadhaar to their attendance systems, teachers’ movements can be constantly tracked. Further, “genuine staff members” may suffer if the government starts using Aadhaar enrolment figures to determine “ghost teachers” and use it as the basis for distributing resources among institutions.

An audit report criticises a Delhi University college for not linking the Aadhaar numbers of all its employees to their service books. The order for doing so, the report says, was issued in 2015.
An audit report criticises a Delhi University college for not linking the Aadhaar numbers of all its employees to their service books. The order for doing so, the report says, was issued in 2015.

‘Opportunity for surveillance’

What has deepened the disquiet is that the institutions have been vague about how the data would be used. Most have instructed their teachers to submit the Aadhaar numbers without bothering to explain why they were being sought.

At Delhi University, teachers suspect their Aadhaar numbers will ultimately be linked to a biometric attendance system, an idea the university has toyed with for years. “We were first asked to submit some months ago and were told by the college that the Ministry of Human Resource Development wanted the numbers,” said Naveen Gaur, who teaches physics at Dyal Singh College. “Then just a couple of weeks ago, probably in February, we again got a letter from the principal saying the University Grants Commission needs us to submit. Some of us are very concerned that this will be linked to the attendance system and every bit of our information will be available and all our movements tracked.” Gaur is holding out, but believes that most teachers will have not an option but to comply soon.

A physics professor at Rajasthan University held out for over a year before reluctantly submitting his Aadhaar number a few weeks ago. The university had issued a circular asking teachers to provide their Aadhaar in April 2017, claiming it was being done at the instance of the human resource development ministry. “Aadhaar is a personal identification number, just like my driving licence,” explained the professor who asked not to be named. He complied after being told that “everyone has submitted”; he feared his salary would be withheld if he did not relent. “Aadhaar provides, or facilitates, an opportunity for centralised surveillance by those in power anywhere,” he said.

Teachers at the National University of Juridical Sciences agree with this view. One of them emailed colleagues: “I think Aadhar is nothing more than a tool for organising a surveillance state – which history tells us [is an] ingredient for building totalitarian regimes. We need to object to this and oppose it in our own long-term interests to lead a life of freedom and dignity.”

He is part of a group of four-five teachers who have “explicitly refused” to provide their Aadhaar numbers.

Another teacher who is part of the group said, “There are plenty of reasons to oppose mandatory submission of Aadhaar – ranging from absence of legal authority, breach of privacy, potential for surveillance by state on academics, contempt of Supreme Court’s interim orders etc,” he said.

The teacher said after they refused to comply with the order, they were not pressured any further. Nor was a small group of teachers resisting a similar directive at IIT Delhi. One of them said he worries about identity theft. “I am not convinced about the security network [supporting Aadhaar],” he said.

The engineering college had asked for Aadhaar numbers about a year ago. Then, when new identification cards were issued about three months ago, there was a column for Aadhaar on the information gathering form. He had sought an explanation but the agency contracted to make the cards did not insist on having the Aadhaar number. “There was no big hue and cry about this,” he said.

A circular issued by Rajasthan University asking teachers to submit their Aadhaar numbers as directed by the human resource development ministry.
A circular issued by Rajasthan University asking teachers to submit their Aadhaar numbers as directed by the human resource development ministry.

Fearing exclusion

At the National University of Juridical Sciences and the Indian Institute of Management, Ahmedabad, faculty members were told that their Aadhaar numbers were required for completing the higher education survey and ranking processes.

An email sent to the academic staff of the National University of Juridical Sciences in April 2017 simply stated: “This is to inform that the university will be uploading data (in the Data Capture Format and Teacher Information Format) on the All India Survey on Higher Education portal. For filling the TIF form, Aadhar number is required from all the faculty members.”

Similarly, in February 2018, the dean of faculty at the management institute asked colleagues for their Aadhaar numbers, writing: “The Institute is required to provide the employment details of faculty members who were on the payroll of the Institute as on September 30, 2017 to complete the [survey] 2016-’17. The submission of Aadhaar card number is a mandatory field in the online Teacher Information Format under [All India Survey on Higher Education].”

The dean’s note said the Aadhaar numbers were also required for the institute to participate in the government’s ranking system for higher education institutions, the National Institute of Ranking Framework. “In case we are unable to furnish the Aadhaar Card details of faculty members, the loss is ours as that many faculty members will not be counted under faculty strength, impacting our faculty – student ratio when data is used by the government from the survey database,” it stated.

Teachers complained that the ranking system is now being used as “a pressure point”. Reetika Khera, who teaches at IIT Delhi, wondered if the government’s refusal to count teachers who do not submit their Aadhaar would affect their ranking. Deliberately undercounting faculty numbers could lead to higher student-teacher ratios, an “important metric in the calculation of ranks”, she said. emailed each of the institutions mentioned in this report, asking to explain why they were collecting Aadhaar numbers and what they planned to do with them. None have responded yet. If and when they do, this report would be updated.

A teacher at the National University of Juridical Sciences said it was unable to submit a complete Teacher Information Format for the higher education survey because of the few teachers who refused to submit their Aadhaar numbers. He said the university was advised by officials in the human resource development to “keep out the names without Aadhaar” and, so, the Teacher Information Format was “submitted without those names.”

“It has so far not been a marker of entitlement or rights,” he said, referring to the survey. But he fears if the ministry and the higher education regulator, the University Grants Commission, start using the survey as the basis for allocating funds, projects approvals and transfer of grants, the “classification” of teachers without Aadhaar may lead to “the same type of exclusion that has been seen with [the Public Distribution System] where beneficiaries without Aadhaar linkage have been declared ghosts”.

Support our journalism by subscribing to Scroll+ here. We welcome your comments at
Sponsored Content BY 

Do you really need to use that plastic straw?

The hazards of single-use plastic items, and what to use instead.

In June 2018, a distressed whale in Thailand made headlines around the world. After an autopsy it’s cause of death was determined to be more than 80 plastic bags it had ingested. The pictures caused great concern and brought into focus the urgency of the fight against single-use plastic. This term refers to use-and-throw plastic products that are designed for one-time use, such as takeaway spoons and forks, polythene bags styrofoam cups etc. In its report on single-use plastics, the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) has described how single-use plastics have a far-reaching impact in the environment.

Dense quantity of plastic litter means sights such as the distressed whale in Thailand aren’t uncommon. Plastic products have been found in the airways and stomachs of hundreds of marine and land species. Plastic bags, especially, confuse turtles who mistake them for jellyfish - their food. They can even exacerbate health crises, such as a malarial outbreak, by clogging sewers and creating ideal conditions for vector-borne diseases to thrive. In 1988, poor drainage made worse by plastic clogging contributed to the devastating Bangladesh floods in which two-thirds of the country was submerged.

Plastic litter can, moreover, cause physiological harm. Burning plastic waste for cooking fuel and in open air pits releases harmful gases in the air, contributing to poor air quality especially in poorer countries where these practices are common. But plastic needn’t even be burned to cause physiological harm. The toxic chemical additives in the manufacturing process of plastics remain in animal tissue, which is then consumed by humans. These highly toxic and carcinogenic substances (benzene, styrene etc.) can cause damage to nervous systems, lungs and reproductive organs.

The European Commission recently released a list of top 10 single-use plastic items that it plans to ban in the near future. These items are ubiquitous as trash across the world’s beaches, even the pristine, seemingly untouched ones. Some of them, such as styrofoam cups, take up to a 1,000 years to photodegrade (the breakdown of substances by exposure to UV and infrared rays from sunlight), disintegrating into microplastics, another health hazard.

More than 60 countries have introduced levies and bans to discourage the use of single-use plastics. Morocco and Rwanda have emerged as inspiring success stories of such policies. Rwanda, in fact, is now among the cleanest countries on Earth. In India, Maharashtra became the 18th state to effect a ban on disposable plastic items in March 2018. Now India plans to replicate the decision on a national level, aiming to eliminate single-use plastics entirely by 2022. While government efforts are important to encourage industries to redesign their production methods, individuals too can take steps to minimise their consumption, and littering, of single-use plastics. Most of these actions are low on effort, but can cause a significant reduction in plastic waste in the environment, if the return of Olive Ridley turtles to a Mumbai beach are anything to go by.

To know more about the single-use plastics problem, visit Planet or Plastic portal, National Geographic’s multi-year effort to raise awareness about the global plastic trash crisis. From microplastics in cosmetics to haunting art on plastic pollution, Planet or Plastic is a comprehensive resource on the problem. You can take the pledge to reduce your use of single-use plastics, here.

This article was produced by the Scroll marketing team on behalf of National Geographic, and not by the Scroll editorial team.