Social Media Buzz

Tweet about man cancelling Ola cab because driver was Muslim provokes outrage (followed by humour)

Social media users offered hilarious reasons for cancelling cabs.

A tweet by a man claiming to have cancelled his Ola cab because the driver was Muslim has prompted outrage on Twitter. Abhishek Mishra, whose Twitter profile describes him as a member of the Vishwa Hindu Parishad and a “Hindutva Thinker” tweeted on April 20: “Cancelled @Olacabs Booking because Driver was Muslim. I don’t want to give my money to Jihadi People.”

The tweet garnered much attention over the weekend and there were multiple pleas to the cab aggregator, Ola, and Twitter, to take action against Mishra. Many also pointed out that Mishra was followed by some Union ministers of the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party, including Defence Minister Nirmala Sitharaman and Minister of State for Culture, Mahesh Sharma.

Mishra’s Facebook profile claims that he works for the VHP’s IT cell and his cover photo is an image of him with Prime Minister Narendra Modi.

On Sunday evening, Ola responded to Mishra’s tweet, asserting that it is a secular platform that does not discriminate against its drivers.

On Monday, Twitter continued confronting the issue in the way it knows best: through humour and satire. Twitter user “A purvaa” said “Cancelled an Ola cab because driver was a guy named Vikas and uske aane ki umeed thi nhi mujhe.” The driver’s name was Vikas, and I didn’t expect him to come, she said, taking a dig at the BJP’s campaign promise of bringing Vikas, or development, to India.

Another Twitter user said: “Cancelled an Ola Cab booking today because the driver’s name was Atif and he screamed “Hum kis gali ja rahe hain” on the call”, referencing popular musician Atif Aslam and his song that translates to, “Where are we going?”

“Cancelled an Ola Cab because the driver’s name was Salman Khan, aur bhai saab main khda tha footpath pe (and I was standing on a footpath”, tweeted Dr. Gill, invoking the infamous hit-and-run case in which the Bollywood actor was tried and later acquitted.

Several jokes about Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal, and famous sportsmen also followed.

Mishra has defended his actions and shared what he said was a message from Twitter claiming that the micro-blogging platform did not see any grounds to take action against him.

Support our journalism by subscribing to Scroll+ here. We welcome your comments at
Sponsored Content BY 

Do you really need to use that plastic straw?

The hazards of single-use plastic items, and what to use instead.

In June 2018, a distressed whale in Thailand made headlines around the world. After an autopsy it’s cause of death was determined to be more than 80 plastic bags it had ingested. The pictures caused great concern and brought into focus the urgency of the fight against single-use plastic. This term refers to use-and-throw plastic products that are designed for one-time use, such as takeaway spoons and forks, polythene bags styrofoam cups etc. In its report on single-use plastics, the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) has described how single-use plastics have a far-reaching impact in the environment.

Dense quantity of plastic litter means sights such as the distressed whale in Thailand aren’t uncommon. Plastic products have been found in the airways and stomachs of hundreds of marine and land species. Plastic bags, especially, confuse turtles who mistake them for jellyfish - their food. They can even exacerbate health crises, such as a malarial outbreak, by clogging sewers and creating ideal conditions for vector-borne diseases to thrive. In 1988, poor drainage made worse by plastic clogging contributed to the devastating Bangladesh floods in which two-thirds of the country was submerged.

Plastic litter can, moreover, cause physiological harm. Burning plastic waste for cooking fuel and in open air pits releases harmful gases in the air, contributing to poor air quality especially in poorer countries where these practices are common. But plastic needn’t even be burned to cause physiological harm. The toxic chemical additives in the manufacturing process of plastics remain in animal tissue, which is then consumed by humans. These highly toxic and carcinogenic substances (benzene, styrene etc.) can cause damage to nervous systems, lungs and reproductive organs.

The European Commission recently released a list of top 10 single-use plastic items that it plans to ban in the near future. These items are ubiquitous as trash across the world’s beaches, even the pristine, seemingly untouched ones. Some of them, such as styrofoam cups, take up to a 1,000 years to photodegrade (the breakdown of substances by exposure to UV and infrared rays from sunlight), disintegrating into microplastics, another health hazard.

More than 60 countries have introduced levies and bans to discourage the use of single-use plastics. Morocco and Rwanda have emerged as inspiring success stories of such policies. Rwanda, in fact, is now among the cleanest countries on Earth. In India, Maharashtra became the 18th state to effect a ban on disposable plastic items in March 2018. Now India plans to replicate the decision on a national level, aiming to eliminate single-use plastics entirely by 2022. While government efforts are important to encourage industries to redesign their production methods, individuals too can take steps to minimise their consumption, and littering, of single-use plastics. Most of these actions are low on effort, but can cause a significant reduction in plastic waste in the environment, if the return of Olive Ridley turtles to a Mumbai beach are anything to go by.

To know more about the single-use plastics problem, visit Planet or Plastic portal, National Geographic’s multi-year effort to raise awareness about the global plastic trash crisis. From microplastics in cosmetics to haunting art on plastic pollution, Planet or Plastic is a comprehensive resource on the problem. You can take the pledge to reduce your use of single-use plastics, here.

This article was produced by the Scroll marketing team on behalf of National Geographic, and not by the Scroll editorial team.