The Daily Fix

The Daily Fix: Yes, Delhi needs autonomy – but the arrangement must be well thought out

Everything you need to know for the day (and a little more).

The Big Story: Administrative chaos

On Monday night, Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal along with several of his cabinet colleagues staged a sit-in protest in the waiting room of Raj Niwas, demanding that the lieutenant governor clear key projects awaiting his sanction and move to end what the Aam Aadmi Party alleged is a “strike” by Indian Administrative Service officers in the Capital that has continued for four months.

Earlier in the day, the Aam Aadmi Party relaunched its campaign for statehood for Delhi, passing a resolution to this effect in the Assembly. Dramatically, Kejriwal declared that if the Bharatiya Janata Party granted statehood to Delhi, he would campaign for Prime Minister Narendra Modi and the party in the 2019 Lok Sabha polls.

The is no denying that since the Aam Aadmi Party came to power in 2015 with a stunning majority, its government has been confronted with administrative roadblocks posed by the office of the lieutenant governor, who is the representative of the Centre and controls key subjects like land and police. In 2016, the Aam Aadmi Party government made a legal challenge
to the powers of the lieutenant governor in the Supreme Court. A constitution bench is likely to deliver its verdict in the matter after the court reopens on July 2.

However, the question of granting statehood to Delhi is not as simple as the Aam Aadmi Party makes it to be. Its own conception of what the Delhi state should be has challenges. For instance, in 2016, when it put out a draft law on statehood, the Aam Aadmi Party allowed the New Delhi municipal council area to remain in the control of Parliament, even though it wanted control of land in others areas of the city. This signaled a willingness to give up a large amount of tax revenue in exchange for political control. Questions were raised about whether such an arrangement would be viable and generate enough money to sustain the city.

While Kejriwal has said that Delhi generates Rs 1.3 lakh crore as tax revenue but gains only Rs 350 crore in return, he hides the fact that Delhi is actually a big beneficiary of the Centre’s tax revenue allocation model. Compared to major states, Delhi produces hardly anything. It even depends on other states for water and power. One reason Delhi does not face inter-state problems like other states do is because of the recognition of its importance as the national capital territory. If Delhi is granted statehood, its government will no longer be treated preferentially and will have to tackle neighbouring states as equals. For example, 30% of the Union Urban Development Ministry’s budget is allocated for infrastructure in Delhi alone, a luxury that no other state enjoys. Around the world, efficient capital cities remain federal units under the central governments. Some like Washington DC have even less autonomy than Delhi does.

However, it is also true that the demand for statehood has become more urgent due to the attitude of the Centre and the lieutenant governor. Both have failed to recognise Delhi’s unique nature and have stalled projects, such as a scheme to deliver rations at residents’ doorsteps. The functioning of the lieutenant governors has for all practical reasons undermined the powers of the Assembly and the Delhi government elected by the people.

More problematic is the manner in which Kejriwal is trying to make this the single-most important issue in Delhi, even offering support to the BJP if the Centre accepts the statehood demand. While greater autonomy is indeed the ideal situation, such profound changes to the system of governance need to be debated thoroughly and should not be the product of political grandstanding.


  1. India has entered a regime of “permanent surpluses” in most crops – a reality our policymakers are unable to grasp, stuck as they are in the era of the Essential Commodities Act, argues Harish Damodaran in Indian Express. 
  2.   It is important to invest in negotiations, political concessions and soft power within Jammu and Kashmir, writes Happymon Jacob in The Hindu. 
  3.   Yeonmi Park and her family suffered tragically under the North Korean regime. Now she’s urging the United States to pressure Kim Jong-un to end the holocaust against his own people.  


Don’t miss

‘Everything that could go wrong went wrong’: Days of rumours led to the lynchings in Assam village.

“In Kaibongkro village, barely a kilometre from where Das and Nath were murdered, Lakhi Ingtipy lives with her father-in-law and three-year old son. Five people have been arrested from the village. Ingtipy said that all she recalled from Friday evening, were men screaming on the street about two phankodongs being spotted. She claimed she did not step out of her house. ‘We had been warned to be extra careful and to keep the kids safe at home because phankodongs had apparently abducted children in Diphu,’ she said.” 

Support our journalism by subscribing to Scroll+ here. We welcome your comments at
Sponsored Content BY 

Do you really need to use that plastic straw?

The hazards of single-use plastic items, and what to use instead.

In June 2018, a distressed whale in Thailand made headlines around the world. After an autopsy it’s cause of death was determined to be more than 80 plastic bags it had ingested. The pictures caused great concern and brought into focus the urgency of the fight against single-use plastic. This term refers to use-and-throw plastic products that are designed for one-time use, such as takeaway spoons and forks, polythene bags styrofoam cups etc. In its report on single-use plastics, the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) has described how single-use plastics have a far-reaching impact in the environment.

Dense quantity of plastic litter means sights such as the distressed whale in Thailand aren’t uncommon. Plastic products have been found in the airways and stomachs of hundreds of marine and land species. Plastic bags, especially, confuse turtles who mistake them for jellyfish - their food. They can even exacerbate health crises, such as a malarial outbreak, by clogging sewers and creating ideal conditions for vector-borne diseases to thrive. In 1988, poor drainage made worse by plastic clogging contributed to the devastating Bangladesh floods in which two-thirds of the country was submerged.

Plastic litter can, moreover, cause physiological harm. Burning plastic waste for cooking fuel and in open air pits releases harmful gases in the air, contributing to poor air quality especially in poorer countries where these practices are common. But plastic needn’t even be burned to cause physiological harm. The toxic chemical additives in the manufacturing process of plastics remain in animal tissue, which is then consumed by humans. These highly toxic and carcinogenic substances (benzene, styrene etc.) can cause damage to nervous systems, lungs and reproductive organs.

The European Commission recently released a list of top 10 single-use plastic items that it plans to ban in the near future. These items are ubiquitous as trash across the world’s beaches, even the pristine, seemingly untouched ones. Some of them, such as styrofoam cups, take up to a 1,000 years to photodegrade (the breakdown of substances by exposure to UV and infrared rays from sunlight), disintegrating into microplastics, another health hazard.

More than 60 countries have introduced levies and bans to discourage the use of single-use plastics. Morocco and Rwanda have emerged as inspiring success stories of such policies. Rwanda, in fact, is now among the cleanest countries on Earth. In India, Maharashtra became the 18th state to effect a ban on disposable plastic items in March 2018. Now India plans to replicate the decision on a national level, aiming to eliminate single-use plastics entirely by 2022. While government efforts are important to encourage industries to redesign their production methods, individuals too can take steps to minimise their consumption, and littering, of single-use plastics. Most of these actions are low on effort, but can cause a significant reduction in plastic waste in the environment, if the return of Olive Ridley turtles to a Mumbai beach are anything to go by.

To know more about the single-use plastics problem, visit Planet or Plastic portal, National Geographic’s multi-year effort to raise awareness about the global plastic trash crisis. From microplastics in cosmetics to haunting art on plastic pollution, Planet or Plastic is a comprehensive resource on the problem. You can take the pledge to reduce your use of single-use plastics, here.

This article was produced by the Scroll marketing team on behalf of National Geographic, and not by the Scroll editorial team.