indian cricket

Rahul Dravid shows BCCI and India the way out of the conflict of interest mess

The rest need to follow his lead but will they?

India holds Rahul Dravid to a higher standard than most other cricketers. They expect him to say the right things, set the right examples and perhaps, more importantly... do the right thing. So when his name cropped up in the conflict of interest debate, the overlying feeling was one of disappointment. After all, this wasn’t the Dravid we knew.

There were some who had written about Dravid’s dual role as India U-19/India ‘A’ coach and Delhi Daredevils’ mentor back in 2016. Then, the issue didn’t garner much interest because the BCCI itself had no problems with his contract – after all, they had drafted it.

But this year, when CoA member Ramachandra Guha, called him out in his resignation letter – it brought the issue into sharp focus.

“For instance, the BCCI has accorded preferential treatment to some national coaches, by giving them ten month contracts for national duty, thus allowing them to work as IPL coaches/mentors for the remaining two months. This was done in an adhoc and arbitrary manner; the more famous the former player-turned-coach, the more likely was the BCCI to allow him to draft his own contract that left loopholes that he exploited to dodge the conflict of interest issue,” Guha wrote in his letter.

It was a scathing indictment of the superstar culture that is prevalent in Indian cricket but in a sense, it was also a call to arms. A clean-up was in order and it needed to begins with the superstars themselves. Dravid’s initial response to Guha’s letter was a cautious one. In an interview to ESPNCricinfo, he said:

“Yes, I have written to the CoA explaining my position and explaining the background against which this perceived conflict of interest has happened. By the BCCI’s conflict of interest rules, I was absolutely not under a conflict of interest. If the rules have changed midway through the contract, then I think it is unfair to criticise me for breaking the rules or twisting the rules to suit my convenience.”

Dravid went on to add that there were five to six other cricketers who were in a similar position and said that there needed to be clarity on the issue.

“If there is clarity, we will be in a position to take an informed decision,” he had then said.

Dravid made the statement on June 9 and by the end of the month, the BCCI made an announcement that he will continue as India U-19 and ‘A’ team coach for another two years. Shortly after the BCCI press release, another announcement was made: Dravid had stepped down as Delhi Daredevils’ mentor.

It was a welcome move which once again reiterated why the former skipper is one of the most respected cricketers around. This isn’t about him deciding to choose India over the IPL or even over the commentary box. The country vs club debate is for another day. This isn’t even about the money – he has got a 100 percent hike and will make Rs 5 crore per annum. Rather, this is about showing the courage to do the right thing.

If Dravid had continued to do both jobs, he would have been lumped with the rest. The players who look up to him would have put it down in the ‘things superstars do’ list. The BCCI would have shrugged their shoulders and called for another committee (perhaps they might have even found one for Dravid). The public would have debated it and then finally moved on but they would remember... just as they remember Sachin Tendulkar and the red Ferrari.

Dravid, it is to be noted, is the only one to have been spurred into action so far. The others have simply refused to acknowledge the conflict of interest brought to the fore by Guha’s letter and in that, they have adopted the way of former BCCI president N Srinivasan. Their silence is sad and telling in more than one way.

But given that he is moulding India’s young cricketers, it was perhaps even more important for Dravid to stand out by doing the right thing. If anything, perhaps the new generation will take their cue from him. Perhaps they will learn how to listen to their conscience and in that, he may be imparting a lesson that serves a far greater purpose than just cricket itself... exactly what India would have expected from Dravid, for that’s the kind of guy he is.

We welcome your comments at letters@scroll.in.
Sponsored Content BY 

When did we start parenting our parents?

As our parents grow older, our ‘adulting’ skills are tested like never before.

From answering every homework question to killing every monster under the bed, from soothing every wound with care to crushing anxiety by just the sound of their voice - parents understandably seemed like invincible, know-it-all superheroes all our childhood. It’s no wonder then that reality hits all of a sudden, the first time a parent falls and suffers a slip disc, or wears a thick pair of spectacles to read a restaurant menu - our parents are growing old, and older. It’s a slow process as our parents turn from superheroes to...human.

And just as slow to evolve are the dynamics of our relationship with them. Once upon a time, a peck on the cheek was a frequent ritual. As were handmade birthday cards every year from the artistically inclined, or declaring parents as ‘My Hero’ in school essays. Every parent-child duo could boast of an affectionate ritual - movie nights, cooking Sundays, reading favourite books together etc. The changed dynamic is indeed the most visible in the way we express our affection.

The affection is now expressed in more mature, more subtle ways - ways that mimics that of our own parents’ a lot. When did we start parenting our parents? Was it the first time we offered to foot the electricity bill, or drove them to the doctor, or dragged them along on a much-needed morning walk? Little did we know those innocent acts were but a start of a gradual role reversal.

In adulthood, children’s affection for their parents takes on a sense of responsibility. It includes everything from teaching them how to use smartphones effectively and contributing to family finances to tracking doctor’s appointments and ensuring medicine compliance. Worry and concern, though evidence of love, tend to largely replace old-fashioned patterns of affection between parents and children as the latter grow up.

It’s something that can be easily rectified, though. Start at the simplest - the old-fashioned peck on the cheek. When was the last time you gave your mom or dad a peck on the cheek like a spontaneous five-year-old - for no reason at all? Young parents can take their own children’s behaviour available as inspiration.

As young parents come to understand the responsibilities associated with caring for their parents, they also come to realise that they wouldn’t want their children to go through the same challenges. Creating a safe and secure environment for your family can help you strike a balance between the loving child in you and the caring, responsible adult that you are. A good life insurance plan can help families deal with unforeseen health crises by providing protection against financial loss. Having assurance of a measure of financial security for family can help ease financial tensions considerably, leaving you to focus on being a caring, affectionate child. Moreover,you can eliminate some of the worry for your children when they grow up – as the video below shows.

Play

To learn more about life insurance plans available for your family, see here.

This article was produced by the Scroll marketing team on behalf of SBI Life and not by the Scroll editorial team.