2017 U17 World Cup

Reality bites: Drubbing against Ghana showed India have a long way to go

India completely disintegrated in the second half, as Ghana racked up 27 shots against the hosts.

In what was billed as their biggest test till date, the Indian colts fell short against a strong Ghana side. The west Africans were dominant from start to finish, sweeping aside the Indian team 4-0.

This time though, coach Luis Norton de Matos had no scope for the “It could have been 2-1..” or “2-2” narrative that he has employed after the previous two defeats. His team was comprehensively outplayed in every department but the Portuguese put it down to a tiring team.

Two goals did come in the dying minutes of the game but that shouldn’t take anything away from the fact that unlike the previous two matches, India didn’t have a single moment where they truly threatened the Ghana goal or created a chance of some significance.

Lalengmawia tries to control the ball in midfield (Image courtesy: AIFF Media)
Lalengmawia tries to control the ball in midfield (Image courtesy: AIFF Media)

Yet, when the line-ups were announced, it felt like de Matos had finally opted to take the handbrakes off the team. The midfield, consisting of Jeakson Thounaojam, Suresh Wangjam and Amarjit Kiyam, combined physicality and passing ability while Nongdamba Naorem and Rahul KP played on either side of Aniket Jadhav, who returned to the line-up.

In defence, Namit Deshpande was benched as Jitendra Singh returned to the heart of defence alongside Anwar Ali, who was playing his third match in seven days.

For the first 20 minutes, India didn’t trouble the Ghana defence but certainly took the fight to the West Africans. The game was fought at an even pace, as Suresh pushed forward in what resembled a 4-2-3-1 formation by India to counter Ghana’s 4-3-3.

Soon enough though, Ghana asserted their superiority in midfield by pressing high up the pitch and looked to flood the Indian half with numbers, looking to unnerve De Matos’ boys. The ploy worked like a treat, as India soon retreated deep into the last third, playing a 4-5-1 as everyone bar Aniket defended the goal with their lives.

Stalin tries to play the ball out of defence. (Image courtesy: AIFF Media)
Stalin tries to play the ball out of defence. (Image courtesy: AIFF Media)

With De Matos later claiming that his boys tired after the half, perhaps this energy would have been better spent against Colombia? We will never know of the outcome of that ploy, but it was curious to see that India had tried to match Ghana’s pace with their own, especially in their third match in seven days.

The Portuguese also claimed that when bodies become physically tired, the thinking process goes out of the window. In such a case, why Amarjit and Nong, both supposedly struggling with injuries, had started, becomes a question of paramount importance.

As expected, both were replaced on the stroke of the hour, leaving the other tired legs to try and defend. Ghana made it easy for India in the first 40 minutes though, as they kept shooting from distance, long-rangers that didn’t ruffle Dheeraj and co but certainly drew the ire of visiting coach Samuel Febin.

As the half drew to a close, Sadiq Ibrahim whizzed past Sanjiv Stalin and drove in a low ball which Dheeraj could only parry to Eric Ayiah, as the Ghana captain swept home the rebound to give his team a crucial lead on the stroke of half-time. All of De Matos’ best-laid plans were undone in that one moment and as we’ve come to expect from the Portuguese, his lack of a plan ‘B’ laid the foundation for a rampant Ghana post half-time.

The Portuguese head-coach claimed that Ghana could have played eight matches in three days and could have remained fit. Surely he didn’t expect his own players to do the same? At half-time, pro-active decision making may have shored up the defence or midfield with an extra pair of fresh legs but no substitution came and soon Ghana were two to the good.

As Edmund Arko-Mensah drove to the touchline, he cut it back to Ayiah, whose instinctive left-footed finish gave Dheeraj no chance. Ayiah, scouted by Manchester City, had been quiet all tournament but chose this night to come up trumps.

Rahim Ali, Ninthoi and Lalengmawia were brought on but could make no difference as Ghana drove on in the last few minutes. The latter, a Mizo midfielder, was shrugged off the ball far too easily as Ayiah’s replacement, Richard Danso was clear through on goal and effortlessly put it past Dheeraj.

A minute later, Ibrahim Sulley’s shot hit the post and with a diving Dheeraj caught in the wrong position, all Emmanuel Toku had to do was to place it and so he did, to compound India’s misery.

In India’s last match of the tournament, the gulf in quality between them and the rest had become painfully clear. Ghana, meanwhile, will be relieved as they qualified for the Round of 16 and are potential title contenders.

Ghana's stats on the left. (Image courtesy: Fifa.com)
Ghana's stats on the left. (Image courtesy: Fifa.com)

Against Colombia and US, Ghana had 17 and 18 shots respectively while they racked up 27 shots here. The important part of that stat for Ghana was that while they managed a 35% shooting accuracy against Colombia (6 out of 17) and 16.6% against US (3 out of 18), they managed a marginally higher 37% accuracy, but their shots on target (10) were higher than in the previous two games combined.

As India’s midfield faded badly, it gave Ghana the license to shoot, one they took gleefully. For all of the praise that India’s defenders have garnered, Dheeraj Singh still had to face 65 shots in his three matches, 25 of which were on target.

The goalkeeper has saved 16 shots, the highest of any goalie throughout the tournament so far and on the balance of it, could have been protected better by his defence and midfield. All Ghana had to do was to keep peppering the Indian goal and hope Ayiah took his chances, which he did.

The half-time stats read 48% possession in favour of India, the highest they had garnered in a single half all tournament but stray passes and Ghana’s physicality and pressing buried them in the second period.

At the end, Febin offered a damning assessment of the game, “We have watched India and were hoping that India would turn up to the party but they didn’t do so today.” One will only hope that party master De Matos was listening.

We welcome your comments at letters@scroll.in.
Sponsored Content BY 

Why should inclusion matter to companies?

It's not just about goodwill - inclusivity is a good business decision.

To reach a 50-50 workplace scenario, policies on diversity need to be paired with a culture of inclusiveness. While diversity brings equal representation in meetings, board rooms, promotions and recruitment, inclusivity helps give voice to the people who might otherwise be marginalized or excluded. Inclusion at workplace can be seen in an environment that values diverse opinions, encourages collaboration and invites people to share their ideas and perspectives. As Verna Myers, a renowned diversity advocate, puts it “Diversity is being invited to the party, inclusion is being asked to dance.”

Creating a sense of belonging for everyone is essential for a company’s success. Let’s look at some of the real benefits of a diverse and inclusive workplace:

Better decision making

A whitepaper by Cloverpop, a decision making tool, established a direct link between inclusive decision making and better business performance. The research discovered that teams that followed an inclusive decision-making process made decisions 2X faster with half the meetings and delivered 60% better results. As per Harvard Business School Professor Francesca Gino, this report highlights how diversity and inclusion are practical tools to improve decision making in companies. According to her, changing the composition of decision making teams to include different perspectives can help individuals overcome biases that affect their decisions.

Higher job satisfaction

Employee satisfaction is connected to a workplace environment that values individual ideas and creates a sense of belonging for everyone. A research by Accenture identified 40 factors that influence advancement in the workplace. An empowering work environment where employees have the freedom to be creative, innovative and themselves at work, was identified as a key driver in improving employee advancement to senior levels.


A research by Catalyst.org stated the in India, 62% of innovation is driven by employee perceptions of inclusion. The study included responses from 1,500 employees from Australia, China, Germany, India, Mexico and the United States and showed that employees who feel included are more likely to go above and beyond the call of duty, suggest new and innovative ways of getting work done.

Competitive Advantage

Shirley Engelmeier, author of ‘Inclusion: The New Competitive Business Advantage’, in her interview with Forbes, talks about the new global business normal. She points out that the rapidly changing customer base with different tastes and preferences need to feel represented by brands. An inclusive environment will future-proof the organisation to cater to the new global consumer language and give it a competitive edge.

An inclusive workplace ensures that no individual is disregarded because of their gender, race, disability, age or other social and cultural factors. Accenture has been a leading voice in advocating equal workplace. Having won several accolades including a perfect score on the Human Rights Campaign’s Corporate equality index, Accenture has demonstrated inclusive and diverse practices not only within its organisation but also in business relationships through their Supplier Inclusion and Diversity program.

In a video titled ‘She rises’, Accenture captures the importance of implementing diverse policies and creating an inclusive workplace culture.


To know more about inclusion and diversity, see here.

This article was produced by the Scroll marketing team on behalf of Accenture and not by the Scroll editorial team.