CWG 2018

CWG 2018 Hockey: Manpreet & Co look to leave Gold Coast with a bronze medal

India need to capitalise on their chances – something that they have failed to do so – to beat England and clinch the bronze.

“The game is about scoring the goals and we don’t do that enough.”

Coach Sjoerd Marijne assessment of his team seems precise, simple and brutal. The Indian men’s hockey team have created and got loads of opportunities throughout the tournament. Conversion, however, has been a problem.

In their 2-3 defeat to New Zealand in the semi-finals, India had attempted eight field goals and took nine penalty corners. And, they converted only one PC out of them. The other goal was off a penalty stroke. So, they converted just one out of the 17 chances in the game. That’s 10 more chances than what New Zealand had on Friday.

“The story of the tournament is that we have had enough penalty corners. We created enough chances but we didn’t score off those,” Marijne said.

The story of the tournament:-

First match vs Pakistan: 1/4

Second match vs Wales: 3/13

Third match vs Malaysia: 2/9

Fourth match vs England: 2/3

Fifth match vs New Zealand: 1/9

Total Penalty Corner conversions: 9/38

This is a problem that’s been plaguing India for a while now. Except the match against England, they have been poor at converting penalty corners.

And, England are whom they will face to win the bronze on Saturday. England, they beat 4-3 in the most dramatic men’s hockey match in this tournament. The second meeting might be tricky for the men in blue, for there’s the pressure of winning a medal. India haven’t returned without a medal in the last two editions of the games. With their female counterparts bowing out to England in a 0-6 loss, it’s up to the men to get the country’s hockey contingent a medal.

Support our journalism by subscribing to Scroll+ here. We welcome your comments at letters@scroll.in.
Sponsored Content BY 

Do you really need to use that plastic straw?

The hazards of single-use plastic items, and what to use instead.

In June 2018, a distressed whale in Thailand made headlines around the world. After an autopsy it’s cause of death was determined to be more than 80 plastic bags it had ingested. The pictures caused great concern and brought into focus the urgency of the fight against single-use plastic. This term refers to use-and-throw plastic products that are designed for one-time use, such as takeaway spoons and forks, polythene bags styrofoam cups etc. In its report on single-use plastics, the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) has described how single-use plastics have a far-reaching impact in the environment.

Dense quantity of plastic litter means sights such as the distressed whale in Thailand aren’t uncommon. Plastic products have been found in the airways and stomachs of hundreds of marine and land species. Plastic bags, especially, confuse turtles who mistake them for jellyfish - their food. They can even exacerbate health crises, such as a malarial outbreak, by clogging sewers and creating ideal conditions for vector-borne diseases to thrive. In 1988, poor drainage made worse by plastic clogging contributed to the devastating Bangladesh floods in which two-thirds of the country was submerged.

Plastic litter can, moreover, cause physiological harm. Burning plastic waste for cooking fuel and in open air pits releases harmful gases in the air, contributing to poor air quality especially in poorer countries where these practices are common. But plastic needn’t even be burned to cause physiological harm. The toxic chemical additives in the manufacturing process of plastics remain in animal tissue, which is then consumed by humans. These highly toxic and carcinogenic substances (benzene, styrene etc.) can cause damage to nervous systems, lungs and reproductive organs.

The European Commission recently released a list of top 10 single-use plastic items that it plans to ban in the near future. These items are ubiquitous as trash across the world’s beaches, even the pristine, seemingly untouched ones. Some of them, such as styrofoam cups, take up to a 1,000 years to photodegrade (the breakdown of substances by exposure to UV and infrared rays from sunlight), disintegrating into microplastics, another health hazard.

More than 60 countries have introduced levies and bans to discourage the use of single-use plastics. Morocco and Rwanda have emerged as inspiring success stories of such policies. Rwanda, in fact, is now among the cleanest countries on Earth. In India, Maharashtra became the 18th state to effect a ban on disposable plastic items in March 2018. Now India plans to replicate the decision on a national level, aiming to eliminate single-use plastics entirely by 2022. While government efforts are important to encourage industries to redesign their production methods, individuals too can take steps to minimise their consumption, and littering, of single-use plastics. Most of these actions are low on effort, but can cause a significant reduction in plastic waste in the environment, if the return of Olive Ridley turtles to a Mumbai beach are anything to go by.

To know more about the single-use plastics problem, visit Planet or Plastic portal, National Geographic’s multi-year effort to raise awareness about the global plastic trash crisis. From microplastics in cosmetics to haunting art on plastic pollution, Planet or Plastic is a comprehensive resource on the problem. You can take the pledge to reduce your use of single-use plastics, here.

This article was produced by the Scroll marketing team on behalf of National Geographic, and not by the Scroll editorial team.