INTERVIEW

'Emergency gave vasectomy a bad name': Indian men are not queuing up for the snip

On World Vasectomy Day, Poonam Muttreja of Population Foundation of India talks about the myths, politics and patriarchy that plague family planning.

India’s Family Planning Programme focuses almost entirely on female sterilisation. In November last year, 18 women died in sterilisation camps at Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. Apart of the abysmal conditions at such camps, the deaths also highlighted how women bear all the burden when it comes to family planning.

In September this year, the Supreme Court ordered the government to end sterilisation camps in three years. In that order, the court also noted that the centre should place more emphasis on the safer method of vasectomy, “for gender equity”.

Vasectomy involves surgically cutting or blocking the vas deferens – the tubes that transport sperm from the testicles to the penis. The procedure lasts about 20 minutes and is considered to be a safe and easy surgery.

On World Vasectomy Day, Scroll.in speaks to Poonam Muttreja, executive director of the non-profit organisation Population Foundation of India on the challenges in making vasectomy a more popular method of family planning.

Poonam Muttreja, executive director of Population Foundation of India.
Poonam Muttreja, executive director of Population Foundation of India.

How many men as compared to women opt for family planning measures?
On an average, vasectomy covers only 1% of the total number of modern contraceptive methods used by people in this country. Condom use is about 5%. Of the total, 48.5% of the total use of modern contraceptive use about 6% if used by men.

The numbers of vasectomy varies from state to state. Some north eastern states such as Assam have some of the highest rates of vasectomy – that is 10% and then it comes down drastically in Uttar Pradesh and Bihar, which is less than 1% of the total use of modern contraceptives. If you look at the graph it is a steep decline from one state to another.

Why is vasectomy not a popular method?
I think Emergency (in 1975) has affected the way we think about vasectomy (there were many allegations of forced vasectomies). It has got a very bad name, especially in UP and Bihar. There was more focus on those two states at the time.

Since then, no politician has wanted to work too much on promoting this procedure. In Bihar, Chief Minister Nitish Kumar had pushed for vasectomy a lot. But we need our frontline healthworkers such as Auxilliary Nurse and Midwife or ANM to push this technique more.

The government has also not done anything to blow the myth that men get weak after the procedure. This myth reaches women also. No woman wants her husband to become weak. Women are totally against men getting a vasectomy procedure. Most women, 63% as per our surveys, say that is legitimate for them to be beaten. Patriarchy is instilled in women as much as men.

So, it is a very complex issue involving myths, politics, and patriarchy.

Do you think the government is serious about pushing for vasectomy? Are there enough campaigns targeting men as opposed to women?
The Supreme Court has asked them to. They have to now. From November 21, they have decided to celebrate two weeks of vasectomy, and will have camps for the same. They do not have a choice.

There is also a huge shortage in many states for skilled doctors who can conduct non-scalpel vasectomy. As per the Family Welfare Statistics in India 2011, where a total of 709 primary health centres were surveyed, only 6.2% of the health centres had a skilled medical officer trained in performing vasectomy procedure. Where there is no person to perform the surgery, there will be neither demand nor supply.

But the government is now recognising the need to train more people. Earlier, all the training for doctors in family planning was conducted for tubectomy, not vasectomy.

What has the experience of men who underwent vasectomy been? Or under what circumstances do men accept to undergo vasectomy?
In general, the experience of vasectomy across caste and class is that it is not accepted. People who opt for it realise that there are no side effects. And that is is easier for men as opposed to women to undergo a sterilisation procedure.

A man usually opts for this procedure only after good counselling. We need ANMs who will go out of their way to counsel men to undergo this procedure. They have to tell men that it is a procedure that is simpler than tubectomy.

I feel that an uneducated health worker is not good enough. We need doctors and trained personnel to counsel men. Also we need key opinion leaders, and champions to push for advocating vasectomy. It cannot be a simple message by health workers.

Even giving incentives to men undergoing vasectomies has not helped much.
The government gives Rs 1,400 to a man undergoing vasectomy as compared to Rs 600 to a woman undergoing tubectomy. But men will not sell their virility, which they believe will be lost after the procedure. Even Rs 2,000 to Rs 5,000 won’t help. I would think a person who is desperate for money like say a drug addict will undergo this procedure. For very few people will Rs 1,400 be an incentive.

We do not believe in incentives for any method. It is so much better to spend money on counseling and providing good quality services. Incentives are totally useless. The failure of the use of incentives in vasectomy proves the argument that incentives do not work.

What has been the experience in other parts of the world? Are they better at promoting vasectomy?
Even in some of our neighbouring countries, such as Nepal have much higher rates of vasectomy. In Nepal, vasectomy contributes to 8% of the modern contraception use in the country.

This does have quite a bit to do with emergency. We just stopped giving services and did not train doctors to conduct vasectomy.

We welcome your comments at letters@scroll.in.
Sponsored Content BY 

Virat Kohli and Ola come together to improve Delhi's air quality

The onus of curbing air-pollution is on citizens as well

A recent study by The Lancet Journal revealed that outdoor pollution was responsible for 6% of the total disease burden in India in 2016. As a thick smog hangs low over Delhi, leaving its residents gasping for air, the pressure is on the government to implement SOS measures to curb the issue as well as introduce long-term measures to improve the air quality of the state. Other major cities like Mumbai, Pune and Kolkata should also acknowledge the gravitas of the situation.

The urgency of the air-pollution crisis in the country’s capital is being reflected on social media as well. A recent tweet by Virat Kohli, Captain of the Indian Cricket Team, urged his fans to do their bit in helping the city fight pollution. Along with the tweet, Kohli shared a video in which he emphasized that curbing pollution is everyone’s responsibility. Apart from advocating collective effort, Virat Kohli’s tweet also urged people to use buses, metros and Ola share to help reduce the number of vehicles on the road.

In the spirit of sharing the responsibility, ride sharing app Ola responded with the following tweet.

To demonstrate its commitment to fight the problem of vehicular pollution and congestion, Ola is launching #ShareWednesdays : For every ​new user who switches to #OlaShare in Delhi, their ride will be free. The offer by Ola that encourages people to share resources serves as an example of mobility solutions that can reduce the damage done by vehicular pollution. This is the fourth leg of Ola’s year-long campaign, #FarakPadtaHai, to raise awareness for congestion and pollution issues and encourage the uptake of shared mobility.

In 2016, WHO disclosed 10 Indian cities that made it on the list of worlds’ most polluted. The situation necessitates us to draw from experiences and best practices around the world to keep a check on air-pollution. For instance, a system of congestion fees which drivers have to pay when entering central urban areas was introduced in Singapore, Oslo and London and has been effective in reducing vehicular-pollution. The concept of “high occupancy vehicle” or car-pool lane, implemented extensively across the US, functions on the principle of moving more people in fewer cars, thereby reducing congestion. The use of public transport to reduce air-pollution is another widely accepted solution resulting in fewer vehicles on the road. Many communities across the world are embracing a culture of sustainable transportation by investing in bike lanes and maintenance of public transport. Even large corporations are doing their bit to reduce vehicular pollution. For instance, as a participant of the Voluntary Traffic Demand Management project in Beijing, Lenovo encourages its employees to adopt green commuting like biking, carpooling or even working from home. 18 companies in Sao Paulo executed a pilot program aimed at reducing congestion by helping people explore options such as staggering their hours, telecommuting or carpooling. After the pilot, drive-alone rates dropped from 45-51% to 27-35%.

It’s the government’s responsibility to ensure that the growth of a country doesn’t compromise the natural environment that sustains it, however, a substantial amount of responsibility also lies on each citizen to lead an environment-friendly lifestyle. Simple lifestyle changes such as being cautious about usage of electricity, using public transport, or choosing locally sourced food can help reduce your carbon footprint, the collective impact of which is great for the environment.

Ola is committed to reducing the impact of vehicular pollution on the environment by enabling and encouraging shared rides and greener mobility. They have also created flat fare zones across Delhi-NCR on Ola Share to make more environment friendly shared rides also more pocket-friendly. To ensure a larger impact, the company also took up initiatives with City Traffic Police departments, colleges, corporate parks and metro rail stations.

Join the fight against air-pollution by using the hashtag #FarakPadtaHai and download Ola to share your next ride.

This article was produced by the Scroll marketing team on behalf of Ola and not by the Scroll editorial team.