Battle lines

What Karnataka’s pitched battle between private doctors and public health activists is all about

Proposed amendments to the Karnataka Private Medical Establishment Act lead to strong opposition from private doctors.

The Karnataka government will try to pass an amendment to the Karnataka Private Medical Establishments Act, 2007 in the assembly session that begins this week in Belagavi.

However, doctors with private medical establishments have been strongly opposed to some of the proposed amendments. The Indian Medical Association in Karnataka has called for doctors to march to Belagavi on Monday to register their protest. Out-patient services in private hospitals across the state may be affected as thousands of doctors are expected to join the March. Private hospitals across the state had closed their out-patient departments on November 3 in a similar protest.

“We are not opposed to the entire Act,” said Dr Ravindra HN, president-elect Indian Medical Association. “But the health minister is trying to pass an amendment which is draconian in nature.”

The Karnataka Private Medical Establishments Act, 2007 was passed with the aim of regulating private sector medical establishments. The Act mandates registration of all private medical establishments, charts out the obligations like maintaining records, prescribes minimum standards of facilities and services provided in the private medical establishment and mandates displaying rates of various procedures. But the Act has no teeth, say health activists. The government is now trying to strengthen the law to include prices caps for medical treatments and procedures and to strengthen grievance redressal systems.

Public health activists in the state have welcomed these changes.

“We need some control mechanism that can take action against those who violate patients rights or medical ethics,” said Narsimha Murthy from Slum Janandolana Karnataka that works for the rights of slum dwellers.

Murthy recalled a case from 2016, when his organisation tried to help file a case against a nursing home in Tumkur for inflated bills. The nursing home treating a man who had consumed poison told his family that we had to be kept on ventilator for two days but then kept him on the ventilator for 10 days instead.

“We tried to file a police complaint,” said Murthy. “After first agreeing to file a complaint, the police later tried to file a complaint against the patient and harassed them.”

Murthy said that Slum Janandolana Karnataka had seen many such complaints where the private medical facilities have harassed poor patients who had no legal recourse. This despite Karnataka having a statewide law to regulate private medical establishments.

The Slum Janandolana Karnataka is among the 16 organisations of health activists, labour rights organisations, sex workers, and women’s rights groups that have pushed for the amendments to the Act, which they believe is pro-people.

Karnataka passed the Karnataka Private Medical Establishments Act three years before the union government passed its Clinical Establishments Act – a law to regulate all health establishments in the country – in 2010. But only 11 states and union territories adopted the Clinical Establishments Act so far.

Yet, Karnataka has not been able to implement the Karnataka Private Medical Establishments Act, properly. For instance, several private medical establishments are still not registered by district authorities.

“We agree that the implementation has not been good,” said Kumar. “We feel the amendment will help us implement the Act better.”

While some news reports suggest that Karnataka Chief Minister Siddaramaiah will review the The Karnataka Private Medical Establishments (Amendment) Bill, 2017, the Health Minister Ramesh Kumar maintained that the Bill will be passed in its current form.

“We are going ahead with the Amendment Bill,” said Kumar. “We believe these private medical establishments need to be regulated. There is a large information asymmetry between the medical establishments and the patients. The establishments know a lot while the patients know too little.”

Taking note of the protests against the amendments, the state government made some concessions by tweaking the Bill earlier this month. One of the changes is addition of a provision that says no court can take cognisance of a complaint against a private medical establishment unless the district authority that registers such establishments submits a complaint to the court in writing. But these changes have not appeased protesting doctors.

No legal framework for patients’ rights violations

The Amendment Bill makes a significant change by drawing up a patients’ charter that talks about the right of the patient to receive care irrespective of caste, social status, and gender. The Bill emphasises the importance of informed consent with patients being given complete information including about costs procedures, risks and benefits before the treatment is started.

The Bill also proposes the creation of district grievance redressal committees that can look into complaints, especially about violations of patients rights. This, the Indian Medical Association says, is unnecessary.

“We have the legal framework to handle such complaints,” said Ravindra. “We have the Consumer Protection Act, or [a patient can] lodge a complaint with the Karnataka Medical Council. If it fits, [a patient] can also file criminal cases in the court.”

However, the current laws do not work to protect patients’ rights, said Akhila Vasan who works with the health right movement Karnataka Janaarogya Chaluvali. Vasan cited the cases from 2015, when private hospitals in Kalburgi district were reported to have performed thousands of unnecessary hysterectomies on women just to be able to charge for the procedures. During an enquiry by district health authorities, many hospitals refused to part with their documents. In 2016, the people running these errant private establishments could only be booked for non maintenance of records under the Karnataka Private Medical Establishments Act, relevant sections of Pre Conception and Pre Natal Diagnostic Techniques Act, 1995 and the Bio Medical Waste (Management and Handling) Rules, 1998.

“In cases of gross violation of rights of the patients, the [current] Karnataka Private Medical Establishments Act is inadequate,” said Vasan.

The Amendment Bill extends the section on penalties. In the 2007 Act, only people who ran medical establishments could be penalised. These penalties were for running medical establishments without registration (a maximum jail term of seven years and a fine) and not maintaining clinical records (six months in jail and fine). The amendment proposes penalising doctors for not displaying rates for treatments on the premises of their establishments.

Price caps

The clause that doctors are most worried about is the one that proposed capping prices for medical procedures and treatments.

Ravindra said that the government has no right to fix rates for treatment and procedure. “They can only fix rates for state health insurance schemes,” he said.

Dr BS Ajaikumar, president of the Association of Healthcare Providers India, said for years the private sector cross-subsidising healthcare, charging rich patients more while charging poorer patients at concession rates. “If the price is fixed, many nursing homes in the rural areas will shut down (because they will not be able to cope with prices),” he said. “We cannot have the same price for a procedure from Bengaluru to Belur (a town in Hassan district of Karnataka).”

Vasan said that there is no basis to the statement that smaller establishments will shut down because of price caps.

Other public health experts pointed out that the private healthcare sector has found ways around price cap before. “When the price of stents were capped, the private sector decided to increase the rates of procedures and doctors fees,” said Dr Abhay Shukla, who works with the health rights organisation Saathi in Pune. “We have to understand that health care is essential services. Nobody wants to buy hospitalisation care. People spend on health care under duress.”

He said that the government can consider differential pricing for rural and urban areas.

Why not include public hospitals?

The IMA also also said that the Bill was discriminatory because it does not bring public sector hospitals into its ambit. “The private sector covers 80% of the health sector, and are filling in for the government,” said Ajaikumar. “They do not mind lower standards for public sector, whereas higher standards for us.”

Health Minister Kumar said that the government already works under a framework under the Directorate of Health Services that keeps their establishments accountable. Besides, the standards for the hospitals are already set by the central government under the Indian Public Health Standards.

Shukla disagrees on this count and believes that public health facilities, which have additional responsibilities of providing free immunisation, carrying out disease surveillance and handling epidemics, can also be held to the same standards as private facilities. “While we can agree public medical facilities need to have standards and should be regulated, we should perhaps have a caveat that they cannot shut down if the standards are not met,” he said. “The drop in standards should be treated as an emergency and should be improved.”

Other activists agree that there should be better standards for government hospitals too, but since more people access private hospitals, they need to be more transparent.

“We direct people who ask for our help to the public sector, but often the private hospitals are nearby,” said Gauri from Mahila Munnade, a women’s rights organisation. “Many women have complained that they have been given exorbitant bills. We have not been able to get any help for them. We need the government to have some control over them.”

Said Vasan, “If [private medical establishments] provide 80% care in the health sector, then you should also be regulated democratically accountable.”

We welcome your comments at
Sponsored Content BY 

Relying on the power of habits to solve India’s mammoth sanitation problem

Adopting three simple habits can help maximise the benefits of existing sanitation infrastructure.

India’s sanitation problem is well documented – the country was recently declared as having the highest number of people living without basic sanitation facilities. Sanitation encompasses all conditions relating to public health - especially sewage disposal and access to clean drinking water. Due to associated losses in productivity caused by sickness, increased healthcare costs and increased mortality, India recorded a loss of 5.2% of its GDP to poor sanitation in 2015. As tremendous as the economic losses are, the on-ground, human consequences of poor sanitation are grim - about one in 10 deaths, according to the World Bank.

Poor sanitation contributes to about 10% of the world’s disease burden and is linked to even those diseases that may not present any correlation at first. For example, while lack of nutrition is a direct cause of anaemia, poor sanitation can contribute to the problem by causing intestinal diseases which prevent people from absorbing nutrition from their food. In fact, a study found a correlation between improved sanitation and reduced prevalence of anaemia in 14 Indian states. Diarrhoeal diseases, the most well-known consequence of poor sanitation, are the third largest cause of child mortality in India. They are also linked to undernutrition and stunting in children - 38% of Indian children exhibit stunted growth. Improved sanitation can also help reduce prevalence of neglected tropical diseases (NTDs). Though not a cause of high mortality rate, NTDs impair physical and cognitive development, contribute to mother and child illness and death and affect overall productivity. NTDs caused by parasitic worms - such as hookworms, whipworms etc. - infect millions every year and spread through open defecation. Improving toilet access and access to clean drinking water can significantly boost disease control programmes for diarrhoea, NTDs and other correlated conditions.

Unfortunately, with about 732 million people who have no access to toilets, India currently accounts for more than half of the world population that defecates in the open. India also accounts for the largest rural population living without access to clean water. Only 16% of India’s rural population is currently served by piped water.

However, there is cause for optimism. In the three years of Swachh Bharat Abhiyan, the country’s sanitation coverage has risen from 39% to 65% and eight states and Union Territories have been declared open defecation free. But lasting change cannot be ensured by the proliferation of sanitation infrastructure alone. Ensuring the usage of toilets is as important as building them, more so due to the cultural preference for open defecation in rural India.

According to the World Bank, hygiene promotion is essential to realise the potential of infrastructure investments in sanitation. Behavioural intervention is most successful when it targets few behaviours with the most potential for impact. An area of public health where behavioural training has made an impact is WASH - water, sanitation and hygiene - a key issue of UN Sustainable Development Goal 6. Compliance to WASH practices has the potential to reduce illness and death, poverty and improve overall socio-economic development. The UN has even marked observance days for each - World Water Day for water (22 March), World Toilet Day for sanitation (19 November) and Global Handwashing Day for hygiene (15 October).

At its simplest, the benefits of WASH can be availed through three simple habits that safeguard against disease - washing hands before eating, drinking clean water and using a clean toilet. Handwashing and use of toilets are some of the most important behavioural interventions that keep diarrhoeal diseases from spreading, while clean drinking water is essential to prevent water-borne diseases and adverse health effects of toxic contaminants. In India, Hindustan Unilever Limited launched the Swachh Aadat Swachh Bharat initiative, a WASH behaviour change programme, to complement the Swachh Bharat Abhiyan. Through its on-ground behaviour change model, SASB seeks to promote the three basic WASH habits to create long-lasting personal hygiene compliance among the populations it serves.

This touching film made as a part of SASB’s awareness campaign shows how lack of knowledge of basic hygiene practices means children miss out on developmental milestones due to preventable diseases.


SASB created the Swachhata curriculum, a textbook to encourage adoption of personal hygiene among school going children. It makes use of conceptual learning to teach primary school students about cleanliness, germs and clean habits in an engaging manner. Swachh Basti is an extensive urban outreach programme for sensitising urban slum residents about WASH habits through demos, skits and etc. in partnership with key local stakeholders such as doctors, anganwadi workers and support groups. In Ghatkopar, Mumbai, HUL built the first-of-its-kind Suvidha Centre - an urban water, hygiene and sanitation community centre. It provides toilets, handwashing and shower facilities, safe drinking water and state-of-the-art laundry operations at an affordable cost to about 1,500 residents of the area.

HUL’s factory workers also act as Swachhata Doots, or messengers of change who teach the three habits of WASH in their own villages. This mobile-led rural behaviour change communication model also provides a volunteering opportunity to those who are busy but wish to make a difference. A toolkit especially designed for this purpose helps volunteers approach, explain and teach people in their immediate vicinity - their drivers, cooks, domestic helps etc. - about the three simple habits for better hygiene. This helps cast the net of awareness wider as regular interaction is conducive to habit formation. To learn more about their volunteering programme, click here. To learn more about the Swachh Aadat Swachh Bharat initiative, click here.

This article was produced by the Scroll marketing team on behalf of Hindustan Unilever and not by the Scroll editorial team.