short films

Watch: In just 12 minutes, Satyajit Ray’s ‘Two’ maps the class divide

Two boys, one rich and the other poor, show off their toys.

Satyajit Ray was only the second Indian to win an Oscar after Bhanu Athaiya. While Athaiya got hers for the costumes for Richard Attenborough’s 1982 biopic Gandhi, Ray was awarded his in 1991 for a lifetime of achievements, starting with Pather Panchali in 1955. The filmmaker was severely ill when he was given the award, and he died the following year.

Apart from features and documentaries, Ray made two fictional shorts. The better known is Pikoo (1980), which explores a young boy’s world against a backdrop of adults at play (his mother is having an extra-marital affair, for one thing). The behaviour of children in the absence of adults features more prominently in Two (also known as Parable of Two). Made in 1964, the same year as Ray’s masterpiece Charulata, the dialogue-less film is a sharply observed account of the encounter between two boys, one privileged and plump and the other poor and lean.

The unnamed rich boy, who is alone at home, keeps himself occupied by playing with his numerous toys, but he is soon distracted by the sound of a flute being played by a child from the shack next door. The rich boy’s competitive instincts are aroused, and he decides to match his rival, one toy at a time. But this game has only one winner.

The 12-minute film’s restored version is available on the YouTube channel maintained by the Academy Picture Archive. “Two was made as part of a trilogy of short films from India that were commissioned by the US Public Television under the banner of Esso World Theater,” said the online resource “The other two films featured Pandit Ravi Shankar and a ballet troupe from Bombay. Ray was asked to make a film in English in a Bengali setting. Not very happy with the prospect, he opted to do away with the spoken word. A great admirer of the silent cinema, Ray pays a tribute to the genre.”

Two (1964).
Support our journalism by subscribing to Scroll+ here. We welcome your comments at
Sponsored Content BY 

Do you really need to use that plastic straw?

The hazards of single-use plastic items, and what to use instead.

In June 2018, a distressed whale in Thailand made headlines around the world. After an autopsy it’s cause of death was determined to be more than 80 plastic bags it had ingested. The pictures caused great concern and brought into focus the urgency of the fight against single-use plastic. This term refers to use-and-throw plastic products that are designed for one-time use, such as takeaway spoons and forks, polythene bags styrofoam cups etc. In its report on single-use plastics, the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) has described how single-use plastics have a far-reaching impact in the environment.

Dense quantity of plastic litter means sights such as the distressed whale in Thailand aren’t uncommon. Plastic products have been found in the airways and stomachs of hundreds of marine and land species. Plastic bags, especially, confuse turtles who mistake them for jellyfish - their food. They can even exacerbate health crises, such as a malarial outbreak, by clogging sewers and creating ideal conditions for vector-borne diseases to thrive. In 1988, poor drainage made worse by plastic clogging contributed to the devastating Bangladesh floods in which two-thirds of the country was submerged.

Plastic litter can, moreover, cause physiological harm. Burning plastic waste for cooking fuel and in open air pits releases harmful gases in the air, contributing to poor air quality especially in poorer countries where these practices are common. But plastic needn’t even be burned to cause physiological harm. The toxic chemical additives in the manufacturing process of plastics remain in animal tissue, which is then consumed by humans. These highly toxic and carcinogenic substances (benzene, styrene etc.) can cause damage to nervous systems, lungs and reproductive organs.

The European Commission recently released a list of top 10 single-use plastic items that it plans to ban in the near future. These items are ubiquitous as trash across the world’s beaches, even the pristine, seemingly untouched ones. Some of them, such as styrofoam cups, take up to a 1,000 years to photodegrade (the breakdown of substances by exposure to UV and infrared rays from sunlight), disintegrating into microplastics, another health hazard.

More than 60 countries have introduced levies and bans to discourage the use of single-use plastics. Morocco and Rwanda have emerged as inspiring success stories of such policies. Rwanda, in fact, is now among the cleanest countries on Earth. In India, Maharashtra became the 18th state to effect a ban on disposable plastic items in March 2018. Now India plans to replicate the decision on a national level, aiming to eliminate single-use plastics entirely by 2022. While government efforts are important to encourage industries to redesign their production methods, individuals too can take steps to minimise their consumption, and littering, of single-use plastics. Most of these actions are low on effort, but can cause a significant reduction in plastic waste in the environment, if the return of Olive Ridley turtles to a Mumbai beach are anything to go by.

To know more about the single-use plastics problem, visit Planet or Plastic portal, National Geographic’s multi-year effort to raise awareness about the global plastic trash crisis. From microplastics in cosmetics to haunting art on plastic pollution, Planet or Plastic is a comprehensive resource on the problem. You can take the pledge to reduce your use of single-use plastics, here.

This article was produced by the Scroll marketing team on behalf of National Geographic, and not by the Scroll editorial team.