say it loud

PEN raises concerns about India using outdated laws to curb free speech

The international advocacy group has released a report on every law in India that curbs unbound expression.

The global free speech advocacy group PEN International has raised concerns in a new report “about the use of outmoded legislation to stifle free expression in India”.

Written in collaboration with PEN Canada and the International Human Rights Program at the University of Toronto, the nearly 150-page report released on May 20 provides a comprehensive overview of the laws governing free speech in the country. Going beyond this, it also suggests a new direction for the government and courts to take.

The timing of the report is spot on. If evidence was needed of India’s conflicted relationship with freedom of expression, the events of the last few months have provided enough.

In March, the Supreme Court struck down Section 66A of the Information Technology Act that threatened internet users with 3-5 years in jail for sending “grossly offensive” or “menacing” information. Last week, another apex court bench ruled that freedom of speech cannot be absolute when it came to “contemporary community standards” and could not be applied to historical figures.

Then there is the example of Delhi politics. During and after his Assembly election campaign, Arvind Kejriwal widely denounced the law against criminal defamation. On May 6, however, he issued an internal circular that asked government officials to apply that law against media houses which covered them negatively. The Supreme Court struck down this notice on May 14.

Even the Centre has gone through similar flip-flops. When the Supreme Court asked the Bharatiya Janata Party-led government for its position on Section 66A, the government defended it, saying it was a necessary check for preventing cyber crime. This was the same section the saffron party had criticised during United Progressive Alliance’s second term.

The PEN report points out that India has not submitted a single report on compliance with the International Covenant on Civil, Cultural and Political Rights since 1996. While countries tend to be tardy too with compliance reports on this covenant – the US, for instance, submitted one report seven years late, but has since kept up – the deadline for India’s fourth period report was 14 years ago, in 2001.

Why the report on India?

“As the world’s largest democracy, with more than a sixth of humanity affected by its laws and legal system, we felt that it was important to actively begin work in the region,” said Tasleem Thawar, executive director of PEN Canada and an editor of the report.

The free speech advocates have been working together since 2012 to create country reports, starting with Mexico that year. Their last report, on the Honduras, was released in January 2014.

The group chose India as their next project, Thawar said, after seeing media reports about banned books, intimidation of journalists, and citizens facing charges for online activity. This period also coincided with the creation of a second PEN India centre in Delhi.

The research period of the report began in 2013 and ended the day before the Bharatiya Janata Party was voted into power. Much has changed since and this turned out to be a challenge for the writers of the report.

“We were updating the report constantly, including after the Supreme Court ruling on Section 66A,” Thawar said. “We were also very lucky to have people like Apar Gupta, who represented the People’s Union for Civil Liberties in the case, write on these current events for the report at very short notice.”

Changing situation

At a time when courts and the government are rapidly amending, implementing and interpreting a large number of laws that govern freedom of expression, the report provides a lucid overview of the legal situation today and where it should ideally go.

“It has now been one year since the change in office,” said Thawar. “Though the courts, in overturning Section 66A for example, have made some improvements, recent government actions are worrying.” She pointed to the use of the Foreign Contributions Regulation Act to freeze Greenpeace India’s bank accounts that might frighten all NGOs who critique government policy. The new panel of the Central Board of Film Certification is also a concern, she said.

Case studies like these cushion the report’s wider and deeper overview of all the laws, regulatory and criminal, that are used regularly to curb freedom of expression.

Several other countries do not require jail time for regulatory offences, the report states, but in India there is very little difference between the two. Criminal laws include blasphemy, sedition, publications that “appear” to violate the Indian Penal Code, promoting enmity and speaking against national integration. On the other hand, regulatory offences govern organisations, from movie censorship to cable regulations to the monitoring of foreign contributions to prevent them from being used to critique Indian sovereignty.

The most dangerous laws, such as the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, are those that are vaguely worded and can therefore be used indiscriminately to muzzle dissent, the report says.

We welcome your comments at letters@scroll.in.
Sponsored Content  BY 

As India turns 70, London School of Economics asks some provocative questions

Is India ready to become a global superpower?

Meaningful changes have always been driven by the right, but inconvenient questions. As India completes 70 years of its sovereign journey, we could do two things – celebrate, pay our token tributes and move on, or take the time to reflect and assess if our course needs correction. The ‘India @ 70: LSE India Summit’, the annual flagship summit of the LSE (London School of Economics) South Asia Centre, is posing some fundamental but complex questions that define our future direction as a nation. Through an honest debate – built on new research, applied knowledge and ground realities – with an eclectic mix of thought leaders and industry stalwarts, this summit hopes to create a thought-provoking discourse.

From how relevant (or irrelevant) is our constitutional framework, to how we can beat the global one-upmanship games, from how sincere are business houses in their social responsibility endeavours to why water is so crucial to our very existence as a strong nation, these are some crucial questions that the event will throw up and face head-on, even as it commemorates the 70th anniversary of India’s independence.

Is it time to re-look at constitution and citizenship in India?

The Constitution of India is fundamental to the country’s identity as a democratic power. But notwithstanding its historical authority, is it perhaps time to examine its relevance? The Constitution was drafted at a time when independent India was still a young entity. So granting overwhelming powers to the government may have helped during the early years. But in the current times, they may prove to be more discriminatory than egalitarian. Our constitution borrowed laws from other countries and continues to retain them, while the origin countries have updated them since then. So, do we need a complete overhaul of the constitution? An expert panel led by Dr Mukulika Banerjee of LSE, including political and economic commentator S Gurumurthy, Madhav Khosla of Columbia University, Niraja Gopal Jayal of JNU, Chintan Chandrachud the author of the book Balanced Constitutionalism and sociologist, legal researcher and Director of Council for Social Development Kalpana Kannabiran will seek answers to this.

Is CSR simply forced philanthropy?

While India pioneered the mandatory minimum CSR spend, has it succeeded in driving impact? Corporate social responsibility has many dynamics at play. Are CSR initiatives mere tokenism for compliance? Despite government guidelines and directives, are CSR activities well-thought out initiatives, which are monitored and measured for impact? The CSR stipulations have also spawned the proliferation of ambiguous NGOs. The session, ‘Does forced philanthropy work – CSR in India?” will raise these questions of intent, ethics and integrity. It will be moderated by Professor Harry Barkema and have industry veterans such as Mukund Rajan (Chairman, Tata Council for Community Initiatives), Onkar S Kanwar (Chairman and CEO, Apollo Tyres), Anu Aga (former Chairman, Thermax) and Rahul Bajaj (Chairman, Bajaj Group) on the panel.

Can India punch above its weight to be considered on par with other super-powers?

At 70, can India mobilize its strengths and galvanize into the role of a serious power player on the global stage? The question is related to the whole new perception of India as a dominant power in South Asia rather than as a Third World country, enabled by our foreign policies, defense strategies and a buoyant economy. The country’s status abroad is key in its emergence as a heavyweight but the foreign service officers’ cadre no longer draws top talent. Is India equipped right for its aspirations? The ‘India Abroad: From Third World to Regional Power’ panel will explore India’s foreign policy with Ashley Tellis, Meera Shankar (Former Foreign Secretary), Kanwal Sibal (Former Foreign Secretary), Jayant Prasad and Rakesh Sood.

Are we under-estimating how critical water is in India’s race ahead?

At no other time has water as a natural resource assumed such a big significance. Studies estimate that by 2025 the country will become ‘water–stressed’. While water has been the bone of contention between states and controlling access to water, a source for political power, has water security received the due attention in economic policies and development plans? Relevant to the central issue of water security is also the issue of ‘virtual water’. Virtual water corresponds to the water content (used) in goods and services, bulk of which is in food grains. Through food grain exports, India is a large virtual net exporter of water. In 2014-15, just through export of rice, India exported 10 trillion litres of virtual water. With India’s water security looking grim, are we making the right economic choices? Acclaimed author and academic from the Institute of Economic Growth, Delhi, Amita Bavisar will moderate the session ‘Does India need virtual water?’

Delve into this rich confluence of ideas and more at the ‘India @ 70: LSE India Summit’, presented by Apollo Tyres in association with the British Council and organized by Teamworks Arts during March 29-31, 2017 at the India Habitat Centre, New Delhi. To catch ‘India @ 70’ live online, register here.

At the venue, you could also visit the Partition Museum. Dedicated to the memory of one of the most conflict-ridden chapters in our country’s history, the museum will exhibit a unique archive of rare photographs, letters, press reports and audio recordings from The Partition Museum, Amritsar.

This article was produced by the Scroll marketing team on behalf of Teamwork Arts and not by the Scroll editorial team.