Opening this week

Film review: In 'Tanu Weds Manu Returns', Kangana Ranaut has twice the fun

Kangana Ranaut plays a double role in the sequel to her 2011 hit 'Tanu Weds Manu', but the second one isn't as effective as the first.

Unwilling to pass up the opportunity of cashing in on a hit, Aanand L Rai brings together the main cast that enlivened 2011’s Tanu Weds Manu for a reunion. It’s more cheerful and crowded than the first movie but just as conservative. Romantic rebellion is relegated to its rightful place and adventurers are allowed to wander but are yanked back just in time.

The 2011 comedy saw the unlikely coupling of Kanpur wild child Tanu (Kangana Ranaut) and stoic London-based doctor Manu (R Madhavan) after a series of encounters that depicted India as the smallest place on the planet, rife with coincidences and bound together by only a few degrees of separation. In the sequel, the world has shrunk even further, in inverse proportion to Madhavan’s girth. Madhavan ambles into the battleground of divorce armed with moobs, a few chins and a waistline that makes him even more sluggish than before.

His marriage to Tanu has fallen apart, which is hardly surprising, given how mismatched their personalities were. In the dungeon-like mental asylum in Twickenham in England to which they have come seeking help (since couples’ counsellors have abandoned the UK for brighter prospects), Tanu declares war on Manu. She returns to Kanpur, slips back into her outré self, and raises the temperatures of tenant Chintu (Mohammed Zeeshan Ayyub) and Raja (Jimmy Shergill), her ex-boyfriend from the previous movie.

Manu, who also flees England, loses his heart to Tanu-lookalike Kusum (Ranaut again), a Haryanvi athlete who shares with her doppelganger a stubbornly independent streak and verbal sharpness. Despite her blunt ways, Kusum turns out to be a lovely soul. One of the nicest ideas in Himanshu Sharma’s story and screenplay is that even on the rebound, all Manu really wants is a better Tanu.

Crowded house

While the first movie balanced the impulses of its leads, the follow-up belongs to Ranaut. She has moved several paces ahead since 2011, and is in fine form as Kusum, combing spontaneity and winsomeness to bring to life a sweet and well-observed character. (Tanu is as screechy and one-note as ever.) Kusum might look like Tanu, but the similarity ends there, and both director and actor never allow one to be mistaken for the other.

Rai, who also made Raanjhanaa in 2013, confirms his ability to conjure up a convincing small-town milieu characterised by clamour and kitsch, but his tendency to cram his frames with lots of people crisscrossing the screen, overlapping dialogue and insistent background music results in a sensory overdose. There are too many characters packed into a 128-minute narrative that is supposed to be about a couple trying to make the best of their marriage. (The returnees include Swara Bhaskar’s Payal, who has her own crisis to face.)

Tanu Weds Manu Returns badly wants to be described as zany, and Himanshu Sharma belts out so many hilarious one-liners you'd think his life depended on it. The movie doesn’t have the patience to stick with one thought, and the frenetic turn of events calms down for a sequence as baffling as it is enchanting: Tanu wanders in a daze through Jhajjar, where she has arrived to settle scores with Manu, to the strains of the song Ja Ja Ja Ja Bewafa from Aar Paar.

The film’s tendency to overplay its hand is best symbolised by Manu’s buddy Pappi (Deepak Dobriyal), who has undergone a drastic mood shift towards mania since we last met him. Dobriyal is a fine actor, capable of conveying a great deal through minimal gestures, but perhaps to overcompensate for Manu’s mild catatonia, he behaves as though he is in a story about consuming uppers rather than a rom-com.

The sequel does distinguish itself from its predecessor, but one character remains unruffled by the new circumstances: stoic, solid, boring Manu, perfect exhibit for the arranged marriage market and every feisty Indian woman’s nightmare. Why Tanu wed Manu was a riddle. In this movie, why Kusum adores Manu will remain one of the great unsolved mysteries of all time.

Support our journalism by subscribing to Scroll+ here. We welcome your comments at
Sponsored Content BY 

Do you really need to use that plastic straw?

The hazards of single-use plastic items, and what to use instead.

In June 2018, a distressed whale in Thailand made headlines around the world. After an autopsy it’s cause of death was determined to be more than 80 plastic bags it had ingested. The pictures caused great concern and brought into focus the urgency of the fight against single-use plastic. This term refers to use-and-throw plastic products that are designed for one-time use, such as takeaway spoons and forks, polythene bags styrofoam cups etc. In its report on single-use plastics, the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) has described how single-use plastics have a far-reaching impact in the environment.

Dense quantity of plastic litter means sights such as the distressed whale in Thailand aren’t uncommon. Plastic products have been found in the airways and stomachs of hundreds of marine and land species. Plastic bags, especially, confuse turtles who mistake them for jellyfish - their food. They can even exacerbate health crises, such as a malarial outbreak, by clogging sewers and creating ideal conditions for vector-borne diseases to thrive. In 1988, poor drainage made worse by plastic clogging contributed to the devastating Bangladesh floods in which two-thirds of the country was submerged.

Plastic litter can, moreover, cause physiological harm. Burning plastic waste for cooking fuel and in open air pits releases harmful gases in the air, contributing to poor air quality especially in poorer countries where these practices are common. But plastic needn’t even be burned to cause physiological harm. The toxic chemical additives in the manufacturing process of plastics remain in animal tissue, which is then consumed by humans. These highly toxic and carcinogenic substances (benzene, styrene etc.) can cause damage to nervous systems, lungs and reproductive organs.

The European Commission recently released a list of top 10 single-use plastic items that it plans to ban in the near future. These items are ubiquitous as trash across the world’s beaches, even the pristine, seemingly untouched ones. Some of them, such as styrofoam cups, take up to a 1,000 years to photodegrade (the breakdown of substances by exposure to UV and infrared rays from sunlight), disintegrating into microplastics, another health hazard.

More than 60 countries have introduced levies and bans to discourage the use of single-use plastics. Morocco and Rwanda have emerged as inspiring success stories of such policies. Rwanda, in fact, is now among the cleanest countries on Earth. In India, Maharashtra became the 18th state to effect a ban on disposable plastic items in March 2018. Now India plans to replicate the decision on a national level, aiming to eliminate single-use plastics entirely by 2022. While government efforts are important to encourage industries to redesign their production methods, individuals too can take steps to minimise their consumption, and littering, of single-use plastics. Most of these actions are low on effort, but can cause a significant reduction in plastic waste in the environment, if the return of Olive Ridley turtles to a Mumbai beach are anything to go by.

To know more about the single-use plastics problem, visit Planet or Plastic portal, National Geographic’s multi-year effort to raise awareness about the global plastic trash crisis. From microplastics in cosmetics to haunting art on plastic pollution, Planet or Plastic is a comprehensive resource on the problem. You can take the pledge to reduce your use of single-use plastics, here.

This article was produced by the Scroll marketing team on behalf of National Geographic, and not by the Scroll editorial team.