Bank Report

Urjit Patel debuted with a rate cut but even he knows your EMIs may not come down any time soon

The Reserve Bank, the government and industry are all keenly watching how much of the benefit banks will pass on to consumers.

Like a top-order batsman sent out to accelerate the run rate after a slow first few overs in a Twenty20 match, Reserve Bank of India Governor Urjit Patel debuted with a six – well, almost. Patel headed the first meeting of the Monetary Policy Committee on Tuesday and decided to slash the repo rate by 0.25% to bring it down to 6.25% in light of sustaining growth in the economy as demand and investment slow down. But, will Patel's opening stroke prove enough to cement a strong innings?

The repo rate is the rate at which the RBI lends to banks and as this rate gets lower, banks get cheaper and greater access to credit that they are then expected to pass on to their customers in the form of lower interest rates on their loans.

Patel’s predecessor at the central bank, Raghuram Rajan, had held off on cutting rates despite being persistently nudged to do so by markets and politicians. Citing inflationary pressures, he had maintained that rate cuts would come only after inflation was brought under check.

Now, his successor and former deputy has gone ahead and made the cut. But nobody is sure if and when it will have the desired impact on the economy.

Inflation watch

Many Rajan critics, batting for lower rates while citing growth concerns, argued that rate cuts would prompt banks to lower interest rates on lending. That, subsequently, would make it easier for businesses to finance their projects and get investment going. But that is just bad economics in the long run since sustained inflation for a period of time can stifle growth rather than boost it.

Patel knows this well. That is perhaps why, when he made the rate cut on Tuesday, he also cautioned against future inflation risks. He said the easing of the monetary policy stance should not be seen as a regular feature of the RBI’s bi-monthly review as inflation has to be watched closely.

However, he indicated that the RBI would seek to achieve an inflation rate of 4% with a margin of 2% on either side in the medium term, that is, 2021, implying that expectations of taming inflation before 2018 stood null and void, according to a report in The Hindu.

Passing it on

Corporate executives and rating agencies are cheering the rate cut, hoping it will transmit to the financial economy and people will have more money in their hands to spend by the end of the year. But this has never proved easy – banks tend to be reluctant to cut rates as fast as the RBI would like them to.

Voicing this concern, Patel said, “I agree that the transmission to bank lending and to bank borrowers has been less than any one of us would have liked.”

However, he expressed hope that with the new measures introduced by the central bank – such as the Marginal Cost Lending Rate or MCLR – the rate cuts would transmit better in the near future. “We are hoping that over the next quarter or two, keeping in mind that the government has also reduced the small savings rate, the MCLR calculation will throw up more transmission.”

This was something that haunted Rajan as well. According to the Economic Survey of India, 2015, banks dropped their rates by only 50 basis points when the RBI cut rates by 150 points. “Perhaps more important at this juncture is to ensure that current and past policy rate cuts transmit to lending rates,” the survey said.

While the RBI would like banks to transmit rates as soon as it cuts or raises them, the banks remain non-committal. Even the government-run State Bank of India said it would ease rates based on the “evolving liquidity situation”.

“The committee’s decision to cut the repo rate by 25 basis points was on expected lines, and with benign inflation trajectory going forward, the RBI’s policy stance is expected to remain accommodative,” SBI chief Arundhati Bhattacharya said. “Banks will continue to transmit rates based on the evolving liquidity scenario.”

According to experts, one reason for the slow transmission of monetary policy in the economy is the small savings rate. They said schemes such as the Kisan Vikas Patra turn out to be relatively more lucrative when interest rates on bank deposits go down – something the banks don’t want.

The government, however, has been working to review the small savings rate more often and it cut rates for provident fund by a marginal 0.1% just last week, the second cut this year after a more substantial slash earlier in the year.

The RBI, on its part, hopes that there are reasons beyond the small saving deposits that prompt bankers to cut rates.

“The easy liquidity conditions engendered by the Reserve Bank’s operations should also enable the smooth transmission of the policy action through various market segments,” the RBI said in a statement. “Furthermore, banks should find added impetus for better transmission by the recent downward adjustment in small savings rates.”

Even industry is looking to the banks in anticipation of rate cuts being transmitted quickly.

“The rate cut should spur growth and the corporate sector should see it as an encouraging move to foster investment,” Deepak Premnarayen, president of the Indian Merchants Chamber, told Firstpost. “However, the speed of transmission of this rate cut would be an important determinant.”


But, the road to actual rate cuts isn’t as easy as it seems. In August, it was reported that the RBI would come up with a new formula to derive lending rates through the Marginal Cost of Lending Rate, which impacts the rate of deposits. According to SBI’s Bhattacharya, 40% of deposits are in savings or current accounts that are interest-rate agnostic, implying that they don’t transmit RBI rate cuts. Hence, the remaining 60% of deposits is where there is scope to cut rates.

“So, since there has been a rate cut of 150 basis points and if you multiply by 60%, then we have already passed on 90 basis points. So, whatever could be passed on, we have already passed on,” she told the Hindu in August. “Transmission is not something that is a one-on-one relationship. It has to happen keeping a lot of things in mind.”

Studies suggest there could be other reasons why the RBI rate cuts do not get transmitted. According to one study published by researchers from the Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research, the formal banking sector is grossly limited in its reach and hence transmission, even if it happens, is unlikely to change the level of aggregate demand in the economy to a great degree.

“The small size of that [formal banking] sector limits the reach of the monetary policy, thus reducing its impact on the economy,” the study noted, adding that whenever it can reach the customers, the costs are too high for financial intermediation to actually reflect monetary policy changes.

“The second [reason] is that costly intermediation likely implies a sharply rising marginal cost of intermediation as banks try to serve smaller and more opaque borrowers, so even for the share of the economy that is served by the formal financial sector, central bank actions may have weak effects on the supply of bank lending.”

We welcome your comments at
Sponsored Content BY 

India’s urban water crisis calls for an integrated approach

We need solutions that address different aspects of the water eco-system and involve the collective participation of citizens and other stake-holders.

According to a UN report, around 1.2 billion people, or almost one fifth of the world’s population, live in areas where water is physically scarce and another 1.6 billion people, or nearly one quarter of the world’s population, face economic water shortage. They lack basic access to water. The criticality of the water situation across the world has in fact given rise to speculations over water wars becoming a distinct possibility in the future. In India the problem is compounded, given the rising population and urbanization. The Asian Development Bank has forecast that by 2030, India will have a water deficit of 50%.

Water challenges in urban India

For urban India, the situation is critical. In 2015, about 377 million Indians lived in urban areas and by 2030, the urban population is expected to rise to 590 million. Already, according to the National Sample Survey, only 47% of urban households have individual water connections and about 40% to 50% of water is reportedly lost in distribution systems due to various reasons. Further, as per the 2011 census, only 32.7% of urban Indian households are connected to a piped sewerage system.

Any comprehensive solution to address the water problem in urban India needs to take into account the specific challenges around water management and distribution:

Pressure on water sources: Rising demand on water means rising pressure on water sources, especially in cities. In a city like Mumbai for example, 3,750 Million Litres per Day (MLD) of water, including water for commercial and industrial use, is available, whereas 4,500 MLD is needed. The primary sources of water for cities like Mumbai are lakes created by dams across rivers near the city. Distributing the available water means providing 386,971 connections to the city’s roughly 13 million residents. When distribution becomes challenging, the workaround is to tap ground water. According to a study by the Centre for Science and Environment, 48% of urban water supply in India comes from ground water. Ground water exploitation for commercial and domestic use in most cities is leading to reduction in ground water level.

Distribution and water loss issues: Distribution challenges, such as water loss due to theft, pilferage, leaky pipes and faulty meter readings, result in unequal and unregulated distribution of water. In New Delhi, for example, water distribution loss was reported to be about 40% as per a study. In Mumbai, where most residents get only 2-5 hours of water supply per day, the non-revenue water loss is about 27% of the overall water supply. This strains the municipal body’s budget and impacts the improvement of distribution infrastructure. Factors such as difficult terrain and legal issues over buildings also affect water supply to many parts. According to a study, only 5% of piped water reaches slum areas in 42 Indian cities, including New Delhi. A 2011 study also found that 95% of households in slum areas in Mumbai’s Kaula Bunder district, in some seasons, use less than the WHO-recommended minimum of 50 litres per capita per day.

Water pollution and contamination: In India, almost 400,000 children die every year of diarrhea, primarily due to contaminated water. According to a 2017 report, 630 million people in the South East Asian countries, including India, use faeces-contaminated drinking water source, becoming susceptible to a range of diseases. Industrial waste is also a major cause for water contamination, particularly antibiotic ingredients released into rivers and soils by pharma companies. A Guardian report talks about pollution from drug companies, particularly those in India and China, resulting in the creation of drug-resistant superbugs. The report cites a study which indicates that by 2050, the total death toll worldwide due to infection by drug resistant bacteria could reach 10 million people.

A holistic approach to tackling water challenges

Addressing these challenges and improving access to clean water for all needs a combination of short-term and medium-term solutions. It also means involving the community and various stakeholders in implementing the solutions. This is the crux of the recommendations put forth by BASF.

The proposed solutions, based on a study of water issues in cities such as Mumbai, take into account different aspects of water management and distribution. Backed by a close understanding of the cost implications, they can make a difference in tackling urban water challenges. These solutions include:

Recycling and harvesting: Raw sewage water which is dumped into oceans damages the coastal eco-system. Instead, this could be used as a cheaper alternative to fresh water for industrial purposes. According to a 2011 World Bank report, 13% of total freshwater withdrawal in India is for industrial use. What’s more, the industrial demand for water is expected to grow at a rate of 4.2% per year till 2025. Much of this demand can be met by recycling and treating sewage water. In Mumbai for example, 3000 MLD of sewage water is released, almost 80% of fresh water availability. This can be purified and utilized for industrial needs. An example of recycled sewage water being used for industrial purpose is the 30 MLD waste water treatment facility at Gandhinagar and Anjar in Gujarat set up by Welspun India Ltd.

Another example is the proposal by Navi Mumbai Municipal Corporation (NMMC) to recycle and reclaim sewage water treated at its existing facilities to meet the secondary purposes of both industries and residential complexes. In fact, residential complexes can similarly recycle and re-use their waste water for secondary purposes such as gardening.

Also, alternative rain water harvesting methods such as harvesting rain water from concrete surfaces using porous concrete can be used to supplement roof-top rain water harvesting, to help replenish ground water.

Community initiatives to supplement regular water supply: Initiatives such as community water storage and decentralized treatment facilities, including elevated water towers or reservoirs and water ATMs, based on a realistic understanding of the costs involved, can help support the city’s water distribution. Water towers or elevated reservoirs with onsite filters can also help optimize the space available for water distribution in congested cities. Water ATMs, which are automated water dispensing units that can be accessed with a smart card or an app, can ensure metered supply of safe water.

Testing and purification: With water contamination being a big challenge, the adoption of affordable and reliable multi-household water filter systems which are electricity free and easy to use can help, to some extent, access to safe drinking water at a domestic level. Also, the use of household water testing kits and the installation of water quality sensors on pipes, that send out alerts on water contamination, can create awareness of water contamination and drive suitable preventive steps.

Public awareness and use of technology: Public awareness campaigns, tax incentives for water conservation and the use of technology interfaces can also go a long way in addressing the water problem. For example, measures such as water credits can be introduced with tax benefits as incentives for efficient use and recycling of water. Similarly, government water apps, like that of the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai, can be used to spread tips on water saving, report leakage or send updates on water quality.

Collaborative approach: Finally, a collaborative approach like the adoption of a public-private partnership model for water projects can help. There are already examples of best practices here. For example, in Netherlands, water companies are incorporated as private companies, with the local and national governments being majority shareholders. Involving citizens through social business models for decentralized water supply, treatment or storage installations like water ATMs, as also the appointment of water guardians who can report on various aspects of water supply and usage can help in efficient water management. Grass-root level organizations could be partnered with for programmes to spread awareness on water safety and conservation.

For BASF, the proposed solutions are an extension of their close engagement with developing water management and water treatment solutions. The products developed specially for waste and drinking water treatment, such as Zetag® ULTRA and Magnafloc® LT, focus on ensuring sustainability, efficiency and cost effectiveness in the water and sludge treatment process.

BASF is also associated with operations of Reliance Industries’ desalination plant at Jamnagar in Gujarat.The thermal plant is designed to deliver up to 170,000 cubic meters of processed water per day. The use of inge® ultrafiltration technologies allows a continuous delivery of pre-filtered water at a consistent high-quality level, while the dosage of the Sokalan® PM 15 I protects the desalination plant from scaling. This combination of BASF’s expertise minimizes the energy footprint of the plant and secures water supply independently of the seasonal fluctuations. To know more about BASF’s range of sustainable solutions and innovative chemical products for the water industry, see here.

This article was produced by the Scroll marketing team on behalf of BASF and not by the Scroll editorial team.