Letters to the editor

Readers' comments: 'The pain and losses of demonetisation are already too heavy'

A selection of readers' opinions.

Pain vs gain

This article puts forth the facts objectively and has made some hard-hitting points of relevance (“Demonetisation deaths and disruption: No long-term gains can make up for some of this pain”). I hope it will create an impact on at least a section of the middle class that is tolerating all the lapses of the government with a sense of heightened nationalism and an illusion that the current economic and development policies of this dispensation will widen their opportunities. I love reading many of the news features and opinion articles of Scroll.in for its pro-masses content and its well researched critiques on contemporary issues. Look forward to many more informative articles that expose misleading posturing by those in power. – Nagmani Rao

***

I am an NRI and am visiting India for six weeks. I do have a few thousand in notes of Rs 500 and Rs 1,000, which we carried back during our last visit to India. Yes, I was disturbed with the announcement, but thanked my stars that it has coincided with my visit and I can deposit the old notes in my bank account.

I have successfully used two ATM machines to withdraw Rs 2,000 each time in Chandigarh.

I have spoke to two taxi drivers, both were very supportive of the action and have had no complaints. I asked a boat man in Sukhna lake, who hails from a remote village Uttar Pradesh and earns Rs 7,000 a month, what he thought of the move. He did not complain of any inconvenience – he was gung ho about the action and full of optimism.

I feel sorry for any lives lost in the process – but that a hospital rejects Rs 500 notes cannot be blamed on the demonetisation. The hospital should be investigated.

Have you counted the number of deaths everyday in private and government hospitals because the poor man does not have enough notes? This is happening daily, unfortunately!

If this action can prevent a few terrorist attacks in Kashmir or elsewhere, it has achieved a great deal! Weddings affected by the lack of legal tender could have made do with cheque deals and bank transactions. May be a bit of austerity would have prevented unnecessary wastage.

We have to pay a price for achieving any reforms. Everyone talks about how China is developing fast. Do you hear the stories of the poor man who is evacuated and forced to accept the alternative offer by the government? – Pitabas Mishra

***

I agree with the author, the pain and losses of demonetisation are already too heavy and the speculated gains will not be able to erase the painful memories of those who have lost everything to this ill-conceived and ill- planned act. – Alka

A step ahead

I totally agree with the view that the poor, migrant labourers and others are suffering due to demonetisation but even before this, their situation was no good (“Demonetisation woes: We, the empowered people of India, do not spare even a thought for the poor”). Further we cannot be just think of the present and not take action. No doubt , in a country like India with a huge population, implementation poses gigantic problems. We need to focus on the future, maybe demonetisation is not the best step, but at least we are moving in that direction. Action is better than no action. – Sudnya Kulkarni

What’s in a name?

The name of the Metro station does not make any difference to the common man who earns his daily wages (“Mumbai: State decides to name new train station in Oshiwara ‘Ram Mandir’”). These things mainly worry the politicians, who win votes by giving religion-based names.

These tricks may have worked during our parents’ time, but not with today’s young and educated generation.

No more fooling citizens. Only results are to be shown by these politicians. – Casimer Quadros

No winners

No one has a clue about the real solution to the Kashmir issue (“Delhi lacks the guts to take back Pakistan-occupied Kashmir, so does Islamabad: Farooq Abdullah”). As long as distrust and hatred are rooted deep within both countries, there is no solution. Be warned that peace is the only way out. Both the countries must work very hard to come to the table. – Kshama Desai

Question for a question

I have some questions of my own, in response to the questions you would like to ask Modi (“Ten questions Modi really should have asked in his demonetisation survey”).

1. Can you please suggest what measures the government should take now to reduce the problems that people are facing?

2. Also, what should the government do to fight against black money?

3. Do you know that only 3% of the Indian population pays income tax? What about the rest – any ideas on how to make them pay tax?

I am not saying that Modi is going to change everything but he is trying something either good or bad, which no other prime minister has done till now. Let’s see what he does.

I think under prime minister and RBI there are many talented people who are capable of giving suggestions and ideas. Do you really feel government has taken such a foolish decision when the entire population is going to be impacted? – Vincent

Looking up

Vijay Pasupulati is a source of inspiration for all of us (“How a former Goldman Sachs employee built India’s fastest-growing education tech company”). The lessons we must learn from him is to dismiss thoughts of failure and uncertainty and stay focused on the vision of what we want to accomplish. Giving up is easy, but to never give up is worthwhile. The surest pathway to our dreams is in discovering our unique strengths, talents, and gifts. This is where our personal and financial wealth resides. In life, there’s no such thing as an ending. Even failure is a new beginning. Obstacles are the tests that will make us feel worthy and proud once we reach our goal.

Follow your dreams and do what your heart tells you to. There will be bumps along the way but never give up! Your destiny is waiting for you at the end of the long road. – Akash Kumar

Changing dynamics

I thought your piece was pretty perceptive, although I’m unsure whether Indians would agree with the suggestions that it makes (“Chinese naval ships in Pakistan’s Gwadar port call for a rethink of India’s regional policy”). Prime Minister Modi, like all his contemporaries, has both his strengths and flaws, but I, as a Pakistani can only really concern myself with India’s foreign policy and the changing complexion of the region as a whole.

I think that there is a sense of buoyancy within the Indian populace with respect to India’s ascent and a renewed confidence that this great nation with an ancient history is witnessing an unprecedented rise on the global stage once again. In fact, the world that we live in today has undergone tremendous change, and as both India and China have shown, the discovery of hydrocarbon wealth is not the only route to becoming part of the nouveau riche group of nation-states.

Whilst I understand the reasons for this buoyancy or even the swagger, typified by the election and indeed popularity of Modi, I think that in the realm of regional politics, India is in danger of succumbing to cavalierism, prematurely.

Of course there is a long-held obsession with Pakistan, and India’s inability to do away with the populist sabre-rattling that resonates within the country.

The goal - to isolate Pakistan, to contain it, to contribute to efforts to undermine its sovereignty, a tactic in tandem with the duplicity of intelligence services, appears to be pretty ambitious particularly in light of recent developments. I think that India would be better served to avoid the allure of indulging in its (not so) guilty pleasure of choice, the shortcomings after all, are embarrassingly public – the snubs, the failed attempts at the UN, the denial, reciprocal border aggression on the Chinese border.

I hope the opportunity for a reassessment comes to the fore, because Modi options have been limited right from the get-go, a big part of his appeal has been muscularism. What now? He has no choice but to plough ahead, and spread the toughness. But at what opportunity cost?

Courting Japan, inviting the Dalai Lama, in what I hope doesn’t form a broader tapestry of digs at the Chinese, are steps in the wrong direction. We ought to be working towards regional cohesiveness and cooperation, harnessing this time that we find ourselves in. India, it appears to me, wants to stick it to Pakistan a little bit too keenly. A U-turn on your own accord is always better than one you are resigned to make. – Ali Hussain

***

Bhadrakumar is a Leftist and a China lacky who thinks that whatever has to be said about foriegn policy had been said by Nehru. It’s our good fortune that Prime Minister Modi is not taking briefs from such outdated specimens who think whatever China is doing is alright and there is something patently wrong with whatever Modi does. It’s difficult to think that Leftists are not naive, they are openly supporting China’s cause. – Sreedathan

Support our journalism by subscribing to Scroll+ here. We welcome your comments at letters@scroll.in.
Sponsored Content BY 

Do you really need to use that plastic straw?

The hazards of single-use plastic items, and what to use instead.

In June 2018, a distressed whale in Thailand made headlines around the world. After an autopsy it’s cause of death was determined to be more than 80 plastic bags it had ingested. The pictures caused great concern and brought into focus the urgency of the fight against single-use plastic. This term refers to use-and-throw plastic products that are designed for one-time use, such as takeaway spoons and forks, polythene bags styrofoam cups etc. In its report on single-use plastics, the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) has described how single-use plastics have a far-reaching impact in the environment.

Dense quantity of plastic litter means sights such as the distressed whale in Thailand aren’t uncommon. Plastic products have been found in the airways and stomachs of hundreds of marine and land species. Plastic bags, especially, confuse turtles who mistake them for jellyfish - their food. They can even exacerbate health crises, such as a malarial outbreak, by clogging sewers and creating ideal conditions for vector-borne diseases to thrive. In 1988, poor drainage made worse by plastic clogging contributed to the devastating Bangladesh floods in which two-thirds of the country was submerged.

Plastic litter can, moreover, cause physiological harm. Burning plastic waste for cooking fuel and in open air pits releases harmful gases in the air, contributing to poor air quality especially in poorer countries where these practices are common. But plastic needn’t even be burned to cause physiological harm. The toxic chemical additives in the manufacturing process of plastics remain in animal tissue, which is then consumed by humans. These highly toxic and carcinogenic substances (benzene, styrene etc.) can cause damage to nervous systems, lungs and reproductive organs.

The European Commission recently released a list of top 10 single-use plastic items that it plans to ban in the near future. These items are ubiquitous as trash across the world’s beaches, even the pristine, seemingly untouched ones. Some of them, such as styrofoam cups, take up to a 1,000 years to photodegrade (the breakdown of substances by exposure to UV and infrared rays from sunlight), disintegrating into microplastics, another health hazard.

More than 60 countries have introduced levies and bans to discourage the use of single-use plastics. Morocco and Rwanda have emerged as inspiring success stories of such policies. Rwanda, in fact, is now among the cleanest countries on Earth. In India, Maharashtra became the 18th state to effect a ban on disposable plastic items in March 2018. Now India plans to replicate the decision on a national level, aiming to eliminate single-use plastics entirely by 2022. While government efforts are important to encourage industries to redesign their production methods, individuals too can take steps to minimise their consumption, and littering, of single-use plastics. Most of these actions are low on effort, but can cause a significant reduction in plastic waste in the environment, if the return of Olive Ridley turtles to a Mumbai beach are anything to go by.

To know more about the single-use plastics problem, visit Planet or Plastic portal, National Geographic’s multi-year effort to raise awareness about the global plastic trash crisis. From microplastics in cosmetics to haunting art on plastic pollution, Planet or Plastic is a comprehensive resource on the problem. You can take the pledge to reduce your use of single-use plastics, here.

This article was produced by the Scroll marketing team on behalf of National Geographic, and not by the Scroll editorial team.