Scholar's murder

Kalburgi’s scholarship got him into trouble with Lingayats, and with Hindutva forces too

Kalburgi never shied away from speaking his mind on knotty issues about religion and society, his contemporaries say.

Malleshappa Madivallapa Kalburgi, who was shot dead on Sunday morning in his home in Dharwad in Karnataka by two armed assailants, was a Kannada literary scholar who was unafraid of asking critical questions and had the nerve to stand by the unpopular answer.

“He was very open-minded and very progressive and he had the courage to speak the unsavoury truth without fear of consequence,” said HS Shivaprakash Kannada poet and playwright and professor at the School of Arts and Aesthetics at Jawaharlal Nehru University.

Kalburgi, who was the former vice-chancellor of the Kannada University at Hampi, dedicated much of his life and career to the study of vachanas ‒ verses that contained the teachings of 12th century philosopher Basava, who is also the patron saint of the Lingayats. Lingayats, the largest community in Karnataka, are considered to be somewhere in the middle of the caste hierarchy. Though Kalburgi was himself a Lingayat and an eminent scholar of the vachanas, his interpretation of the texts did not always sit well with the community establishment.

The 1989 Lingayat outrage

In his first volume of research articles on Lingayat or Veerashaiva literature, Kalburgi implied possible strained relations between Basava and his second wife Nilambike. He linked his theory to a myth in which a disguised Lord Shiva asks Basava to find him a consort. When Basava is unable to do so, Nilambike tries to help her husband by offering herself to him upon which Shiva sheds his disguise and ploy and blesses her. In the same work Kalburgi also suggested that Basava’s sister, who is mother to the important Lingayat figure Channabasava, may have married a lower caste man.

While Kalburgi extolled the devotion of Basava’s wife and the progressive thinking of his sister, his reading enraged Lingayat groups. They called his work blasphemous and demanded that the government ban the book. Kalburgi even received death threats. The dispute ended only after he issued an apology and recanted what had been his life’s work. Speaking to India Today at the time he said, “"I did it to save the lives of my family. But I also committed intellectual suicide on that day."

Said Dalit poet and writer Aravind Malagatti, “Kalburgi looked into questions about society and because he never compromised on his research he got caught in controversy.”

Kalburgi didn’t stop being critical of the Lingayat practices. He often tore into the Lingayat maths, accusing these monastic establishments of forgetting Basava’s ideology. He spoke against blindly following rituals saying they were against Basava’s teachings. He also accused the maths of leaving the religion poorer as they grew richer.

At the same time, Kalburgi supported the demand of groups like the All India Veerashaiva Sabha for Lingayats to be to be recognised as a religious minority separate from Hindus, on the grounds that it originated as a non-Vedic tradition.

Kalburgi's legacy

Apart from his scholarship on Basava and the vachanas, Kalburgi was a noted epigraphist with great insight into ancient and medieval texts. His latest project was the translation of the literature of Adil Shahi, the Shia Muslim rulers of Bijapur, into Kannada. Kalburgi was the head of the Adil Shahi Literature Translation Committee set up by the state department of Kannada and Culture that released the first six volumes of translated works this year.

“His legacy was to promote direct intellectual debate without any rancour or malice about the person you are debating with,” said BK Chandrashekhar, former Karnataka education minister, about Kalburgi.

Chandrashekhar spoke at a condolence meeting for Kalburgi at Bangalore’s town hall on Sunday evening. Although the perpetrators of Kalburgi’s murder remain unknown, the tone of the meeting was one of protest against right-wing groups. Parallels were drawn between Kalburgi’s killing and the murders of rationalist Narendra Dabholkar and Govind Pansare in Maharashtra over the last three years.

Last June, Kalburgi drew the wrath of the Vishwa Hindu Parishad and Bajrang Dal for quoting the late UR Ananthamurthy on the latter urinating on spirit stones in his village as a child. Hindu groups also complained against Ananthamurthy, who had written about the incident 18 years before to discuss the idea of what is sacred.

But, as Shivaprakash pointed out, Kalburgi’s runs-in with Hindutva groups were much more recent and less significant than the long history of friction with his own Lingayat community. “In Karnataka, most of the attacks on books have been made by the Lingayat community. When it comes to literature there is a different chemistry in Karnataka,” he said. “But there is an attack on academic freedom through the country, which is unfortunate. This is another example of the culture of violence and intolerance spreading in the country.”

The identity of Kalburgi’s killer and their motives remain unknown. “This is not just the murder of one Kalburgi, it is the murder of development and freedom,” Malagatti said.

Support our journalism by subscribing to Scroll+ here. We welcome your comments at
Sponsored Content BY 

Swara Bhasker: Sharp objects has to be on the radar of every woman who is tired of being “nice”

The actress weighs in on what she loves about the show.

This article has been written by award-winning actor Swara Bhasker.

All women growing up in India, South Asia, or anywhere in the world frankly; will remember in some form or the other that gentle girlhood admonishing, “Nice girls don’t do that.” I kept recalling that gently reasoned reproach as I watched Sharp Objects (you can catch it on Hotstar Premium). Adapted from the author of Gone Girl, Gillian Flynn’s debut novel Sharp Objects has been directed by Jean-Marc Vallée, who has my heart since he gave us Big Little Lies. It stars the multiple-Oscar nominee Amy Adams, who delivers a searing performance as Camille Preaker; and Patricia Clarkson, who is magnetic as the dominating and dark Adora Crellin. As an actress myself, it felt great to watch a show driven by its female performers.

The series is woven around a troubled, alcohol-dependent, self-harming, female journalist Camille (single and in her thirties incidentally) who returns to the small town of her birth and childhood, Wind Gap, Missouri, to report on two similarly gruesome murders of teenage girls. While the series is a murder mystery, it equally delves into the psychology, not just of the principal characters, but also of the town, and thus a culture as a whole.

There is a lot that impresses in Sharp Objects — the manner in which the storytelling gently unwraps a plot that is dark, disturbing and shocking, the stellar and crafty control that Jean-Marc Vallée exercises on his narrative, the cinematography that is fluid and still manages to suggest that something sinister lurks within Wind Gap, the editing which keeps this narrative languid yet sharp and consistently evokes a haunting sensation.

Sharp Objects is also liberating (apart from its positive performance on Bechdel parameters) as content — for female actors and for audiences in giving us female centric and female driven shows that do not bear the burden of providing either role-models or even uplifting messages. 

Instead, it presents a world where women are dangerous and dysfunctional but very real — a world where women are neither pure victims, nor pure aggressors. A world where they occupy the grey areas, complex and contradictory as agents in a power play, in which they control some reigns too.

But to me personally, and perhaps to many young women viewers across the world, what makes Sharp Objects particularly impactful, perhaps almost poignant, is the manner in which it unravels the whole idea, the culture, the entire psychology of that childhood admonishment “Nice girls don’t do that.” Sharp Objects explores the sinister and dark possibilities of what the corollary of that thinking could be.

“Nice girls don’t do that.”

“Who does?”

“Bad girls.”

“So I’m a bad girl.”

“You shouldn’t be a bad girl.”

“Why not?”

“Bad girls get in trouble.”

“What trouble? What happens to bad girls?”

“Bad things.”

“What bad things?”

“Very bad things.”

“How bad?”


“Like what?”


A point the show makes early on is that both the victims of the introductory brutal murders were not your typically nice girly-girls. Camille, the traumatised protagonist carrying a burden from her past was herself not a nice girl. Amma, her deceptive half-sister manipulates the nice girl act to defy her controlling mother. But perhaps the most incisive critique on the whole ‘Be a nice girl’ culture, in fact the whole ‘nice’ culture — nice folks, nice manners, nice homes, nice towns — comes in the form of Adora’s character and the manner in which beneath the whole veneer of nice, a whole town is complicit in damning secrets and not-so-nice acts. At one point early on in the show, Adora tells her firstborn Camille, with whom she has a strained relationship (to put it mildly), “I just want things to be nice with us but maybe I don’t know how..” Interestingly it is this very notion of ‘nice’ that becomes the most oppressive and deceptive experience of young Camille, and later Amma’s growing years.

This ‘Culture of Nice’ is in fact the pervasive ‘Culture of Silence’ that women all over the world, particularly in India, are all too familiar with. 

It takes different forms, but always towards the same goal — to silence the not-so-nice details of what the experiences; sometimes intimate experiences of women might be. This Culture of Silence is propagated from the child’s earliest experience of being parented by society in general. Amongst the values that girls receive in our early years — apart from those of being obedient, dutiful, respectful, homely — we also receive the twin headed Chimera in the form of shame and guilt.

“Have some shame!”

“Oh for shame!”




“Do not bring shame upon…”

Different phrases in different languages, but always with the same implication. Shameful things happen to girls who are not nice and that brings ‘shame’ on the family or everyone associated with the girl. And nice folks do not talk about these things. Nice folks go on as if nothing has happened.

It is this culture of silence that women across the world today, are calling out in many different ways. Whether it is the #MeToo movement or a show like Sharp Objects; or on a lighter and happier note, even a film like Veere Di Wedding punctures this culture of silence, quite simply by refusing to be silenced and saying the not-nice things, or depicting the so called ‘unspeakable’ things that could happen to girls. By talking about the unspeakable, you rob it of the power to shame you; you disallow the ‘Culture of Nice’ to erase your experience. You stand up for yourself and you build your own identity.

And this to me is the most liberating aspect of being an actor, and even just a girl at a time when shows like Sharp Objects and Big Little Lies (another great show on Hotstar Premium), and films like Veere Di Wedding and Anaarkali Of Aarah are being made.

The next time I hear someone say, “Nice girls don’t do that!”, I know what I’m going to say — I don’t give a shit about nice. I’m just a girl! And that’s okay!

Swara is a an award winning actor of the Hindi film industry. Her last few films, including Veere Di Wedding, Anaarkali of Aaraah and Nil Battey Sannata have earned her both critical and commercial success. Swara is an occasional writer of articles and opinion pieces. The occasions are frequent :).

Watch the trailer of Sharp Objects here:


This article was published by the Scroll marketing team with Swara Bhasker on behalf of Hotstar Premium and not by the Scroll editorial team.