Opinion

Anna Swaraj: The only way we can rescue Indian farmers from debt and suicide

Punjab's experiment with Bt cotton failed, as the recent whitefly attack shows. It's time we return to regenerative agricultural practices that are ecologically sound.

Fifteen farmers in the fertile belt of Punjab have committed suicide in recent days after whitefly pest devoured two-thirds of the state’s cotton crop, almost all of which is reportedly Bt cotton.

Bt cotton, a genetically modified variety, was supposed to be a substitute for pesticides when it was introduced, first informally in 1998 and then with the approval of the Genetic Engineering Appraisal Committee in 2002. Since its advent, though, there have been ever-newer epidemics of pests. In this and many other ways, what was to be the redeemer of the cotton farmer became his oppressor.

Monsanto, the American multinational corporation that produces Bt cotton, has collected royalties from our small farmers, leaving them trapped in debt. The cost of cotton seed, which was once Rs 5- Rs 10 per kilo, ballooned to Rs 4,000 a kilo after Monsanto’s entry. This was why, years ago, a case was brought against Monsanto under the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act.

Further, since Monsanto’s Bt cotton is a genetically modified hybrid, it needs more water for irrigation. In drought-prone rain-fed areas, the crop often fails, forcing the farmer to buy the seeds twice-thrice in a planting season.

All this is a recipe for a debt trap. It is for this reason that many states, such as Andhra Pradesh and Karnataka, have filed cases against Monsanto to regulate seed prices and royalties. But this won’t be enough: it is time for India to re-evaluate its experiment with genetically modified varieties to extract its farmers from the quagmire of debt, vulnerability and suicides.

Ineffective at pest control

The despondency pervading rural Punjab today reminds me of the 1980s, when rich and poor farmers alike were feeling the pinch of ecological erosion, debt and declining profits margins. That was the first reaction to the cultural erosion that resulted from the spread of commercial agriculture and the Green Revolution.

The Green Revolution, like the Gene Revolution, which is the application of biotechnology to food production, had promised higher yields and abundance. Instead, it led to rural poverty, debt and mass migrations. Its propaganda misguided farmers into leaving their traditional ways of agriculture and into relying on external inputs for higher yield. Within years, it was clear that the bargain was unfair. The destruction of biodiversity and introduction of monocultures in Punjab’s farms effected a tragedy from which the state still hasn’t recovered.

After the crash of the Green Revolution dream, the loss of this season’s cotton is the second big blow to Punjab’s farmers. Stemming from the failure of genetically modified cotton crops, it makes clear again that genetically modified organisms and chemical pesticides are ineffective at pest control. Scientific studies worldwide prove that their use has birthed super weeds and pests – and yet state governments in India continue to promote their excessive use and subsidise them.

Anna Swaraj

India needs to realise that pest control through biodiversity is the only sustainable solution. The pursuit to control nature is mindless – nature will always win and industrial science will always be a step behind. Each year, pests grow more resilient, rendering pesticides redundant. Even after the introduction of hybrid seeds in Punjab during the Green Revolution, crops were threatened by new pests and diseases every year. Whether it was the brown planthopper, white-backed plant hopper or sheath rot and hispa, nature’s vagaries always outmanoeuvred the ineffectual remedies offered by agricultural scientists. The symptom-based approach adopted by agro-chemical companies can never be a permanent solution.

If we look closely, the recent tragedy in Punjab also provides us the solution. The non-GM seeds and bio-pesticides warded off the whitefly pest and suffered less crop damage. This is the direction other farmers in Punjab and around the world should take. We must adopt regenerative practices that are ecologically sound. We must look at ways that have sustained India for over 5,000 years and make Indian villages agriculturally independent of external inputs.

If we want to end the cycle of exploitation, we must transform locally saved seeds as the spinning wheel of modern times. Only by reviving traditional methods of ecological and organic agriculture can we bring about a new Anna Swaraj – a food and agriculture revolution that brings about a food democracy. This can be done if citizens and government at all levels work in a synchronised manner towards food sovereignty. We must stop treating food as a commodity, to be wasted, contaminated and profited from. Our culture teaches us “Annam Brahman” – food is divinity. It may be the only ethical weapon we posses to free the Indian farmer from debt, suicide and starvation.

Support our journalism by subscribing to Scroll+ here. We welcome your comments at letters@scroll.in.
Sponsored Content BY 

Do you really need to use that plastic straw?

The hazards of single-use plastic items, and what to use instead.

In June 2018, a distressed whale in Thailand made headlines around the world. After an autopsy it’s cause of death was determined to be more than 80 plastic bags it had ingested. The pictures caused great concern and brought into focus the urgency of the fight against single-use plastic. This term refers to use-and-throw plastic products that are designed for one-time use, such as takeaway spoons and forks, polythene bags styrofoam cups etc. In its report on single-use plastics, the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) has described how single-use plastics have a far-reaching impact in the environment.

Dense quantity of plastic litter means sights such as the distressed whale in Thailand aren’t uncommon. Plastic products have been found in the airways and stomachs of hundreds of marine and land species. Plastic bags, especially, confuse turtles who mistake them for jellyfish - their food. They can even exacerbate health crises, such as a malarial outbreak, by clogging sewers and creating ideal conditions for vector-borne diseases to thrive. In 1988, poor drainage made worse by plastic clogging contributed to the devastating Bangladesh floods in which two-thirds of the country was submerged.

Plastic litter can, moreover, cause physiological harm. Burning plastic waste for cooking fuel and in open air pits releases harmful gases in the air, contributing to poor air quality especially in poorer countries where these practices are common. But plastic needn’t even be burned to cause physiological harm. The toxic chemical additives in the manufacturing process of plastics remain in animal tissue, which is then consumed by humans. These highly toxic and carcinogenic substances (benzene, styrene etc.) can cause damage to nervous systems, lungs and reproductive organs.

The European Commission recently released a list of top 10 single-use plastic items that it plans to ban in the near future. These items are ubiquitous as trash across the world’s beaches, even the pristine, seemingly untouched ones. Some of them, such as styrofoam cups, take up to a 1,000 years to photodegrade (the breakdown of substances by exposure to UV and infrared rays from sunlight), disintegrating into microplastics, another health hazard.

More than 60 countries have introduced levies and bans to discourage the use of single-use plastics. Morocco and Rwanda have emerged as inspiring success stories of such policies. Rwanda, in fact, is now among the cleanest countries on Earth. In India, Maharashtra became the 18th state to effect a ban on disposable plastic items in March 2018. Now India plans to replicate the decision on a national level, aiming to eliminate single-use plastics entirely by 2022. While government efforts are important to encourage industries to redesign their production methods, individuals too can take steps to minimise their consumption, and littering, of single-use plastics. Most of these actions are low on effort, but can cause a significant reduction in plastic waste in the environment, if the return of Olive Ridley turtles to a Mumbai beach are anything to go by.

To know more about the single-use plastics problem, visit Planet or Plastic portal, National Geographic’s multi-year effort to raise awareness about the global plastic trash crisis. From microplastics in cosmetics to haunting art on plastic pollution, Planet or Plastic is a comprehensive resource on the problem. You can take the pledge to reduce your use of single-use plastics, here.

This article was produced by the Scroll marketing team on behalf of National Geographic, and not by the Scroll editorial team.