Loco Motives

How Indian Railways is crumbling under its own weight – and multiple ambitions

The nation's largest transporter is dealing with stiff competition, congestion and politicians, all at the same time.

In 1909, the Divisional Superintendent of Sahibganj (now in Jharkhand) received a letter about the dismal service of railways by a troubled passenger who could not find a toilet on-board.

"I am arrive by passenger train Ahmedpur station and my belly is too much swelling with jackfruit. I am therefore went to privy. Just I doing the nuisance that guard making whistle blow for train to go off and I am running with 'lotah' in one hand and 'dhoti' in the next when I am fall over and expose all my shocking to man and female women on plateform. I am got leaved Ahmedpur station.

"This too much bad, if passenger go to make dung that dam guard not wait train five minutes for him. I am therefore pray your honour to make big fine on that guard for public sake. Otherwise I am making big report to papers."

The letter by Okhil Chandra Sen, now displayed at the Railway Museum in Delhi, is cited as having prompted the Indian Railways to build "attached toilets" for train compartments.

While the letter was written 100 years ago, even today it is not unusual to come across complaints about the Railways – the difference is that the ones on social media, particularly on Twitter, tend to attract more attention, where some have found out that by directly tagging the minister, they are able to get their complaints redressed. Despite this, however, the public perception of the largest employer in the country remains that of an inefficient laggard.

Take for instance, the debate that takes place around the rail budget every year when Members of Parliament make it an annual ritual to score political points and voice their constituencies’ demand for new trains, stations and stoppages. But for the general public, the concerns are more basic about issues that affect them every day: clean toilets, hygienic food, train safety and timely arrival and departure of about 13,000 trains.

Why is it so difficult to fulfil these basic demands? What ails Indian Railways?

While there is no easy answer to that question, what most experts and committees ever set up to restructure and bring the railways back on track agree on is that the culprit is the ambiguity on what the Indian Railways is supposed to do. Is it a national carrier meant to serve the people? Or a public sector entity meant to provide high quality services and boost the economy?

“For many decades, Indian Railways has carried the burden of both public and business expectations which has led to most of the problems it faces today,” says NP Srivastav, former finance commissioner in Indian Railways. “It is torn between providing cheap travel to the general public and making money from serving businesses which is why there’s a conflict in deciding prices, trains, running schedule and many other things.”

An overstressed system

Srivastav isn’t off the mark in his assessment. According to the latest statistics released by the Indian Railways, average speed of a passenger train in the country is merely 36 km/hr while goods trains travel even slower with an average speed of just 26 km/hr. To put this in context, cars in traffic-clogged Delhi travel faster and Chinese trains have an average speed that is twice that of Indian ones.

The problem of slow trains isn’t exactly a new one. A note written back in 1954 by Railways Secretary AK Chandra said that “the speed at which the passenger and freight traffic is moving is yet to attain pre-war level.”

The words ring true even today when the government is trying to rope in French state-run companies to provide India with high-speed train technology and has promised to make substantial progress on the dedicated freight corridor in the coming years which is expected to speed up the movement of goods.

Slow speeds not only make train travel unattractive for many who would rather choose roads or buy affordable tickets for economy class air travel, but they also have a direct impact on the state of the economy.

“When your trains are running slow and freight is expensive, why would a transporter choose to ship with railways instead of road?” asks Srivasatav. “This has started happening. Roads have become a big competition to railways when it comes to carrying goods and something clearly needs to be done.”

This, however, is not what, many contend, is stopping railways from increasing its earnings. Former Railway Board Chairman Vivek Sahai believes the problem is of fares more than anything else.

"Our train fares for goods are the steepest in the world while we lose money on passenger trains," Sahai said. "You can't have a healthy entity when freight, which makes up for two-thirds for railways' earnings, is exorbitantly priced. Roads will take over sooner or later if this continues."

For instance, a World Bank analysis from 2012 showed that the productivity of Indian Railways doesn’t match up to international standards. China makes three times more money than India does on every passenger carried while it charges only 50% of the Indian tariff for transporting goods, after adjusting for purchasing power parity.

Clogged arteries

While acknowledging the problem of trains running slow and getting delayed, Indian Railways also realises that there’s not much it can do in the absence of enough investment in network expansion and decongestion programs. “There has been severe congestion on the network and has resulted in the inability of the system to accommodate more trains and increase the speed of trains,” a white paper on Railways said last year.

Railways, hence, is not an underperforming entity but an overstressed system which often faces abuse at the hands of politicians who announce new projects, trains and stations that add to bottlenecks and congestion on the network, resulting in slowing down of trains. For instance, more than 40% of line sections in the country are currently running at 100% or above capacity.

Meanwhile, the situation is even worse when one looks at only the High Density Network lines which cater to a lot more traffic each day. Here, 65% of the lines are running on 100% or more capacity already. The following map visualises the extent of the problem.

Sahai said that while there are certain routes which are congested and in need of serious respite from introduction of new trains or stoppages, he contended that there are many unconnected parts of the country which should be the priority of the government and new trains can be introduced to ease pressure there.

"Only the A routes are somewhat congested while many routes don't have enough trains to ferry passengers, which is why passenger revenue is not growing as fast as it should but the government is not putting new trains on the tracks," he said. "When the government is spending heavily on track expansion and doubling of the tracks, what's the point of them lying idle if new trains aren't being introduced to connect the hinterland?"

Bibek Debroy, member of the NITI Aayog, who wrote the report on restructuring of the railways last month, believes that it's not as easy to connect new stations just because the line capacity isn't full up to the brim because there might be heavy traffic on some parts of the route already.

"We see if place A is not connected to place B, we want to connect these two. But, what if a place C that lies in the middle of that route sees heavy traffic between B to C, by adding more trains, the situation will be of a perpetual jam then," he explained. "What we need is rationalising the number and length of trains that we are running to make sure that the traffic flow is smooth."

Getting back on track

The government, last year, acknowledged the need for upgrading rail networks and took some promising steps. One of the most prominent moves in the last budget was introduction of no new trains – the first time in many years – signalling the seriousness of the government.

Already, there are 362 sanctioned projects sitting on shelves for new lines, doubling of single lines and gauge conversions. Each project here could take anywhere between 3-5 years to complete after land acquisition happens and hence, experts feel that the railways can barely afford to take up new ventures which will only make it bleed further.

Recently, NITI Aayog’s Transport Advisor also took note of these pending projects and said that the Railways’ target of doubling existing corridors in the next five years was “aggressive, adding that it will be a challenge to achieve the feat given that the track record of Railways has “not been very impressive.”

According to Sahai, the railways is in serious need of this capital expenditure but someone has to be held accountable if the network is still congested.

"They claim that there is congestion and financial constraints so we won't introduce new projects but railways is not even spending its allocated plan expenditure in full," he said. "They can blame the government for not giving enough funds but who is stopping them from spending what they have got in their kitty? On one hand, claims of network congestion are made but the government then says we have spent so much to ease networks. When will those benefits accrue?"

Srivastav, meanwhile, suggests that the government continues to plough through its existing projects and completely “depoliticise” the budget in order to cater to Railways' health first rather than try to meet populist expectations.

“They should take a 5-year plan holiday,” he said. “All projects which haven’t yet started should be shelved, and no new trains should be announced, or any other project should be undertaken, for five years. Only ongoing projects must be completed because the cost of interest and materials on ongoing projects gets higher with each passing year.”

Like each year, Railway Ministry is flooding with requests from MPs for new trains, modernisation of stations and other things. Unlike previous years, though, the Railways is thinking hard about introducing only a few new trains or introducing just premium ones which charge higher than the normal fare – something which may benefit a lesser number of people but could make the beleaguered entity a bit more money.

We welcome your comments at letters@scroll.in.
Sponsored Content BY 

What hospitals can do to drive entrepreneurship and enhance patient experience

Hospitals can perform better by partnering with entrepreneurs and encouraging a culture of intrapreneurship focused on customer centricity.

At the Emory University Hospital in Atlanta, visitors don’t have to worry about navigating their way across the complex hospital premises. All they need to do is download wayfinding tools from the installed digital signage onto their smartphone and get step by step directions. Other hospitals have digital signage in surgical waiting rooms that share surgery updates with the anxious families waiting outside, or offer general information to visitors in waiting rooms. Many others use digital registration tools to reduce check-in time or have Smart TVs in patient rooms that serve educational and anxiety alleviating content.

Most of these tech enabled solutions have emerged as hospitals look for better ways to enhance patient experience – one of the top criteria in evaluating hospital performance. Patient experience accounts for 25% of a hospital’s Value-Based Purchasing (VBP) score as per the US government’s Centres for Medicare and Mediaid Services (CMS) programme. As a Mckinsey report says, hospitals need to break down a patient’s journey into various aspects, clinical and non-clinical, and seek ways of improving every touch point in the journey. As hospitals also need to focus on delivering quality healthcare, they are increasingly collaborating with entrepreneurs who offer such patient centric solutions or encouraging innovative intrapreneurship within the organization.

At the Hospital Leadership Summit hosted by Abbott, some of the speakers from diverse industry backgrounds brought up the role of entrepreneurship in order to deliver on patient experience.

Getting the best from collaborations

Speakers such as Dr Naresh Trehan, Chairman and Managing Director - Medanta Hospitals, and Meena Ganesh, CEO and MD - Portea Medical, who spoke at the panel discussion on “Are we fit for the world of new consumers?”, highlighted the importance of collaborating with entrepreneurs to fill the gaps in the patient experience eco system. As Dr Trehan says, “As healthcare service providers we are too steeped in our own work. So even though we may realize there are gaps in customer experience delivery, we don’t want to get distracted from our core job, which is healthcare delivery. We would rather leave the job of filling those gaps to an outsider who can do it well.”

Meena Ganesh shares a similar view when she says that entrepreneurs offer an outsider’s fresh perspective on the existing gaps in healthcare. They are therefore better equipped to offer disruptive technology solutions that put the customer right at the center. Her own venture, Portea Medical, was born out of a need in the hitherto unaddressed area of patient experience – quality home care.

There are enough examples of hospitals that have gained significantly by partnering with or investing in such ventures. For example, the Children’s Medical Centre in Dallas actively invests in tech startups to offer better care to its patients. One such startup produces sensors smaller than a grain of sand, that can be embedded in pills to alert caregivers if a medication has been taken or not. Another app delivers care givers at customers’ door step for check-ups. Providence St Joseph’s Health, that has medical centres across the U.S., has invested in a range of startups that address different patient needs – from patient feedback and wearable monitoring devices to remote video interpretation and surgical blood loss monitoring. UNC Hospital in North Carolina uses a change management platform developed by a startup in order to improve patient experience at its Emergency and Dermatology departments. The platform essentially comes with a friendly and non-intrusive way to gather patient feedback.

When intrapreneurship can lead to patient centric innovation

Hospitals can also encourage a culture of intrapreneurship within the organization. According to Meena Ganesh, this would mean building a ‘listening organization’ because as she says, listening and being open to new ideas leads to innovation. Santosh Desai, MD& CEO - Future Brands Ltd, who was also part of the panel discussion, feels that most innovations are a result of looking at “large cultural shifts, outside the frame of narrow business”. So hospitals will need to encourage enterprising professionals in the organization to observe behavior trends as part of the ideation process. Also, as Dr Ram Narain, Executive Director, Kokilaben Dhirubhai Ambani Hospital, points out, they will need to tell the employees who have the potential to drive innovative initiatives, “Do not fail, but if you fail, we still back you.” Innovative companies such as Google actively follow this practice, allowing employees to pick projects they are passionate about and work on them to deliver fresh solutions.

Realizing the need to encourage new ideas among employees to enhance patient experience, many healthcare enterprises are instituting innovative strategies. Henry Ford System, for example, began a system of rewarding great employee ideas. One internal contest was around clinical applications for wearable technology. The incentive was particularly attractive – a cash prize of $ 10,000 to the winners. Not surprisingly, the employees came up with some very innovative ideas that included: a system to record mobility of acute care patients through wearable trackers, health reminder system for elderly patients and mobile game interface with activity trackers to encourage children towards exercising. The employees admitted later that the exercise was so interesting that they would have participated in it even without a cash prize incentive.

Another example is Penn Medicine in Philadelphia which launched an ‘innovation tournament’ across the organization as part of its efforts to improve patient care. Participants worked with professors from Wharton Business School to prepare for the ideas challenge. More than 1,750 ideas were submitted by 1,400 participants, out of which 10 were selected. The focus was on getting ideas around the front end and some of the submitted ideas included:

  • Check-out management: Exclusive waiting rooms with TV, Internet and other facilities for patients waiting to be discharged so as to reduce space congestion and make their waiting time more comfortable.
  • Space for emotional privacy: An exclusive and friendly space for individuals and families to mourn the loss of dear ones in private.
  • Online patient organizer: A web based app that helps first time patients prepare better for their appointment by providing check lists for documents, medicines, etc to be carried and giving information regarding the hospital navigation, the consulting doctor etc.
  • Help for non-English speakers: Iconography cards to help non-English speaking patients express themselves and seek help in case of emergencies or other situations.

As Arlen Meyers, MD, President and CEO of the Society of Physician Entrepreneurs, says in a report, although many good ideas come from the front line, physicians must also be encouraged to think innovatively about patient experience. An academic study also builds a strong case to encourage intrapreneurship among nurses. Given they comprise a large part of the front-line staff for healthcare delivery, nurses should also be given the freedom to create and design innovative systems for improving patient experience.

According to a Harvard Business Review article quoted in a university study, employees who have the potential to be intrapreneurs, show some marked characteristics. These include a sense of ownership, perseverance, emotional intelligence and the ability to look at the big picture along with the desire, and ideas, to improve it. But trust and support of the management is essential to bringing out and taking the ideas forward.

Creating an environment conducive to innovation is the first step to bringing about innovation-driven outcomes. These were just some of the insights on healthcare management gleaned from the Hospital Leadership Summit hosted by Abbott. In over 150 countries, Abbott, which is among the top 100 global innovator companies, is working with hospitals and healthcare professionals to improve the quality of health services.

To read more content on best practices for hospital leaders, visit Abbott’s Bringing Health to Life portal here.

This article was produced on behalf of Abbott by the Scroll.in marketing team and not by the Scroll.in editorial staff.