Scroll

Why Darul Uloom's fatwa against 'Bharat Mata ki jai' is not such a big deal

Fatwas are churned out by the hundreds and blithely ignored by most. Else Sunni Muslims would have given up photography, wearing ties – and even shaving.

What is the real value of a fatwa from India’s biggest Sunni Muslim seminary?

Darul Uloom Deoband, the seat of the Deobandi school of Sunni Islam, issues hundreds of fatwas every year from its headquarters in Uttar Pradesh. Some of them notoriously make it to the headlines, for being either discriminatory towards women or simply incongruous with the modern world.

The latest to land Darul Uloom in the midst of a media controversy is its fatwa, issued on April 1, asking Muslims not to chant “Bharat Mata ki jai” because it goes against the basic Islamic principle of worshipping one god.

Headlines about Islamic fatwas are almost always dramatic, but this time, much of the drama preceded the Deoband school’s decree. It began on March 14, when Asaduddin Owaisi – leader of Hyderabad's All India Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen – declared that he would never say “Bharat Mata ki jai” even if a knife was put to his throat.

Owaisi’s remarks were in defiance of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh’s emphasis on chanting patriotic slogans to hail Mother India. Two days later, AIMIM leader Waris Pathan was suspended from the Maharashtra Assembly by a unanimous vote after he refused to say “Bharat Mata ki jai” in the house.

Darul Uloom’s fatwa against the slogan came, it says, in response to “thousands” of letters from Muslims seeking to know if Islam permits the chanting of a slogan that personifies the nation as a goddess. As expected, the fatwa instantly drew the ire of right-wing Hindutva politicians and groups who slammed the Deoband seminary for being fundamentalist.

But is the fatwa against “Bharat Mata ki jai”, or any other Darul Uloom fatwa, really worth getting so worked up over?

Agony aunts

After the infamous Iranian fatwa calling for the death of author Salman Rushdie in 1989, most of the non-Muslim world has associated the word “fatwa” with extremist diktats that, if not followed, could result in extreme consequences.

Muslim scholars, meanwhile, have had to repeatedly explain the true meaning of fatwa: it is merely a legal opinion based on the interpretation of Islamic texts, given by qualified priests or muftis to any Muslim who seeks answers to any kind of question.

The fatwa page on Darul Uloom’s website, in fact, reads more like an agony aunt column. Muslims send in letters seeking advice on a range of life problems, and Deobandi scholars make Quranic references to offer practical or didactic solutions. How do I refrain from sins? Sit in solitude and meditate. How do I quit smoking? Cut down the number of cigarettes you smoke, week by week. How do I end my illicit affair? Dissociate yourself from that person.

Of course, Darul Uloom is no different from other patriarchal seminaries, and its conservatism is evident in some of these fatwas. This, for instance, was the fatwa board’s response to a woman who complained of her husband ignoring her and treating her like “dirt”:

“A wife generally has such intense love for her husband that she always tends to regard her husband’s love for her as deficient and lacking...Whatever difficulties you experience from your husband, regard it as a means of the forgiveness of your sins.”

Infamous fatwas

Such mundane fatwas, however, sexist though they are, rarely make it to the news. When Darul Uloom is written about, it is usually for decrees like these:

Working women: In May 2010, a fatwa from the Deoband seminary claimed it is haraam (forbidden) under Sharia law for Muslim women to work alongside men, and for a family to accept her earnings. The fatwa was a response to a citizen’s query whether Muslim women can work in the government or private sector.

Women receptionists: The fatwa against working women must have been rather ineffective, because in 2012, Darul Uloom came out with a more specific fatwa against employing Muslim women as receptionists, because it required interacting with men without a veil.

Mobile divorce: In November 2010, a Deobandi fatwa claimed that a divorce served via cell phone – by uttering “talaq” thrice over a phone call – would be valid even if the woman didn’t hear the words clearly due to network problems.

Photography: In September 2013, the Darul Uloom’s fatwa board declared photography to be a sin, and also claimed it is un-Islamic to take wedding videos or preserve photos as mementos. This fatwa was a response to a Muslim youth who wanted to find out if a career in photography would be permissible in Islam.

Shaving: In August 2015, two barbers from Saharanpur asked scholars at Darul Uloom if Islam allows the shaving of beards. A panel of three muftis responded that cutting anyone’s beard would go against the Sharia, so it would be better for Muslim barbers to seek another vocation. While the two barbers in question chose to stop beard-shaving, news reports Deoband’s fatwa as a diktat that would leave barbers and clean-shaved Muslims in a dilemma.

The Deoband seminary, of course, is not the only Islamic institution issuing fatwas in India. Just this week, the competing Barelvi school of Islam issued a fatwa against Wahabis entering Sufi Sunni mosques; in December, a Muslim institute in Tamil Nadu banned the use of Patanjali products; there have been fatwas against wearing ties and fatwas against AR Rahman. And in the past year, multiple Muslim institutions have come out with fatwas against terrorist organisation ISIS.

Not so effective

Do Muslims in India religiously follow the fatwas churned out by Darul Uloom or any of the other ceremonies? Have Sunni Muslim citizens given up photography or wearing ties? Are Muslim barbers nowhere to be found? Not really, say most Muslim scholars.

“Everyone knows that fatwas are not binding ordinances, even if they come from the Darul Uloom,” said Maulana Mehmood Daryabadi, general secretary of the All India Ulema Council. “The Deoband school has a huge following – everyone except the Barelvis and the Shias follow them – but agreeing with a fatwa and implementing it in daily life are two different things. Many people find it difficult to implement the advice given in fatwas, and there is nothing wrong with that.”

Zakia Soman, a co-founder of the Bharatiya Muslim Mahila Andolan, believes that Darul Uloom’s fatwas don’t really impact the lifestyles of most Muslims in India. Many Muslim women, she says, have to work and earn because of their socio-economic conditions, and the fatwa against women working in jobs hasn’t changed that. “Today we are citizens of a democracy with all kinds of avenues to seek advice and opinions on various aspects of life,” said Soman. “This one institution cannot impact people alone.”

We welcome your comments at letters@scroll.in.
Sponsored Content BY 

How sustainable farming practices can secure India's food for the future

India is home to 15% of the world’s undernourished population.

Food security is a pressing problem in India and in the world. According to the Food and Agriculture Organization of the UN (FAO), it is estimated that over 190 million people go hungry every day in the country.

Evidence for India’s food challenge can be found in the fact that the yield per hectare of rice, one of India’s principal crops, is 2177 kgs per hectare, lagging behind countries such as China and Brazil that have yield rates of 4263 kgs/hectare and 3265 kgs/hectare respectively. The cereal yield per hectare in the country is also 2,981 kgs per hectare, lagging far behind countries such as China, Japan and the US.

The slow growth of agricultural production in India can be attributed to an inefficient rural transport system, lack of awareness about the treatment of crops, limited access to modern farming technology and the shrinking agricultural land due to urbanization. Add to that, an irregular monsoon and the fact that 63% of agricultural land is dependent on rainfall further increase the difficulties we face.

Despite these odds, there is huge potential for India to increase its agricultural productivity to meet the food requirements of its growing population.

The good news is that experience in India and other countries shows that the adoption of sustainable farming practices can increase both productivity and reduce ecological harm.

Sustainable agriculture techniques enable higher resource efficiency – they help produce greater agricultural output while using lesser land, water and energy, ensuring profitability for the farmer. These essentially include methods that, among other things, protect and enhance the crops and the soil, improve water absorption and use efficient seed treatments. While Indian farmers have traditionally followed these principles, new technology now makes them more effective.

For example, for soil enhancement, certified biodegradable mulch films are now available. A mulch film is a layer of protective material applied to soil to conserve moisture and fertility. Most mulch films used in agriculture today are made of polyethylene (PE), which has the unwanted overhead of disposal. It is a labour intensive and time-consuming process to remove the PE mulch film after usage. If not done, it affects soil quality and hence, crop yield. An independently certified biodegradable mulch film, on the other hand, is directly absorbed by the microorganisms in the soil. It conserves the soil properties, eliminates soil contamination, and saves the labor cost that comes with PE mulch films.

The other perpetual challenge for India’s farms is the availability of water. Many food crops like rice and sugarcane have a high-water requirement. In a country like India, where majority of the agricultural land is rain-fed, low rainfall years can wreak havoc for crops and cause a slew of other problems - a surge in crop prices and a reduction in access to essential food items. Again, Indian farmers have long experience in water conservation that can now be enhanced through technology.

Seeds can now be treated with enhancements that help them improve their root systems. This leads to more efficient water absorption.

In addition to soil and water management, the third big factor, better seed treatment, can also significantly improve crop health and boost productivity. These solutions include application of fungicides and insecticides that protect the seed from unwanted fungi and parasites that can damage crops or hinder growth, and increase productivity.

While sustainable agriculture through soil, water and seed management can increase crop yields, an efficient warehousing and distribution system is also necessary to ensure that the output reaches the consumers. According to a study by CIPHET, Indian government’s harvest-research body, up to 67 million tons of food get wasted every year — a quantity equivalent to that consumed by the entire state of Bihar in a year. Perishables, such as fruits and vegetables, end up rotting in store houses or during transportation due to pests, erratic weather and the lack of modern storage facilities. In fact, simply bringing down food wastage and increasing the efficiency in distribution alone can significantly help improve food security. Innovations such as special tarpaulins, that keep perishables cool during transit, and more efficient insulation solutions can reduce rotting and reduce energy usage in cold storage.

Thus, all three aspects — production, storage, and distribution — need to be optimized if India is to feed its ever-growing population.

One company working to drive increased sustainability down the entire agriculture value chain is BASF. For example, the company offers cutting edge seed treatments that protect crops from disease and provide plant health benefits such as enhanced vitality and better tolerance for stress and cold. In addition, BASF has developed a biodegradable mulch film from its ecovio® bioplastic that is certified compostable – meaning farmers can reap the benefits of better soil without risk of contamination or increased labor costs. These and more of the company’s innovations are helping farmers in India achieve higher and more sustainable yields.

Of course, products are only one part of the solution. The company also recognizes the importance of training farmers in sustainable farming practices and in the safe use of its products. To this end, BASF engaged in a widespread farmer outreach program called Samruddhi from 2007 to 2014. Their ‘Suraksha Hamesha’ (safety always) program reached over 23,000 farmers and 4,000 spray men across India in 2016 alone. In addition to training, the company also offers a ‘Sanrakshan® Kit’ to farmers that includes personal protection tools and equipment. All these efforts serve to spread awareness about the sustainable and responsible use of crop protection products – ensuring that farmers stay safe while producing good quality food.

Interested in learning more about BASF’s work in sustainable agriculture? See here.

This article was produced by the Scroll marketing team on behalf of BASF and not by the Scroll editorial team.