History revisited

From Tamluk to Nandigram: How the Quit India movement brought down the Left Front in West Bengal

A short history of how a small part of Bengal liberated itself from British rule in 1942 – and continued to speak truth to power even after 1947.

Today, 74 years ago, on August 8, 1942, the Congress passed what has come to be known to history as the Quit India resolution. The entire summer had seen Mohandas Gandhi in an unprecedentedly belligerent mood towards the British. Three years earlier, a month before the start of World War II, however, Gandhi had had Subhas Bose expelled from the Congress for advocating a mass movement, preferring instead, along with entire right wing of the Congress, to work with the Raj.

But now things were different and Gandhi was turning increasingly hostile – a change Jawaharlal Nehru attributed to “Gandhiji’s feelings that Japan and Germany will win [World War II]”, a popular sentiment at the time, before the allies turned the tide in Stalingrad.

On July 10, Gandhi spoke vehemently against the Raj’s scorched-earth policy in Bengal, built to deny provisions to Japan should it invade from Burma – a move that would cause a famine killing three million Bengalis. This statement was so incendiary that the British government thought it amounted to the declaration of a “parallel authority acting in defiance of…measures necessary for the prosecution of war.”

Arrest and repression

Then, on July 14, the Congress passed a resolution asking for complete independence and speaking vaguely of a “widespread struggle”, without giving any details how this was to be accomplished. The resolution of August 8, more or less, repeated the points made in the July 14 resolution: independence and a vague reference to mass struggle.

The British reaction this time, though, was different. Taking the Congress off guard, the Raj arrested the entire party leadership and banned the organisation. Historian Sumit Sarkar explains that the August 8 resolution was not a call for a mass movement per se or a complete break with the Raj:

“far from ruling out further negotiations, the whole thing may conceivably have been an exercise in brinksmanship and a bargaining counter.”

The British, facing a life and death struggle of their own, though, were in no mood to negotiate with the Congress. Not only did they arrest the Congress leadership, before they could launch any sort of mass movement, the Raj also unleashed an unprecedented wave of repression with no less than 57 armed battalions deployed against Indian civilians.

Leaderless and under heavy fire, nevertheless, Indians across the subcontinent fought back. On August 31, the Viceroy would write:

I am engaged here in meeting by far the most serious rebellion since that of 1857, the gravity and extent of which we have so far concealed from the world.

In fact, so fierce was the Indian response that, for the first time in a century, the Raj actually lost control of some areas. One of them was located on the western coast of Bengal, in Midnapore district, where rebels ran an independent government for two whole years, called the Tamluk Jatiya Sarkar, the Tamluk National Government.

Heroic resistance

Most of the revolutionary activities in the area were led by a Congressman, Sushil Kumar Dhara and Satish Samanta (although given the famine and the chaos, quite a bit of the resistance was also leaderless).

Villagers in some cases attacked armed soldiers taking away rice from the district – resisting the colonial scorched-earth policy which would soon lead to mass starvation. By the end of September, Dhara’s team was taking over police stations and government officers. In this direct action, 71-year old Matongini Hazra was shot and killed as she attempted to take over the police station of the district headquarters located in Tamluk.

Hazra’s murder came to symbolise the immense British repression as well as the heroic grassroots resistance that characterises the Quit India movement and she remains an icon of anti-colonial struggle. Modern Kolkata remembers her with a statue at the Brigade Parade Grounds, proudly holding up the Congress flag – which is what she was doing when she was shot.

By the end of 1942, the Tamluk Jatiya Sarkar had been fully established and the Raj – with the imperial centre of Calcutta only two hours away – completely cut off. Government buildings had been taken over, roads dug up and telegraph wires cut.

British repression

The British response was initially brutal. Colonial security forces fired upon unarmed Midnaporis and even machine-gunned Tamluk town using aeroplanes. In October, 1942 a massive cyclone hit the region and the Raj, as collective punishment, provided almost no relief work. After a while, though, the Raj simply let the provisional government be, given that it did not really threaten the war effort – which is all the British were interested in at the moment. Tucked away in the south of Bengal, Midnapore did not affect either the Assam or Burmese front of war.

The Jatiya Sarkar, meanwhile, launched a militia, in the hope of helping Bose’s Indian National Army, should it succeed in invading British-held Bengal (it didn’t). The Sarkar was also involved in cyclone relief work and was actually rather successful in famine relief, targeting hoarders and distributing surplus paddy to the poor. The parallel government was so organised that it even ran its own justice system, helping to dispose of 1,681 cases.

Eventually, while the Quit India movement did not succeed in its immediate aim – of making the British quit India – it did have a major impact on Britain’s colonial policy after the war. Clear that they could not hold India by force, the British looked to work out a negotiated withdrawal from India – which they did on August 15, 1947.

1942 to 2007

And it wasn’t only 1947. The culture of Midnapore which had produced something as radical as the Tamluk Jatiya Sarkar wasn’t going to quieten down overnight. Sixty years later, in 2007, the Left Front government looked to acquire land forcibly in the Nandigram area of Midnapore – one of the areas liberated by the Tamluk Jatiya Sarkar. In a movement startlingly similar to 1942, Nandigram simply cut itself off from Kolkata. Protestors dug up roads, cut off telephone cables and declared a muktanchal, “liberated zone” free from government control. Chief minister Buddhadeb Bhattacharya told the West Bengal Assembly, “For two and a half months, the administration could not function at Nandigram”.

Eventually, the state government would launch a massive operation involving 3,000 policemen supported by Communist Party of India (Marxists) cadre to try and “take back” Nandigram. During this, the police opened fire on protestors, killing between 14 (official figures) to 50 people.

Like in 1942, though, the events in Midnapore reverberated far beyond the district. Four years later, the Trinamool Congress would make opposition to forcible land acquisition its main point of attack against the ruling Left, holding up the violence in Nandigram as a graphic example. The campaign would be a success and Nandigram would end the Left’s 34-year rule over West Bengal.

We welcome your comments at letters@scroll.in.
Sponsored Content BY 

Virat Kohli and Ola come together to improve Delhi's air quality

The onus of curbing air-pollution is on citizens as well

A recent study by The Lancet Journal revealed that outdoor pollution was responsible for 6% of the total disease burden in India in 2016. As a thick smog hangs low over Delhi, leaving its residents gasping for air, the pressure is on the government to implement SOS measures to curb the issue as well as introduce long-term measures to improve the air quality of the state. Other major cities like Mumbai, Pune and Kolkata should also acknowledge the gravitas of the situation.

The urgency of the air-pollution crisis in the country’s capital is being reflected on social media as well. A recent tweet by Virat Kohli, Captain of the Indian Cricket Team, urged his fans to do their bit in helping the city fight pollution. Along with the tweet, Kohli shared a video in which he emphasized that curbing pollution is everyone’s responsibility. Apart from advocating collective effort, Virat Kohli’s tweet also urged people to use buses, metros and Ola share to help reduce the number of vehicles on the road.

In the spirit of sharing the responsibility, ride sharing app Ola responded with the following tweet.

To demonstrate its commitment to fight the problem of vehicular pollution and congestion, Ola is launching #ShareWednesdays : For every ​new user who switches to #OlaShare in Delhi, their ride will be free. The offer by Ola that encourages people to share resources serves as an example of mobility solutions that can reduce the damage done by vehicular pollution. This is the fourth leg of Ola’s year-long campaign, #FarakPadtaHai, to raise awareness for congestion and pollution issues and encourage the uptake of shared mobility.

In 2016, WHO disclosed 10 Indian cities that made it on the list of worlds’ most polluted. The situation necessitates us to draw from experiences and best practices around the world to keep a check on air-pollution. For instance, a system of congestion fees which drivers have to pay when entering central urban areas was introduced in Singapore, Oslo and London and has been effective in reducing vehicular-pollution. The concept of “high occupancy vehicle” or car-pool lane, implemented extensively across the US, functions on the principle of moving more people in fewer cars, thereby reducing congestion. The use of public transport to reduce air-pollution is another widely accepted solution resulting in fewer vehicles on the road. Many communities across the world are embracing a culture of sustainable transportation by investing in bike lanes and maintenance of public transport. Even large corporations are doing their bit to reduce vehicular pollution. For instance, as a participant of the Voluntary Traffic Demand Management project in Beijing, Lenovo encourages its employees to adopt green commuting like biking, carpooling or even working from home. 18 companies in Sao Paulo executed a pilot program aimed at reducing congestion by helping people explore options such as staggering their hours, telecommuting or carpooling. After the pilot, drive-alone rates dropped from 45-51% to 27-35%.

It’s the government’s responsibility to ensure that the growth of a country doesn’t compromise the natural environment that sustains it, however, a substantial amount of responsibility also lies on each citizen to lead an environment-friendly lifestyle. Simple lifestyle changes such as being cautious about usage of electricity, using public transport, or choosing locally sourced food can help reduce your carbon footprint, the collective impact of which is great for the environment.

Ola is committed to reducing the impact of vehicular pollution on the environment by enabling and encouraging shared rides and greener mobility. They have also created flat fare zones across Delhi-NCR on Ola Share to make more environment friendly shared rides also more pocket-friendly. To ensure a larger impact, the company also took up initiatives with City Traffic Police departments, colleges, corporate parks and metro rail stations.

Join the fight against air-pollution by using the hashtag #FarakPadtaHai and download Ola to share your next ride.

This article was produced by the Scroll marketing team on behalf of Ola and not by the Scroll editorial team.