Indian economy

Claim: 99.99% of Indian households have bank accounts. Fact: Survey missed 14% households

The government has not specified the methodology it used to calculate households with bank accounts.

The Bharatiya Janata Party claimed on January 2 that 99.99% of Indian households now have a bank account, but that omits 35 million households not reached in the survey that underpins the claim.

Here is the tweet India’s ruling party put out, based on a recent survey conducted under the Pradhan Mantri Jan Dhan Yojana, the prime minister’s people’s wealth programme, which hopes to provide millions of poor families with a bank account:

The “99.99% households” the party refers to are part of 210 million surveyed by officials working with the PMJDY, according to this January 1, 2017, Press Information Bureau release of the finance ministry.

Here’s what Factchecker found:

Claim: 99.99% of 21.22 crore (212.2 million) households surveyed had bank accounts.
Fact: 14% of Indian households not included in the survey.

Census 2011 listed 24.67 crore households, or 246.7 million. Of these, 41% (10.18 crore or 101.8 million) did not have access to banking, according to data on household amenities under the census survey.

That leaves 3.5 crore (35 million) or 14% of households, many of which may not have members with bank accounts. Also, there were more than 19.19 crore (191.9 million) households in India in 2001, increasing by 5.5 crore (55 million) or 28% between 2001 and 2011, according to census data. Since 2011, these households have further increased, but they are not counted by census officials.

The government has not specified the methodology it used to calculate households with bank accounts and whether it accounted for the increase in households since the 2011 census. So, the claim that 99.99% of Indian households have access to banking appears to lack a statistical foundation.

Claim: “Zero-balance” accounts (those without money) have been reduced to 23.86% of all accounts.
Fact: There has been a 1.8 percentage-point dip in zero-balance accounts since May 2016; despite the November 8, 2016, demonetisation process.

There were 75% zero-balance Jan Dhan accounts in September 2014, a month after the programme was launched; accounts without money have been steadily declining and were 25.7% of Jan Dhan accounts in May 2016, as IndiaSpend reported on June 27, 2016.

Zero-balance accounts constituted 23.9% of Jan Dhan accounts in December 2016, according to the latest available data from the finance ministry. A decrease of 1.8 percentage points is not a significant decrease since May 2016, since the demonetisation drive should have encouraged people to have used their accounts.

The dip in zero-balance accounts has also been attributed to what has been called the “Re 1 trick”, a reference to how bank employees were found to be making minimal deposits of one, two, or five rupees from maintenance funds or own resources to reduce their tally of zero-balance accounts; as the Indian Express reported on September 13, 2016.

This article first appeared on Fact Checker.

We welcome your comments at letters@scroll.in.
Sponsored Content BY 

Watch Ruchir's journey: A story that captures the impact of accessible technology

Accessible technology has the potential to change lives.

“Technology can be a great leveller”, affirms Ruchir Falodia, Social Media Manager, TATA CLiQ. Out of the many qualities that define Ruchir as a person, one that stands out is that he is an autodidact – a self-taught coder and lover of technology.

Ruchir’s story is one that humanises technology - it has always played the role of a supportive friend who would look beyond his visual impairment. A top ranker through school and college, Ruchir would scan course books and convert them to a format which could be read out to him (in the absence of e-books for school). He also developed a lot of his work ethos on the philosophy of Open Source software, having contributed to various open source projects. The access provided by Open Source, where users could take a source code, modify it and distribute their own versions of the program, attracted him because of the even footing it gave everyone.

That is why I like being in programming. Nobody cares if you are in a wheelchair. Whatever be your physical disability, you are equal with every other developer. If your code works, good. If it doesn’t, you’ll be told so.

— Ruchir.

Motivated by the objectivity that technology provided, Ruchir made it his career. Despite having earned degree in computer engineering and an MBA, friends and family feared his visual impairment would prove difficult to overcome in a work setting. But Ruchir, who doesn’t like quotas or the ‘special’ tag he is often labelled with, used technology to prove that differently abled persons can work on an equal footing.

As he delved deeper into the tech space, Ruchir realised that he sought to explore the human side of technology. A fan of Agatha Christie and other crime novels, he wanted to express himself through storytelling and steered his career towards branding and marketing – which he sees as another way to tell stories.

Ruchir, then, migrated to Mumbai for the next phase in his career. It was in the Maximum City that his belief in technology being the great leveller was reinforced. “The city’s infrastructure is a challenging one, Uber helped me navigate the city” says Ruchir. By using the VoiceOver features, Ruchir could call an Uber wherever he was and move around easily. He reached out to Uber to see if together they could spread the message of accessible technology. This partnership resulted in a video that captures the essence of Ruchir’s story: The World in Voices.

Play

It was important for Ruchir to get rid of the sympathetic lens through which others saw him. His story serves as a message of reassurance to other differently abled persons and abolishes some of the fears, doubts and prejudices present in families, friends, employers or colleagues.

To know more about Ruchir’s journey, see here.

This article was produced by the Scroll marketing team on behalf of Uber and not by the Scroll editorial team.