Ear to the ground

In Surat’s textile hub, small businesses are afraid of GST – but big companies are not

Products manufactured by a chain of smaller units will become more expensive as tax is paid out at each level, businessman fear.

Rajesh Mehra is desolate.

A big-boned man in his mid-fifties, he is a trader in women’s blouses.

Until ten years ago, Mehra used to take orders from garment wholesalers in big cities like Mumbai, Kolkata and Bengaluru, buy the cloth and thread he needed from garment clusters like Silvassa, and get the blouses stitched in Amritsar.

But this business model ran into trouble when blouse-making units came up in Surat, one of India’s biggest synthetic fabric and sari-making clusters. Enjoying advantages like proximity to cloth- and thread-makers, these units made cheaper blouses than their counterparts in Amritsar.

In response, Mehra made a hard call. He left his family behind in Amritsar and moved to Surat, working on the assumption that having a perch in that city would help him sell better.

Now, as India readies to overhaul its tax regime for businesses, replacing a welter of sales and income taxes with a single tax called the Goods and Services Tax, Mehra has run out of ideas. “Kya hoga?” he asked. “Kaise chalega yeh sab?” What will happen? How can this business continue?

Anxieties about how GST will impact their businesses have prompted textile traders to go on a nationwide strike over three days this week. But not everyone in Surat’s textile hub is worried.

Sanjay Saraogi: GST will create jobs for accountants but drive small entrepreneurs out of work. Photo credit: M Rajshekhar
Sanjay Saraogi: GST will create jobs for accountants but drive small entrepreneurs out of work. Photo credit: M Rajshekhar

No more than 20 minutes away from Mehra’s shop in the basement of a building opposite Surat’s old Ratan Cinema, in the heart of the town’s textile market, lies the soot-blackened industrial estate of Pandesara. This is where Sanjay Saraogi works.

Saraogi, who looks far younger than his 46 years, is the managing director of Rs 450 crore Laxmipati Saris.

Described by his peers as one of the sharpest minds in the Surat textile industry, he entered the family business at 14 when his father fell very ill – he would go to school in the morning and spend the rest of the day in the shop. Over the last ten years, he has steered Laxmipati beyond trading into sari manufacturing.

When it comes to GST, he is relatively unconcerned. It will be good for businesses like ours, he said.

The contrasting responses of Mehra and Saraogi offer a picture of how GST will affect people and companies in India’s manufacturing economy.

An introduction to Surat

Lying midway between Ahmedabad and Mumbai, Surat is India’s largest producer of synthetic fabrics. Around 40% of all manmade fabrics produced in India come from here. The city, located in South Gujarat, especially dominates the polyester sari market. Buy one anywhere in India – the glitziest metropolitan mall or a rural haat – and chances are it came from Surat.

One way to understand GST’s impact on this city is to study how it affects the makers of Surat’s biggest product – polyester saris. As the chart below shows, sari production involves six stages.

The industry producing Surat’s saris is part-formal economy, part-informal economy.

Only two companies, Reliance and Indo-Rama, make purified terephthalic acid or PTA. No more than three companies convert PTA into polyester chips, said Hashim Dada, who works in a “fancy yarn” manufacturing company called Eastern Enterprise in Surat’s old city. According to Saraogi, India has about 25-50 companies that convert these chips into yarn.

Those units are mostly located in Silvassa, Daman and Mumbai. Once the yarn is made, however, most production shifts to Surat. Here, the value chain fragments into thousands of large and small enterprises. More than 100 dealers sell this yarn. About 10,000 weavers, ranging from small units with a few powerlooms to large businesses with dozens of modern shuttleless looms, weave that yarn into grey fabric. This then goes to 400-450 mills and processing factories in and around Surat. Beyond them lies another maze of small units – people who decorate the saris with embroidery, diamonds or by sticking borders (“pattas”, they’re called locally) to them.

A quick look at Surat’s sari manufacturing industry reveals two contrasting philosophies towards manufacturing. A small number of companies – no more than 25, according to Saraogi – are vertically integrated. They do most of the production inhouse. Saraogi’s Laxmipati, for instance, buys yarn from outside but does the weaving, printing and post-production work like embroidery in its factory. The rest are far smaller. Strapped for cash, they focus on no more than one or two of the production stages. Take VK Tex. Working out of a long, narrow room in Pandesara’s Unity Estate, it only makes grey fabric.

A powerloom unit in Pandesara. Small units like this, once the mainstay of India's textile industry, are now imperilled. Photo credit: M Rajshekhar
A powerloom unit in Pandesara. Small units like this, once the mainstay of India's textile industry, are now imperilled. Photo credit: M Rajshekhar

These companies – thousands of weavers, printers, processors, embroiders and more – work as outsourcers. These units cluster around traders like Mehra. Surat has about 65,000 such traders, working out of 250 or so large textile markets in the heart of the city. They collect orders from wholesalers – who, in turn, pick up orders and signal customer preferences from shopkeepers – and get the garments manufactured, guiding them through this thicket of companies towards completion.

Mehra, for instance, bought thread from Silvassa and sent it to Amritsar for stitching.

Most of these companies – traders and manufacturers alike – are small in size. Most will have an annual turnover, as Saraogi said, of between Rs 1 crore to Rs 5 crore. Stacking them up according to their function produces the informal economy’s equivalent of a vertically integrated unit.

Surat’s reaction to GST is split along this formal/informal axis. Composite units are unconcerned while smaller ones are in despair. The reasons go beyond loose chatter about these units wanting to avoid taxes, worrying about a jump in paperwork, or running a business that is too cash-strapped to employ accountants.

How GST affects Surat

India’s corporate tax collections are very similar to the country’s income tax collections.

Most businesses do not pay taxes. This is because most are they are too small to qualify under the tax net. Others fudge accounts and pass themselves as smaller than they really are. The ones that pay taxes are relatively larger businesses, which pay a welter of state and central taxes pegged to their sales and profits.

That will change with the GST. It replaces the current taxes with a single, countrywide tax levied on all goods and services. Scroll.in has previously reported on GST’s implications for state autonomy – since state government taxes get subsumed by GST, they become more dependent on central government allocations. This article focuses on its implications for businesses.

GST differs from the previous system in two important ways. It is pegged to the value each rung adds to the product. If Hashim Dada’s company buys polyester chips from Reliance at Rs 100 and sells its yarn at 130, it will pay a tax on that Rs 30. This has big implications. If Reliance has not paid its tax, then Dada’s company will have to pay a tax on the entire Rs 130. In this manner, GST introduces a strong incentive for companies to buy only from businesses that have paid their taxes. Second, in the past, traders like Mehra only had to pay a service tax. But now, since GST treats goods and services on par, they will have to pay GST as well.

Both these measures have adverse implications for disaggregated value chains – in textiles and elsewhere. As the chart below shows, they will pay tax at more points than a vertically-integrated company, which will pay at the end of the production process.

These charts are based on a letter submitted by Surat’s textile industry to the central government which shows a disaggregated value chain might end up paying as much as 20% more tax than a vertically-integrated company.

This deserves a larger explanation. The garment-making process is much the same. The tax rate is the same. How does it matter whether the tax is collected at the end of each production stage or at completion? Larger companies will partly benefit from their scale – they have more efficient equipment, they get raw material at lower rates, and they spread their administrative and manufacturing costs over a larger volume of production. The disaggregated value chain would lose out partly because traders are covered under the GST as well. As Saraogi had said, they are the “centrepoint” of the disaggregated value chain. They buy yarn and send it to weavers. Then collect the grey fabric and send it to mills for processing. And then take the finished fabric and sell it to wholesalers. GST will be levied on each of these intermediary transactions as well.

Put both factors together and it is no surprise that the disggregated chain ends up paying more tax than its formal economy equivalent. The result? Once GST comes into play, with its 18% tax for yarn and 5% for subsequent value addition, its cost structure will be heavier than that of vertically-integrated units. Agreed Saraogi, “Composite units will get more support. Disaggregated units will get more costly.”

The fallouts are predictable. As customers move towards lower prices, both manufacturers and traders in the disaggregated chain will see a drop in volumes. Even the retail trade will be hurt, said Saraogi. Bigger retailers, he said, now have even more reason to bypass distributors and buy directly from manufacturers. Smaller shops will continue to buy through wholesalers/distributors but given their margins and taxes, these shops will end up with a sale price that is higher than what the big retailers sell at. “They will get affected as well,” he said.

As such, there is a risk that some of the businesses, desperate to survive, might start working in black. There is also a risk that India might see an intensification of Inspector Raj as the government tries to ensure compliance.

These are businesses with wafer-thin margins, said MS Sriram, a professor of Public Policy in IIM Bangalore. “We do not know what the outcomes will be,” he said. “GST should be introduced in a nuanced, calibrated manner, responding to the results we see.”

Surat's textile traders work out of 250 or so gigantic malls. The biggest of these is Millennium Textile Market, which has as many as 5,000 shops for wholesalers. Photo credit: M Rajshekhar
Surat's textile traders work out of 250 or so gigantic malls. The biggest of these is Millennium Textile Market, which has as many as 5,000 shops for wholesalers. Photo credit: M Rajshekhar

A cluster in trouble

There is a bigger question here. GST is being rolled out at a time when Surat’s disaggregated value chain was already ceding ground to larger units.

As the next article in this series will show, over the last ten years, Surat’s smaller textile units have been hammered by changing customer preferences, rising imports of Chinese fabrics, and the entry of businessmen from Saurashtra and elsewhere into the textile trade. Between them, these changes have pushed units in Surat towards modernisation and expanding their production capacities. The first to keep in sync with changing customer demands, the second to protect margins. Smaller units, with weaker financials, are dropping out.

The combined fallout? Dhirubhai Shah, the managing director of Shahlon Industries, a company in real estate and yarn manufacture, has a dire prognosis for Surat’s businesses. Even as the city’s production capacity rises, he said, it was going to see the shuttering of many units. At this time, he said, “Surat has 700,000 looms operated by 10,000 companies. In five years, that will come down to 2,000 companies. We have 400-500 companies in processing. We will see similar consolidation there as well.”

With GST, that trend looks like it will accelerate further.

The next part of this article will look at why small and medium-sized units in Surat’s textile industry are in trouble.

We welcome your comments at letters@scroll.in.
Sponsored Content BY 

How sustainable farming practices can secure India's food for the future

India is home to 15% of the world’s undernourished population.

Food security is a pressing problem in India and in the world. According to the Food and Agriculture Organization of the UN (FAO), it is estimated that over 190 million people go hungry every day in the country.

Evidence for India’s food challenge can be found in the fact that the yield per hectare of rice, one of India’s principal crops, is 2177 kgs per hectare, lagging behind countries such as China and Brazil that have yield rates of 4263 kgs/hectare and 3265 kgs/hectare respectively. The cereal yield per hectare in the country is also 2,981 kgs per hectare, lagging far behind countries such as China, Japan and the US.

The slow growth of agricultural production in India can be attributed to an inefficient rural transport system, lack of awareness about the treatment of crops, limited access to modern farming technology and the shrinking agricultural land due to urbanization. Add to that, an irregular monsoon and the fact that 63% of agricultural land is dependent on rainfall further increase the difficulties we face.

Despite these odds, there is huge potential for India to increase its agricultural productivity to meet the food requirements of its growing population.

The good news is that experience in India and other countries shows that the adoption of sustainable farming practices can increase both productivity and reduce ecological harm.

Sustainable agriculture techniques enable higher resource efficiency – they help produce greater agricultural output while using lesser land, water and energy, ensuring profitability for the farmer. These essentially include methods that, among other things, protect and enhance the crops and the soil, improve water absorption and use efficient seed treatments. While Indian farmers have traditionally followed these principles, new technology now makes them more effective.

For example, for soil enhancement, certified biodegradable mulch films are now available. A mulch film is a layer of protective material applied to soil to conserve moisture and fertility. Most mulch films used in agriculture today are made of polyethylene (PE), which has the unwanted overhead of disposal. It is a labour intensive and time-consuming process to remove the PE mulch film after usage. If not done, it affects soil quality and hence, crop yield. An independently certified biodegradable mulch film, on the other hand, is directly absorbed by the microorganisms in the soil. It conserves the soil properties, eliminates soil contamination, and saves the labor cost that comes with PE mulch films.

The other perpetual challenge for India’s farms is the availability of water. Many food crops like rice and sugarcane have a high-water requirement. In a country like India, where majority of the agricultural land is rain-fed, low rainfall years can wreak havoc for crops and cause a slew of other problems - a surge in crop prices and a reduction in access to essential food items. Again, Indian farmers have long experience in water conservation that can now be enhanced through technology.

Seeds can now be treated with enhancements that help them improve their root systems. This leads to more efficient water absorption.

In addition to soil and water management, the third big factor, better seed treatment, can also significantly improve crop health and boost productivity. These solutions include application of fungicides and insecticides that protect the seed from unwanted fungi and parasites that can damage crops or hinder growth, and increase productivity.

While sustainable agriculture through soil, water and seed management can increase crop yields, an efficient warehousing and distribution system is also necessary to ensure that the output reaches the consumers. According to a study by CIPHET, Indian government’s harvest-research body, up to 67 million tons of food get wasted every year — a quantity equivalent to that consumed by the entire state of Bihar in a year. Perishables, such as fruits and vegetables, end up rotting in store houses or during transportation due to pests, erratic weather and the lack of modern storage facilities. In fact, simply bringing down food wastage and increasing the efficiency in distribution alone can significantly help improve food security. Innovations such as special tarpaulins, that keep perishables cool during transit, and more efficient insulation solutions can reduce rotting and reduce energy usage in cold storage.

Thus, all three aspects — production, storage, and distribution — need to be optimized if India is to feed its ever-growing population.

One company working to drive increased sustainability down the entire agriculture value chain is BASF. For example, the company offers cutting edge seed treatments that protect crops from disease and provide plant health benefits such as enhanced vitality and better tolerance for stress and cold. In addition, BASF has developed a biodegradable mulch film from its ecovio® bioplastic that is certified compostable – meaning farmers can reap the benefits of better soil without risk of contamination or increased labor costs. These and more of the company’s innovations are helping farmers in India achieve higher and more sustainable yields.

Of course, products are only one part of the solution. The company also recognizes the importance of training farmers in sustainable farming practices and in the safe use of its products. To this end, BASF engaged in a widespread farmer outreach program called Samruddhi from 2007 to 2014. Their ‘Suraksha Hamesha’ (safety always) program reached over 23,000 farmers and 4,000 spray men across India in 2016 alone. In addition to training, the company also offers a ‘Sanrakshan® Kit’ to farmers that includes personal protection tools and equipment. All these efforts serve to spread awareness about the sustainable and responsible use of crop protection products – ensuring that farmers stay safe while producing good quality food.

Interested in learning more about BASF’s work in sustainable agriculture? See here.

This article was produced by the Scroll marketing team on behalf of BASF and not by the Scroll editorial team.