cost of oil

The Centre could provide relief from rising fuel prices by cutting taxes, but here’s why it may not

The price of petrol and diesel remains as high even though the cost of importing crude oil has halved from 2011.

In 2011 when the cost of oil being imported by India was averaging above $100 per barrel, the retail price that citizens paid for petrol in Delhi averaged Rs 65 per litre. But today, when the cost of importing oil is substantially lower at an average of $50 per barrel – half of that prevailing in 2011 – why are consumers required to pay above Rs 70 per litre of petrol? Shouldn’t the retail price of oil products, both petrol and diesel, come down somewhat if not proportionately?

Potentially, yes. The Bharatiya Janata Party-led government could reduce the prices. But the crisis in the economy has tied its hands. A good part of the blame for the economic crisis lies with the government and the rest on global economic trends.

Why are the costs of petrol and diesel high in India?

India imports above 80% of its crude oil requirement. So, the cost of imported oil is critical. This crude oil is then refined. The refineries add the cost of refining and their profit margin to the cost of the oil, and sells it onwards to Oil Marketing Companies such as the Indian Oil Corporation. These firms, in turn, stack up their costs of selling fuel and their profit margin, and supply petrol and diesel to retail petrol pump owners. Retailer pump owners are allowed a fixed profit margin when selling to consumers. But taxes imposed by the Central and state governments are also added to this topped up price.

Just over 50% of the price consumers pay for petrol is taxes that go to the Centre and state. The tax rates imposed by the Centre and state on the production and sale of petrol and diesel have risen over the last two years.

What could the government potentially do about the soaring prices?

There are two ways the government could reduce prices of fuel in India. It could either ask oil marketing companies that sell oil to petrol pumps to reduce their sale price. Or, it could reduce the taxes it imposes on the sale of oil products such as petrol and diesel.

Why it is unwilling to ask oil companies to sell at a lower price to petrol stations?

Asking oil companies to shave off their profits could be tricky for the economy in the long run. It would also be the undoing of a bold policy move that the BJP-led government made when it took over power at the Centre in 2014.

For a long time, as global prices of crude oil shot up, the Indian oil producing and marketing companies were asked to sell their products – such as diesel, petrol – at prices lower than those prevailing internationally. These companies still made profits but the profits were not enough to help them provide resources to add capacities to meet a future growth in demand. The difference between prevailing international prices and the price Indian oil producing and marketing companies were asked to sell at was called “under-recoveries” – a smart phrase for a notional loss. Remember, India has heard this phrase before in connection with the coal scam?

The government paid the oil companies for some of this notional loss, and the oil refiners and marketing companies bore the rest on their own. By 2012-’13, the “under-recoveries” of the oil marketing companies stood at Rs 92,061 crore – almost 40% of the total government subsidy payout for the year.

Though there has been a lot of criticism on how the “under-recoveries” of the oil companies are inflated because of the formula used to calculate what is only a notional loss, when Narendra Modi became the Prime Minister, his government decided to deregulate prices and let oil marketing companies fix the prices as per the market rates.

This would bring down the burden on the government to subsidise the oil marketing companies.

The government and the oil companies also hit a lucky patch. Global oil prices have fallen over the last three years. With increased retail prices and the lower cost of importing crude oil, oil companies were able to wipe off their notional-losses even faster.

But now, over the past few months, crude oil import prices have begun to rise again. The increase in domestic taxes over the last two years riding on top of costlier oil imports are working in tandem to take the prices of oil products higher for consumers.

If, at this stage, oil companies were to reduce their profit margins, their long-term ability to meet the future demand for oil would be reduced. At another level, this would postpone the chances of petrol and diesel markets being deregulated completely to ease entry of private companies into this sector in full force – they will only do so if public sector oil companies are not benefitting from government support.

Why not reduce the taxes on petrol and diesel instead?

The government could do this, but it is in a tight spot.

The economy is sliding down a deep trough at the moment. Last month, government statistics showed that India’s gross domestic product growth had slowed to 5.7% in the first quarter of 2017 from 7.9% in the corresponding period last year. The government has had to manage two successive droughts of 2014 and 2015. The government’s ill-conceived and badly-implemented demonetisation exercise, along with its hasty roll out of the Goods and Services Tax in July has delayed a potential economic recovery. This year again, the monsoon has ditched the unirrigated parts of the country. That promises to make economic recovery slower even as India tackles the fallout of private sector failing to repay its previous loans and consequently being unable to take new ones and invest the money productively. Exports, which make up a fifth of the country’s economy, have also fallen. Experts are divided if this is because of the high exchange rate of the rupee or global demand of Indian goods drying up, or both.

A bad economy also means lower tax collections for the government. Revenues from taxes on oil make up a substantial part of the government kitty – both for the Centre and the state. Though over the past three years the Centre has tweaked the tax classification and slabs to keep a higher proportion of the total revenue from the petroleum sector at the cost of the states’ share.

In 2016-’17 the Union government earned Rs 2.43 lakh crore from excise duty on oil – this was 2.45 times the amount it earned in 2014-’15. The total revenue the government earned from oil companies in 2016-’17, which includes dividends and taxes from oil marketing companies, was also nearly double the amount earned in 2014-’15.

The Centre subsequently transfers 42% of the revenue from excise and other taxes which are not classified as cess to the states. Even then, states’ tax receipts from the petroleum industry remain lower than the net tax and non-tax revenues the Centre earns from the industry.”

Perhaps aware that the implementation of GST would hit economic activity this financial year, the government had anyway projected just a 5% growth in indirect tax collections (which includes taxes on petroleum) compared to 2016-’17 actuals. Compare this with the 35% growth in indirect tax collections the government had registered in 2016-’17 over the year before that. Now with even this 5% growth in indirect tax collections being an uphill task, the government is unwilling to further reduce revenues from petroleum sales so far.

A flip-side to the story

There is one persistent reason why structurally Indian governments of all hues have taxed petroleum products higher than many other countries. In comparison to the tax incidence of over 50% in India, on average the state and central taxes add up to around 17% of the price of petrol (called gasoline in the US). But then, the US is not comparable to India in its economics or its geopolitical heft which is essential to set the energy security matrix of a country.

High taxes artificially reduce the demand for oil products in India – a necessary tool to ensure oil security for the country, though it comes at the cost of poorer sections of society. But reducing taxes substantially would lead to a sharp rise in demand for petrol and diesel, which in turn could mean a heavy import bill for the government, and a spike in global oil prices as well.

The flip-side is that a further increase in prices of diesel (not so much petrol) will lead to the increase in the prices of other goods in the market, as diesel is the fuel used to transport goods. A rising inflation rate at this juncture, when unemployment is high, the economy slack and domestic demand shrunk, is bound to hurt people more.

The Opposition parties have caught onto this and have begun to use rising petrol and diesel prices as an issue that people can relate to instead of talking of the entire set of factors that are grinding the economy right now. This, in turn, is limiting the BJP government’s wiggle room on oil prices.

The Opposition smells the opportunity. After all, before 2014, the BJP, a much better-organised and more charged Opposition, had been even more shrill in its rhetoric against oil prices under the previous Congress-led United Progressive Alliance government when it let the market determine petrol prices in 2010, though not diesel.

We welcome your comments at letters@scroll.in.
Sponsored Content BY 

Relying on the power of habits to solve India’s mammoth sanitation problem

Adopting three simple habits can help maximise the benefits of existing sanitation infrastructure.

India’s sanitation problem is well documented – the country was recently declared as having the highest number of people living without basic sanitation facilities. Sanitation encompasses all conditions relating to public health - especially sewage disposal and access to clean drinking water. Due to associated losses in productivity caused by sickness, increased healthcare costs and increased mortality, India recorded a loss of 5.2% of its GDP to poor sanitation in 2015. As tremendous as the economic losses are, the on-ground, human consequences of poor sanitation are grim - about one in 10 deaths, according to the World Bank.

Poor sanitation contributes to about 10% of the world’s disease burden and is linked to even those diseases that may not present any correlation at first. For example, while lack of nutrition is a direct cause of anaemia, poor sanitation can contribute to the problem by causing intestinal diseases which prevent people from absorbing nutrition from their food. In fact, a study found a correlation between improved sanitation and reduced prevalence of anaemia in 14 Indian states. Diarrhoeal diseases, the most well-known consequence of poor sanitation, are the third largest cause of child mortality in India. They are also linked to undernutrition and stunting in children - 38% of Indian children exhibit stunted growth. Improved sanitation can also help reduce prevalence of neglected tropical diseases (NTDs). Though not a cause of high mortality rate, NTDs impair physical and cognitive development, contribute to mother and child illness and death and affect overall productivity. NTDs caused by parasitic worms - such as hookworms, whipworms etc. - infect millions every year and spread through open defecation. Improving toilet access and access to clean drinking water can significantly boost disease control programmes for diarrhoea, NTDs and other correlated conditions.

Unfortunately, with about 732 million people who have no access to toilets, India currently accounts for more than half of the world population that defecates in the open. India also accounts for the largest rural population living without access to clean water. Only 16% of India’s rural population is currently served by piped water.

However, there is cause for optimism. In the three years of Swachh Bharat Abhiyan, the country’s sanitation coverage has risen from 39% to 65% and eight states and Union Territories have been declared open defecation free. But lasting change cannot be ensured by the proliferation of sanitation infrastructure alone. Ensuring the usage of toilets is as important as building them, more so due to the cultural preference for open defecation in rural India.

According to the World Bank, hygiene promotion is essential to realise the potential of infrastructure investments in sanitation. Behavioural intervention is most successful when it targets few behaviours with the most potential for impact. An area of public health where behavioural training has made an impact is WASH - water, sanitation and hygiene - a key issue of UN Sustainable Development Goal 6. Compliance to WASH practices has the potential to reduce illness and death, poverty and improve overall socio-economic development. The UN has even marked observance days for each - World Water Day for water (22 March), World Toilet Day for sanitation (19 November) and Global Handwashing Day for hygiene (15 October).

At its simplest, the benefits of WASH can be availed through three simple habits that safeguard against disease - washing hands before eating, drinking clean water and using a clean toilet. Handwashing and use of toilets are some of the most important behavioural interventions that keep diarrhoeal diseases from spreading, while clean drinking water is essential to prevent water-borne diseases and adverse health effects of toxic contaminants. In India, Hindustan Unilever Limited launched the Swachh Aadat Swachh Bharat initiative, a WASH behaviour change programme, to complement the Swachh Bharat Abhiyan. Through its on-ground behaviour change model, SASB seeks to promote the three basic WASH habits to create long-lasting personal hygiene compliance among the populations it serves.

This touching film made as a part of SASB’s awareness campaign shows how lack of knowledge of basic hygiene practices means children miss out on developmental milestones due to preventable diseases.

Play

SASB created the Swachhata curriculum, a textbook to encourage adoption of personal hygiene among school going children. It makes use of conceptual learning to teach primary school students about cleanliness, germs and clean habits in an engaging manner. Swachh Basti is an extensive urban outreach programme for sensitising urban slum residents about WASH habits through demos, skits and etc. in partnership with key local stakeholders such as doctors, anganwadi workers and support groups. In Ghatkopar, Mumbai, HUL built the first-of-its-kind Suvidha Centre - an urban water, hygiene and sanitation community centre. It provides toilets, handwashing and shower facilities, safe drinking water and state-of-the-art laundry operations at an affordable cost to about 1,500 residents of the area.

HUL’s factory workers also act as Swachhata Doots, or messengers of change who teach the three habits of WASH in their own villages. This mobile-led rural behaviour change communication model also provides a volunteering opportunity to those who are busy but wish to make a difference. A toolkit especially designed for this purpose helps volunteers approach, explain and teach people in their immediate vicinity - their drivers, cooks, domestic helps etc. - about the three simple habits for better hygiene. This helps cast the net of awareness wider as regular interaction is conducive to habit formation. To learn more about their volunteering programme, click here. To learn more about the Swachh Aadat Swachh Bharat initiative, click here.

This article was produced by the Scroll marketing team on behalf of Hindustan Unilever and not by the Scroll editorial team.