The Daily Fix

The Daily Fix: The Rajya Sabha needs to re-examine the draconian provisions of the triple talaq Bill

Everything you need to know for the day (and a little more).

The Big Story: Talaq, talaq, talaq

Instant triple talaq or talaq-e-biddat is a form of instant, oral divorce that was, till recently, available to Muslim men in India. The practice was unfair to women, giving them little security in a society where men mostly control a family’s finances. Triple talaq had already been abolished in most other countries where Muslim law held sway, such as Pakistan or Bangladesh. It took a Supreme Court decision in August to abolish talaq-e-biddat from Indian Muslim personal law.

This should have been the end of the matter. But it wasn’t. Within months, the Union government started to draft a law that made talaq-e-biddat a criminal offence. A Muslim man might face three years in prison for uttering the word “talaq” three times, even though this act has no legal power anymore. Moreover, unlike in other types of crimes committed within the framework of marriage, the draft bill made instant triple talaq a cognisable offence – which means anyone can file a complaint. The offence is also a non-bailable one.

In sum, a Muslim man could be put in prison if anyone alleges that he has said a word three times, even though that word has no legal weight. In a legal system that already acts against Muslims, this law opens avenues for further abuse, allowing for arbitrary prison time and for the break up of families based on an external complaint or even suo moto police action.

The bill was passed in the Lok Sabha on Thursday. Like the provisions in the proposed law, the manner in which the bill was passed was highly irregular. Even as Muslims groups across the board spoke out against the law, no experts or special interest groups were consulted. In fact, the Bebaak Collective, a women’s rights group that was key in the Supreme Court case that made the practice illegal, warned that “the move to imprison Muslim men will add to the prevailing insecurity and alienation of the Muslim community”.

The Lok Sabha saw little pushback from the Opposition. While the lower house has a clear government majority, the situation is different in the Rajya Sabha, where the bill will be introduced on Wednesday. The Opposition has already demanded that the bill be sent to a Select Committee. It has the numbers in the House to ensure that its demand is carried out. Efforts must be made to revise the draconian measures of the bill that seek only to victimise a minority.

The Big Scroll

  • The triple talaq Bill is hasty, impulsive and cruel – much like the act it seeks to criminalise, argues Abhishek Sudhir.
  • As triple talaq Bill heads to Rajya Sabha, Opposition unity will be put to the test, reports Anita Katyal.

Subscribe to “The Daily Fix” by either downloading Scroll’s Android app or opting for it to be delivered to your mailbox. For the rest of the day’s headlines do click here.

If you have any concerns about our coverage of particular issues, please write to the Readers’ Editor at readerseditor@scroll.in

Punditry

  • At the root of the insecurities of Marathas, Jats and Patels lies lack of education and employability, point out Christophe Jaffrelot and Kalaiyarasan A in the Indian Express.
  • For Tamils, Rajinikanth signals a shift away from a politics rooted in ideology to one that is solely personality-centric, argues K Venkataramanan in the Hindu.
  • After Trump’s tweet, India hopes the United States will bring Pakistan to heel, writes Manoj Joshi in Bloomberg Quint.

Giggle

Don’t Miss

“They are scared of Dalit assertion”: Gujarat MLA Jignesh Mevani speaks to Dhirendra Jha on the Bhima Koregaon violence

“The Peshwa regime was meant to protect the Brahminical system based on caste. The same is perpetrated by the BJP and the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh. Hindu Rashtra means protecting and promoting the hegemony of upper castes. Modiji has perpetrated neo-liberal policies by favouring the greed of corporate houses and patronised Brahminical oppression. His Gujarat model is essentially a Brahminical model. Dalits, minorities, farmers, labourers have no place in this system. Their rights have no meaning for these Brahminical oppressors, just as they meant nothing to the Peshwas.”

Support our journalism by subscribing to Scroll+ here. We welcome your comments at letters@scroll.in.
Sponsored Content BY 

Do you really need to use that plastic straw?

The hazards of single-use plastic items, and what to use instead.

In June 2018, a distressed whale in Thailand made headlines around the world. After an autopsy it’s cause of death was determined to be more than 80 plastic bags it had ingested. The pictures caused great concern and brought into focus the urgency of the fight against single-use plastic. This term refers to use-and-throw plastic products that are designed for one-time use, such as takeaway spoons and forks, polythene bags styrofoam cups etc. In its report on single-use plastics, the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) has described how single-use plastics have a far-reaching impact in the environment.

Dense quantity of plastic litter means sights such as the distressed whale in Thailand aren’t uncommon. Plastic products have been found in the airways and stomachs of hundreds of marine and land species. Plastic bags, especially, confuse turtles who mistake them for jellyfish - their food. They can even exacerbate health crises, such as a malarial outbreak, by clogging sewers and creating ideal conditions for vector-borne diseases to thrive. In 1988, poor drainage made worse by plastic clogging contributed to the devastating Bangladesh floods in which two-thirds of the country was submerged.

Plastic litter can, moreover, cause physiological harm. Burning plastic waste for cooking fuel and in open air pits releases harmful gases in the air, contributing to poor air quality especially in poorer countries where these practices are common. But plastic needn’t even be burned to cause physiological harm. The toxic chemical additives in the manufacturing process of plastics remain in animal tissue, which is then consumed by humans. These highly toxic and carcinogenic substances (benzene, styrene etc.) can cause damage to nervous systems, lungs and reproductive organs.

The European Commission recently released a list of top 10 single-use plastic items that it plans to ban in the near future. These items are ubiquitous as trash across the world’s beaches, even the pristine, seemingly untouched ones. Some of them, such as styrofoam cups, take up to a 1,000 years to photodegrade (the breakdown of substances by exposure to UV and infrared rays from sunlight), disintegrating into microplastics, another health hazard.

More than 60 countries have introduced levies and bans to discourage the use of single-use plastics. Morocco and Rwanda have emerged as inspiring success stories of such policies. Rwanda, in fact, is now among the cleanest countries on Earth. In India, Maharashtra became the 18th state to effect a ban on disposable plastic items in March 2018. Now India plans to replicate the decision on a national level, aiming to eliminate single-use plastics entirely by 2022. While government efforts are important to encourage industries to redesign their production methods, individuals too can take steps to minimise their consumption, and littering, of single-use plastics. Most of these actions are low on effort, but can cause a significant reduction in plastic waste in the environment, if the return of Olive Ridley turtles to a Mumbai beach are anything to go by.

To know more about the single-use plastics problem, visit Planet or Plastic portal, National Geographic’s multi-year effort to raise awareness about the global plastic trash crisis. From microplastics in cosmetics to haunting art on plastic pollution, Planet or Plastic is a comprehensive resource on the problem. You can take the pledge to reduce your use of single-use plastics, here.

This article was produced by the Scroll marketing team on behalf of National Geographic, and not by the Scroll editorial team.