Communal politics

Vinay Katiyar demand for Muslims to leave India shows BJP is cranking up the hate machine for 2019

With little time to fire up the economy before the next general election, the ruling party’s pitch will grow increasingly communal.

On Wednesday, Bharatiya Janata Party MP Vinay Katiyar said that Muslims must leave India. “They have been given their lands,” he said. “They should go to Pakistan or Bangladesh. What are they doing here?”

On Twitter, Mohandas Pai, a prominent right-wing commentator, described Katiyar as a “loony”. Reacting to the MP’s demand on Monday that the Taj Mahal be demolished and a Hindu temple erected in its place, Pai asked, “Why do you take them seriously?” But Katiyar is no fringe element. He is a member of the party that rules at both the Centre and in Uttar Pradesh.

For Katiyar to deliver such an incendiary statement without inviting censure from his party, which has a highly centralised structure, would seem to indicate that the BJP endorses his politics. Katiyar’s rhetoric is yet another sign that as the 2019 Lok Sabha election approaches, the BJP will depend heavily on hard Hindutva for votes.

Constant communalism

It is not hard to discern a pattern here. In the run-up to the 2014 Lok Sabha election, senior BJP leader Giriraj Singh had said anyone opposing Narendra Modi should be shipped to Pakistan. Singh’s remark resulted in the Election Commission barring him from campaigning. Yet, when the BJP won, Singh’s statement was seen as a profitable model to be followed in future campaigns.

Indeed, the constant communal rhetoric of the past four years should force a re-evaluation of our understanding of the 2014 election result. It is frequently argued that it was a vote for development – a word that in India stands for economic matters. Yet, it is now clear that the BJP’s pitch was based on economics as well as religious identity. It was not a choice between development and Hindutva – it was development and Hindutva.

Party line

Since taking power, the BJP has kept the Hindutva pot boiling. The cow has occupied centre stage, with a spate of lynchings by vigilantes targeting Muslims. States ruled by the BJP in particular have done little to prevent such attacks; indeed, in most instances, criminal cases have been registered against the victims.

State elections too have been fought with communalism as the main plank of the BJP’s campaigns. In the campaign for the Gujarat assembly election last year, for example, a video advertisement asking people to vote for Modi showed a young women expressing fears for her safety as the azaan, the Muslim call to prayer, is heard in the background.

Modi himself has played the Hindu-Muslim card. In Gujarat, he raised the Ayodhya dispute, asking whether the Congress wanted a Ram temple or a mosque at the site where the Babri Masjid once stood. At an election rally in Uttar Pradesh in February 2017, the prime minister made the unsubstantiated claim that the authorities in the state – then ruled by the Samajwadi Party – provided uninterrupted electricity supply for Muslim festivals but not Hindu ones.

Development and Hindutva

In 2018, while the “development plus Hindutva” formula of 2014 still holds, the balance of the equation has changed. The BJP’s economic promises of 2014 were too bold. Far from the BJP government ushering in “achhe din”, or good times, as it had promised to do, little has changed materially for most Indians. If anything, things have become worse. The unemployment rate, for one, has risen after Modi took over from Manmohan Singh. Private investment is falling, which means few new jobs will be created in the near future.

Add to this demonetisation and the Goods and Services Tax – both disruptive measures that have harmed vast swathes of the population – and it is easy to see why an economic pitch for 2019 would be a tough sell.

Hence, Katiyar. The BJP faces a growing difficultly of credibly selling development and has little time to crank up the economy before the next election. India should brace for even more communalism from its ruling establishment as it heads to the polls.

Support our journalism by subscribing to Scroll+ here. We welcome your comments at
Sponsored Content BY 

Do you really need to use that plastic straw?

The hazards of single-use plastic items, and what to use instead.

In June 2018, a distressed whale in Thailand made headlines around the world. After an autopsy it’s cause of death was determined to be more than 80 plastic bags it had ingested. The pictures caused great concern and brought into focus the urgency of the fight against single-use plastic. This term refers to use-and-throw plastic products that are designed for one-time use, such as takeaway spoons and forks, polythene bags styrofoam cups etc. In its report on single-use plastics, the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) has described how single-use plastics have a far-reaching impact in the environment.

Dense quantity of plastic litter means sights such as the distressed whale in Thailand aren’t uncommon. Plastic products have been found in the airways and stomachs of hundreds of marine and land species. Plastic bags, especially, confuse turtles who mistake them for jellyfish - their food. They can even exacerbate health crises, such as a malarial outbreak, by clogging sewers and creating ideal conditions for vector-borne diseases to thrive. In 1988, poor drainage made worse by plastic clogging contributed to the devastating Bangladesh floods in which two-thirds of the country was submerged.

Plastic litter can, moreover, cause physiological harm. Burning plastic waste for cooking fuel and in open air pits releases harmful gases in the air, contributing to poor air quality especially in poorer countries where these practices are common. But plastic needn’t even be burned to cause physiological harm. The toxic chemical additives in the manufacturing process of plastics remain in animal tissue, which is then consumed by humans. These highly toxic and carcinogenic substances (benzene, styrene etc.) can cause damage to nervous systems, lungs and reproductive organs.

The European Commission recently released a list of top 10 single-use plastic items that it plans to ban in the near future. These items are ubiquitous as trash across the world’s beaches, even the pristine, seemingly untouched ones. Some of them, such as styrofoam cups, take up to a 1,000 years to photodegrade (the breakdown of substances by exposure to UV and infrared rays from sunlight), disintegrating into microplastics, another health hazard.

More than 60 countries have introduced levies and bans to discourage the use of single-use plastics. Morocco and Rwanda have emerged as inspiring success stories of such policies. Rwanda, in fact, is now among the cleanest countries on Earth. In India, Maharashtra became the 18th state to effect a ban on disposable plastic items in March 2018. Now India plans to replicate the decision on a national level, aiming to eliminate single-use plastics entirely by 2022. While government efforts are important to encourage industries to redesign their production methods, individuals too can take steps to minimise their consumption, and littering, of single-use plastics. Most of these actions are low on effort, but can cause a significant reduction in plastic waste in the environment, if the return of Olive Ridley turtles to a Mumbai beach are anything to go by.

To know more about the single-use plastics problem, visit Planet or Plastic portal, National Geographic’s multi-year effort to raise awareness about the global plastic trash crisis. From microplastics in cosmetics to haunting art on plastic pollution, Planet or Plastic is a comprehensive resource on the problem. You can take the pledge to reduce your use of single-use plastics, here.

This article was produced by the Scroll marketing team on behalf of National Geographic, and not by the Scroll editorial team.