Bank Report

RBI, government also responsible for PNB fraud, says former deputy governor of India’s central bank

‘There is no accountability in public banks. In private banks, there is pressure from shareholders,’ says KC Chakrabarty.

India’s banking sector seems to be lurching from one crisis to another.

On February 14, Punjab National Bank, the country’s second-largest government-owned lender, revealed that it had uncovered a $1.77 billion fraud at one of its branches in Mumbai. It cautioned that the problem is expected to spill over to other lenders.

This could not have come at a worse time as Indian banks battle a pile of non-performing assets that is expected to rise from Rs 8 lakh crores in March 2017 to Rs 9.5 lakh crores in March 2018.

KC Chakrabarty, former deputy governor of the Reserve Bank of India, believes these problems are likely to escalate as governance and regulatory standards hit a nadir. Chakrabarty, who served as chairman and managing director of Punjab National Bank between 2007 and 2009, said that since such crises are products of systemic problems, the banking regulator and government, too, must take responsibility.

He spoke to Quartz about what this fraud implies, the growing non-performing assets problem, and what measures are needed. Edited excerpts:

A $1.77 billion fraud went unnoticed for seven years. What does it says about Indian banking?
Banking is a risk-taking business and so frauds, bad loans, and wrong decisions will happen. But the business has to be done within a broad risk-management framework. In Indian banking, [this] framework is primitive. In fact, we have no risk-management system at all and this is a systemic issue. It is the responsibility of the board, policy makers, and the regulator, and they all should put in place a strong credit-assessment process. Our entire approach is that if you violate the framework and make profit, you are rewarded; questions are asked only when you make losses. Instead, you should be reprimanded and punished the moment you violate guidelines.

Who do you think is responsible for these oversights?
Everybody – the regulator, bank boards, management, and even employees. There is very poor control and oversight. Unless you correct this, these things will keep happening.

What should done to ensure these instances are not repeated?
How can one bank branch in Mumbai sanction Rs 11,000 crore of contingent liability credit risk [letters of credit] and go unnoticed? In fact, the moment you sanction a letter of credit, it should be reflected on the books as it is a loan, and the name of the approver should also be recorded. We are not ready to follow the global best practice, according to which, people who sanction the loan should not be allowed to talk to the borrower. The credit operation should be segregated from credit-risk assessment. Ideally, loans should not be sanctioned at the bank level, but from a centralised office.

Are these lapses fuelling India’s toxic-loan problem?
Absolutely. Nobody is questioning why these loans were given in the first place. We are blaming the borrowers for not repaying, but the fact is these bad loans are also a result of governance issues.

Nobody is questioning why these loans were given in the first place. In fact, I think the whole NPA [non-performing assets] problem is much bigger than what is being discussed. We have gross non-performing assets of Rs 8-9 lakh crore. Then, loans worth Rs 6 lakh crore have been written off and that is also NPA. So the NPA problem is already at Rs 15 lakh crore. But from Parliament to RBI to banks, they keep saying that NPA is only around Rs 9 lakh crore. They are all lying, as we are not recognising the full problem. Imagine, we don’t even have the basic transparency.

The banks keep saying the worst is behind us. Do you agree?
How can they even say that when they haven’t improved their risk management framework or appraisal methodology? All that we seem to be saying is that god will take care of it and so it won’t happen again! It may not happen for few months, but then again it can recur after a few years.

If the RBI’s latest circular is implemented, then the NPA problem will only get bigger. Bad loans will go up by Rs 2 lakh crore immediately as all your restructured assets will become NPAs.

Why do public sector banks seem to be in greater trouble?
Because there is no accountability. In private banks, there is pressure from shareholders, the management can get terminated if they do something wrong, and their risk-management framework is slightly better.

How much responsibility do the Reserve Bank of India and government share in this financial mess?
If all banks don’t have the risk-management system, then it is a regulatory failure and the owner’s [government] failure as well. The owner will feel the heat because it needs to give capital. But what is the accountability of the regulator?

At this rate do you think we can trust Indian banks?
I don’t think Indians have an option. Plus, you know that the government will step in and rescue. The problem is that the ordinary taxpayers’ money will go in all this.

This article first appeared on Quartz.

Support our journalism by subscribing to Scroll+ here. We welcome your comments at
Sponsored Content BY 

Do you really need to use that plastic straw?

The hazards of single-use plastic items, and what to use instead.

In June 2018, a distressed whale in Thailand made headlines around the world. After an autopsy it’s cause of death was determined to be more than 80 plastic bags it had ingested. The pictures caused great concern and brought into focus the urgency of the fight against single-use plastic. This term refers to use-and-throw plastic products that are designed for one-time use, such as takeaway spoons and forks, polythene bags styrofoam cups etc. In its report on single-use plastics, the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) has described how single-use plastics have a far-reaching impact in the environment.

Dense quantity of plastic litter means sights such as the distressed whale in Thailand aren’t uncommon. Plastic products have been found in the airways and stomachs of hundreds of marine and land species. Plastic bags, especially, confuse turtles who mistake them for jellyfish - their food. They can even exacerbate health crises, such as a malarial outbreak, by clogging sewers and creating ideal conditions for vector-borne diseases to thrive. In 1988, poor drainage made worse by plastic clogging contributed to the devastating Bangladesh floods in which two-thirds of the country was submerged.

Plastic litter can, moreover, cause physiological harm. Burning plastic waste for cooking fuel and in open air pits releases harmful gases in the air, contributing to poor air quality especially in poorer countries where these practices are common. But plastic needn’t even be burned to cause physiological harm. The toxic chemical additives in the manufacturing process of plastics remain in animal tissue, which is then consumed by humans. These highly toxic and carcinogenic substances (benzene, styrene etc.) can cause damage to nervous systems, lungs and reproductive organs.

The European Commission recently released a list of top 10 single-use plastic items that it plans to ban in the near future. These items are ubiquitous as trash across the world’s beaches, even the pristine, seemingly untouched ones. Some of them, such as styrofoam cups, take up to a 1,000 years to photodegrade (the breakdown of substances by exposure to UV and infrared rays from sunlight), disintegrating into microplastics, another health hazard.

More than 60 countries have introduced levies and bans to discourage the use of single-use plastics. Morocco and Rwanda have emerged as inspiring success stories of such policies. Rwanda, in fact, is now among the cleanest countries on Earth. In India, Maharashtra became the 18th state to effect a ban on disposable plastic items in March 2018. Now India plans to replicate the decision on a national level, aiming to eliminate single-use plastics entirely by 2022. While government efforts are important to encourage industries to redesign their production methods, individuals too can take steps to minimise their consumption, and littering, of single-use plastics. Most of these actions are low on effort, but can cause a significant reduction in plastic waste in the environment, if the return of Olive Ridley turtles to a Mumbai beach are anything to go by.

To know more about the single-use plastics problem, visit Planet or Plastic portal, National Geographic’s multi-year effort to raise awareness about the global plastic trash crisis. From microplastics in cosmetics to haunting art on plastic pollution, Planet or Plastic is a comprehensive resource on the problem. You can take the pledge to reduce your use of single-use plastics, here.

This article was produced by the Scroll marketing team on behalf of National Geographic, and not by the Scroll editorial team.