Field Watch

Interview: For doubles stars Pedersen-Juhl, success on court comes before their relationship

They eat, sleep, practice, play and win together. Meet Christinna and Kamilla – a couple that’s sweet, successful and inspiring.

The headlines in Danish badminton, over the last two years, have been mostly of Viktor Axelsen. With the precociously talented Viktor a.k.a. The Great Dane (nicknamed aptly by the international media) it was just a question of when, and not if, he’d reach the pinnacle of the world badminton rankings. That inevitability occured last September.

If this was the headline of last year, there was, a few days later, another story – one that’s sweet, successful and inspiring – of two of Viktor’s compatriots - Christinna Pedersen and Kamilla Rytter Juhl.

The success of Christinna and Kamilla in women’s doubles is already known and hasn’t been matched ever in all of Europe. They became the only Europeans to feature in the women’s doubles final of the Olympics and won silver in Rio. This apart, there are medals and titles that are testimony to their brilliant partnership on court.

But what endeared them to the badminton followers over the world (well, at least to most of them) in October was their announcement that they’d achieved all this being in a relationship since 2009.

Of course, homosexuality isn’t a big deal in a country as liberal as Denmark. The pair, in fact, told their families and friends without a long wait after revealing their love for each other. But for eight years, they chose to keep their relationship under wraps from the international media: not only because of the apprehension of a backlash, but also because of the ambition to accomplish, so that they are identified with success and not with their relationship off court.

They eat, sleep, practice, play and win together. But to find them together during the Premier Badminton League isn’t very easy, as they play for different teams: Kamilla for Ahmedabad Smash Masters and Christinna for Awadhe Warriors.

The Field caught up with them together, to speak about their on-court and off-court partnership.


Tell us your story. How did you guys first meet, get together...

Christinna: It started in 2009 when we got into this relationship. We knew we had feelings for each other. We then decided to tell our parents and close friends that we are together... Actually that’s it. Then we started writing the book. Everyone in Denmark knew we were together. Then, the international media also knew about it. So, it’s now okay to talk about that we are together off court as well.

Do you remember the first time you guys met?

Kamilla: No. Actually not. We were both at the national training centre. That’s where it started. We practiced together everyday. It was not like love at first sight or anything (smiles). It was something that came very slowly.

What do you like and dislike about each other?

Christinna: What I like about Kamilla and like a lot is that she’s calm. When we are practicing, when we are playing tournaments in the beginning, I wasn’t feeling as calm as Kamilla did. I learnt that from her. Especially on court.

And do you have any sort of dislikes…

Christinna and Kamilla: No, not at all.

And, what about you, Kamilla? What do you like about her?

Kamilla: I like a lot of things about Christinna. She has made me believe in myself. She’s good in believing in herself. So, I think we are a good combination on and off court. We are really strong together.

You guys have said before that people have received your relationship in a positive manner. But there have been negative comments as well. How do you react to those comments?

Kamilla: It’s not like we are counting how many negative comments we get. But it’s like if we get maybe 100 positive, we get one or two negative. So… we are handling our social media. We are keeping an eye on what’s going on. Are people too negative, what’s the reaction when we post something. Of course, there are people who don’t like this kind of relationship. That’s okay for us. As long as we have so many positives. It’s not like we are acting on the negative comments. We haven’t felt anyone being aggressive towards us or anything like that. Again, it’s just a few comments on social media. And, on social media, you can do anything you want. In real life, we didn’t have anyone saying negative things to us…

So, what goes through in your mind when you travel to a country like India, where homosexuality is criminalised?

Christinna: We told ourselves in October [2017] when the international media got the news and before we left for our first tournament after that in China and Hong Kong that “We have to wait and see what will happen. Will there be any reaction now?” We did the same before coming here to India. And, nothing negative has been here. We are really pleased that everyone has been really kind and friendly to us. Even though we are a couple off court, one thing that’s been really important to show was: we are still the same people before you knew about our relationship. I am still Christinna and this is still Kamilla. Nothing has changed.

You’re in the same career, same sport. Is that a positive or a negative? Because one of you might want to discuss the sport all the time but the other wouldn’t want that…

Kamilla: Normally when people ask us, how much time we spend together, we say, “24 hours a day”. Of course, we are a lot together. We talk a lot about badminton. It’s our sport, we love our sport, we are talking a lot about it. But it’s not like after we go home, we analyse what was good, what was bad, and what to do tomorrow…

Christinna: Sometimes I analyse if Kamilla has made too many errors (both laugh).

Kamilla: Luckily for me it’s not everyday. So… But of course, we talk a lot about badminton. We are good at doing other things that take our minds away from the court. And, I think that’s a positive.

Has there been instances when personal problems affected your on-court performances?

Kamilla: We have been playing together for eight years. And, of course, there can be conflicts during a tournament in that time. But there hasn’t been many…

Christinna: I can’t even think of a specific instance like that.

Kamilla: Yeah, I don’t think we have lost a match because of that. We know that when we step on court, we have to stick together. If we don’t do that, we don’t have a chance. It’s the same every morning. When we go to practice in Copenhagen, we practice together with the boys. But when we step on to the court, we know we have to stick together. If we don’t, then the boys will kick our a**es. And we know we have to play only one hour, one and a half hours, and we can stick together.

And, being in a relationship might help understand each other’s games well.

Christinna: I am sure that’s the reason why our relationship has been this good. It’s because we know each other well. And as Kamilla said, when on court, we always want to win together. I am 100% sure that’s our secret weapon for our good results. It’s also, you can say, the love for each other.

Kamilla: Actually, it’s simple. Everytime we step on court,we tell each other that we have to do everything that’s possible to win this match. We don’t want to look back and say ‘I could have done 10 percent more’. It doesn’t work. You can’t win matches like that. I think that’s why we could keep up our level after the Olympics. Normally when players make a big result, they go a little bit down. We didn’t want that and we told ourselves that. It’s not like we are going to Korea or Japan and all other tournaments. It’s not like someone is forcing us to go there. It’s our own decision.

Kamilla and Christinna with their silver medals in the Rio Olympics. -AFP
Kamilla and Christinna with their silver medals in the Rio Olympics. -AFP

What do you guys do when you aren’t practicing or playing badminton?

Christinna: We travel for a lot of tournaments, visiting a lot of countries. When we aren’t playing badminton we like to go back to our families, we love to visit them. We’d like to go watch a movie in the cinemas. Go into the city and have a cafe latte. Just casual things. And we hang out with our really good friends.

How difficult was it to keep your relationship under the wraps since 2009?

Kamilla: It’s not something that we used so much energy on. Fellow players, our coaches and friends knew it. A lot of European players knew about it. So, when a journalist came and said “We have to make a quiz; how well do you know her?” and I was like “I know her pretty well”.

Does it bother you sometimes that the talking point, when it comes to you both, becomes about your sexuality than your game?

Christinna: No. The reason why we kept it with ourselves until now is because we wanted to show everybody that we are good at playing badminton than just being famous for being together off court.

How’s the following of badminton back home?

Kamilla: Badminton is getting more and more popular in Denmark. It’s of course because of Viktor. He’s doing a really great job. Carsten (Mogensten) and Boe Mathias in the men’s doubles are also doing a good job. When they are not winning tournaments, we are doing well. So, there’s always one or two combinations doing quite well. So that’s affecting the media. They are liking badminton more and more. And, it’s coming more in television as well. So, that’s a positive thing and we just have to keep it going.

Support our journalism by subscribing to Scroll+ here. We welcome your comments at
Sponsored Content BY 

Swara Bhasker: Sharp objects has to be on the radar of every woman who is tired of being “nice”

The actress weighs in on what she loves about the show.

This article has been written by award-winning actor Swara Bhasker.

All women growing up in India, South Asia, or anywhere in the world frankly; will remember in some form or the other that gentle girlhood admonishing, “Nice girls don’t do that.” I kept recalling that gently reasoned reproach as I watched Sharp Objects (you can catch it on Hotstar Premium). Adapted from the author of Gone Girl, Gillian Flynn’s debut novel Sharp Objects has been directed by Jean-Marc Vallée, who has my heart since he gave us Big Little Lies. It stars the multiple-Oscar nominee Amy Adams, who delivers a searing performance as Camille Preaker; and Patricia Clarkson, who is magnetic as the dominating and dark Adora Crellin. As an actress myself, it felt great to watch a show driven by its female performers.

The series is woven around a troubled, alcohol-dependent, self-harming, female journalist Camille (single and in her thirties incidentally) who returns to the small town of her birth and childhood, Wind Gap, Missouri, to report on two similarly gruesome murders of teenage girls. While the series is a murder mystery, it equally delves into the psychology, not just of the principal characters, but also of the town, and thus a culture as a whole.

There is a lot that impresses in Sharp Objects — the manner in which the storytelling gently unwraps a plot that is dark, disturbing and shocking, the stellar and crafty control that Jean-Marc Vallée exercises on his narrative, the cinematography that is fluid and still manages to suggest that something sinister lurks within Wind Gap, the editing which keeps this narrative languid yet sharp and consistently evokes a haunting sensation.

Sharp Objects is also liberating (apart from its positive performance on Bechdel parameters) as content — for female actors and for audiences in giving us female centric and female driven shows that do not bear the burden of providing either role-models or even uplifting messages. 

Instead, it presents a world where women are dangerous and dysfunctional but very real — a world where women are neither pure victims, nor pure aggressors. A world where they occupy the grey areas, complex and contradictory as agents in a power play, in which they control some reigns too.

But to me personally, and perhaps to many young women viewers across the world, what makes Sharp Objects particularly impactful, perhaps almost poignant, is the manner in which it unravels the whole idea, the culture, the entire psychology of that childhood admonishment “Nice girls don’t do that.” Sharp Objects explores the sinister and dark possibilities of what the corollary of that thinking could be.

“Nice girls don’t do that.”

“Who does?”

“Bad girls.”

“So I’m a bad girl.”

“You shouldn’t be a bad girl.”

“Why not?”

“Bad girls get in trouble.”

“What trouble? What happens to bad girls?”

“Bad things.”

“What bad things?”

“Very bad things.”

“How bad?”


“Like what?”


A point the show makes early on is that both the victims of the introductory brutal murders were not your typically nice girly-girls. Camille, the traumatised protagonist carrying a burden from her past was herself not a nice girl. Amma, her deceptive half-sister manipulates the nice girl act to defy her controlling mother. But perhaps the most incisive critique on the whole ‘Be a nice girl’ culture, in fact the whole ‘nice’ culture — nice folks, nice manners, nice homes, nice towns — comes in the form of Adora’s character and the manner in which beneath the whole veneer of nice, a whole town is complicit in damning secrets and not-so-nice acts. At one point early on in the show, Adora tells her firstborn Camille, with whom she has a strained relationship (to put it mildly), “I just want things to be nice with us but maybe I don’t know how..” Interestingly it is this very notion of ‘nice’ that becomes the most oppressive and deceptive experience of young Camille, and later Amma’s growing years.

This ‘Culture of Nice’ is in fact the pervasive ‘Culture of Silence’ that women all over the world, particularly in India, are all too familiar with. 

It takes different forms, but always towards the same goal — to silence the not-so-nice details of what the experiences; sometimes intimate experiences of women might be. This Culture of Silence is propagated from the child’s earliest experience of being parented by society in general. Amongst the values that girls receive in our early years — apart from those of being obedient, dutiful, respectful, homely — we also receive the twin headed Chimera in the form of shame and guilt.

“Have some shame!”

“Oh for shame!”




“Do not bring shame upon…”

Different phrases in different languages, but always with the same implication. Shameful things happen to girls who are not nice and that brings ‘shame’ on the family or everyone associated with the girl. And nice folks do not talk about these things. Nice folks go on as if nothing has happened.

It is this culture of silence that women across the world today, are calling out in many different ways. Whether it is the #MeToo movement or a show like Sharp Objects; or on a lighter and happier note, even a film like Veere Di Wedding punctures this culture of silence, quite simply by refusing to be silenced and saying the not-nice things, or depicting the so called ‘unspeakable’ things that could happen to girls. By talking about the unspeakable, you rob it of the power to shame you; you disallow the ‘Culture of Nice’ to erase your experience. You stand up for yourself and you build your own identity.

And this to me is the most liberating aspect of being an actor, and even just a girl at a time when shows like Sharp Objects and Big Little Lies (another great show on Hotstar Premium), and films like Veere Di Wedding and Anaarkali Of Aarah are being made.

The next time I hear someone say, “Nice girls don’t do that!”, I know what I’m going to say — I don’t give a shit about nice. I’m just a girl! And that’s okay!

Swara is a an award winning actor of the Hindi film industry. Her last few films, including Veere Di Wedding, Anaarkali of Aaraah and Nil Battey Sannata have earned her both critical and commercial success. Swara is an occasional writer of articles and opinion pieces. The occasions are frequent :).

Watch the trailer of Sharp Objects here:


This article was published by the Scroll marketing team with Swara Bhasker on behalf of Hotstar Premium and not by the Scroll editorial team.