India in South Africa

Watching Shastri, missing Kumble: India made mistakes that well-drilled teams would not have

When you look at the team’s performance in the first two Tests in South Africa, the one thing that this team clearly needed was good old-fashioned coaching.

“I don’t call what I do coaching,” said Ravi Shastri after the Galle Test against Sri Lanka in 2017. “I know I’ve been appointed coach, but it’s more fine-tuning, more man-management. It’s what a captain does, basically. It’s just an extension of that. All those qualities you need to be a really good captain come into play here.”

But when you look at the Indian team’s performance in the first two Tests in South Africa, the one thing that this team clearly needed was good old-fashioned coaching. The kind that drills things into your head; the kind that Sunil Gavaskar and Kapil Dev swear by; the kind that forces you to forget habits formed by playing on Indian pitches for years.

In the very same interview, Shastri also mentioned this: “The captain is the ultimate boss. He takes the team on to the park. Your job is to get them in the best frame of mind to go out and express themselves. Play a brand of cricket that’s fearless and enjoyable, not just for themselves, but for those watching. You can’t go out and field over there. You can’t bat. Your job is to prepare them. After that, the captain calls the shots.”

But just how has Shastri prepared them? If that is his job, then has he done it well? The cricket this team played was neither fearless not enjoyable.

Not an ideal preparation

Yes, Virat Kohli, Cheteshwar Pujara, Murali Vijay and every other member of this team will tell you that they had perfect practice sessions but on the field, their performance told a very different stories. Simply put, India got their basics wrong. Not once, not twice but multiple times. They dropped catches, made silly mistakes, played rash shots… and they did it in a manner that well-drilled, world No 1 teams would never do. Don’t get me wrong, all teams make mistakes but India have failed to improve and in that lies their fault.

Hardik Pandya reacts after getting run out on day three| Image credit: Ron Gaunt/BCCI/SPORTZPICS
Hardik Pandya reacts after getting run out on day three| Image credit: Ron Gaunt/BCCI/SPORTZPICS

Of course, someone might turn around and say that it’s just two losses; just two losses after a string of victories. But then you also have to remember that these are precisely the ‘away’ matches that Kohli and Shastri so badly wanted to win. They made it their goal from the get-go and if they wanted it so badly, they should have prepared for it better.

And perhaps they would have prepared better if only they truly believed they needed to.

Instead, we heard this from assistant coach Sanjay Bangar on the eve of the first Test: “We are very, very confident about our preparations, because we got four-five days but we made sure we’ve got plenty out of it. All the guys are really in a very, very positive state of mind.”

Now, how much of this was just lip service and how much was actually belief we’ll never know. But they knew that this wasn’t going to be an easy tour and Bangar is a pretty pragmatic guy. So then what happened to the ‘very, very confident’ unit that was in a ‘very, very positive state of mind’?

To cut a long story short, they crashed and burned.

Batsmen failed in application

If Shastri failed, then so has Bangar. One look at the batting line-up’s numbers after two Tests and you know that something has gone horribly wrong. It was as if they didn’t have a game plan or didn’t know how to stick to it.

Kohli: 191 runs, avg 47.75
Rohit Sharma: 78 runs, 19.50
Parthiv Patel: 38 runs, 19.00
Murali Vijay: 69 runs, 17.25
Shikhar Dhawan: 32 runs, 16.00
Cheteshwar Pujara: 49 runs, 12.25
KL Rahul: 14 runs, 7.00

Pandya and Ashwin have scored more runs than all the batsmen. Bhuvneshwar, who didn’t play the second Test, has an average second only to Kohli. Bangar should be worried because the shot selection was not good and neither was the technique. Kohli and Shastri like to stress on how batsmen should be allowed to play their natural games but indecisive footwork, drop in concentration and not grounding your bat are mistakes that suggest that a certain casualness has crept into their game. That casualness has to be stamped out.

This is a team that believes in quality training sessions and getting enough rest but after the reverse in the first Test, Sunil Gavaskar was surprised to see only the reserves turn up for practice the next day. The match had ended early and in a way given them another opportunity to polish their skills. But everyone took the break instead. This cannot be the madness one needs to win away from home; this cannot be the madness that Kohli spoke of.

Slip conundrum

And then, we come to fielding. To anyone watching this team, it is now clear as daylight: they can’t catch in the slips. In South Africa, England and Australia, you will get a lot of chances in the slips. If you don’t grab them, you will suffer. In his post-match conference after the second Test ended, Kohli said SA were ‘better in every department, especially the fielding’.

He wasn’t kidding. Some of the catches and run-outs effected by the home team were simply breathtaking. India, on the other hand, continued to have trouble with their slip catching and with Wriddhiman Saha out injured, Patel made a hash of the keepers’ slot too. Slip catching has been a long-time problem for India now and the fact that they have still not identified their regular slip cordon should be a worry. Players are constantly in and out of the slips and even in the slips, their positions keep changing. Once again, that can’t be good.

This team is very athletic – as the Pandya run out showed – but it takes more than mere fitness to take catches in the slips. The technique and the concentration required are sorely missing.

Bowlers were the only silver lining

The bowling coach, Bharat Arun, has managed to get the best out of his unit. The first innings in Cape Town wasn’t their best but they have consistently delivered the goods for Kohli. In that, there can’t be complaints. But in every other department, this team needs to up the ante.

The coaching staff has to play a huge role if there is to be a turnaround at all. Somehow, they need this team to understand it’s limitations. All those ‘home is away and away is home’ theories need to be forgotten because it has been proved for now and forever that home is not away, away is not home even when the pitch is like the one we saw in Centurion.

Kohli had reservations with Anil Kumble’s ‘style’ of coaching but perhaps it is that style this team needs now. Maybe they do need a taskmaster to do things that no team in the history of Indian cricket has achieved.

Kumble saw the Coach’s role akin to ‘holding a mirror’ to drive self-improvement in the team’s interest. If Shastri wants to see this team win in tough, alien conditions, he will have to do more than just talk. If he can’t, then this captain-coach dynamic would have let the team down. He might even need to take the captain on and get the team selection sorted but all in all, it must be acknowledged that the support staff’s inability to prepare this team better has played a huge role in this series loss.

It has been a collective failure in more ways than one. Kohli knows that, Shastri should too... after all they wanted to do this together... they asked for it.

Support our journalism by subscribing to Scroll+ here. We welcome your comments at
Sponsored Content BY 

The next Industrial Revolution is here – driven by the digitalization of manufacturing processes

Technologies such as Industry 4.0, IoT, robotics and Big Data analytics are transforming the manufacturing industry in a big way.

The manufacturing industry across the world is seeing major changes, driven by globalization and increasing consumer demand. As per a report by the World Economic Forum and Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Ltd on the future of manufacturing, the ability to innovate at a quicker pace will be the major differentiating factor in the success of companies and countries.

This is substantiated by a PWC research which shows that across industries, the most innovative companies in the manufacturing sector grew 38% (2013 - 2016), about 11% year on year, while the least innovative manufacturers posted only a 10% growth over the same period.

Along with innovation in products, the transformation of manufacturing processes will also be essential for companies to remain competitive and maintain their profitability. This is where digital technologies can act as a potential game changer.

The digitalization of the manufacturing industry involves the integration of digital technologies in manufacturing processes across the value chain. Also referred to as Industry 4.0, digitalization is poised to reshape all aspects of the manufacturing industry and is being hailed as the next Industrial Revolution. Integral to Industry 4.0 is the ‘smart factory’, where devices are inter-connected, and processes are streamlined, thus ensuring greater productivity across the value chain, from design and development, to engineering and manufacturing and finally to service and logistics.

Internet of Things (IoT), robotics, artificial intelligence and Big Data analytics are some of the key technologies powering Industry 4.0. According to a report, Industry 4.0 will prompt manufacturers globally to invest $267 billion in technologies like IoT by 2020. Investments in digitalization can lead to excellent returns. Companies that have implemented digitalization solutions have almost halved their manufacturing cycle time through more efficient use of their production lines. With a single line now able to produce more than double the number of product variants as three lines in the conventional model, end to end digitalization has led to an almost 20% jump in productivity.

Digitalization and the Indian manufacturing industry

The Make in India program aims to increase the contribution of the manufacturing industry to the country’s GDP from 16% to 25% by 2022. India’s manufacturing sector could also potentially touch $1 trillion by 2025. However, to achieve these goals and for the industry to reach its potential, it must overcome the several internal and external obstacles that impede its growth. These include competition from other Asian countries, infrastructural deficiencies and lack of skilled manpower.

There is a common sentiment across big manufacturers that India lacks the eco-system for making sophisticated components. According to FICCI’s report on the readiness of Indian manufacturing to adopt advanced manufacturing trends, only 10% of companies have adopted new technologies for manufacturing, while 80% plan to adopt the same by 2020. This indicates a significant gap between the potential and the reality of India’s manufacturing industry.

The ‘Make in India’ vision of positioning India as a global manufacturing hub requires the industry to adopt innovative technologies. Digitalization can give the Indian industry an impetus to deliver products and services that match global standards, thereby getting access to global markets.

The policy, thus far, has received a favourable response as global tech giants have either set up or are in the process of setting up hi-tech manufacturing plants in India. Siemens, for instance, is helping companies in India gain a competitive advantage by integrating industry-specific software applications that optimise performance across the entire value chain.

The Digital Enterprise is Siemens’ solution portfolio for the digitalization of industries. It comprises of powerful software and future-proof automation solutions for industries and companies of all sizes. For the discrete industries, the Digital Enterprise Suite offers software and hardware solutions to seamlessly integrate and digitalize their entire value chain – including suppliers – from product design to service, all based on one data model. The result of this is a perfect digital copy of the value chain: the digital twin. This enables companies to perform simulation, testing, and optimization in a completely virtual environment.

The process industries benefit from Integrated Engineering to Integrated Operations by utilizing a continuous data model of the entire lifecycle of a plant that helps to increase flexibility and efficiency. Both offerings can be easily customized to meet the individual requirements of each sector and company, like specific simulation software for machines or entire plants.

Siemens has identified projects across industries and plans to upgrade these industries by connecting hardware, software and data. This seamless integration of state-of-the-art digital technologies to provide sustainable growth that benefits everyone is what Siemens calls ‘Ingenuity for Life’.

Case studies for technology-led changes

An example of the implementation of digitalization solutions from Siemens can be seen in the case of pharma major Cipla Ltd’s Kurkumbh factory.

Cipla needed a robust and flexible distributed control system to dispense and manage solvents for the manufacture of its APIs (active pharmaceutical ingredients used in many medicines). As part of the project, Siemens partnered with Cipla to install the DCS-SIMATIC PCS 7 control system and migrate from batch manufacturing to continuous manufacturing. By establishing the first ever flow Chemistry based API production system in India, Siemens has helped Cipla in significantly lowering floor space, time, wastage, energy and utility costs. This has also improved safety and product quality.

In yet another example, technology provided by Siemens helped a cement plant maximise its production capacity. Wonder Cement, a greenfield project set up by RK Marbles in Rajasthan, needed an automated system to improve productivity. Siemens’ solution called CEMAT used actual plant data to make precise predictions for quality parameters which were previously manually entered by operators. As a result, production efficiency was increased and operators were also freed up to work on other critical tasks. Additionally, emissions and energy consumption were lowered – a significant achievement for a typically energy intensive cement plant.

In the case of automobile major, Mahindra & Mahindra, Siemens’ involvement involved digitalizing the whole product development system. Siemens has partnered with the manufacturer to provide a holistic solution across the entire value chain, from design and planning to engineering and execution. This includes design and software solutions for Product Lifecycle Management, Siemens Technology for Powertrain (STP) and Integrated Automation. For Powertrain, the solutions include SINUMERIK, SINAMICS, SIMOTICS and SIMATIC controls and drives, besides CNC and PLC-controlled machines linked via the Profinet interface.

The above solutions helped the company puts its entire product lifecycle on a digital platform. This has led to multi-fold benefits – better time optimization, higher productivity, improved vehicle performance and quicker response to market requirements.

Siemens is using its global expertise to guide Indian industries through their digital transformation. With the right technologies in place, India can see a significant improvement in design and engineering, cutting product development time by as much as 30%. Besides, digital technologies driven by ‘Ingenuity for Life’ can help Indian manufacturers achieve energy efficiency and ensure variety and flexibility in their product offerings while maintaining quality.


The above examples of successful implementation of digitalization are just some of the examples of ‘Ingenuity for Life’ in action. To learn more about Siemens’ push to digitalize India’s manufacturing sector, see here.

This article was produced on behalf of Siemens by the marketing team and not by the editorial staff.