‘Restrain from eating meat for 1-2 days’: Gujarat HC tells man challenging slaughterhouse curbs
The Ahmedabad civic body had shut down the only slaughterhouse in the city during a Jain festival.
The Gujarat High Court on Tuesday told a petitioner challenging the temporary closure of a slaughterhouse in Ahmedabad to restrain himself from eating meat for some days, Live Law reported.
The court was hearing a petition filed by an organisation named Kul Hind Jamiat-al-Quresh Action Committee Gujarat. The organisation, represented by Danish Qureshi Razawala, challenged the shutting down of the sole slaughterhouse in Ahmedabad during the Paryushan Parv observed by the Jain community.
On August 18, the Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation’s standing committee had approved closing down the slaughterhouse between August 24 to August 31, as well as on days of associated festivities on September 5 and September 9, The Indian Express reported. Razawala challenged the decision of the civic body before the High Court.
However, Justice Sandeep Bhatt criticised the petitioner for approaching the court at the last moment.
“Why are running at the last moment, we will not entertain this,” the judge said. “Every season you rush to the court. You can restrain yourself for one day or two days from eating [meat].”
However, Razawala, who argued the case in person, said that the petition was about fundamental rights of citizens.
“On other previous occasions also slaughterhouses were closed,” he told the court. “Therefore we came before this court, if it passes an appropriate order, this process can be curbed for the rest of the time also.”
The High Court then allowed the petitioner to argue on the matter.
Razawala referred to observations by the High Court’s Justice Biren Vaishnav, who had said in December that the city civic body could not stop residents from eating non-vegetarian food. Justice Vaishnav had made the statement while hearing a plea by vendors whose carts were seized from the main roads by the civic body in Navratri.
On Tuesday, Justice Bhatt adjourned the case to September 2 after Razawala sought time to bring more material to the court’s attention.