My criticism of Malayalis for electing Rahul Gandhi was patronising, says historian Ramachandra Guha
Guha said his remarks, which generated a lot of controversy, were made in the broader context of ‘Modi, Hindutva and India’.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bb4b2/bb4b23a295e88a65db0a4e48c3b9d2bda0ef6c70" alt="My criticism of Malayalis for electing Rahul Gandhi was patronising, says historian Ramachandra Guha"
Historian Ramachandra Guha on Sunday admitted that it was patronising of him to chastise the people of Wayanad in Kerala for electing Congress leader Rahul Gandhi to Parliament. In a series of tweets, Guha said his much talked-about remarks were made in the broader context of “[Prime Minister Narendra] Modi, Hindutva and India”. The historian added that he would always remain an opponent of Hindutva.
“I have nothing against Rahul Gandhi personally,” Guha had said on Friday on the second day of the ongoing Kerala Literature Festival in Kozhikode city. “He is a decent fellow, very well-mannered. But young India does not want a fifth-generation dynast. If you Malayalis make the mistake of re-electing Rahul Gandhi in 2024 too, you are merely handing over an advantage to Narendra Modi.”
Congress leader Shashi Tharoor said he was sure the historian was not deeming the prime minister’s capacity for hard work more important than “its actual divisive consequences for the nation”. “Whatever you think about Rahul Gandhi, he embodies an alternative vision of India that many millions support in resisting BJP,” Tharoor added.
In response, Guha said he agreed with the Congress leader “about the divisive politics of the PM and his party and have documented the consequences in many recent articles”. However, he wondered what Gandhi’s vision of India was. The historian claimed a reporter had “cherry picked two sentences out of a one hour talk to distort its meaning”.
Thanks for the clarification, @Ram_Guha. I'm sure you aren't elevating PM's capacity for hard work above its actual divisive consequences for the nation! Whatever you think about @RahulGandhi, he embodies an alternative vision of India that many millions support in resisting BJP https://t.co/XNy6YZjpfH
— Shashi Tharoor (@ShashiTharoor) January 18, 2020
On Sunday, Guha wrote a detailed response of the criticism he faced for his comments. “His [Rahul Gandhi] lack of focus and administrative experience and, most importantly, his being a fifth generation dynast are a great disadvantage for Rahul when it comes to winning General Elections,” the historian tweeted.
His lack of focus and administrative experience and, most importantly, his being a fifth generation dynast are a great disadvantage for Rahul when it comes to winning General Elections. That said, it was patronizing of me to chastise Malayalis for sending him to Parliament. 2/7
— Ramachandra Guha (@Ram_Guha) January 19, 2020
Guha said in “presidential style” national elections, voters tend to prefer Modi to Gandhi because the prime minister is a self-made man. However, he reiterated his firm opposition to Hindutva.
“Ever since I went to Bhagalpur after the 1989 riots, I have been implacably opposed to Hindutva and all its works,” the historian tweeted. “This opposition is spelt out in articles, books, tweets, speeches. As I said on December 19, ‘I will continue to oppose Hindutva with every fiber in my being.”
In ‘Presidential’ style General Elections, voters tend to prefer Modi to Rahul because the former is more experienced and in political terms self-made. That said, I have been for many years a sharp critic of Modi‘s policies, as in my columns in @httweets and @ttindia . 3/7
— Ramachandra Guha (@Ram_Guha) January 19, 2020
The historian said the regime of Modi and Union Home Minister Amit Shah was the “most dangerous and divisive the Republic has ever seen”. He alleged that apart from promoting religious polarisation and making minorities feel insecure, the Modi government intimidated the media and the judiciary.
“I have been deeply inspired by the peaceful protests against the CAA [Citizenship Amendment Act] across the country,” Guha said. He added that the protests had broken the “pall of fear”. “The struggle against the Modi-Shah regime must continue with resolution, courage, and non-violence,” the historian said. He also tweeted a video of his speech at the literature festival.
Ever since I went to Bhagalpur after the 1989 riots, I have been implacably opposed to Hindutva & all its works. This opposition is spelt out in articles, books, tweets, speeches. As I said on 19th December, ‘I will continue to oppose Hindutva with every fiber in my being‘. 4/7
— Ramachandra Guha (@Ram_Guha) January 19, 2020
I have been deeply inspired by the peaceful protests against the CAA across the country. The students especially have been wonderful; through them the pall of fear has broken. The struggle against the Modi-Shah regime must continue with resolution, courage, and non-violence. 6/7
— Ramachandra Guha (@Ram_Guha) January 19, 2020
Finally, here is the full video of my #KLF speech, an hour-long exposition in defense of constitutional patriotism against the horrors of Hindutva. https://t.co/RZYs6bEkHL
— Ramachandra Guha (@Ram_Guha) January 19, 2020
Do listen, and send comments and criticisms to me at ramachandraguha@yahoo.in
7/7