‘Building your palace amid farmers’ protest’: Congress criticises Modi on new Parliament building
CPI(M) General Secretary Sitaram Yechury accused the prime minister of indulging in ‘diabolic doublespeak’ by attacking democracy and dissent in practice.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44c9f/44c9f867e38534e00187faaa0efb4f04ec2e540e" alt="‘Building your palace amid farmers’ protest’: Congress criticises Modi on new Parliament building"
Congress and other Opposition parties on Thursday questioned the timing and need of a new Parliament building amid the coronavirus pandemic and the farmers’ protest. Prime Minister Narendra Modi laid its foundation stone earlier in the day.
The party’s spokesperson Randeep Singh Surjewala criticised the prime minister for the ceremony and “building a palace for himself” even as the farmers’ protest entered its 16th day. In a separate tweet, he said that the Parliament “is not mortar and stones”, but it imbibes the Constitution and represents values like democracy, equality and compassion. “What would a building built upon trampling of these values represent,” he asked.
मोदी जी,
— Randeep Singh Surjewala (@rssurjewala) December 10, 2020
इतिहास में यह भी दर्ज होगा कि जब अन्नदाता सड़कों पर 16 दिन से हक़ों की लड़ाई लड़ रहे थे तब आप सेंट्रल विस्टा के नाम पर अपने लिए महल खड़ा कर रहे थे !
लोकतंत्र में सत्ता, सनक पूरी करने का नहीं, जनसेवा और लोक कल्याण का माध्यम होती है।#Farmers #किसान_आंदोलन pic.twitter.com/rMSrsJqqE5
Dear PM,
— Randeep Singh Surjewala (@rssurjewala) December 10, 2020
Parliament is not mortar & stones,
It envisions Democracy,
It imbibes Constitution,
It is Economic-Political-Social Equality,
It is Compassion & Camaraderie,
It is aspirations of 130 Cr Indians.
What would a building built upon trampling of these values represent? pic.twitter.com/Gp8hGj8lIK
Meanwhile, the Congress said that the “desperate desire to build bigger” is a mark of insecurity of not being able to live up to the leaders and governments of the past.
This desperate desire to build bigger & scream louder comes from a deep-seated insecurity that one will never live up to great leaders & govts of the past that helped mould the incredible democracy being torn apart today.https://t.co/WknhriYFNv
— Congress (@INCIndia) December 10, 2020
The party’s youth wing posted a video highlighting the estimated cost of the new building and questioned if it was a necessity at a time when the economy was struggling and thousands of people have lost their jobs during the coronavirus pandemic.
क्या देश को सच में एक नए संसद भवन की जरूरत थी? pic.twitter.com/ES4XnOmaM3
— Youth Congress (@IYC) December 10, 2020
Communist Party of India (Marxist) General Secretary Sitaram Yechury took exception to Modi’s speech at the foundation laying ceremony, where he spoke about values and culture of democracy. Yechury accused the prime minister of indulging in “diabolic doublespeak” by attacking democracy and dissent in practice.
Mr Modi is giving a moral lecture on the ‘values’ & ‘culture’ of democracy while in practice destroying democracy mercilessly, assaulting all dissent & preventing our youth from even choosing their life partners: diabolic doublespeak.
— Sitaram Yechury (@SitaramYechury) December 10, 2020
Opposition parties and former civil servants are among those who have severely criticised the Narendra Modi government for not cutting down on “luxuries” like the Central Vista project amid the coronavirus crisis. The Rs 20,000-crore venture aims to build a new Parliament and other central government offices in Lutyens’ Delhi. The government has justified its decision to build a new Parliament building, saying that the current one was “showing signs of distress and over-use”.
Despite Thursday’s groundbreaking ceremony, construction of the new Parliament building cannot begin immediately as the government on Monday assured the Supreme Court that it would not carry out any construction, demolition or felling of trees in the Central Vista area for now. This came after the top court had expressed displeasure at the government “aggressively” continuing with the redevelopment project while petitions challenging the project were yet to be decided.