Women's health

The two serious problems with India’s new family planning push

Experts challenge the contraception choices being promoted by the central government.

On April 5, Union Health Minister JP Nadda announced a basket of contraceptive choices for women including injectables and oral pills – all of which will be made available through the public health system under the National Family Planning programme. The contraceptive choices in question are – the hormonal injectable contraceptive depot medroxyprogesterone acetate, or DMPA, Cenrchroman, a non-hormonal, non-steroidal drug, and progesterone only pills.

Speaking at the National Family Planning Summit in Mumbai, Nadda said reducing fertility would lead to overall economic development in the country, particularly by reducing morbidity. The success of the programme will be beneficial for the “economic health of the nation,” he added.

The function hosted by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare is an indication of the revival of family planning measures in India in tandem with a similar push in the rest of the world – a development health activists refer to as a “neo-Malthusian revival” (a reference to Thomas Malthus, who believed that left unchecked, population could outgrow resources, leading to poverty). Dr Jagdish Prasad, the director general of health services, left no doubt about that when he said that the department should concentrate 90% of its energies on family planning. “It impacts female health, maternal mortality, and child mortality,” said Prasad. “If the family suffers, the nation suffers. We need to stabilise the population by 2045.”

Controversial injectable

However, there are two problems with the health ministry’s fresh push for family planning.

The first relates directly to the contraception choices unveiled. For instance, DMPA has been introduced in the programme despite two decades of activism against it, including a case in the Supreme Court. Though DMPA has been available in private hospitals in India since 1993, it’s not a popular form of contraception. The injection can prevent pregnancies for three months after administration, but it is also linked to a host of side effects, and comes with a boxed warning (designed to call attention to serious and life-threatening risks on its label) in the US that warns of the loss of significant bone density that is possibly non-reversible. The warning says that it should be used only if other birth control methods are inadequate. The government has decided to introduce the contraceptive only at district hospitals and tertiary level hospitals.

In fact, last October, activists and scholars working in the field of medicine, public health and women’s rights wrote to Nadda protesting against the government’s approval to introduce injectable contraceptives in National Family Planning programmes, saying they were harmful to women’s health.

Its champions don’t think so. The side effects of DMPA are innocuous, said Dr Ravi Anand of ABT Associates in Lucknow, which works on the DIMPA programme – a network of private gynecologists working to increase demand for, and access to, DMPA in Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand and Jharkhand. “They may irritate women, like a cold for instance,” said Dr Anand. “They require counselling after which the women can handle it. If you can help them tide over that time, then they can deal with it.”

But others flag its side effects, which do not subside for at least three months. “Can you imagine having a headache for three months? Or heavy bleeding? Or spotting for months?” asked Dr Veena Shatrugna, former deputy director, National Institute of Nutrition, Hyderabad. “Where will they get the menstrual cloth from, and the water to wash the rags and dry them out in the sun during the days of heavy bleeding and spotting? Can you imagine the chaos during the rains, or days considered auspicious?

Dr Shatrugna added: “Why is it ok for poor women to be administered this contraceptive?”

Outside the auditorium hosting the National Family Planning Summit in Mumbai, there was a tent referred to as the marketplace, which had stalls of different non-governmental organisations working in the field of family planning. Posters of Amitabh Bachchan – the brand ambassador of the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare’s family planning communication strategy – with beaming families were all over the area.  (Photo credit: Population Foundation of India)
Outside the auditorium hosting the National Family Planning Summit in Mumbai, there was a tent referred to as the marketplace, which had stalls of different non-governmental organisations working in the field of family planning. Posters of Amitabh Bachchan – the brand ambassador of the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare’s family planning communication strategy – with beaming families were all over the area. (Photo credit: Population Foundation of India)

Another question over its introduction is that the use of injectables in the private sector has also been extremely low, as per the National Family Health Survey-3 data. Also, more than half the women who took injectables discontinued it within a year.

The other contraceptives introduced include Centchroman, popularly known as Saheli, a non-steroidal, non-hormonal oral contraceptive pill which claims to have no side effects. Centchroman was the result of indigenous research of the Central Drug Research Institute, Lucknow. The progesterone-only pills, which will be made part of the programme next year after the pilot project, also has side effects.

Women’s burden

The second problem with government’s revived focus on family planning is an old complaint – that it is women who always have to bear the burden of contraception. Take for instance sterilisation. As per 2014 figures from the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, 1.48 lakh women were sterilised as opposed to 5,004 men in India. This despite the fact that contraceptive methods for women have severe side effects. Sometimes, they have have fatal consequences too, like in the case of the 15 women who died at a mass-sterilisation camp at Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.

Tuesday’s health ministry function seemed to have totally glossed over that complaint – it unveiled only contraceptive products for women.

A paper published in the Economic and Political Weekly in October last year said who gets to determine what is in the "basket of choices" is a question that deserves greater attention. It argued that the presumption of economic growth and liberation of women based on successful family planning precluded a “real discussion of which methods are the safest for women and men.”

The EPW paper added: “The entire [family planning] programme is plagued by contemptuous misogyny, and caste and class prejudices.”

But it's not as if there are no tangible benefits. Nachiket Mor, the director of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, India, showed in his presentation at the summit that the addition of one method of contraception for at least half the population (i.e. women) correlates with an increase of 4-8 percentage points in the use of contraceptive methods. The Gates Foundation is a major force behind the family planning initiative – FP2020 – which aims to get 120 million more women and girls to use contraception by the year 2020 worldwide.

However, Mohan Rao, professor at the Centre of Social Medicine and Community Health, Jawaharlal Nehru University, who co-authored the EPW paper, said that the government had its priorities all wrong. “The problem is the emphasis placed on the family planning programme as opposed to creating a public health system which provides quality care,” he said. “We do not have a system that can deal with these kinds of contraceptives.”

At the summit, the government also launched a new communications programme on family planning, which had advertisements, radio spots, and posters with superstar Amitabh Bachchan. “Parivar ko bojh nahi, takat baniye (Don’t make your family a burden, make it your strength),” Bachchan said in one ad. The question is: Why is it women who always have to bear the bojh, or burden, of family planning?

We welcome your comments at letters@scroll.in.
Sponsored Content BY 

Behind the garb of wealth and success, white collar criminals are hiding in plain sight

Understanding the forces that motivate leaders to become fraudsters.

Most con artists are very easy to like; the ones that belong to the corporate society, even more so. The Jordan Belforts of the world are confident, sharp and can smooth-talk their way into convincing people to bend at their will. For years, Harshad Mehta, a practiced con-artist, employed all-of-the-above to earn the sobriquet “big bull” on Dalaal Street. In 1992, the stockbroker used the pump and dump technique, explained later, to falsely inflate the Sensex from 1,194 points to 4,467. It was only after the scam that journalist Sucheta Dalal, acting on a tip-off, broke the story exposing how he fraudulently dipped into the banking system to finance a boom that manipulated the stock market.


In her book ‘The confidence game’, Maria Konnikova observes that con artists are expert storytellers - “When a story is plausible, we often assume it’s true.” Harshad Mehta’s story was an endearing rags-to-riches tale in which an insurance agent turned stockbroker flourished based on his skill and knowledge of the market. For years, he gave hope to marketmen that they too could one day live in a 15,000 sq.ft. posh apartment with a swimming pool in upmarket Worli.

One such marketman was Ketan Parekh who took over Dalaal Street after the arrest of Harshad Mehta. Ketan Parekh kept a low profile and broke character only to celebrate milestones such as reaching Rs. 100 crore in net worth, for which he threw a lavish bash with a star-studded guest-list to show off his wealth and connections. Ketan Parekh, a trainee in Harshad Mehta’s company, used the same infamous pump-and-dump scheme to make his riches. In that, he first used false bank documents to buy high stakes in shares that would inflate the stock prices of certain companies. The rise in stock prices lured in other institutional investors, further increasing the price of the stock. Once the price was high, Ketan dumped these stocks making huge profits and causing the stock market to take a tumble since it was propped up on misleading share prices. Ketan Parekh was later implicated in the 2001 securities scam and is serving a 14-years SEBI ban. The tactics employed by Harshad Mehta and Ketan Parekh were similar, in that they found a loophole in the system and took advantage of it to accumulate an obscene amount of wealth.


Call it greed, addiction or smarts, the 1992 and 2001 Securities Scams, for the first time, revealed the magnitude of white collar crimes in India. To fill the gaps exposed through these scams, the Securities Laws Act 1995 widened SEBI’s jurisdiction and allowed it to regulate depositories, FIIs, venture capital funds and credit-rating agencies. SEBI further received greater autonomy to penalise capital market violations with a fine of Rs 10 lakhs.

Despite an empowered regulatory body, the next white-collar crime struck India’s capital market with a massive blow. In a confession letter, Ramalinga Raju, ex-chairman of Satyam Computers convicted of criminal conspiracy and financial fraud, disclosed that Satyam’s balance sheets were cooked up to show an excess of revenues amounting to Rs. 7,000 crore. This accounting fraud allowed the chairman to keep the share prices of the company high. The deception, once revealed to unsuspecting board members and shareholders, made the company’s stock prices crash, with the investors losing as much as Rs. 14,000 crores. The crash of India’s fourth largest software services company is often likened to the bankruptcy of Enron - both companies achieved dizzying heights but collapsed to the ground taking their shareholders with them. Ramalinga Raju wrote in his letter “it was like riding a tiger, not knowing how to get off without being eaten”, implying that even after the realisation of consequences of the crime, it was impossible for him to rectify it.

It is theorised that white-collar crimes like these are highly rationalised. The motivation for the crime can be linked to the strain theory developed by Robert K Merton who stated that society puts pressure on individuals to achieve socially accepted goals (the importance of money, social status etc.). Not having the means to achieve those goals leads individuals to commit crimes.

Take the case of the executive who spent nine years in McKinsey as managing director and thereafter on the corporate and non-profit boards of Goldman Sachs, Procter & Gamble, American Airlines, and Harvard Business School. Rajat Gupta was a figure of success. Furthermore, his commitment to philanthropy added an additional layer of credibility to his image. He created the American India Foundation which brought in millions of dollars in philanthropic contributions from NRIs to development programs across the country. Rajat Gupta’s descent started during the investigation on Raj Rajaratnam, a Sri-Lankan hedge fund manager accused of insider trading. Convicted for leaking confidential information about Warren Buffet’s sizeable investment plans for Goldman Sachs to Raj Rajaratnam, Rajat Gupta was found guilty of conspiracy and three counts of securities fraud. Safe to say, Mr. Gupta’s philanthropic work did not sway the jury.


The people discussed above have one thing in common - each one of them was well respected and celebrated for their industry prowess and social standing, but got sucked down a path of non-violent crime. The question remains - Why are individuals at successful positions willing to risk it all? The book Why They Do It: Inside the mind of the White-Collar Criminal based on a research by Eugene Soltes reveals a startling insight. Soltes spoke to fifty white collar criminals to understand their motivations behind the crimes. Like most of us, Soltes expected the workings of a calculated and greedy mind behind the crimes, something that could separate them from regular people. However, the results were surprisingly unnerving. According to the research, most of the executives who committed crimes made decisions the way we all do–on the basis of their intuitions and gut feelings. They often didn’t realise the consequences of their action and got caught in the flow of making more money.


The arena of white collar crimes is full of commanding players with large and complex personalities. Billions, starring Damien Lewis and Paul Giamatti, captures the undercurrents of Wall Street and delivers a high-octane ‘ruthless attorney vs wealthy kingpin’ drama. The show looks at the fine line between success and fraud in the stock market. Bobby Axelrod, the hedge fund kingpin, skilfully walks on this fine line like a tightrope walker, making it difficult for Chuck Rhoades, a US attorney, to build a case against him.

If financial drama is your thing, then block your weekend for Billions. You can catch it on Hotstar Premium, a platform that offers a wide collection of popular and Emmy-winning shows such as Game of Thrones, Modern Family and This Is Us, in addition to live sports coverage, and movies. To subscribe, click here.

This article was produced by the Scroll marketing team on behalf of Hotstar and not by the Scroll editorial team.