Budget 2017

In budget 2017, Arun Jaitley gave flailing public health programmes little hope

The finance minister gave the health ministry Rs 10,000 crores more this year, but that is still less than health allocation in 2011.

At a time when the country is grappling with perilous effects of demonetisation, Finance Minister Arun Jaitley was expected to be sensitive to the suffering of millions of Indians and enhance the social safety nets in the form of expansion of employment, education, health, food and nutrition. He has, instead, made some nominal increases in the rural sector and offered tax sops to the middle class. This increase in allocation appears mere tokenism when we compare it to price increases and expenditure cutbacks over last few years.

For instance, an additional Rs 10,600 crores have been allocated for health in this budget compared to previous year. But, when adjusted against prices accounting for inflation, this allocation is not even equal to that made in 2011-12. Given the severe cuts in the overall health budget over last three years, the increase in allocation this year may not be enough to maintain existing health programmes. Union government spending on health is only 0.29% of GDP. The union and states’ health spending together is about 1.2% of GDP. The World Health Organisation recommends that governments spend between 2.5% to 5% of their GDP on health.

In addition, funds allocated in the budget were transferred to health ministry with considerable delays and with cuts and as a result little was spent on the ground. Only last month Health Minister Jagat Prakash Nadda expressed deep concern that his ministry has not been getting the money promised by the Finance Minister and as a result most central programmes were facing severe cash crunches. Although the health minister has expressed his gratitude to the finance minister after the budget, there is no reason to think that health programmes will suddenly be flush with funds. The government should have tried to make up for these cuts and delays and gone further to improve health overall health spending and not just in comparison to last year.

A large increase in allocation is long overdue just to maintain the momentum under National Rural Health Mission and to kick start the National Urban Health Mission that has not made much progress on the ground. The paltry increase in the budget this year is not adequate to even maintain current activities. In addition, several ambitious health programmes have been announced without any budgetary support.

One of big health promises from the budget was the intended conversion of 1.5 lakh sub-centres into health and wellness centres. If this is undertaken seriously, funded adequately and implemented appropriately to extend a comprehensive primary level care, a large number of vulnerable and poor people can benefit, especially in urban areas. Unfortunately there is no allocation specified in the budget for this programme.

Big bang health announcements often win the day and then disappear into oblivion for lack of funds. On August 15, 2012, Manmohan Singh who was then prime minister announced a scheme for free distribution of medicines but apart from paltry allocations and announcement to expand the Jan Aushadhi Scheme to set up generic stores in the last budget nothing concrete has been done so far. In his budget speech this year Finance Minister Arun Jaitley proposed to amend the Drugs and Cosmetics Rules to ensure availability of drugs at reasonable prices and promote use of generic medicines, while maintaining silence on the free medicines agenda. At a time when any attempt to regulate drug prices is being challenged vehemently by the pharmaceutical lobby and price control orders are being rampantly bypassed the efficacy of such price regulation is doubtful. It is essential that an alternative system of procurement, distribution and delivery of medicines, such as those in place in Tamil Nadu and Rajasthan, be scaled up for the entire country.

Similarly, in last year’s budget, Jaitley announced the launch of the National Health Protection Scheme, and improved version of the government’s flagship health insurance scheme Rashtriya Swasthya Bima Yojana. While coverage under RSBY was Rs 30,000 per annum, the NHPS offered coverage up to Rs 1lakh. Allocations under NHPS have been reduced from 1,500 crores last year to Rs 1,000 crores this year.

Repackaged plans

Some pre-existing schemes rebranded as “Human Resources for Health and Medical Education” have also been included to show an large increase in the mission’s budget. In reality, the budget for existing functions has increased only by Rs 2,500 crores, which is an increase of only 4% when adjusted for inflation.

The Finance Minister also reiterated Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s New Year promise to transfer Rs 6,000 directly to the bank accounts of pregnant women who undergo institutional deliveries and vaccinate their children. In fact, the National Food Security Act, which was passed in July 2013, promised universal maternity benefit of Rs 6,000 but has not been implemented yet. States like Odisha and Tamil Nadu that operationalised the scheme have been using their own resources.

Even if a quarter of all mothers delivering babies in a year get benefits under this scheme, around Rs 5,000 crores would be required per annum. If this amount is taken from the National Health Mission allocation of Rs 27,153 crores, it will further squeeze allocations for other existing programs.

Besides, global experience suggests that cash transfer schemes can work only if it is complemented with good quality public services. Notwithstanding its limitations, National Health Mission has helped in increasing institutional deliveries and saved thousands of mothers and children with a combination of improved quality of services and targeted cash transfer.

While quality of care in public facilities likely to be hit because of the National Health Mission’s cash crunch and further strain on the programme to provide incentives for pregnant women to have their babies in private facilities at greater financial cost to the patients and risks of unnecessary procedures. A normal delivery in a private hospital costs a minimum of Rs 15,000 to Rs 20,000. The issue of out-of-pocket expenditure is becoming a major concern for all kinds of healthcare, since financial incentives for medical care at private facilities are highly ineffective in providing financial protection.

All the revenue predictions in the budget are based on data from before November 2016 and do not take into account the impact demonetisation is going to have on the economy. In previous years, it has been hard enough for the finance ministry to honour its allocation commitments and send funds to the line ministries on time to finally reach intended beneficiaries. With the additional impact of demonetisation, there is little hope that these financial resources will be mobilised effectively.

The writer is a research scientist and assistant professor at the Public Health Foundation of India.

We welcome your comments at letters@scroll.in.
Sponsored Content BY 

Relying on the power of habits to solve India’s mammoth sanitation problem

Adopting three simple habits can help maximise the benefits of existing sanitation infrastructure.

India’s sanitation problem is well documented – the country was recently declared as having the highest number of people living without basic sanitation facilities. Sanitation encompasses all conditions relating to public health - especially sewage disposal and access to clean drinking water. Due to associated losses in productivity caused by sickness, increased healthcare costs and increased mortality, India recorded a loss of 5.2% of its GDP to poor sanitation in 2015. As tremendous as the economic losses are, the on-ground, human consequences of poor sanitation are grim - about one in 10 deaths, according to the World Bank.

Poor sanitation contributes to about 10% of the world’s disease burden and is linked to even those diseases that may not present any correlation at first. For example, while lack of nutrition is a direct cause of anaemia, poor sanitation can contribute to the problem by causing intestinal diseases which prevent people from absorbing nutrition from their food. In fact, a study found a correlation between improved sanitation and reduced prevalence of anaemia in 14 Indian states. Diarrhoeal diseases, the most well-known consequence of poor sanitation, are the third largest cause of child mortality in India. They are also linked to undernutrition and stunting in children - 38% of Indian children exhibit stunted growth. Improved sanitation can also help reduce prevalence of neglected tropical diseases (NTDs). Though not a cause of high mortality rate, NTDs impair physical and cognitive development, contribute to mother and child illness and death and affect overall productivity. NTDs caused by parasitic worms - such as hookworms, whipworms etc. - infect millions every year and spread through open defecation. Improving toilet access and access to clean drinking water can significantly boost disease control programmes for diarrhoea, NTDs and other correlated conditions.

Unfortunately, with about 732 million people who have no access to toilets, India currently accounts for more than half of the world population that defecates in the open. India also accounts for the largest rural population living without access to clean water. Only 16% of India’s rural population is currently served by piped water.

However, there is cause for optimism. In the three years of Swachh Bharat Abhiyan, the country’s sanitation coverage has risen from 39% to 65% and eight states and Union Territories have been declared open defecation free. But lasting change cannot be ensured by the proliferation of sanitation infrastructure alone. Ensuring the usage of toilets is as important as building them, more so due to the cultural preference for open defecation in rural India.

According to the World Bank, hygiene promotion is essential to realise the potential of infrastructure investments in sanitation. Behavioural intervention is most successful when it targets few behaviours with the most potential for impact. An area of public health where behavioural training has made an impact is WASH - water, sanitation and hygiene - a key issue of UN Sustainable Development Goal 6. Compliance to WASH practices has the potential to reduce illness and death, poverty and improve overall socio-economic development. The UN has even marked observance days for each - World Water Day for water (22 March), World Toilet Day for sanitation (19 November) and Global Handwashing Day for hygiene (15 October).

At its simplest, the benefits of WASH can be availed through three simple habits that safeguard against disease - washing hands before eating, drinking clean water and using a clean toilet. Handwashing and use of toilets are some of the most important behavioural interventions that keep diarrhoeal diseases from spreading, while clean drinking water is essential to prevent water-borne diseases and adverse health effects of toxic contaminants. In India, Hindustan Unilever Limited launched the Swachh Aadat Swachh Bharat initiative, a WASH behaviour change programme, to complement the Swachh Bharat Abhiyan. Through its on-ground behaviour change model, SASB seeks to promote the three basic WASH habits to create long-lasting personal hygiene compliance among the populations it serves.

This touching film made as a part of SASB’s awareness campaign shows how lack of knowledge of basic hygiene practices means children miss out on developmental milestones due to preventable diseases.


SASB created the Swachhata curriculum, a textbook to encourage adoption of personal hygiene among school going children. It makes use of conceptual learning to teach primary school students about cleanliness, germs and clean habits in an engaging manner. Swachh Basti is an extensive urban outreach programme for sensitising urban slum residents about WASH habits through demos, skits and etc. in partnership with key local stakeholders such as doctors, anganwadi workers and support groups. In Ghatkopar, Mumbai, HUL built the first-of-its-kind Suvidha Centre - an urban water, hygiene and sanitation community centre. It provides toilets, handwashing and shower facilities, safe drinking water and state-of-the-art laundry operations at an affordable cost to about 1,500 residents of the area.

HUL’s factory workers also act as Swachhata Doots, or messengers of change who teach the three habits of WASH in their own villages. This mobile-led rural behaviour change communication model also provides a volunteering opportunity to those who are busy but wish to make a difference. A toolkit especially designed for this purpose helps volunteers approach, explain and teach people in their immediate vicinity - their drivers, cooks, domestic helps etc. - about the three simple habits for better hygiene. This helps cast the net of awareness wider as regular interaction is conducive to habit formation. To learn more about their volunteering programme, click here. To learn more about the Swachh Aadat Swachh Bharat initiative, click here.

This article was produced by the Scroll marketing team on behalf of Hindustan Unilever and not by the Scroll editorial team.