Full Text

India has failed to keep its promise to pay Rs 6,000 to every mother

Academics and activists write a letter to the prime minister urging him to implement the modest maternity allowance under the National Food Security Act.

India accounts for 17% of all maternal deaths in the world. The country’s maternal mortality ratio was 167 per 100,000 live births in 2013. This means an estimated 44,000 women die during pregnancy and childbirth in India every year. That’s 120 maternal deaths every day.

The country’s record on infant mortality is equally dismal: 40 deaths per 1,000 live births in 2013. Every year, more than one million children die before they complete their first year.

The main cause of high maternal mortality is poor nutrition, compounded by inadequate care during pregnancy. Many women are unable to afford leave before and after childbirth.

In 2010, the government launched the Indira Gandhi Matritva Sahyog Yojana, which gave a modest allowance of Rs 4,000 to pregnant and lactating mothers in 53 districts.

The National Food Security Act, which was passed in July 2013, provided a universal maternity benefit of Rs 6,000. Three years later, the maternity benefit under the Act is yet to be implemented.

On Monday, November 21, a day ahead of public meetings organised by the Right to Food campaign across India, more than 60 academics and activists wrote a letter to Prime Minister Narendra Modi urging him to implement the maternity benefit under the National Food Security Act.

“The nation is paying a heavy price for this violation of the Act,” the letter said. “Maternity entitlements are essential to address India’s staggering problem of low birth weights, poor maternal health and severe hardship during pregnancy.”

The letter was signed by members of the National Alliance for Maternal Health and Human Rights, Alliance for Right to Early Child Development, Jan Swasthya Abhiyan, Right to Food campaign, among others.

Shri Narendra Modi

Prime Minister of India

Dear Prime Minister,

We are writing to draw your attention to the continued denial of women’s rights to maternity entitlements under the National Food Security Act 2013 (NFSA) and beyond.

Section 4(b) of the NFSA provides for maternity entitlements of Rs 6,000 for all pregnant women (except regular public sector employees, who currently have more substantial entitlements in keeping with global norms). This is one of the most important provisions of the Act. However, the Central Government has completely ignored it. The law has been grossly violated for more than three years, without any justification whatsoever.

Questioned by the Supreme Court on this, the Ministry of Women and Child Development filed a very misleading affidavit on 30 October 2015, claiming that it was planning to extend the Indira Gandhi Matritva Sahyog Yojana (IGMSY) from 53 “pilot districts” to 200 districts in 2015-6 and to all districts in 2016-7. Contrary to this claim, the budget allocation for IGMSY in the 2016-7 Union Budget remains a measly Rs 400 crore (as in 2015-16 and 2014-15), making it impossible to go beyond the 53 pilot districts. Universal maternity entitlements of Rs 6,000 per child, a very modest and outdated norm, would require an annual allocation of Rs 15,000 crore at the very least.

The nation is paying a heavy price for this violation of the Act. Maternity entitlements are essential to address India’s staggering problem of low birth weights, poor maternal health and severe hardship during pregnancy. Ensuring rest for the mother after delivery, six months of exclusive breastfeeding and appropriate care for the child needs a number of supportive measures including maternity entitlements. 

Maternity entitlements are required not just to improve maternal and child health but also in recognition of women as workers. Further, for child safety and support to parents, appropriate arrangements for crèches need to be made. What is in fact required is a comprehensive legislation ensuring unconditional maternity entitlements of at least minimum wages and child care for all children, in place of the current Maternity Benefits Act. Implementing the universal maternity entitlements under the NFSA would be a useful first step towards the goal of ensuring the right to maternity entitlements and child care services for all.

We urge you to recognise this lapse, abide by the law, and ensure that universal maternity entitlements are provided for without delay.

Photo credit: Dipa Sinha
Photo credit: Dipa Sinha
Support our journalism by subscribing to Scroll+ here. We welcome your comments at letters@scroll.in.
Sponsored Content BY 

Do you really need to use that plastic straw?

The hazards of single-use plastic items, and what to use instead.

In June 2018, a distressed whale in Thailand made headlines around the world. After an autopsy it’s cause of death was determined to be more than 80 plastic bags it had ingested. The pictures caused great concern and brought into focus the urgency of the fight against single-use plastic. This term refers to use-and-throw plastic products that are designed for one-time use, such as takeaway spoons and forks, polythene bags styrofoam cups etc. In its report on single-use plastics, the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) has described how single-use plastics have a far-reaching impact in the environment.

Dense quantity of plastic litter means sights such as the distressed whale in Thailand aren’t uncommon. Plastic products have been found in the airways and stomachs of hundreds of marine and land species. Plastic bags, especially, confuse turtles who mistake them for jellyfish - their food. They can even exacerbate health crises, such as a malarial outbreak, by clogging sewers and creating ideal conditions for vector-borne diseases to thrive. In 1988, poor drainage made worse by plastic clogging contributed to the devastating Bangladesh floods in which two-thirds of the country was submerged.

Plastic litter can, moreover, cause physiological harm. Burning plastic waste for cooking fuel and in open air pits releases harmful gases in the air, contributing to poor air quality especially in poorer countries where these practices are common. But plastic needn’t even be burned to cause physiological harm. The toxic chemical additives in the manufacturing process of plastics remain in animal tissue, which is then consumed by humans. These highly toxic and carcinogenic substances (benzene, styrene etc.) can cause damage to nervous systems, lungs and reproductive organs.

The European Commission recently released a list of top 10 single-use plastic items that it plans to ban in the near future. These items are ubiquitous as trash across the world’s beaches, even the pristine, seemingly untouched ones. Some of them, such as styrofoam cups, take up to a 1,000 years to photodegrade (the breakdown of substances by exposure to UV and infrared rays from sunlight), disintegrating into microplastics, another health hazard.

More than 60 countries have introduced levies and bans to discourage the use of single-use plastics. Morocco and Rwanda have emerged as inspiring success stories of such policies. Rwanda, in fact, is now among the cleanest countries on Earth. In India, Maharashtra became the 18th state to effect a ban on disposable plastic items in March 2018. Now India plans to replicate the decision on a national level, aiming to eliminate single-use plastics entirely by 2022. While government efforts are important to encourage industries to redesign their production methods, individuals too can take steps to minimise their consumption, and littering, of single-use plastics. Most of these actions are low on effort, but can cause a significant reduction in plastic waste in the environment, if the return of Olive Ridley turtles to a Mumbai beach are anything to go by.

To know more about the single-use plastics problem, visit Planet or Plastic portal, National Geographic’s multi-year effort to raise awareness about the global plastic trash crisis. From microplastics in cosmetics to haunting art on plastic pollution, Planet or Plastic is a comprehensive resource on the problem. You can take the pledge to reduce your use of single-use plastics, here.

This article was produced by the Scroll marketing team on behalf of National Geographic, and not by the Scroll editorial team.