Justice denied

Sterilisation deaths: The doctor is off the hook and the Chhattisgarh government's apathy continues

Charges have been dropped against the doctor who operated at a sterilisation camp where 13 women died.

Fourteen years ago, an adivasi woman in Sonhat block of Koriya district in north Chhattisgarh died a day after undergoing sterilisation. The government immediately covered it up saying that her death was due to alcohol consumption. But in November 2014, when 13 women died after sterilisation surgeries carried out in government camps in Bilaspur, which was the home district of the then state health minister, the government had no way of concealing the tragedy that was reported widely in the national and international media.

Health activists felt that the furore and scrutiny around the deaths would result in the guilty being punished. This expectation has been belied.

On February 15, the Bilaspur High Court ordered that all charges be dropped against the main accused in the sterilisation deaths case – the operating doctor, Dr RK Gupta – on a technicality. The court said that the investigators had failed to take permission from the state government to prosecute the doctor who was a government employee at the time of the incident.

Gupta had performed laparoscopic tubectomies at a sterilisation camp held on November 8, 2014 at Nemichand Hospital, an abandoned private hospital in Takhatpur block, where the largest number of deaths occurred. Earlier in the year, he had received an award for conducting over 50,000 laparoscopic tubectomies. On November 8, he did 83 laparoscopic tubectomies in just a few hours, using just one laparoscopic instrument. It takes about 20 minutes to sterilise a laparoscope but there was a gap of hardly a few minutes between each of Gupta’s operations that day.

Subsequently, 13 women died and more than 130 women were hospitalised with serious complications from the surgeries at camps at the Takhatpur, Gaurella, Marwahi and Pendra blocks.

Gupta was arrested on November 12 and was in jail for less than a month, after which the Chhattisgarh High Court granted him bail. Two women survivors subsequently challenged his bail in court, but their petition was dismissed.

Enquiry committee

The government enquiry committee, three separate fact-finding teams and a judicial commission all concluded that the doctor operating on the women had violated all government norms and guidelines for providing sterilisation services and did not take the necessary precautions against infections. Post-mortem records show that the women who died had all acquired infections leading to septicemia, that could have been caused by infected and unsterilised instruments and unhygienic surroundings.

The government, however, proposed that a contamination of medicines with rat poison had caused the deaths. Subsequent enquiries and lab reports found the medicines to be substandard but there has not been any conclusive evidence that rat poison was mixed with them. The government pushed the “rat poison theory” so vigorously that many families of the women who died still believe it to be true. While Gupta has been out on bail, the directors of the pharmaceutical company that supplied the medicines remain in jail.

The debate of whether it was the infection or the medicines that led to the deaths will continue as long as the government is not serious about finding the truth with an independent, scientific, epidemiological enquiry.

No help, no respite

As the affected families and women tried to come to terms with their loss and debility, they continued to be victimised. The government set up a one-person judicial commission that conducted all its proceedings while sitting in Bilaspur city, far away from the affected villages. The commission made no attempt to reach out to the affected people or visit their villages. An advertisement in the papers asked people to file affidavits regarding the case. Husbands who had just lost their wives, and women who had just come out of the hospital, all were expected to travel to Bilaspur, draw up the affidavits, make five copies each and submit them to the commission, all at their own cost.

Legal aid organisations like Human Rights Law Network, Kanooni Margdarshan Kendra and Janhit at Bilaspur helped some affected families to file affidavits. These lawyers also made sure that they were present during the commission’s hearings, cross-questioning government witnesses despite all attempts to disallow that.

Under great pressure by NGOs and constant vigilance by the media, the commission submitted its report in August 2015. It equally blamed the operating doctor and medicine manufacturers. It also held health officials who organised and were supposed to monitor the camp, and those who had given approval to buy drugs, responsible for the tragedy. Subsequently, chargesheets were filed against some of these people, but the status of the chargesheets is not known.

Since the beginning of legal proceedings, Gupta and the government have tried to make the case that as a government employee he was forced to undertake these operations as a “moral responsibility”. This is ironic given that there is little government pressure and moral responsibility when a government doctor refuses to treat a patient unless he pays, or when he refers patients to private health facilities from where the same doctor can treat the same patient for a higher fee.

In the aftermath of the Bilaspur sterilisation tragedy, women in Chhattisgarh were denied family planning services. The family planning programme, which consists mainly of sterilisation of women, was completely shut down. Hospitals that provided these services stopped doing so. Doctors told their bosses that they would not take the risk of operating unless they were given written orders. Women who wanted permanent contraception were told to go private facilities.

Falling rates

Government data shows that sterilisation rates in Chhattisgarh for both women and men dropped by half over the next year. Today, women have to travel to the district hospitals, sometimes as far as 200 kms away, to avail of these services. Many travel to neighbouring states at great personal cost and inconvenience. There has been no attempt to promote male contraception or to provide any safe alternatives to the women. On the other hand, the state is preparing to introduce the injectable contraceptive, which has its own history of adverse effects on women’s health. The state also continues to deny contraceptive services to Particularly Vulnerable Tribal Groups – the Baigas, Kamars, Pahari Korwas, Abhujhmarias and Birhors – on the basis of a 1979 state government order that restricts their access to permanent contraception.

A couple of days after the incident, when reporters asked Chief Minister Raman Singh whether he would dismiss the health minister, he retorted, “Operations are conducted by doctors, not ministers.” This statement highlights the negligence by the state government.

If the government is serious about delivering justice in the Bilaspur tragedy, it needs to restart proceedings against Gupta, authorise an independent, comprehensive, epidemiologically-sound investigation and fix culpability on health officials who were complicit in the case and its cover up. It needs to ensure universal provision of safe and quality family planning services in the state. It needs to realise that most poor, rural, Adivasi and Dalit people in the state use government health services that need to be further strengthened.

We welcome your comments at letters@scroll.in.
Sponsored Content BY 

Relying on the power of habits to solve India’s mammoth sanitation problem

Adopting three simple habits can help maximise the benefits of existing sanitation infrastructure.

India’s sanitation problem is well documented – the country was recently declared as having the highest number of people living without basic sanitation facilities. Sanitation encompasses all conditions relating to public health - especially sewage disposal and access to clean drinking water. Due to associated losses in productivity caused by sickness, increased healthcare costs and increased mortality, India recorded a loss of 5.2% of its GDP to poor sanitation in 2015. As tremendous as the economic losses are, the on-ground, human consequences of poor sanitation are grim - about one in 10 deaths, according to the World Bank.

Poor sanitation contributes to about 10% of the world’s disease burden and is linked to even those diseases that may not present any correlation at first. For example, while lack of nutrition is a direct cause of anaemia, poor sanitation can contribute to the problem by causing intestinal diseases which prevent people from absorbing nutrition from their food. In fact, a study found a correlation between improved sanitation and reduced prevalence of anaemia in 14 Indian states. Diarrhoeal diseases, the most well-known consequence of poor sanitation, are the third largest cause of child mortality in India. They are also linked to undernutrition and stunting in children - 38% of Indian children exhibit stunted growth. Improved sanitation can also help reduce prevalence of neglected tropical diseases (NTDs). Though not a cause of high mortality rate, NTDs impair physical and cognitive development, contribute to mother and child illness and death and affect overall productivity. NTDs caused by parasitic worms - such as hookworms, whipworms etc. - infect millions every year and spread through open defecation. Improving toilet access and access to clean drinking water can significantly boost disease control programmes for diarrhoea, NTDs and other correlated conditions.

Unfortunately, with about 732 million people who have no access to toilets, India currently accounts for more than half of the world population that defecates in the open. India also accounts for the largest rural population living without access to clean water. Only 16% of India’s rural population is currently served by piped water.

However, there is cause for optimism. In the three years of Swachh Bharat Abhiyan, the country’s sanitation coverage has risen from 39% to 65% and eight states and Union Territories have been declared open defecation free. But lasting change cannot be ensured by the proliferation of sanitation infrastructure alone. Ensuring the usage of toilets is as important as building them, more so due to the cultural preference for open defecation in rural India.

According to the World Bank, hygiene promotion is essential to realise the potential of infrastructure investments in sanitation. Behavioural intervention is most successful when it targets few behaviours with the most potential for impact. An area of public health where behavioural training has made an impact is WASH - water, sanitation and hygiene - a key issue of UN Sustainable Development Goal 6. Compliance to WASH practices has the potential to reduce illness and death, poverty and improve overall socio-economic development. The UN has even marked observance days for each - World Water Day for water (22 March), World Toilet Day for sanitation (19 November) and Global Handwashing Day for hygiene (15 October).

At its simplest, the benefits of WASH can be availed through three simple habits that safeguard against disease - washing hands before eating, drinking clean water and using a clean toilet. Handwashing and use of toilets are some of the most important behavioural interventions that keep diarrhoeal diseases from spreading, while clean drinking water is essential to prevent water-borne diseases and adverse health effects of toxic contaminants. In India, Hindustan Unilever Limited launched the Swachh Aadat Swachh Bharat initiative, a WASH behaviour change programme, to complement the Swachh Bharat Abhiyan. Through its on-ground behaviour change model, SASB seeks to promote the three basic WASH habits to create long-lasting personal hygiene compliance among the populations it serves.

This touching film made as a part of SASB’s awareness campaign shows how lack of knowledge of basic hygiene practices means children miss out on developmental milestones due to preventable diseases.

Play

SASB created the Swachhata curriculum, a textbook to encourage adoption of personal hygiene among school going children. It makes use of conceptual learning to teach primary school students about cleanliness, germs and clean habits in an engaging manner. Swachh Basti is an extensive urban outreach programme for sensitising urban slum residents about WASH habits through demos, skits and etc. in partnership with key local stakeholders such as doctors, anganwadi workers and support groups. In Ghatkopar, Mumbai, HUL built the first-of-its-kind Suvidha Centre - an urban water, hygiene and sanitation community centre. It provides toilets, handwashing and shower facilities, safe drinking water and state-of-the-art laundry operations at an affordable cost to about 1,500 residents of the area.

HUL’s factory workers also act as Swachhata Doots, or messengers of change who teach the three habits of WASH in their own villages. This mobile-led rural behaviour change communication model also provides a volunteering opportunity to those who are busy but wish to make a difference. A toolkit especially designed for this purpose helps volunteers approach, explain and teach people in their immediate vicinity - their drivers, cooks, domestic helps etc. - about the three simple habits for better hygiene. This helps cast the net of awareness wider as regular interaction is conducive to habit formation. To learn more about their volunteering programme, click here. To learn more about the Swachh Aadat Swachh Bharat initiative, click here.

This article was produced by the Scroll marketing team on behalf of Hindustan Unilever and not by the Scroll editorial team.