Gorakhpur Deaths

A tragedy foretold: The questions Uttar Pradesh government must answer for Gorakhpur deaths

Local news reports show that the medical college knew since beginning of August that oxygen supply could be disrupted putting patients’ lives at risk.

On August 10, the website Gorakhpur Newsline reported a possible crisis due to an oxygen supply shortage at Baba Raghav Das Medical College and Hospital at Gorakhpur in Uttar Pradesh. The report said that Pushpa Sales, the company that supplied liquid oxygen to the medical college, had cut off supply because the medical college had not paid its arrears, warning that this could put patients’ lives at risk.

This is precisely what seems to have happened.

A statement released by the hospital on the evening of August 11 said that 30 children died after the liquid oxygen supply was disrupted.

The Gorakhpur Newsline report on August 10 cites two letters showing that the medical college authorities had been aware of a possible oxygen supply shortage since the beginning of August.

On August 1, Pushpa Sales wrote to the principal of BRD Medical College saying that the college owed the company Rs 63.65 lakh, which the medical college had not paid despite repeated requests from the company. In this letter, the company has also warned that oxygen supply could be disrupted if the payment was not made. Despite this warning, the medical college did not make the payment to Pushpa Sales, according to the news report.

On August 10, the central oxygen pipeline operators of BRD Medical College wrote to the principal of the college, the chief medical superintendent and the nodal officer of the National Health Mission reiterating that Pushpa Sales had stopped supplying liquid oxygen citing payment arrears. The letter also pointed out that the medical college had only enough oxygen to last till that night.

These were not the only two letters.

A letter released by news agency ANI said the department handling oxygen supply at BRD Medical College wrote a letter about the impending oxygen shortage to the principal, district medical authorities and National Health Mission officer on August 3 as well.

According to the Gorakhpur Newsline report, Pushpa Sales had set up a liquid oxygen supply plant on at BRD Medical College from which it supplies oxygen to the trauma centre and several wards at the Nehru Hospital affiliated to the college. Three of the wards that get this oxygen supply have patients with encephalitis.

The first and most important question that the Uttar Pradesh government and the medical college need to answer is why, despite several intimations and warnings, did they allow oxygen supply to be disrupted in the second week of August?

Causes of death?

The authorities seem to be avoiding that question by simply saying that the deaths were not caused by the oxygen supply disruption.

On August 11, the website reported that the Gorpakhpur district magistrate attempted to play down the fact that the oxygen supply had failed. He said that none of the 17 newborns, eight children in the general ward and five encephalitis patients had died due to lack of oxygen supply. He said that BRD Medical College is a large hospital where many children are admitted. He also said that 10 children and 10 newborns die everyday on average due to acute encephalitis syndrome. Gorakhpur is located in eastern Uttar Pradesh, a region where encephalitis is endemic.

However, data released by the hospital belies these claims and shows few deaths on account of encephalitis and the most number of deaths in the neonatal ward.

NICU: Neonatal Intensive Care Unit; AES: Acute Encephalitis Syndrome
NICU: Neonatal Intensive Care Unit; AES: Acute Encephalitis Syndrome

The number of deaths spiked on August 10 – the day the oxygen supply failed. Gorakhpur Newsline also reported the average number of deaths in the neonatal ward is no more than five per day. Accounting for all causes, the number of deaths in the children’s ward does not normally exceed 15.

All this data raises the the question of what was responsible for the death of 23 children, including 17 newborns, in a single day.

If the hospital and the Uttar Pradesh government continue to claim that that the oxygen supply disruption did not lead to the deaths, and the hospital routinely sees such a high number of deaths in a day, then they must release data of fatalities at the hospital for previous months and years, and not just for five days prior to August 11.

The hospital will also need to account for the deaths by releasing detailed medical records of the victims and whether postmortems were conducted to determine the exact causes of death.

The Gorakhpur Newsline also reported that 18 adults have died and their deaths were not mentioned in the hospital’s statement. In ward number 14, which comes under the medicine department, eight people died on August 10 and 10 people died on August 11, according to the news report.

Scroll.in has not been able to independently confirm these deaths. It remains unclear what caused these deaths and whether they were related to the oxygen supply disruption – one more thing that the medical college and the state government need to explain.

Delayed payments?

The oxygen supply disruption seems to have been caused due to the non-payment of Rs 63 lakh to the company Pushpa Sales. The company spokesperson told ANI that the deaths have not occurred due to oxygen supply failure and that the company knows the consequences of stopping oxygen supply to a hospital. However, the spokesperson reiterated that the company had repeatedly written to the medical college about pending payments but never got a response.

The lack of payment by BRD Medical College does not seem to be restricted to the oxygen supply company. The salaries of at least 400 medical personnel who are involved in the treatment of encephalitis at the medical college have not been paid for many months, the Gorakhpur Newsline reported. Doctors at the physical and medicine and rehabilitation unit have not been paid for 27 months and neonatal unit staff have not received their salaries in six months, it said.

The reason for the lack of payments is unclear. In 2014, the BRD Medical College received Rs 150 crore – Rs 120 crore from the Centre and Rs 30 crore from the state government – under a scheme to upgrade medical college institutions under the Pradhan Mantri Swasthya Suraksha Yojana.

In October 2016, The Times of India reported that BRD Medical College was among several hospitals in the state that had not fully utilised funds allotted to them under the state government’s Asadhya Rog scheme. BRD Medical College had used just Rs 15.56 lakh of the Rs 4.5 crore that was allocated to it three years earlier in 2013.

On the other hand, the Hindustan Times reported that in May 2017 the college administration asked for Rs 37 crore to improve facilities, including maintenance of wards and the intensive care unit, procuring medicines and ventilators and maintaining its laboratories. The state government forwarded the request to the central government and an official told the newspaper that they were still waiting for the funds to be released.

Whether it is a lack of funds or simply under-ultilisation of existing funds, the government must answer why an important hospital serving the whole of eastern Uttar Pradesh and parts of neighbouring Bihar could not pay an oxygen supply company on time.

We welcome your comments at letters@scroll.in.
Sponsored Content BY 

What hospitals can do to drive entrepreneurship and enhance patient experience

Hospitals can perform better by partnering with entrepreneurs and encouraging a culture of intrapreneurship focused on customer centricity.

At the Emory University Hospital in Atlanta, visitors don’t have to worry about navigating their way across the complex hospital premises. All they need to do is download wayfinding tools from the installed digital signage onto their smartphone and get step by step directions. Other hospitals have digital signage in surgical waiting rooms that share surgery updates with the anxious families waiting outside, or offer general information to visitors in waiting rooms. Many others use digital registration tools to reduce check-in time or have Smart TVs in patient rooms that serve educational and anxiety alleviating content.

Most of these tech enabled solutions have emerged as hospitals look for better ways to enhance patient experience – one of the top criteria in evaluating hospital performance. Patient experience accounts for 25% of a hospital’s Value-Based Purchasing (VBP) score as per the US government’s Centres for Medicare and Mediaid Services (CMS) programme. As a Mckinsey report says, hospitals need to break down a patient’s journey into various aspects, clinical and non-clinical, and seek ways of improving every touch point in the journey. As hospitals also need to focus on delivering quality healthcare, they are increasingly collaborating with entrepreneurs who offer such patient centric solutions or encouraging innovative intrapreneurship within the organization.

At the Hospital Leadership Summit hosted by Abbott, some of the speakers from diverse industry backgrounds brought up the role of entrepreneurship in order to deliver on patient experience.

Getting the best from collaborations

Speakers such as Dr Naresh Trehan, Chairman and Managing Director - Medanta Hospitals, and Meena Ganesh, CEO and MD - Portea Medical, who spoke at the panel discussion on “Are we fit for the world of new consumers?”, highlighted the importance of collaborating with entrepreneurs to fill the gaps in the patient experience eco system. As Dr Trehan says, “As healthcare service providers we are too steeped in our own work. So even though we may realize there are gaps in customer experience delivery, we don’t want to get distracted from our core job, which is healthcare delivery. We would rather leave the job of filling those gaps to an outsider who can do it well.”

Meena Ganesh shares a similar view when she says that entrepreneurs offer an outsider’s fresh perspective on the existing gaps in healthcare. They are therefore better equipped to offer disruptive technology solutions that put the customer right at the center. Her own venture, Portea Medical, was born out of a need in the hitherto unaddressed area of patient experience – quality home care.

There are enough examples of hospitals that have gained significantly by partnering with or investing in such ventures. For example, the Children’s Medical Centre in Dallas actively invests in tech startups to offer better care to its patients. One such startup produces sensors smaller than a grain of sand, that can be embedded in pills to alert caregivers if a medication has been taken or not. Another app delivers care givers at customers’ door step for check-ups. Providence St Joseph’s Health, that has medical centres across the U.S., has invested in a range of startups that address different patient needs – from patient feedback and wearable monitoring devices to remote video interpretation and surgical blood loss monitoring. UNC Hospital in North Carolina uses a change management platform developed by a startup in order to improve patient experience at its Emergency and Dermatology departments. The platform essentially comes with a friendly and non-intrusive way to gather patient feedback.

When intrapreneurship can lead to patient centric innovation

Hospitals can also encourage a culture of intrapreneurship within the organization. According to Meena Ganesh, this would mean building a ‘listening organization’ because as she says, listening and being open to new ideas leads to innovation. Santosh Desai, MD& CEO - Future Brands Ltd, who was also part of the panel discussion, feels that most innovations are a result of looking at “large cultural shifts, outside the frame of narrow business”. So hospitals will need to encourage enterprising professionals in the organization to observe behavior trends as part of the ideation process. Also, as Dr Ram Narain, Executive Director, Kokilaben Dhirubhai Ambani Hospital, points out, they will need to tell the employees who have the potential to drive innovative initiatives, “Do not fail, but if you fail, we still back you.” Innovative companies such as Google actively follow this practice, allowing employees to pick projects they are passionate about and work on them to deliver fresh solutions.

Realizing the need to encourage new ideas among employees to enhance patient experience, many healthcare enterprises are instituting innovative strategies. Henry Ford System, for example, began a system of rewarding great employee ideas. One internal contest was around clinical applications for wearable technology. The incentive was particularly attractive – a cash prize of $ 10,000 to the winners. Not surprisingly, the employees came up with some very innovative ideas that included: a system to record mobility of acute care patients through wearable trackers, health reminder system for elderly patients and mobile game interface with activity trackers to encourage children towards exercising. The employees admitted later that the exercise was so interesting that they would have participated in it even without a cash prize incentive.

Another example is Penn Medicine in Philadelphia which launched an ‘innovation tournament’ across the organization as part of its efforts to improve patient care. Participants worked with professors from Wharton Business School to prepare for the ideas challenge. More than 1,750 ideas were submitted by 1,400 participants, out of which 10 were selected. The focus was on getting ideas around the front end and some of the submitted ideas included:

  • Check-out management: Exclusive waiting rooms with TV, Internet and other facilities for patients waiting to be discharged so as to reduce space congestion and make their waiting time more comfortable.
  • Space for emotional privacy: An exclusive and friendly space for individuals and families to mourn the loss of dear ones in private.
  • Online patient organizer: A web based app that helps first time patients prepare better for their appointment by providing check lists for documents, medicines, etc to be carried and giving information regarding the hospital navigation, the consulting doctor etc.
  • Help for non-English speakers: Iconography cards to help non-English speaking patients express themselves and seek help in case of emergencies or other situations.

As Arlen Meyers, MD, President and CEO of the Society of Physician Entrepreneurs, says in a report, although many good ideas come from the front line, physicians must also be encouraged to think innovatively about patient experience. An academic study also builds a strong case to encourage intrapreneurship among nurses. Given they comprise a large part of the front-line staff for healthcare delivery, nurses should also be given the freedom to create and design innovative systems for improving patient experience.

According to a Harvard Business Review article quoted in a university study, employees who have the potential to be intrapreneurs, show some marked characteristics. These include a sense of ownership, perseverance, emotional intelligence and the ability to look at the big picture along with the desire, and ideas, to improve it. But trust and support of the management is essential to bringing out and taking the ideas forward.

Creating an environment conducive to innovation is the first step to bringing about innovation-driven outcomes. These were just some of the insights on healthcare management gleaned from the Hospital Leadership Summit hosted by Abbott. In over 150 countries, Abbott, which is among the top 100 global innovator companies, is working with hospitals and healthcare professionals to improve the quality of health services.

To read more content on best practices for hospital leaders, visit Abbott’s Bringing Health to Life portal here.

This article was produced on behalf of Abbott by the Scroll.in marketing team and not by the Scroll.in editorial staff.