Entertainment News

India censored more films than any other country in 2017, finds a study on artistic freedom

The State of Artistic Freedom report noted the furor over ‘Padmaavat’, ‘S Durga’, ‘Lipstick Under My Burkha’ and ‘Satyadev IPS’.

India surpassed Turkey, China, Lebanon, France and its neighbour Pakistan to top the list of countries that have censored the most films in 2017, found a study by Freemuse, an independent international organisation advocating for free artistic expression.

According to The State of Artistic Freedom study, 20% of all film censorship cases in 2017 came from India, followed by Turkey, with 9% of cases. India also accounted for one-third of all documented cases of persecution and threats to filmmakers and actors, followed by United Arab Emirates, with 17% cases.

The report noted the furor and censorship of Sanjay Leela Bhansali’s Padmaavat, Sanal Kumar Sasidharan’s S Durga, Alankrita Srivastava’s Lipstick Under My Burkha and Gautham Menon’s Satyadev IPS, the Kannada-dubbed version of Ajith Kumar starrer 2015 Tamil hit Yennai Arindhaal. The release of Menon’s film was disrupted by violent protests by pro-Kannada activists who claimed that the release of dubbed films threatened the state’s culture and industry.

The report examined 553 documented cases where artistic freedom was violated across 78 countries.

India was also among the the 10 countries that have exhibited “alarming developments in how they treat artists and their freedom of artistic expression, and are ones to keep a watch on throughout 2018”. The other nations on that list were China, the United States, Cuba, Iran, Israel, Mexico, Poland, Venezuela and Spain.

India was also featured in several other lists, including the top six countries that denied women’s rights to artistic freedom, where it ranked fourth after Iran, Israel and Egypt.

In terms of censorship across art forms, India was eighth in the list of Top 10 countries, sharing space with the United Kingdom. That list was topped by Uzbekistan, followed by France and Algeria.

Fifty-five percent of the documented violations of artistic freedom in India have come from government authorities, according to the study, while non-state actors, including religious and caste groups, accounted for 36%.

Support our journalism by subscribing to Scroll+ here. We welcome your comments at letters@scroll.in.
Sponsored Content BY 

Do you really need to use that plastic straw?

The hazards of single-use plastic items, and what to use instead.

In June 2018, a distressed whale in Thailand made headlines around the world. After an autopsy it’s cause of death was determined to be more than 80 plastic bags it had ingested. The pictures caused great concern and brought into focus the urgency of the fight against single-use plastic. This term refers to use-and-throw plastic products that are designed for one-time use, such as takeaway spoons and forks, polythene bags styrofoam cups etc. In its report on single-use plastics, the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) has described how single-use plastics have a far-reaching impact in the environment.

Dense quantity of plastic litter means sights such as the distressed whale in Thailand aren’t uncommon. Plastic products have been found in the airways and stomachs of hundreds of marine and land species. Plastic bags, especially, confuse turtles who mistake them for jellyfish - their food. They can even exacerbate health crises, such as a malarial outbreak, by clogging sewers and creating ideal conditions for vector-borne diseases to thrive. In 1988, poor drainage made worse by plastic clogging contributed to the devastating Bangladesh floods in which two-thirds of the country was submerged.

Plastic litter can, moreover, cause physiological harm. Burning plastic waste for cooking fuel and in open air pits releases harmful gases in the air, contributing to poor air quality especially in poorer countries where these practices are common. But plastic needn’t even be burned to cause physiological harm. The toxic chemical additives in the manufacturing process of plastics remain in animal tissue, which is then consumed by humans. These highly toxic and carcinogenic substances (benzene, styrene etc.) can cause damage to nervous systems, lungs and reproductive organs.

The European Commission recently released a list of top 10 single-use plastic items that it plans to ban in the near future. These items are ubiquitous as trash across the world’s beaches, even the pristine, seemingly untouched ones. Some of them, such as styrofoam cups, take up to a 1,000 years to photodegrade (the breakdown of substances by exposure to UV and infrared rays from sunlight), disintegrating into microplastics, another health hazard.

More than 60 countries have introduced levies and bans to discourage the use of single-use plastics. Morocco and Rwanda have emerged as inspiring success stories of such policies. Rwanda, in fact, is now among the cleanest countries on Earth. In India, Maharashtra became the 18th state to effect a ban on disposable plastic items in March 2018. Now India plans to replicate the decision on a national level, aiming to eliminate single-use plastics entirely by 2022. While government efforts are important to encourage industries to redesign their production methods, individuals too can take steps to minimise their consumption, and littering, of single-use plastics. Most of these actions are low on effort, but can cause a significant reduction in plastic waste in the environment, if the return of Olive Ridley turtles to a Mumbai beach are anything to go by.

To know more about the single-use plastics problem, visit Planet or Plastic portal, National Geographic’s multi-year effort to raise awareness about the global plastic trash crisis. From microplastics in cosmetics to haunting art on plastic pollution, Planet or Plastic is a comprehensive resource on the problem. You can take the pledge to reduce your use of single-use plastics, here.

This article was produced by the Scroll marketing team on behalf of National Geographic, and not by the Scroll editorial team.