Opening this week

‘Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom’ film review: Bland humans and not enough dinosaurs

JA Bayona directs the sequel to the 2015 hit ‘Jurassic World’.

Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom, the fifth film in the Jurassic Park franchise and the sequel to Jurassic World (2015) has its moments. Director JA Bayona (The Orphanage, The Impossible) creates a tense atmosphere in the fights between human and dinosaur only at the the tail end of the 128-minute movie. Cinematographer Oscar Faura efficiently conveys scale and splendour through imagery, such as a tiny plane flying by gigantic mountains. The movie frequently, if not always successfully, invokes the iconic scene from Steven Spielberg’s 1993 original, Jurassic Park, in which the characters first encounter the dinosaurs and are awestruck.

The biggest failings of the sequel, co-written by Jurassic World director Colin Trevorrow and Derek Connolly, are that the human characters never truly become interesting and there aren’t enough dinosaurs. For large portions of the movie, the perfect predators are reduced to whimpering animals that would not be out of place in a petting zoo.

The movie is set three years after the events of the 2015 film, which ended with dinosaur trainer Owen (Chris Pratt) and theme park manager Claire (Bryce Dallas Howard) fleeing the island Isla Nublar after an artificially created dinosaur went on the rampage. Owen and Claire are called back to the island by Eli Mills (Rafe Spall), who is shepherding the surviving dinosaurs to a sanctuary owned by Benjamin Lockwood (James Cromwell) before a volcano erupts. Lockwood, however, has other plans for the creatures.

Play
Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom (2018).

Many of the characters seem to have been created to fit an audience-friendly demographic chart. There’s a tattooed, tough-talking hipster (Daniella Pineda), a constantly frightened geek hacker (Justice Smith) and a young adventurous girl (Isabella Sermon) who uncovers mystery after mystery. These underwritten characters are never fleshed out, and the actors never do them justice either. The only time any of the human interactions become interesting are when veterans such as Toby Jones and Jeff Goldblum appear on the screen.

The film does have a few charming moments and decent action scenes, and all of them involve dinosaurs. But whenever any energy builds up, the film falls into its tired old patterns, resorting to either safety or danger at the last minute. The characters are either completely safe when a dinosaur suddenly pops up, or they are in extreme peril when something miraculous brings them out of harm’s way.

The first film in the series, Jurassic Park, was lean and taut, had little exposition and just the right amount of back story. As the franchise progressed, the writers fleshed out certain elements that did not actually need to be explained or repeated the original theme of whether humans should play god and clone prehistoric creatures. The main thrill of the movies, however, isn’t the animal rights allegory embedded into the narrative. It is the spectacle of giant dinosaurs wreaking havoc on the screen, and Fallen Kingdom doesn’t have enough of these moments.

Support our journalism by subscribing to Scroll+ here. We welcome your comments at letters@scroll.in.
Sponsored Content BY 

Do you really need to use that plastic straw?

The hazards of single-use plastic items, and what to use instead.

In June 2018, a distressed whale in Thailand made headlines around the world. After an autopsy it’s cause of death was determined to be more than 80 plastic bags it had ingested. The pictures caused great concern and brought into focus the urgency of the fight against single-use plastic. This term refers to use-and-throw plastic products that are designed for one-time use, such as takeaway spoons and forks, polythene bags styrofoam cups etc. In its report on single-use plastics, the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) has described how single-use plastics have a far-reaching impact in the environment.

Dense quantity of plastic litter means sights such as the distressed whale in Thailand aren’t uncommon. Plastic products have been found in the airways and stomachs of hundreds of marine and land species. Plastic bags, especially, confuse turtles who mistake them for jellyfish - their food. They can even exacerbate health crises, such as a malarial outbreak, by clogging sewers and creating ideal conditions for vector-borne diseases to thrive. In 1988, poor drainage made worse by plastic clogging contributed to the devastating Bangladesh floods in which two-thirds of the country was submerged.

Plastic litter can, moreover, cause physiological harm. Burning plastic waste for cooking fuel and in open air pits releases harmful gases in the air, contributing to poor air quality especially in poorer countries where these practices are common. But plastic needn’t even be burned to cause physiological harm. The toxic chemical additives in the manufacturing process of plastics remain in animal tissue, which is then consumed by humans. These highly toxic and carcinogenic substances (benzene, styrene etc.) can cause damage to nervous systems, lungs and reproductive organs.

The European Commission recently released a list of top 10 single-use plastic items that it plans to ban in the near future. These items are ubiquitous as trash across the world’s beaches, even the pristine, seemingly untouched ones. Some of them, such as styrofoam cups, take up to a 1,000 years to photodegrade (the breakdown of substances by exposure to UV and infrared rays from sunlight), disintegrating into microplastics, another health hazard.

More than 60 countries have introduced levies and bans to discourage the use of single-use plastics. Morocco and Rwanda have emerged as inspiring success stories of such policies. Rwanda, in fact, is now among the cleanest countries on Earth. In India, Maharashtra became the 18th state to effect a ban on disposable plastic items in March 2018. Now India plans to replicate the decision on a national level, aiming to eliminate single-use plastics entirely by 2022. While government efforts are important to encourage industries to redesign their production methods, individuals too can take steps to minimise their consumption, and littering, of single-use plastics. Most of these actions are low on effort, but can cause a significant reduction in plastic waste in the environment, if the return of Olive Ridley turtles to a Mumbai beach are anything to go by.

To know more about the single-use plastics problem, visit Planet or Plastic portal, National Geographic’s multi-year effort to raise awareness about the global plastic trash crisis. From microplastics in cosmetics to haunting art on plastic pollution, Planet or Plastic is a comprehensive resource on the problem. You can take the pledge to reduce your use of single-use plastics, here.

This article was produced by the Scroll marketing team on behalf of National Geographic, and not by the Scroll editorial team.