Finance Minister Arun Jaitley and Reserve Bank of India Governor Raghuram Rajan during a financial stability development council meeting in June 2014. “No one wants to go after the rich and well-connected wrong-doer, which means they get away with even more,” Rajan wrote, in an email to RBI employees last month.
If the unpaid loans made by India’s public-sector banks were recovered, they would be enough to pay for India’s 2015 spending on defence, education, highways, and health, according to an IndiaSpend analysis.
These bad loans, or gross non-performing assets as they are called in banking parlance, of public-sector banks crossed Rs 4.04 lakh crore, a rise of 450% since March 2011.
Private-sector banks also have an NPA problem, but their bad loans are less than half the level of public-sector banks, which account for 73% of all lending.
This affects their ability to make fresh loans to business, and these bad loans are ultimately paid for by India’s taxpayers, the final guarantors of government-owned public-sector banks, as editor and columnist TN Ninan recently wrote in Business Standard.
“So what is to be done?” he wrote of the banking crisis. “The easy option is to take more of your tax money and give it to the same banks, on a platter. The government has talked of giving them another Rs 2.4 lakh crore – which works out to Rs 10,000 from every family, rich and poor.”
“Indeed, 19 of 24 listed government banks’ stocks now quote at less than half of book value, some at a discount of 75 per cent. Clearly, investors still think these banks’ books are akin to fiction.”
Indeed, the actual value of stressed and below-par assets of public-sector banks is higher than the NPA data reveal.
Stressed loans + bad loans = Rs 8 lakh crore ($117 billion)
There are a number of loans that have been restructured, which means the borrower gets more time to repay the loan; sometimes, the interest rate is lowered as well–because the borrower could not, or did not, keep to the original terms of repayment.
The combined level of NPAs and restructured assets is 14% – or one rupee in seven – of all loans made by India’s public-sector banks, close to Rs 8 lakh crore ($117 billion). This amount, higher than the gross domestic product of Oman, Sri Lanka and Myanmar, is potentially at risk.
The Government and the Reserve Bank of India have tried to address the problem over several quarters. The Economic Survey 2014-15, released just before last year’s budget, identified rising NPAs as a major problem and listed the RBI efforts to curb them, including tighter guidelines on reporting bad loans.
Tighter reporting guidelines are partly responsible for swelling NPA levels: Loans that could have earlier not been revealed in accounting statements are now being reported as bad loans.
Bad risk management, not always fraud
The RBI cites three reasons for these loans which have gone bad: genuine business reasons; wrong business decision and inefficiencies; and misdemeanour.
Almost 85% of all stressed assets are from the industrial sector (Refer chart below), mostly from core sectors, such as iron & steel, infrastructure, engineering, construction, textiles and shipbuilding, all affected by India’s industrial slowdown.
Some of the large loans that recently went bad include:
- ABG Shipyard: Rs 11,000 crore, restructured and then became NPA
- Bharati Shipyard: Rs 8,500 crore
- Gammon Infrastructure: Rs 15,000 crore
- Electrosteel Steels: Rs 9,600 crore
Contrary to popular perception, not all bad loans are the result of fraud or political influence. For instance, the four examples listed above are operational companies with physical assets. They have been brought down by a combination of factors, including poor economic conditions and high levels of debt relative to their capital and profits.
In some cases, projects have been stalled due to land-acquisition issues, local opposition or environmental clearance: This is especially true for the hydropower sector, where almost all projects are behind schedule.
Many of the bad or stressed loans result from mis-management and, perhaps, overly optimistic business projections, such as tycoon Vijay Mallya, whose defunct Kingfisher Airlines owes banks Rs 4,000 crore.
The impunity of big borrowers
This is not to say that there haven’t been frauds. There have been high-profile defaults by borrowers, such as Winsome Diamonds, Deccan Chronicle Holdings and Surya Vinayak Industries, which borrowed several thousand crore from public-sector banks, with very little by way of physical assets and investments.
India’s banking culture of allowing influential borrowers who default to get away was flagged in January by RBI governor Raghuram Rajan.
“We do not punish the wrong-doer–unless he is small and weak,” Rajan wrote in an email to RBI employees. “This belief feeds on itself. No one wants to go after the rich and well-connected wrong-doer, which means they get away with even more. If we are to have strong sustainable growth, this culture of impunity should stop.”
How the taxpayer pays for bad loans–and other effects of NPAs
There are two effects that the rising tide of bad loans has on the banking system.
First, the taxpayer ends up paying. Banks take money from depositors that they lend to borrowers. If a borrower cannot repay loans, banks make up the shortfall from their own capital and profits. If a bank has bad loans, its shareholders take the hit. India’s public-sector banks are owned by the government, and, so, these bad loans are a loss to the government and the taxpayer.
Second, bad loans slow economic activity. Banks lend to companies to make profits and grow their working capital. High levels of bad loans erode bank capital, reduce their ability to raise fresh capital and reduce a bank’s capacity to lend, slowing the economy.
Private-sector banks also face stress over bad loans, but their problems are nowhere close to the crisis at their public-sector cousins.
For bad loans, worst private banks better than best public banks
The total stressed assets of India’s private-sector banks were 6.7% of their outstanding loans, against 14% for public-sector lenders, according to RBI data.
Private banks have consistently had lower NPA levels. For the quarter ended December 2015, many private banks, such as HDFC Bank, IndusInd Bank and Yes Bank, have NPA levels of less than 1%; the worst private performers, such as ICICI Bank and Federal Bank, do better than the best-performing public-sector banks.
This article was originally published on IndiaSpend, a data-driven and public-interest journalism non-profit.
Respond to this article with a post
Share your perspective on this article with a post on ScrollStack, and send it to your followers.