Letters to the editor

'It's kiddish of the Congress to merely wait for the BJP to make mistakes'

A selection of readers' opinions over the past week.

A matter of ideology

It’s true that the Congress lacks ideology, true national spirit and the will to oppose the ongoing madness of the ruling party (“Serious question: Does the Congress party believe in anything at all?”). It seems that the Congress is “certain” of coming to power in three years’ time. Therefore, they are merely waiting for the BJP to commit mistakes so as to reap the benefits. This is kiddish behaviour. Vikrant Mahajan


I absolutely agree with Anjali Mody’s view that the Congress is giving up the ideological and political battle to the Bharatiya Janata Party without a fight. I think it is happening because of ineptitude of its current leadership, where the senior most leader is incapable of comprehending the nuances of the BJP’s divisive politics. The Congress’ inability to bring educated Indians back into the forefront has made it a soft target for the BJP. Sumit Mitra


Can someone please tell the Congress to have intra-party elections? Most of the country is fed up of the very obvious dynastic succession. It doesn’t inspire any confidence at all. And since the idea is to have a fair election, there has to be a secret ballot. Elect a leader and some of the party’s old supporters may come back to them. Otherwise the BJP will win in 2019 again, merely because there is no alternative. Jamila Koshy


The Congress has always worked against the interests of the country. They have been self-centred and will go to any extent to retain power. RV Ramani


I am on the same page as Anjali Mody in understanding Congress politics in competing with the Bharatiya Janata Party on nationalism and pandering to what it considers as Hindu majoritarian views and sentiments.

The writer has mentioned Gujarat and the Afzal Guru hanging. I can add Punjab to the list. The details she provided on how the Congress had two different manifestos – one in English for liberal middle class where secularism was mentioned, and another one in Gujarati where secularism was abandoned to pander to the electorate – shows the utter bankruptcy of the Congress politics that has eventually contributed to consolidating Hindu communalism and expanding the base of the BJP. Pritam Singh

Time warp

Well, at least Rahul Gandhi got Narendra Modi talking (“Has Rahul Gandhi finally got under the skin of the BJP?”). But I’m disappointed that he could not get him to debate on any of the important issues or the current happenings. Modi seems to be stuck in a time warp as all his rhetoric is reserved for the Gandhi family. I was not much of an Atal Bihari Vajpayee fan, but I have now realised his value. He was a true statesman, who knew where to draw the line when it came to the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh. All I have to say to Modi now is: Sir, I am sorry I wasted my vote on you. Rekha BM

Professor's paradox

This professor from Lucknow has behaved like any other opportunistic academician/pseudo-intellectual at this moment in our country (“’This is worse than the Emergency’: Lucknow professor targeted for sharing article on Umar Khalid”). He said that he has merely shared the article in which Apoorvanand supported Umar Khalid’s protest.

Well, this whole argument is that Umar Khalid was not just demonstrating a different thought. Had that been the case, we all would have welcome a different thought as a fresh breeze and debated it. However, he and many others like him decided to allegedly shout anti-Indians slogans. Nobody should be allowed to do that. Country is first and foremost and our radical opinions come after that.

The Lucknow professor is saying everything that there is to say, like comparing the current happenings to the Emergency, and yet claiming that the situation is not conducive. I think that someone needs to tell him that if it was like the Emergency period, then he would not be roaming freely after supporting anti-India slogans. So there is a paradox in his actions and words written against the current establishment.

However, one very important fact is that he is from Uttar Pradesh and his intellect is not showing him the worsened law and order mechanism in the state. Let us stop the hypocrisy here and be united at least on the agenda of India. Himanshoo Kumar Saxena


I read the article on the Lucknow professor, Rajesh Misra, and do feel bad for him for what he has to go through because of a simple Facebook post. It reminds me of a student who posted on Facebook about some activities in his university that he did not like. Some people entered his hostel room that night and had arguments and scuffled with him. I don’t know if the boy got injured as that is still a bit mysterious.

Who do you think the professor and the media would call the victim in the above case? The student who created the post or the people who had a scuffle in his room?

The university I am referring to is the University of Hyderabad and one of the people who entered that student’s room to have a scuffle against the Facebook post was one Rohith Vemula. Who do you support now?

Get some perspective. There are victims on both sides of this battle and the media needs to be neutral. Krishnan

Manufactured campaign

To compare the JNU police arrest to the provocative sloganeering with McCarthyism is typical hyperbole from those pseudo-intellectual Leftists who have visceral hatred of this democratically-elected government (“’What is happening in India today is similar to the McCarthy era’: Partha Chatterjee”).

It’s shameful behaviour on the part of these people as they are partners in crime of the incredibly corrupt undemocratic Congress party that has presided over abject poverty, massive under- and unemployment and hunger and malnutrition for 60 years.

You manufacture, exaggerate and falsify to portray this regime, which is attempting to address the issues neglected for decades, as intolerant, fascist and numerous equally unwarranted hateful adjectives.

You have deeply entrenched bias, intellectual dishonesty and unwillingness to admit that you may be barking up not just wrong tree but in the wrong forest altogether. Harish Datta

The hate spectrum

Your speech was rolling along brilliantly; I found myself nodding when you spoke about the primacy of the constitution and a thoughtful and robust interpretation of Article 19(1)(A) (“’Affection cannot be manufactured or be regulated by the law’: Lawrence Liang quotes Gandhi in his JNU teach-in lecture”). I even cheered when you brought up the issue of raucous news anchors.

And then in one word you destroyed everything that you said you stood for. If I recall correctly, you exhorted the students to “fight the [political] right”. Why assume that everything the Right does is wrong; everything the Left stands for is perfect and good and “reasonable”?

When I see the hate spectrum we have unleashed in this country, I despair; this is the polarisation that stems from hate, not that which stems from reasoned debate. The Left and the Right are no less culpable, which leaves us floundering for the voice of sanity, which I thought you almost were. Sandhya Sundar

Mischief mongering

Please do a little more homework to make your case (“Make in India and remove Sheldon Pollock from Murty Classical Library, demand 132 intellectuals”). What is it about the timing of the petition that you are suspicious about? It requires time to study a book and to arrive at certain conclusions after discussing it with like-minded people who have also gone through it. So identifying the timing of the petition with the JNU row is a clear case of “journalistic mischief” or gathering evidence against something you are fighting for. Arun

Seeking objectivity

I am not Right, Left or Centre, but just an individual who feels the need to know about affairs that matter with clarity and equanimity (“Why Hindutva groups have for long had Sheldon Pollock in their sights”). Among the affairs that matter to me is classical Indian works, for which I have much respect.

I do find the piece one-sided. No surprise there given that it is written by a student of Sheldon Pollock. But given that he has taken Rajiv Malhotra by name, criticised his work and labeled him many things, I submit that in the interest of objectivity and fairness, Malhotra be invited to write a rebuttal. Badhri

Mild description

The writer holds that violence begins in Syria and is “exported to Europe”, followed by the erection of walls and fences (“Live and let die: Did Michel Foucault predict Europe’s refugee crisis?”). But what about Nato’s illegal invasion of Iraq, its funding and arming of what later became ISIS, and now Russia’s bombs? Didn’t any of this contribute to the refugee crisis, which anyway for Europe amounts to only a very small number of immigrants?

Live and let die is too charitable a description of what has been perpetrated on these societies by Euro-American governments. It amounts to the same old explanation, that some people just have chaos and barbarism in their blood. Aman Kumar

We welcome your comments at letters@scroll.in.
Sponsored Content BY 

What hospitals can do to drive entrepreneurship and enhance patient experience

Hospitals can perform better by partnering with entrepreneurs and encouraging a culture of intrapreneurship focused on customer centricity.

At the Emory University Hospital in Atlanta, visitors don’t have to worry about navigating their way across the complex hospital premises. All they need to do is download wayfinding tools from the installed digital signage onto their smartphone and get step by step directions. Other hospitals have digital signage in surgical waiting rooms that share surgery updates with the anxious families waiting outside, or offer general information to visitors in waiting rooms. Many others use digital registration tools to reduce check-in time or have Smart TVs in patient rooms that serve educational and anxiety alleviating content.

Most of these tech enabled solutions have emerged as hospitals look for better ways to enhance patient experience – one of the top criteria in evaluating hospital performance. Patient experience accounts for 25% of a hospital’s Value-Based Purchasing (VBP) score as per the US government’s Centres for Medicare and Mediaid Services (CMS) programme. As a Mckinsey report says, hospitals need to break down a patient’s journey into various aspects, clinical and non-clinical, and seek ways of improving every touch point in the journey. As hospitals also need to focus on delivering quality healthcare, they are increasingly collaborating with entrepreneurs who offer such patient centric solutions or encouraging innovative intrapreneurship within the organization.

At the Hospital Leadership Summit hosted by Abbott, some of the speakers from diverse industry backgrounds brought up the role of entrepreneurship in order to deliver on patient experience.

Getting the best from collaborations

Speakers such as Dr Naresh Trehan, Chairman and Managing Director - Medanta Hospitals, and Meena Ganesh, CEO and MD - Portea Medical, who spoke at the panel discussion on “Are we fit for the world of new consumers?”, highlighted the importance of collaborating with entrepreneurs to fill the gaps in the patient experience eco system. As Dr Trehan says, “As healthcare service providers we are too steeped in our own work. So even though we may realize there are gaps in customer experience delivery, we don’t want to get distracted from our core job, which is healthcare delivery. We would rather leave the job of filling those gaps to an outsider who can do it well.”

Meena Ganesh shares a similar view when she says that entrepreneurs offer an outsider’s fresh perspective on the existing gaps in healthcare. They are therefore better equipped to offer disruptive technology solutions that put the customer right at the center. Her own venture, Portea Medical, was born out of a need in the hitherto unaddressed area of patient experience – quality home care.

There are enough examples of hospitals that have gained significantly by partnering with or investing in such ventures. For example, the Children’s Medical Centre in Dallas actively invests in tech startups to offer better care to its patients. One such startup produces sensors smaller than a grain of sand, that can be embedded in pills to alert caregivers if a medication has been taken or not. Another app delivers care givers at customers’ door step for check-ups. Providence St Joseph’s Health, that has medical centres across the U.S., has invested in a range of startups that address different patient needs – from patient feedback and wearable monitoring devices to remote video interpretation and surgical blood loss monitoring. UNC Hospital in North Carolina uses a change management platform developed by a startup in order to improve patient experience at its Emergency and Dermatology departments. The platform essentially comes with a friendly and non-intrusive way to gather patient feedback.

When intrapreneurship can lead to patient centric innovation

Hospitals can also encourage a culture of intrapreneurship within the organization. According to Meena Ganesh, this would mean building a ‘listening organization’ because as she says, listening and being open to new ideas leads to innovation. Santosh Desai, MD& CEO - Future Brands Ltd, who was also part of the panel discussion, feels that most innovations are a result of looking at “large cultural shifts, outside the frame of narrow business”. So hospitals will need to encourage enterprising professionals in the organization to observe behavior trends as part of the ideation process. Also, as Dr Ram Narain, Executive Director, Kokilaben Dhirubhai Ambani Hospital, points out, they will need to tell the employees who have the potential to drive innovative initiatives, “Do not fail, but if you fail, we still back you.” Innovative companies such as Google actively follow this practice, allowing employees to pick projects they are passionate about and work on them to deliver fresh solutions.

Realizing the need to encourage new ideas among employees to enhance patient experience, many healthcare enterprises are instituting innovative strategies. Henry Ford System, for example, began a system of rewarding great employee ideas. One internal contest was around clinical applications for wearable technology. The incentive was particularly attractive – a cash prize of $ 10,000 to the winners. Not surprisingly, the employees came up with some very innovative ideas that included: a system to record mobility of acute care patients through wearable trackers, health reminder system for elderly patients and mobile game interface with activity trackers to encourage children towards exercising. The employees admitted later that the exercise was so interesting that they would have participated in it even without a cash prize incentive.

Another example is Penn Medicine in Philadelphia which launched an ‘innovation tournament’ across the organization as part of its efforts to improve patient care. Participants worked with professors from Wharton Business School to prepare for the ideas challenge. More than 1,750 ideas were submitted by 1,400 participants, out of which 10 were selected. The focus was on getting ideas around the front end and some of the submitted ideas included:

  • Check-out management: Exclusive waiting rooms with TV, Internet and other facilities for patients waiting to be discharged so as to reduce space congestion and make their waiting time more comfortable.
  • Space for emotional privacy: An exclusive and friendly space for individuals and families to mourn the loss of dear ones in private.
  • Online patient organizer: A web based app that helps first time patients prepare better for their appointment by providing check lists for documents, medicines, etc to be carried and giving information regarding the hospital navigation, the consulting doctor etc.
  • Help for non-English speakers: Iconography cards to help non-English speaking patients express themselves and seek help in case of emergencies or other situations.

As Arlen Meyers, MD, President and CEO of the Society of Physician Entrepreneurs, says in a report, although many good ideas come from the front line, physicians must also be encouraged to think innovatively about patient experience. An academic study also builds a strong case to encourage intrapreneurship among nurses. Given they comprise a large part of the front-line staff for healthcare delivery, nurses should also be given the freedom to create and design innovative systems for improving patient experience.

According to a Harvard Business Review article quoted in a university study, employees who have the potential to be intrapreneurs, show some marked characteristics. These include a sense of ownership, perseverance, emotional intelligence and the ability to look at the big picture along with the desire, and ideas, to improve it. But trust and support of the management is essential to bringing out and taking the ideas forward.

Creating an environment conducive to innovation is the first step to bringing about innovation-driven outcomes. These were just some of the insights on healthcare management gleaned from the Hospital Leadership Summit hosted by Abbott. In over 150 countries, Abbott, which is among the top 100 global innovator companies, is working with hospitals and healthcare professionals to improve the quality of health services.

To read more content on best practices for hospital leaders, visit Abbott’s Bringing Health to Life portal here.

This article was produced on behalf of Abbott by the Scroll.in marketing team and not by the Scroll.in editorial staff.