Political murders

Why the BJP has finally decided to make an issue of Kerala's long history of political violence

The saffron party fears that the new government will released jailed Leftists accused of previous murders.

Kerala's new Communist Party of India (Marxist) government faces the prospect of beginning its term on a collision course with the Central government.

Last week, the CPI(M)-led Left Democratic Front powered to a 45-constituency win over the Congress-led United Democratic Front. Pinarayi Vijayan, who has been nominated as the new chief minister, is expected to be sworn in on Wednesday along with his team.

The Bharatiya Janata Party won only a single seat, dashing its hopes of a significantly better performance. But even after the results were declared on May 19, the BJP has continued to press on with its campaign strategy of highlighting political violence in the state.

On Sunday, a delegation led by Union Minister Nitin Gadkari sought President Pranab Mukherjee intervention to halt the post-poll violence. Since the results were announced on Thursday, one worker each from BJP and the CPI(M) have died in clashes, while nearly 50 injured in various parts of the state.

On Saturday, BJP president Amit Shah warned the CPI(M) that workers of his party would take to streets if it did not stop the cycle of violence. His colleague and Union Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad reminded the CPI (M) that BJP was ruling the country.

Campaign issue

As if to emphasise this, BJP workers held an unruly demonstration outside the CPI(M) headquarters in New Delhi on Sunday. The protestors broke police barriers and damaged a signboard.

Political violence was a major poll plank of the BJP for the Assembly polls on May 16. Prime Minister Narendra Modi had launched his campaign in the state by presenting a victim of the political violence: S Sadanandan, who lost both his legs in a CPI (M) attack in 1994.

The CPI (M) has viewed the statements of BJP leaders as a threat, and the demonstration at their party headquarters in Delhi on Sunday as the beginning of its execution. Party state secretary Kodiyeri Balakrishnan said Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh was trying to create terror with the help of the government they control at the Centre.

Chief Minister designate Pinarayi Vijayan alleged that BJP workers were unleashing violence as they were intolerant towards the people’s mandate in Kerala.

Some observers claim that these two recent deaths were relatively minor incidents, considering the brutality of some of the previous political murders over the last four decades.

Despite the long history of political violence in Kerala, the BJP and Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh have rarely sought to make it a national issue. But some believe that the saffron party is afraid that with the CPI(M) coming to power, its workers may feel emboldened to continue the cycle of revenge killings. BJP leaders link the current bout of political violence with the Kozhikode CPI(M) district secretary P Jayarajan’s reported statement in April that the CPI (M) would “repay all its debts”.

The BJP leaders fear that CPI (M) workers now in jail for murders and other crimes will be released once the new government takes charge. This anxiety is grounded on experiences of the mass remissions granted to prisoners by the previous Left governments.

Widespread remissions

The defeated Oommen Chandy government had set free over 2,000 prisoners in the first year of its office. The Chandy government tried to release another 2015 prisoners last year but Governor P Sathasivam put his foot down, saying that the rules governing remission were being misused.

Though Sathasivam is still continuing as Governor, the BJP fears that the Vijayan government may make all attempts to release jailed party workers.

The tough words used by the BJP leaders against the CPI (M) are a reflection of the added strength they have got in the state in the current elections. Though the party will have only one member in the Assembly, the party received more than 15% of the votes. The leadership believes that this is a sign that the BJP has emerged as an alternative in Kerala.

We welcome your comments at letters@scroll.in.
Sponsored Content  BY 

As India turns 70, London School of Economics asks some provocative questions

Is India ready to become a global superpower?

Meaningful changes have always been driven by the right, but inconvenient questions. As India completes 70 years of its sovereign journey, we could do two things – celebrate, pay our token tributes and move on, or take the time to reflect and assess if our course needs correction. The ‘India @ 70: LSE India Summit’, the annual flagship summit of the LSE (London School of Economics) South Asia Centre, is posing some fundamental but complex questions that define our future direction as a nation. Through an honest debate – built on new research, applied knowledge and ground realities – with an eclectic mix of thought leaders and industry stalwarts, this summit hopes to create a thought-provoking discourse.

From how relevant (or irrelevant) is our constitutional framework, to how we can beat the global one-upmanship games, from how sincere are business houses in their social responsibility endeavours to why water is so crucial to our very existence as a strong nation, these are some crucial questions that the event will throw up and face head-on, even as it commemorates the 70th anniversary of India’s independence.

Is it time to re-look at constitution and citizenship in India?

The Constitution of India is fundamental to the country’s identity as a democratic power. But notwithstanding its historical authority, is it perhaps time to examine its relevance? The Constitution was drafted at a time when independent India was still a young entity. So granting overwhelming powers to the government may have helped during the early years. But in the current times, they may prove to be more discriminatory than egalitarian. Our constitution borrowed laws from other countries and continues to retain them, while the origin countries have updated them since then. So, do we need a complete overhaul of the constitution? An expert panel led by Dr Mukulika Banerjee of LSE, including political and economic commentator S Gurumurthy, Madhav Khosla of Columbia University, Niraja Gopal Jayal of JNU, Chintan Chandrachud the author of the book Balanced Constitutionalism and sociologist, legal researcher and Director of Council for Social Development Kalpana Kannabiran will seek answers to this.

Is CSR simply forced philanthropy?

While India pioneered the mandatory minimum CSR spend, has it succeeded in driving impact? Corporate social responsibility has many dynamics at play. Are CSR initiatives mere tokenism for compliance? Despite government guidelines and directives, are CSR activities well-thought out initiatives, which are monitored and measured for impact? The CSR stipulations have also spawned the proliferation of ambiguous NGOs. The session, ‘Does forced philanthropy work – CSR in India?” will raise these questions of intent, ethics and integrity. It will be moderated by Professor Harry Barkema and have industry veterans such as Mukund Rajan (Chairman, Tata Council for Community Initiatives), Onkar S Kanwar (Chairman and CEO, Apollo Tyres), Anu Aga (former Chairman, Thermax) and Rahul Bajaj (Chairman, Bajaj Group) on the panel.

Can India punch above its weight to be considered on par with other super-powers?

At 70, can India mobilize its strengths and galvanize into the role of a serious power player on the global stage? The question is related to the whole new perception of India as a dominant power in South Asia rather than as a Third World country, enabled by our foreign policies, defense strategies and a buoyant economy. The country’s status abroad is key in its emergence as a heavyweight but the foreign service officers’ cadre no longer draws top talent. Is India equipped right for its aspirations? The ‘India Abroad: From Third World to Regional Power’ panel will explore India’s foreign policy with Ashley Tellis, Meera Shankar (Former Foreign Secretary), Kanwal Sibal (Former Foreign Secretary), Jayant Prasad and Rakesh Sood.

Are we under-estimating how critical water is in India’s race ahead?

At no other time has water as a natural resource assumed such a big significance. Studies estimate that by 2025 the country will become ‘water–stressed’. While water has been the bone of contention between states and controlling access to water, a source for political power, has water security received the due attention in economic policies and development plans? Relevant to the central issue of water security is also the issue of ‘virtual water’. Virtual water corresponds to the water content (used) in goods and services, bulk of which is in food grains. Through food grain exports, India is a large virtual net exporter of water. In 2014-15, just through export of rice, India exported 10 trillion litres of virtual water. With India’s water security looking grim, are we making the right economic choices? Acclaimed author and academic from the Institute of Economic Growth, Delhi, Amita Bavisar will moderate the session ‘Does India need virtual water?’

Delve into this rich confluence of ideas and more at the ‘India @ 70: LSE India Summit’, presented by Apollo Tyres in association with the British Council and organized by Teamworks Arts during March 29-31, 2017 at the India Habitat Centre, New Delhi. To catch ‘India @ 70’ live online, register here.

At the venue, you could also visit the Partition Museum. Dedicated to the memory of one of the most conflict-ridden chapters in our country’s history, the museum will exhibit a unique archive of rare photographs, letters, press reports and audio recordings from The Partition Museum, Amritsar.

This article was produced by the Scroll marketing team on behalf of Teamwork Arts and not by the Scroll editorial team.