Political murders

BJP leader’s killing in South Kashmir shows a party keen to breach bastions of militancy

Despite its workers being attacked and intimidated, the Hindutva party says it is determined to expand in the Valley.

On November 2, the body of 30-year-old Gowhar Hussain Bhat, his throat slit, was found in an orchard in South Kashmir. He was district president of the Bharatiya Janata Party’s youth wing, the Bharatiya Janata Yuva Morcha. The district in question is Shopian, a stronghold of the indigenous militancy that has gained ground in Kashmir over the last few years, and the site of frequent gunfights between militants and security forces as well as of large-scale cordon and search operations.

Within a day, the Shopian police named his alleged killers: a Pakistani operative of the Lashkar-e-Taiba known as Hamas and three Kashmiri militants – Umer Nazir of the Lashkar, and Ishfaq Thoker and Zubair Turray of the Hizbul Mujahideen.

Three days later, mourners thronged Bhat’s house in Shopian town’s Bongam area. Rayees, his older brother, insisted that “Gowhar has always been with the tehreek”, or the separatist movement, even if he had joined a Hindu nationalist party.

Bhat’s funeral had been well attended, according to the family. They do not explicitly blame anyone for his killing, notwithstanding the police’s claims. “What else do you say when a person gets stone-pelters released and helps the families of militants?” asked Rayees. “There were 2,000 stone-pelters at his funeral. We still don’t understand why anyone would have killed him.”

Another relative was more blunt. “Gowhar helped the families of the people who did this,” said the relative who asked not to be identified. “He used to say that if someone has become a militant why punish their families.”

Parting ways

Although there is popular support for militancy in Shopian, Bhat had created an organisation for the BJP in the district, his family said, recruiting 200-250 workers from Shopian town alone. He did not usually talk about his party or politics at home, they added, but a few days before his death he had been upset about the “othering” he felt subjected to in the town.

Indeed, rumours have been floating in Shopian that BJP workers were given “Rs 500 and bottles of whiskey for attending the party’s rallies” organised with Bhat’s help. One such rally was held in Srinagar on October 23 and attended by the Yuva Morcha’s national president and MP Poonam Mahajan.

His family and friends said Bhat was disturbed by online abuse that came his way after BJP banners, with his face on them, were put up in Shopian, allegedly by a rival from the People’s Democratic Party. Days later, on October 26, he announced his resignation from “all political parties” in a local Urdu daily. It was similar to the public resignations posted by several workers of pro-India political parties in recent months.

Bhat's family said this statement was advertised in a local Urdu daily on October 26.
Bhat's family said this statement was advertised in a local Urdu daily on October 26.

The BJP still claims Bhat as its own. He was reportedly seen at the party’s first state executive meeting in Kashmir, in Srinagar on October 29. The meeting was attended by the BJP national general secretary Ram Madhav and other senior leaders.

Veer Saraf, who oversees the BJP’s affairs in South Kashmir, claimed that Bhat had not “officially resigned” from the party. “We are told he resigned through a newspaper but we have not been given proof of it,” he said.

He added that the party would offer Bhat’s family a compensation of Rs 5 lakh, in addition to any ex-gratia from the state government.

Saraf claimed Bhat had joined the BJP as a worker in early 2014, but Rayees claimed his brother had been with the party for less than a year. According to Ghulam Hassan Khan, the BJP’s Budgam district president, Bhat may have kept his family in the dark “to stop them worrying”. In fact, Khan claimed, Bhat had, at the October 29 meet, “told Madhav ji that not only he but also his prominent workers in Shopian were under threat”.

These concerns, he added, were shared with security forces in writing. “We don’t want police protection so they may die instead of us,” Khan said. “We just want the strength to retaliate.”

Bhat’s killing, Khan claimed, would not frighten them into submission. “We are all grassroots workers who live in their own homes, unprotected,” he said. “We will do try things to protect ourselves but we will not leave our ideology.” Party workers scared of their safety sometimes take shelter at friends’ houses or the party office in Srinagar, he added.

It is “more dangerous” to raise the BJP flag in Kashmir than to speak of the Hizbul Mujahideen in Delhi, Khan claimed, but the party leadership would stand its ground in the Valley. Just as the militancy struck roots in the Valley “and refused to leave, so too has the BJP”. “We won’t leave easily,” Khan said.

Gowhar Hussain Bhat.
Gowhar Hussain Bhat.

Steady presence

The BJP, which runs the state’s coalition government along with the People’s Democratic Party, took all its 25 seats in the Assembly from Jammu region in the 2014 election. The party, however, has long had a presence in the Valley too.

In 1989, BJP leader Tika Lal Taploo became the first Kashmiri Pandit to be killed by separatist militants. In 1999, the BJP nominee for the Anantnag parliamentary seat, Ghulam Hyder Noorani, and three of his workers were killed on the campaign trail. Several party workers were injured, among them Sofi Yousuf, now a member of the Legislative Council.

Yousuf, who joined the BJP in 1999 and is one of the party’s oldest members in Kashmir, unsuccessfully contested three assembly and as many parliamentary elections before he was elected unopposed to the Legislative Council in 2015, becoming the party’s first Kashmiri Muslim lawmaker.

He said the BJP’s progress in Kashmir has been difficult. “The administration would say ‘Sofi you have become a Hindu, are you converting people you help in government offices’,” the lawmaker said about his early days with the party. “I was pushed out of the offices of four district commissioners.”

Yet, Yousuf claimed, the BJP has grown stronger, swelling from 100-150 workers across the Valley in 1996 to a whopping 3,30,000 today. His claims would be tested when panchayat elections are held in a few months.

Saraf said the party would campaign on the plank of development and fight independently of the People’s Democratic Party. “We have to test our waters and the PDP theirs,” he said.

The BJP’s last electoral outing in Kashmir, the 2014 Assembly election, did not go well. Despite trying to create a committed grassroots base by getting the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh’s Muslim Rashtriya Manch and the Jama’at Ulema-e-Hind to work silently with the local clergy, the party failed to win a seat. The effort did yielded the party’s highest vote share ever in the Valley, though, even if it was a mere 2.2%.

If the BJP’s electoral influence is so negligible, what draws people like Bhat to the party? Yousuf offered nationalism and the pursuit of development. He himself has stuck with the BJP for nearly two decades because it is the only “nationalist party”. “Our Quran tells us to praise the country we are born in, to treat it like a mother,” he said. Other parties in Kashmir, he claimed, had links with the separatists.

Nationalism is twinned with development. Yousuf claimed other mainstream parties have “only looted Kashmir since 1947 and there are still villages where the situation is the same as it was in ’47”. Only the BJP, he added, had the will to bring development to such places.

We welcome your comments at letters@scroll.in.
Sponsored Content BY 

Behind the garb of wealth and success, white collar criminals are hiding in plain sight

Understanding the forces that motivate leaders to become fraudsters.

Most con artists are very easy to like; the ones that belong to the corporate society, even more so. The Jordan Belforts of the world are confident, sharp and can smooth-talk their way into convincing people to bend at their will. For years, Harshad Mehta, a practiced con-artist, employed all-of-the-above to earn the sobriquet “big bull” on Dalaal Street. In 1992, the stockbroker used the pump and dump technique, explained later, to falsely inflate the Sensex from 1,194 points to 4,467. It was only after the scam that journalist Sucheta Dalal, acting on a tip-off, broke the story exposing how he fraudulently dipped into the banking system to finance a boom that manipulated the stock market.


In her book ‘The confidence game’, Maria Konnikova observes that con artists are expert storytellers - “When a story is plausible, we often assume it’s true.” Harshad Mehta’s story was an endearing rags-to-riches tale in which an insurance agent turned stockbroker flourished based on his skill and knowledge of the market. For years, he gave hope to marketmen that they too could one day live in a 15,000 sq.ft. posh apartment with a swimming pool in upmarket Worli.

One such marketman was Ketan Parekh who took over Dalaal Street after the arrest of Harshad Mehta. Ketan Parekh kept a low profile and broke character only to celebrate milestones such as reaching Rs. 100 crore in net worth, for which he threw a lavish bash with a star-studded guest-list to show off his wealth and connections. Ketan Parekh, a trainee in Harshad Mehta’s company, used the same infamous pump-and-dump scheme to make his riches. In that, he first used false bank documents to buy high stakes in shares that would inflate the stock prices of certain companies. The rise in stock prices lured in other institutional investors, further increasing the price of the stock. Once the price was high, Ketan dumped these stocks making huge profits and causing the stock market to take a tumble since it was propped up on misleading share prices. Ketan Parekh was later implicated in the 2001 securities scam and is serving a 14-years SEBI ban. The tactics employed by Harshad Mehta and Ketan Parekh were similar, in that they found a loophole in the system and took advantage of it to accumulate an obscene amount of wealth.


Call it greed, addiction or smarts, the 1992 and 2001 Securities Scams, for the first time, revealed the magnitude of white collar crimes in India. To fill the gaps exposed through these scams, the Securities Laws Act 1995 widened SEBI’s jurisdiction and allowed it to regulate depositories, FIIs, venture capital funds and credit-rating agencies. SEBI further received greater autonomy to penalise capital market violations with a fine of Rs 10 lakhs.

Despite an empowered regulatory body, the next white-collar crime struck India’s capital market with a massive blow. In a confession letter, Ramalinga Raju, ex-chairman of Satyam Computers convicted of criminal conspiracy and financial fraud, disclosed that Satyam’s balance sheets were cooked up to show an excess of revenues amounting to Rs. 7,000 crore. This accounting fraud allowed the chairman to keep the share prices of the company high. The deception, once revealed to unsuspecting board members and shareholders, made the company’s stock prices crash, with the investors losing as much as Rs. 14,000 crores. The crash of India’s fourth largest software services company is often likened to the bankruptcy of Enron - both companies achieved dizzying heights but collapsed to the ground taking their shareholders with them. Ramalinga Raju wrote in his letter “it was like riding a tiger, not knowing how to get off without being eaten”, implying that even after the realisation of consequences of the crime, it was impossible for him to rectify it.

It is theorised that white-collar crimes like these are highly rationalised. The motivation for the crime can be linked to the strain theory developed by Robert K Merton who stated that society puts pressure on individuals to achieve socially accepted goals (the importance of money, social status etc.). Not having the means to achieve those goals leads individuals to commit crimes.

Take the case of the executive who spent nine years in McKinsey as managing director and thereafter on the corporate and non-profit boards of Goldman Sachs, Procter & Gamble, American Airlines, and Harvard Business School. Rajat Gupta was a figure of success. Furthermore, his commitment to philanthropy added an additional layer of credibility to his image. He created the American India Foundation which brought in millions of dollars in philanthropic contributions from NRIs to development programs across the country. Rajat Gupta’s descent started during the investigation on Raj Rajaratnam, a Sri-Lankan hedge fund manager accused of insider trading. Convicted for leaking confidential information about Warren Buffet’s sizeable investment plans for Goldman Sachs to Raj Rajaratnam, Rajat Gupta was found guilty of conspiracy and three counts of securities fraud. Safe to say, Mr. Gupta’s philanthropic work did not sway the jury.


The people discussed above have one thing in common - each one of them was well respected and celebrated for their industry prowess and social standing, but got sucked down a path of non-violent crime. The question remains - Why are individuals at successful positions willing to risk it all? The book Why They Do It: Inside the mind of the White-Collar Criminal based on a research by Eugene Soltes reveals a startling insight. Soltes spoke to fifty white collar criminals to understand their motivations behind the crimes. Like most of us, Soltes expected the workings of a calculated and greedy mind behind the crimes, something that could separate them from regular people. However, the results were surprisingly unnerving. According to the research, most of the executives who committed crimes made decisions the way we all do–on the basis of their intuitions and gut feelings. They often didn’t realise the consequences of their action and got caught in the flow of making more money.


The arena of white collar crimes is full of commanding players with large and complex personalities. Billions, starring Damien Lewis and Paul Giamatti, captures the undercurrents of Wall Street and delivers a high-octane ‘ruthless attorney vs wealthy kingpin’ drama. The show looks at the fine line between success and fraud in the stock market. Bobby Axelrod, the hedge fund kingpin, skilfully walks on this fine line like a tightrope walker, making it difficult for Chuck Rhoades, a US attorney, to build a case against him.

If financial drama is your thing, then block your weekend for Billions. You can catch it on Hotstar Premium, a platform that offers a wide collection of popular and Emmy-winning shows such as Game of Thrones, Modern Family and This Is Us, in addition to live sports coverage, and movies. To subscribe, click here.

This article was produced by the Scroll marketing team on behalf of Hotstar and not by the Scroll editorial team.