Hindutva, H-1B visas and Pakistan: How a Trump presidentship will impact India

It's a bit unclear what the new US president stands for but, either way, India won't be much affected.

“Donald Trump is elected president in stunning repudiation of the Establishment,” read the New York Times headline today. How stunning it was can be gauged from the fact that the newspaper had itself, just a few weeks ago, predicted the chance of a Trump win at only 8%.

Even as Americans grapple with this tectonic shift, what does it mean for India? The first thing to understand about Trump is that very few very few people know much about him. Throughout his campaign, Trump hasn’t really laid out policy or communicated plans. That includes US foreign policy with respect to India. Nonetheless, here are the probable effects a Trump win will have on the country.

Hindutva boost

The Hindutva love for Trump has been one of the most fascinating, if tangential, stories of this US presidential election. The New York Times even ran a story pointing out that “Hindu nationalists” are among Trump’s “biggest fans”.

A Trump win will, of course, have no direct effect on Hindu nationalism in India. But it will have a second order impact, helping legitimise the Hindutva ideology. Since the 1980s, Hindutva has steadily made inroads into India’s political centre, culminating in 2014, when the BJP won a majority in the Lok Sabha. The fact that religious nativism now find space at the high table of the world’s only superpower, displacing the liberalism that underpinned much of the Western world for the past seven decades, provides a powerful moral grounding for Hindutva in India.

Just two days ago, on Monday, the fringe Hindu Mahasabha prayed for Trump to win. That their prayers were answered is a good sign for Hindutva to try and push far-right, nativist Trump-style politics in India.

Stemming Indian immigration

NRI: the three magic letters that have formed the bedrock of every Karan Johar movie might also be rather badly affected by a Trump win. There is no greater bugbear for Trump than immigrants. His entire campaign was centered around White nativism, which demanded that non-White immigrants be expelled from the US.

While he has reserved his greatest bile for Mexicans, Trump has also attacked the workhorse of Indian immigration to the United States: the H-1B visa programme, which allows skilled foreign professionals to work in the country for a limited period. “I will end forever the use of the H-1B as a cheap labor programme,” the real-estate-capitalist-turned-politician said. Trump also wants to put in checks and balances for companies using the H1-B via: they’ll first have to hire American workers before having a look at foreigners. This is terrible news for India’s software industry, which is crucially dependent on sending coders to the US.

Of course, the second-order effects of India's brain drain being slowed down, should Trump's immigration curbs be put in place, is yet to be seen or measured.

Attacking China will help Delhi

India and China share a large, undemarcated border. Just last week, Indian and Chinese troops were locked in a stand-off in the Ladakh region. And China has constantly aimed to surround India, building alliances with Pakistan, Sri Lanka and, most recently, Bangladesh.

In this situation, Trump’s unapologetic anti-China stance might end up helping India. One of the president-elect’s main campaign planks was opposing globalisation. And nothing represents globalisation like Chinese exports to the US. In 2015, the US imported goods worth nearly $500 billion from China and ran a trade deficit of $336 billion. Donald Trump has promised to reduce this deficit which would probably mean restricting imports from China ­– a development that India might take advantage off by trying to push her own exports.

Pakistan and terror

Apart from Mexicans, the one group Trump’s racist rhetoric has targeted sharply is Muslims, mixing up the attacks with threats against terror as well as Pakistan. While the racism is unfortunate, this might end up helping Indian government’s foreign policy objectives. More than any other US president before him, Trump seems to be on course to be firm on Pakistani terror. He also indicted that this action against Pakistan creates a role for India. “India is the check to Pakistan,” Trump said in September. “You have to get India involved ... They have their own nukes and have a very powerful army. They seem to be the real check ... I think we have to deal very closely with India to deal with it [Pakistan]”.

Michael Kugelman, a senior associate for South Asia at the Woodrow Wilson International Centre for Scholars in Washington, DC points out that “with Trump, the [US-Pakistan] relationship could face some very trying times”.

This was back in 2012

Corporate taxes

Apart from immigration, another body blow that Trump could deliver to India’s economy is that he plans to reduce corporate taxes in a move to entice industry back to the United States. The move is part of this anti-globalisation rhetoric. Right now the corporate tax rate stands at 35% in the US. Trump wants to reduce that by more than half to 15%. The reduction could offset the saving American corporations see in India due to low labour costs causing India to lose industry.

Support our journalism by subscribing to Scroll+ here. We welcome your comments at
Sponsored Content BY 

Do you really need to use that plastic straw?

The hazards of single-use plastic items, and what to use instead.

In June 2018, a distressed whale in Thailand made headlines around the world. After an autopsy it’s cause of death was determined to be more than 80 plastic bags it had ingested. The pictures caused great concern and brought into focus the urgency of the fight against single-use plastic. This term refers to use-and-throw plastic products that are designed for one-time use, such as takeaway spoons and forks, polythene bags styrofoam cups etc. In its report on single-use plastics, the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) has described how single-use plastics have a far-reaching impact in the environment.

Dense quantity of plastic litter means sights such as the distressed whale in Thailand aren’t uncommon. Plastic products have been found in the airways and stomachs of hundreds of marine and land species. Plastic bags, especially, confuse turtles who mistake them for jellyfish - their food. They can even exacerbate health crises, such as a malarial outbreak, by clogging sewers and creating ideal conditions for vector-borne diseases to thrive. In 1988, poor drainage made worse by plastic clogging contributed to the devastating Bangladesh floods in which two-thirds of the country was submerged.

Plastic litter can, moreover, cause physiological harm. Burning plastic waste for cooking fuel and in open air pits releases harmful gases in the air, contributing to poor air quality especially in poorer countries where these practices are common. But plastic needn’t even be burned to cause physiological harm. The toxic chemical additives in the manufacturing process of plastics remain in animal tissue, which is then consumed by humans. These highly toxic and carcinogenic substances (benzene, styrene etc.) can cause damage to nervous systems, lungs and reproductive organs.

The European Commission recently released a list of top 10 single-use plastic items that it plans to ban in the near future. These items are ubiquitous as trash across the world’s beaches, even the pristine, seemingly untouched ones. Some of them, such as styrofoam cups, take up to a 1,000 years to photodegrade (the breakdown of substances by exposure to UV and infrared rays from sunlight), disintegrating into microplastics, another health hazard.

More than 60 countries have introduced levies and bans to discourage the use of single-use plastics. Morocco and Rwanda have emerged as inspiring success stories of such policies. Rwanda, in fact, is now among the cleanest countries on Earth. In India, Maharashtra became the 18th state to effect a ban on disposable plastic items in March 2018. Now India plans to replicate the decision on a national level, aiming to eliminate single-use plastics entirely by 2022. While government efforts are important to encourage industries to redesign their production methods, individuals too can take steps to minimise their consumption, and littering, of single-use plastics. Most of these actions are low on effort, but can cause a significant reduction in plastic waste in the environment, if the return of Olive Ridley turtles to a Mumbai beach are anything to go by.

To know more about the single-use plastics problem, visit Planet or Plastic portal, National Geographic’s multi-year effort to raise awareness about the global plastic trash crisis. From microplastics in cosmetics to haunting art on plastic pollution, Planet or Plastic is a comprehensive resource on the problem. You can take the pledge to reduce your use of single-use plastics, here.

This article was produced by the Scroll marketing team on behalf of National Geographic, and not by the Scroll editorial team.