Letters to the editor

Readers’ comments: Honorary doctorates, like Nobel Peace Prizes, are just political appeasement

A selection of readers’ opinions.

Honouring Erdogan

By the same principle, should Modi and his cohorts in BJP be governing India (“By conferring a doctorate on Erdogan, Jamia is celebrating a regime that attacks academic freedom”)? Are Aung San Suu Kyi and Menachem Begin worthy of the Nobel Peace Prize? Whether one is awarded a doctorate or a Nobel Peace Prize means absolutely nothing. It’s just political appeasement. Just give it a rest and move on. – Usman Madha


By his action of purging all those Turkish people who were opposed to his plan of the extension of Islamism wherever possible, Erodgan has shown that he is the civilian face of an armed jihad. By honouring such a leader, does Jama Millia Islamia University too want to join the bandwagon? – Shreepal Singh


The real question in this article comes at the very end: “We should also ask: why Jamia and not Delhi University? Is it because an Islamist dictator can be honoured only by an Islamic institution? Have we forgotten how a smear campaign was launched against Jamia and Aligarh Muslim University, calling them dens of terrorists, by those who hold power today?”

For the rest, Jamia cannot be held responsible. The decision was made by the present government, and Jamia dutifully obeyed. – CM Naim

AAP’s collapse

I am able to understand the sense of such articles (“Arvind Kejriwal’s four mistakes: Why the AAP leader lost the plot so quickly”). Journalists who are unable to predict events before they happen surely cannot be trusted to analyse them thereafter. – Subhasis Ghosh


Arvind Kejriwal has shown that he is neither an administrator nor a politician. We supported him, along with Anna Hazare, in the fiht against corruption. But that was the problem under the UPA government. Modiji is not corrupt. All the allegations against him are fabrications of other parties and the media.

Instead of ruling the Delhi with in constitutional parameters, Kejriwal was busy fighting with the LG everyday and taking on the the PMO for no reason. He is only after popularity and cheap publicity. –Surendranath Gopala Pillai


I don’t think Kejriwal lost the plot, I think his downward slide is on account of a fatal flaw in his nature. He is educated and somewhat smart, but he is arrogant – he thinks he knows more than anyone else – and is very ambitious. He thought he would become a national leader or maybe even prime minister faster if he went up against the BJP and Modi. But he was not up to that as he did not have the support base or the resources. He did a lot of drama, but in the end, most people were able to see through his game. – Ashok Bhagat


I agree with some of the analysis but I disagree with the assessment that the LG was a tool in the hands of Centre. Najeeb Jung forthrightly said in an interview that there was no interference from the Centre and had their been, he would not have tolerated it. Kejriwal knew how the Delhi government functions.

He should have worked on the development plank, found ways to raise funds before announcing freebies, worked with the LG within constitutional norms. He should have stopped whining and criticising everyone. – Uday Vaidya

Triple talaq

It is highly regrettable and shameful that credible writers such as Ajaz Ashraf have stooped so low in their zeal to expose the BJP that they are now justifying triple talaq citing statistics, neglecting the victimhood of thousands of innocent women (“Modi asks Muslims not to politicise triple talaq debate. But the BJP has already done that”). The BJP might be a wicked party but the Muslims too need to look at the bigger picture. – Anup Singh

Move on

Every Indian knows that Rahul Gandhi is not competent for any post (“Well into 2017, Congress is still discussing when Rahul Gandhi will take over”). Why is the Congress adamant on making him head? He must be removed from the party because without a credible Opposition, democracy is a hypocrisy. There are many other leaders in the Congress who are fit to spearhead the party. – Ajit Jha

On the job

I am firm believer of Modi’s policies and I also agree that this analysis of the situation with regard to job creation is spot on (“One question Prime Minister Narendra Modi needs to focus on: How many jobs have we added?”). A major problem with Indian corporations is the huge disparity in salaries. About 10% of of employees get 70% of the salaries. The government should definitely keep a check on the governance of companies. – Arvind

Red alert

I agree with KPS Gill – such events are avoidable and precious lives could have been saved (“KPS Gill: Only a fair investigation can expose murky realities behind the attack on CRPF in Sukma”). With firm resolve and training, Maoists can be neutralised. But our politicians seem to be playing with fire by delaying taking solutions. The armed forces can control the situation somewhat but not eliminate it. RK Sharma


KPS Gill is a very successful police office who, in a short period, handled the problem of terror in Punjab. In his time, the judiciary also cooperated with him. Now it is responsible for the failure of law and order because of day-to-day interference in the functioning of law and order enforcement agencies and the military. – RD Goyal

TV wars

I couldn’t agree more (“Why are ‘nationalistic’ TV channels paying extremist Pakistanis to sell hatred against India?”). Indeed, some TV channels have made it a business to sell hatred against India and then justify how nationalistic they have been in demanding we sever all ties with Pakistan. Gone are the days of nuanced, sober debates on television. – Pujarileena


People who do not have rational views or who do not listen to others’ opinions should not be given a platform to preach and spread venom against our security forces. – Harbhajan Singh Khanuja


Aren’t certain anchors also hatemongers like their guests? They should also be isolated. – Ashok Singh Garcha

Yogi yug

Hats off to Supriya Sharma and team for such detailed reportage (“They paid a price for Adityanath’s hate speech – and now have fallen silent”). We need this kind of work. Keep pushing for the truth and keep focusing on the right issues. – Mayur

We welcome your comments at letters@scroll.in.
Sponsored Content BY 

Why should inclusion matter to companies?

It's not just about goodwill - inclusivity is a good business decision.

To reach a 50-50 workplace scenario, policies on diversity need to be paired with a culture of inclusiveness. While diversity brings equal representation in meetings, board rooms, promotions and recruitment, inclusivity helps give voice to the people who might otherwise be marginalized or excluded. Inclusion at workplace can be seen in an environment that values diverse opinions, encourages collaboration and invites people to share their ideas and perspectives. As Verna Myers, a renowned diversity advocate, puts it “Diversity is being invited to the party, inclusion is being asked to dance.”

Creating a sense of belonging for everyone is essential for a company’s success. Let’s look at some of the real benefits of a diverse and inclusive workplace:

Better decision making

A whitepaper by Cloverpop, a decision making tool, established a direct link between inclusive decision making and better business performance. The research discovered that teams that followed an inclusive decision-making process made decisions 2X faster with half the meetings and delivered 60% better results. As per Harvard Business School Professor Francesca Gino, this report highlights how diversity and inclusion are practical tools to improve decision making in companies. According to her, changing the composition of decision making teams to include different perspectives can help individuals overcome biases that affect their decisions.

Higher job satisfaction

Employee satisfaction is connected to a workplace environment that values individual ideas and creates a sense of belonging for everyone. A research by Accenture identified 40 factors that influence advancement in the workplace. An empowering work environment where employees have the freedom to be creative, innovative and themselves at work, was identified as a key driver in improving employee advancement to senior levels.


A research by Catalyst.org stated the in India, 62% of innovation is driven by employee perceptions of inclusion. The study included responses from 1,500 employees from Australia, China, Germany, India, Mexico and the United States and showed that employees who feel included are more likely to go above and beyond the call of duty, suggest new and innovative ways of getting work done.

Competitive Advantage

Shirley Engelmeier, author of ‘Inclusion: The New Competitive Business Advantage’, in her interview with Forbes, talks about the new global business normal. She points out that the rapidly changing customer base with different tastes and preferences need to feel represented by brands. An inclusive environment will future-proof the organisation to cater to the new global consumer language and give it a competitive edge.

An inclusive workplace ensures that no individual is disregarded because of their gender, race, disability, age or other social and cultural factors. Accenture has been a leading voice in advocating equal workplace. Having won several accolades including a perfect score on the Human Rights Campaign’s Corporate equality index, Accenture has demonstrated inclusive and diverse practices not only within its organisation but also in business relationships through their Supplier Inclusion and Diversity program.

In a video titled ‘She rises’, Accenture captures the importance of implementing diverse policies and creating an inclusive workplace culture.


To know more about inclusion and diversity, see here.

This article was produced by the Scroll marketing team on behalf of Accenture and not by the Scroll editorial team.