demonetisation revisited

Did India really need to demonetise? No, said a BJP government-commissioned report

However, the decision to withdraw high-value currency notes was announced even before the study could be released.

Few measures have been more controversial during Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s time in office than his decision to demonetise India’s high value notes in November, 2016. Even though it isn’t clear whether demonetisation had any significant effect on curbing corruption, its drag on economic growth was obvious. Fifteen months after the decision was implemented, the Reserve Bank of India is yet to even count the demonetised notes returned to the banking system.

For a move so wide ranging, did the Union government do its research? The original proposal to demonetise large denomination notes was prepared by a small Pune think-tank called Arthakranti (literally, “economic revolution”). Nine months before demonetisation was actually carried out, two state governments – Haryana and Madhya Pradesh – both led by the Bharatiya Janata Party, asked the National Institute of Public Finance and Policy, an independent research institute funded by the Union finance ministry, to evaluate Arthakranti’s proposal.

Released in June 2017, after demonetisation has already been implemented, the report argued that the ground conditions to require demonetisation simply did not exist.

The institute report listed out two questions to be asked before which demonetisation should even have been considered: “One, is there too much cash in India and second, is the value of the highest denomination note too high?”

Too much cash?

Arthrakranti attempted to address the the first question by listing a cross-country comparison of currency in circulation to gross domestic product. The NIPFP report, however, ruled that out as too simplistic. The report argued that this single metric does not take into account factors such as imports/exports, inflation, interests rates and industrialisation. “In situations of high inflation and high interest rate,” said the institue report, considering one scenario, “it is argued that people would prefer not to hold currency and hence the need for currency would be lower.”

Taking these factors into account, the economists at the institute concluded that “given the structure of the Indian economy, the level of currency in circulation is not sharply higher than that dictated by its needs”.

Too many big notes?

The second question to determine is demonetisation was needed if India’s currency spread was top heavy. Did India have too many Rs 1,000 and Rs 500 notes – the two notes that were banned by the Modi government? The NIPFP report examines this by asking if India’s highest denomination note is too big when buying basic commodities and services as compared to other countries.

To do this, the report took milk, bread, eggs, water and local transport and compared them across 15 countries – developed and developing – in order to determine if India’s currency stack was too top heavy.

The conclusion: “The comparison with other countries, the notion that India is an outlier, i.e., that it circulates a denomination that is too high in value, in relation to prices of specific commodities, may be incorrect.”

The report also compared the proportion of large currency notes to total currency circulation with other countries. Benchmarking with 25 other economies, the report actually concluded, “The share of the largest note in circulation in total value of currency in India is below the proportion observed for a number of other countries.” In India, as it so happens, the largest number of notes in circulation was the humble tenner.

The NIPFP report then carried out the same exercise with respect to value. Before demonetisation, India had 86% of its currency by value in Rs 500 and Rs 1,000 notes. However, the distribution is similar for the US and for the United Kingdom. “Even within this comparison, India does not seem to be a complete outlier,” says the report.

No rationale

The report said that it “cannot be conclusively inferred that India has too high a value for high denomination currency notes”. It proposed another logical impediment: “It may be mentioned that even if we remove the high denomination notes, there would still exist another ‘highest denomination note’ and its share in total value of currency in circulation would continue to remain high.”

As per its analysis, argued the NIFPF report, “the rationale for eliminating high denomination notes is not clear”.

As it so happened, the Modi government did not wait for the NIFPF to complete its study. It announced demonetisation in November 2016. If any economic experts were consulted, it isn’t clear who they were.

Support our journalism by paying for Scroll+ here. We welcome your comments at
Sponsored Content BY 

Bringing the glamour back to flying while keeping it affordable

The pleasure of air travel is back, courtesy of an airline in India.

Before dinner, fashionable women would retire to the powder room and suited-up men would indulge in hors d’oeuvres, surrounded by plush upholstery. A gourmet meal would soon follow, served in fine tableware. Flying, back in the day, was like an upscale party 35,000 feet up in the air.

The glamour of flying has been chronicled in Keith Lovegrove’s book titled ‘Airline: Style at 30,000 feet’. In his book, Lovegrove talks about how the mid-50s and 60s were a “fabulously glamorous time to fly in commercial airlines”. Back then, flying was reserved for the privileged and the luxuries played an important role in making travelling by air an exclusive experience.

Fast forward to the present day, where flying has become just another mode of transportation. In Mumbai, every 65 seconds an aircraft lands or takes off at the airport. The condition of today’s air travel is a cumulative result of the growth in the volume of fliers, the accessibility of buying an air ticket and the number of airlines in the industry/market.

Having relegated the romance of flying to the past, air travel today is close to hectic and borderline chaotic thanks to busy airports, packed flights with no leg room and unsatisfactory meals. With the skies dominated by frequent fliers and the experience having turned merely transactional and mundane, is it time to bid goodbye to whatever’s enjoyable in air travel?

With increased resources and better technology, one airline is proving that flying in today’s scenario can be a refreshing, enjoyable and affordable experience at the same time. Vistara offers India’s first and only experience of a three-cabin configuration. At a nominal premium, Vistara’s Premium Economy is also redefining the experience of flying with a host of features such as an exclusive cabin, 20% extra legroom, 4.5-inch recline, dedicated check-in counter and baggage delivery on priority. The best in class inflight dining offers a range of regional dishes, while also incorporating global culinary trends. Other industry-first features include Starbucks coffee on board and special assistance to solo women travellers, including preferred seating.

Vistara’s attempts to reduce the gap between affordability and luxury can also be experienced in the economy class with an above average seat pitch, complimentary selection of food and beverages and a choice of leading newspapers and publications along with an inflight magazine. Hospitality aboard Vistara is, moreover, reminiscent of Singapore Airlines’ famed service with a seal of Tata’s trust, thanks to its cabin crew trained to similarly high standards.

The era of style aboard a ‘flying boat’ seems long gone. However, airlines like Vistara are bringing back the allure of air travel. Continuing their campaign with Deepika Padukone as brand ambassador, the new video delivers a bolder and a more confident version of the same message - making flying feel new again. Watch the new Vistara video below. For your next trip, rekindle the joy of flying and book your tickets here.


This article was produced by the Scroll marketing team on behalf of Vistara and not by the Scroll editorial team.