fake encounter cases

In Manipur, wife of man killed in alleged fake encounter says police raided her home, threatened her

Salima Memcha called the police action a ‘direct reprisal of my effort for seeking justice’.

A Manipuri woman whose husband was killed in an alleged extra-judicial encounter has accused the state police of vandalising her home and intimidating her. In her written complaint, Salima Memcha, a resident of Thoubal district, accused a team of the elite Manipur Police Commandos of coming to her home at around 5 am on Saturday and of “demolition and destruction of my properties”. She alleged that they threatened her of “dire consequences” before they left.

Memcha is part of the Extra Judicial Execution Victim Families Association, which has been at the forefront of a long legal battle seeking justice for victims of these purported staged killings, which are largely blamed on the Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act that is in force in the state. This law gives security personnel sweeping powers to arrest, search and even kill and some degree of immunity from prosecution.

Memcha’s husband, Mohammed Faziruddin, was killed by troops of the 33 Assam Rifles in January 2010. The security force claimed he was a militant killed in a gunfight. Memcha, however, claims her husband was a farmer and was killed in cold blood. The National Human Rights Commission had ordered the Manipur state administration to pay monetary compensation to Memcha for her husband’s killing.

Faziruddin’s case was among 62 cases the Extra Judicial Execution Victim Families Association listed as instances of fake encounters when it first approached the Supreme Court in 2012. In its petition, the group has alleged that there were 1,528 extra-judicial killings in Manipur between 1979 and 2012 but that action had not been taken against the personnel involved in even one case. In a landmark judgement in July 2017, the Supreme Court directed the Central Bureau of Investigation to look into 98 cases of alleged extra-judicial killings in the state.

Faziruddin’s case is not among these 98 cases. It is being investigated by the state Criminal Investigation Department. Memcha said she was to depose before the department on the day the police landed up at her house, and did not go out of fear. “Anything may happen to me on that journey,” she wrote in her complaint.

She said the police raid was a “direct reprisal of my effort for seeking justice”.

Standard operation, say police

Thoubal Superintendent of Police S Goutam, however, said the police had gone to her home as part of a “routine cordon and search operation” and were not aware that “she was victim of such kind of a thing”. He said the raid was not prompted by any specific intelligence input.

Asked about the timing of the raid, Goutam said it was standard procedure to conduct cordon and search operations at the crack of dawn.

Not the first time

But Babloo Loitongbam of Human Rights Alert – which assisted the Extra Judicial Execution Victim Families Association in filing the petition in the Supreme Court and gathering evidence – said the raid at Memcha’s house was not an isolated incident. “There have been many such incidents recently and there is a clear pattern emerging that the police are targeting people associated with the case on very vague charges,” he alleged.

In February, Army personnel, accompanied by state police officials and a masked man, had allegedly entered the house of Human Rights Alert activist Ranjeeta Sadokpam at 1 am. Sadokpam said she and her family members were forced to sign a document, the contents of which were not shown to them.

Earlier the same month, Manoj Thockchom of the Extra Judicial Execution Victim Families Association was allegedly detained by the police for 15 hours without an arrest warrant and questioned about links with armed insurgent groups.

In January, another member of the association, Sagolsem Menjor Singh, whose son was killed in an alleged fake encounter, claimed to have been harassed by the police on concocted charges.

Loitongbam said the government and senior police officers had conceded in each of these incidents that they were cases of mistaken identity. “The CM [chief minister] and senior police officers listen patiently but clearly the message from them has not been loud and clear as these incidents continue to happen,” he added.

Loitongbam also said no senior police official had met with Memcha though they had promised to do so.

Irengbam Arun, media adviser to Chief Minister N Biren Singh, said on Sunday that an enquiry into the incident has been ordered.

Support our journalism by subscribing to Scroll+ here. We welcome your comments at letters@scroll.in.
Sponsored Content BY 

Do you really need to use that plastic straw?

The hazards of single-use plastic items, and what to use instead.

In June 2018, a distressed whale in Thailand made headlines around the world. After an autopsy it’s cause of death was determined to be more than 80 plastic bags it had ingested. The pictures caused great concern and brought into focus the urgency of the fight against single-use plastic. This term refers to use-and-throw plastic products that are designed for one-time use, such as takeaway spoons and forks, polythene bags styrofoam cups etc. In its report on single-use plastics, the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) has described how single-use plastics have a far-reaching impact in the environment.

Dense quantity of plastic litter means sights such as the distressed whale in Thailand aren’t uncommon. Plastic products have been found in the airways and stomachs of hundreds of marine and land species. Plastic bags, especially, confuse turtles who mistake them for jellyfish - their food. They can even exacerbate health crises, such as a malarial outbreak, by clogging sewers and creating ideal conditions for vector-borne diseases to thrive. In 1988, poor drainage made worse by plastic clogging contributed to the devastating Bangladesh floods in which two-thirds of the country was submerged.

Plastic litter can, moreover, cause physiological harm. Burning plastic waste for cooking fuel and in open air pits releases harmful gases in the air, contributing to poor air quality especially in poorer countries where these practices are common. But plastic needn’t even be burned to cause physiological harm. The toxic chemical additives in the manufacturing process of plastics remain in animal tissue, which is then consumed by humans. These highly toxic and carcinogenic substances (benzene, styrene etc.) can cause damage to nervous systems, lungs and reproductive organs.

The European Commission recently released a list of top 10 single-use plastic items that it plans to ban in the near future. These items are ubiquitous as trash across the world’s beaches, even the pristine, seemingly untouched ones. Some of them, such as styrofoam cups, take up to a 1,000 years to photodegrade (the breakdown of substances by exposure to UV and infrared rays from sunlight), disintegrating into microplastics, another health hazard.

More than 60 countries have introduced levies and bans to discourage the use of single-use plastics. Morocco and Rwanda have emerged as inspiring success stories of such policies. Rwanda, in fact, is now among the cleanest countries on Earth. In India, Maharashtra became the 18th state to effect a ban on disposable plastic items in March 2018. Now India plans to replicate the decision on a national level, aiming to eliminate single-use plastics entirely by 2022. While government efforts are important to encourage industries to redesign their production methods, individuals too can take steps to minimise their consumption, and littering, of single-use plastics. Most of these actions are low on effort, but can cause a significant reduction in plastic waste in the environment, if the return of Olive Ridley turtles to a Mumbai beach are anything to go by.

To know more about the single-use plastics problem, visit Planet or Plastic portal, National Geographic’s multi-year effort to raise awareness about the global plastic trash crisis. From microplastics in cosmetics to haunting art on plastic pollution, Planet or Plastic is a comprehensive resource on the problem. You can take the pledge to reduce your use of single-use plastics, here.

This article was produced by the Scroll marketing team on behalf of National Geographic, and not by the Scroll editorial team.