Farm challenges

As garlic prices drop, government intervention in Rajasthan, MP brings farmers little relief

Madhya Pradesh has added garlic to its price deficit payment scheme while Rajasthan has decided to procure the crop.

Last year, Bunty Rawal planted garlic on six acres of his land in Khardabad village in Rajasthan’s Kota district. He reckoned it was a good decision. High quality garlic was selling for around Rs 12,000 a quintal at the time, he said. However, he managed to make only around Rs 5,000 as the quality of his crop was not good enough.

This year, Rawal got 80 quintals of garlic from his six acres. But garlic acreage has increased across India, particularly in Kota, where the area under garlic cultivation has gone up from 29,000 hectares in 2013-2014 to a little over 1 lakh hectares in 2017-2018, according to the district’s horticulture department. Production in Madhya Pradesh, the largest garlic-producing state in India, has also increased.

Unfortunately for garlic farmers like Rawal, the maximum price for good quality garlic in April hovered at around Rs 1,200 a quintal, a sharp drop from the previous year and not even half of the average production cost of Rs 2,800 a quintal.

As distress set in in the garlic growing areas of Hadoti in Rajasthan and Malwa in Madhya Pradesh, the two state governments swung into action. On April 10, the Madhya Pradesh government announced that it would add garlic to its Bhavantar Bhugtan Yojana, a scheme that promises to compensate farmers by paying the difference between production cost and market sales price.

Two weeks later, the Rajasthan government announced that the Rajasthan State Cooperative Marketing Federation, or Rajfed, would begin procuring garlic under the Centre’s Market Intervention Scheme at Rs 3,257 per quintal.

Garlic procured by Rajfed at a warehouse in Kota's Bhamashah Mandi.
Garlic procured by Rajfed at a warehouse in Kota's Bhamashah Mandi.

Two states, two responses

Both schemes have garnered different responses.

In Kota’s Bhamashah mandi, the average modal price of garlic from March to May was Rs 1,495. In Malwa’s Mandsaur mandi, the price hovered at a similar Rs 1,472.

But while arrivals in Kota plummeted from 1.2 lakh quintals between March and May last year to 94,729 quintals in the same period this year, in Mandsaur they went up from 3.8 lakh quintals last year to 10.6 lakh quintals this year.

OP Sharma, secretary of the Agriculture Produce Marketing Committee in Mandsaur, said the increased arrivals in Madhya Pradesh were because of the Bhavantar Bhugtan Yojana. “After garlic was brought into the Bhavantar Bhugtan Yojana, people from other parts of the state [not near Mandsaur] who sold to Kota began to come here instead,” Sharma said.

At the Mandsaur market alone, garlic arrivals touched 33,000 metric tonnes, a big jump from last year. But Sharma said this could not be compared with previous years – of Madhya Pradesh’s 258 large markets, only 51 have been sanctioned for garlic compensation under the scheme, which means that arrivals will be concentrated in these markets.

The opposite has happened in Rajasthan, where procurement is slowly underway and farmers are opting to wait instead of taking a chance on market prices. Rajfed has a target of procuring 12.9 lakh quintals of garlic from 64,756 farmers. As of June 4, it had procured only 1,77,280 quintals from 4,945 farmers, around 13% of the target. Of 22 Rajfed centres in Kota, only 12 are procuring garlic. Under a new registration system, farmers have to register their crops online and then wait for a message from Rajfed before coming to the agricultural mandis. According to a Rajfed official at the Bhamashah mandi, only 40 farmers receive a message instructing them to come to that centre each day.

Neither scheme seems to have been able to arrest the fall in market prices. Instead of bolstering prices for May – a month when the market rate for garlic is usually strong because of lower arrivals – prices continue to drop. In Madhya Pradesh, garlic prices have in fact fallen since it was brought under the Bhavantar Bhugtan Yojana, the Business Standard reported. According to the report, farmers have claimed that traders are unwilling to buy at the state’s guaranteed price of Rs 800 per quintal and are instead buying at Rs 300.

Traders also seem to be earning profits in Rajasthan. Initially, Rajfed sold its procured garlic to Azadpur mandi in Delhi, but found this unprofitable. For about three weeks now, it has been selling its stock to traders in Kota instead at Rs 900 per quintal, which is well below even the current depressed market prices, said Avinash Rathi, head of the Kota Grain and Seeds Merchant Association.

Rathi said the need of the hour was investment in cold storage. This would allow traders to hedge their bets and respond better when market prices are low.

Then there are international factors to consider. China produces around 70% of the world’s garlic, with India coming a distant second. According to the Commerce Ministry, imports from China, which had slowed considerably in 2016-2017, picked up towards the end of 2017-2018 after a large harvest brought down domestic prices there. Meanwhile, India’s exports, which in 2017-2018 were the highest in quantity since 2012 and the highest ever in value, have begun to slow down in response to China’s production.

Bunty Rawal (right) waits with other farmers for his garlic to be procured in Kota.
Bunty Rawal (right) waits with other farmers for his garlic to be procured in Kota.

Uncertain future

Kota farmer Bunty Rawal received his message from Rajfed on June 2 and came to the mandi on June 4. But he was told he would be able to sell only 40 quintals of his 80 quintals.

“Only two people in my village have received the message so far,” he said. “Everyone else is just waiting at home until they too hear from Rajfed.”

As the delay gets longer, farmers face the prospect of their crop withering. Rajfed will only procure garlic with pods that are more than 25 millimetres wide, with a 1% margin of error. Dhulichand Meena, a leader of the All India Kisan Sabha from Kota, pointed out that the norms this year were different from those in 2016-2017, when Rajfed had procured garlic with pods 20 millimetres wide, with a 5% margin of error.

Perhaps the wait proved too long and the Rajfed rates too low for Hukumchand Meena, who committed suicide on May 24. The 38-year-old farmer from Brajnagar in Kota had taken 58 bighas or around 21 acres of land on lease for Rs 6 lakh last May, said his brother Anirudh Meena. He also had Rs 18 lakh in loans to pay, Rs 12 lakh of which he had taken from private moneylenders. He had cultivated garlic on the leased land, hoping to clear his loans for the coming year from his earnings. On his own land, he had planted chana and wheat. The gamble did not pay off.

“This was the first year he planted so much garlic,” said Anirudh Meena. “He had put it hoping for higher prices from the crop. But by the end of last season, prices had already come down to Rs 3,000. And then after that there was not enough rain at the right time.”

By May, the lowest prices hovered around Rs 200 to Rs 300. For the Rs 12 lakh Hukumchand Meena had spent the previous year, he had made Rs 2 lakh from his chana and wheat crops, which had gone towards paying his farm workers. He had registered with Rajfed and was waiting for a message from them. Even if the message had come earlier, he may have at best received no more than Rs 50,000 at the present buying rate.

Hukumchand Meena’s gamble is a reflection of how farmers across India are making similar calculations across agricultural commodities.

“Which commodity has good prices now?” asked Rathi, the Kota trader. “Across India, prices are down for everything.”

He said the demonetisation of high-value currency notes in 2016 had cleared out black money from agricultural markets, reducing the risk capacity of traders across commodities. There was also a temporary slump in the market over lack of clarity on whether the Goods and Services Tax, which was rolled out in July last year, would apply to agricultural traders, he added.

All photographs by Mridula Chari

Support our journalism by subscribing to Scroll+ here. We welcome your comments at
Sponsored Content BY 

Do you really need to use that plastic straw?

The hazards of single-use plastic items, and what to use instead.

In June 2018, a distressed whale in Thailand made headlines around the world. After an autopsy it’s cause of death was determined to be more than 80 plastic bags it had ingested. The pictures caused great concern and brought into focus the urgency of the fight against single-use plastic. This term refers to use-and-throw plastic products that are designed for one-time use, such as takeaway spoons and forks, polythene bags styrofoam cups etc. In its report on single-use plastics, the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) has described how single-use plastics have a far-reaching impact in the environment.

Dense quantity of plastic litter means sights such as the distressed whale in Thailand aren’t uncommon. Plastic products have been found in the airways and stomachs of hundreds of marine and land species. Plastic bags, especially, confuse turtles who mistake them for jellyfish - their food. They can even exacerbate health crises, such as a malarial outbreak, by clogging sewers and creating ideal conditions for vector-borne diseases to thrive. In 1988, poor drainage made worse by plastic clogging contributed to the devastating Bangladesh floods in which two-thirds of the country was submerged.

Plastic litter can, moreover, cause physiological harm. Burning plastic waste for cooking fuel and in open air pits releases harmful gases in the air, contributing to poor air quality especially in poorer countries where these practices are common. But plastic needn’t even be burned to cause physiological harm. The toxic chemical additives in the manufacturing process of plastics remain in animal tissue, which is then consumed by humans. These highly toxic and carcinogenic substances (benzene, styrene etc.) can cause damage to nervous systems, lungs and reproductive organs.

The European Commission recently released a list of top 10 single-use plastic items that it plans to ban in the near future. These items are ubiquitous as trash across the world’s beaches, even the pristine, seemingly untouched ones. Some of them, such as styrofoam cups, take up to a 1,000 years to photodegrade (the breakdown of substances by exposure to UV and infrared rays from sunlight), disintegrating into microplastics, another health hazard.

More than 60 countries have introduced levies and bans to discourage the use of single-use plastics. Morocco and Rwanda have emerged as inspiring success stories of such policies. Rwanda, in fact, is now among the cleanest countries on Earth. In India, Maharashtra became the 18th state to effect a ban on disposable plastic items in March 2018. Now India plans to replicate the decision on a national level, aiming to eliminate single-use plastics entirely by 2022. While government efforts are important to encourage industries to redesign their production methods, individuals too can take steps to minimise their consumption, and littering, of single-use plastics. Most of these actions are low on effort, but can cause a significant reduction in plastic waste in the environment, if the return of Olive Ridley turtles to a Mumbai beach are anything to go by.

To know more about the single-use plastics problem, visit Planet or Plastic portal, National Geographic’s multi-year effort to raise awareness about the global plastic trash crisis. From microplastics in cosmetics to haunting art on plastic pollution, Planet or Plastic is a comprehensive resource on the problem. You can take the pledge to reduce your use of single-use plastics, here.

This article was produced by the Scroll marketing team on behalf of National Geographic, and not by the Scroll editorial team.