indian cricket

Not Ganguly but Shastri will direct Team India in Bangladesh: Is the advisory panel dead on arrival?

Why is the Board of Control for Cricket in India unnecessarily complicating the appointment of coach and manager?

In true Board of Control for Cricket in India style, everything was fuzzy from the start. First the incessant rumours of the past few months that Sourav Ganguly, one of India’s greatest captains, was going to be associated in some capacity with the current Indian team.

Then, we thought it became clearer. Ganguly was widely tipped to replace Ravi Shastri as India team director. There was no word yet on who would replace Darren Fletcher, the coach, but this much seemed definite.

Subsequently, it became foggy again. News emerged that Ganguly, Sachin Tendulkar and VVS Laxman would be a part of a special “advisory committee”. What this advisory committee would do was anyone’s guess. But the speculation was that it was the first step in acquiring the services of these legends for the benefit of Indian cricket.

Wednesday, June 3, saw an announcement from the BCCI stating that Ravi Shastri would continue in his role as team director, at least till the end of the Bangladesh tour. Accompanying this piece of news was a ringing endorsement from Virat Kohli, current India Test captain, who gushed, “Just to have Ravi Shastri around the team is a massive boost.”

While it makes perfect sense to continue with Ravi Shastri if the current team is satisfied with his performance, it does beg some important questions: what exact role will Ganguly, Sachin and Laxman have? And what was the point of continuing with Shastri, if Ganguly had already been pencilled in for the role?

Murky business

A report published in the Anandabazar Patrika on June 3 claims that Shastri delivered an ultimatum to the BCCI stating that he would not accept a temporary assignment, come what may. In fact, ABP quotes him in the report as saying, “If I am going to be entrusted with a duty, it has to be for at least a year. One year or nothing.”

This was subsequently followed by BCCI’s announcement that Shastri had been retained as director, an act interpreted by the newspaper to mean that the BCCI had bowed to Shastri’s diktat.

What BCCI’s future course of action will be remains to be seen. But the current president, Jagmohan Dalmiya has usually found a way out of every impasse that he has faced. He may well maneouvre a canny solution this time too.

Shastri, Ganguly or Dravid?

Here’s another question to add to the several swirling around: if Shastri is so universally liked by the entire team, why not just extend his contract and give him an extended run as team director? As the BCCI themselves have pointed out, things haven’t gone too wrong after Shastri took over – the boys put in a spirited performance overseas against Australia and went till the semis in a World Cup where few had given them much chance of making it that far. Wouldn’t it better to clear the air once and for all?

On the other hand, if there’s any truth in the rumour that Ganguly is ‘preferred’ by the BCCI as the perosn who should take over as High Performance Manager, what’s stopping them from making the appointment? Why leak such news out without any kind of confirmation? Now, if Shastri’s contract is extended, the media will have a field day interpreting the news as the Indian players choosing Shastri’s services over Ganguly.

What is happening in this case is that a simple cricketing appointment is becoming a clash of egos, providing more and more fodder for the media. The New Indian Express quoted another BCCI official as saying that Dravid didn’t join the advisory panel because he wasn’t comfortable with Ganguly.

Is this really what the team requires now? When you have people of the stature of Shastri, Ganguly, Sachin, Laxman and Dravid, isn’t it more beneficial to allocate specific roles to them and utilise the vast repertoire of knowledge they possess, rather than make it a shadowy game of snakes-and-ladders?

But then again, this is the BCCI we’re talking about.

We welcome your comments at
Sponsored Content BY 

When did we start parenting our parents?

As our parents grow older, our ‘adulting’ skills are tested like never before.

From answering every homework question to killing every monster under the bed, from soothing every wound with care to crushing anxiety by just the sound of their voice - parents understandably seemed like invincible, know-it-all superheroes all our childhood. It’s no wonder then that reality hits all of a sudden, the first time a parent falls and suffers a slip disc, or wears a thick pair of spectacles to read a restaurant menu - our parents are growing old, and older. It’s a slow process as our parents turn from superheroes to...human.

And just as slow to evolve are the dynamics of our relationship with them. Once upon a time, a peck on the cheek was a frequent ritual. As were handmade birthday cards every year from the artistically inclined, or declaring parents as ‘My Hero’ in school essays. Every parent-child duo could boast of an affectionate ritual - movie nights, cooking Sundays, reading favourite books together etc. The changed dynamic is indeed the most visible in the way we express our affection.

The affection is now expressed in more mature, more subtle ways - ways that mimics that of our own parents’ a lot. When did we start parenting our parents? Was it the first time we offered to foot the electricity bill, or drove them to the doctor, or dragged them along on a much-needed morning walk? Little did we know those innocent acts were but a start of a gradual role reversal.

In adulthood, children’s affection for their parents takes on a sense of responsibility. It includes everything from teaching them how to use smartphones effectively and contributing to family finances to tracking doctor’s appointments and ensuring medicine compliance. Worry and concern, though evidence of love, tend to largely replace old-fashioned patterns of affection between parents and children as the latter grow up.

It’s something that can be easily rectified, though. Start at the simplest - the old-fashioned peck on the cheek. When was the last time you gave your mom or dad a peck on the cheek like a spontaneous five-year-old - for no reason at all? Young parents can take their own children’s behaviour available as inspiration.

As young parents come to understand the responsibilities associated with caring for their parents, they also come to realise that they wouldn’t want their children to go through the same challenges. Creating a safe and secure environment for your family can help you strike a balance between the loving child in you and the caring, responsible adult that you are. A good life insurance plan can help families deal with unforeseen health crises by providing protection against financial loss. Having assurance of a measure of financial security for family can help ease financial tensions considerably, leaving you to focus on being a caring, affectionate child. Moreover,you can eliminate some of the worry for your children when they grow up – as the video below shows.


To learn more about life insurance plans available for your family, see here.

This article was produced by the Scroll marketing team on behalf of SBI Life and not by the Scroll editorial team.